of course - many instances where a baby has a prenatal terminal diagnosis but can "live" for a few days hooked up to neonatal devices.
Did Tran's bill only allow for a 3rd trimester abortion for non-viable babies?
This thread isn't about Tran's bill, it's about Northam's comment where he specifically referenced non viable fetuses...or as Deej refers to it - infanticide. Northam is even referring to current law in his comments as he notes it requires more than one physician to certify. Do you think it's infanticide for a mother and doctor to discuss best course of treatment for a baby born with a terminal condition?
What an absolute Kunt.
He was being asked specifically about Tran’s bill when he made the comment you fucking hack.
He was being asked if he supported her bill he wasn’t asked if he supported the existing law.
When Northam was talking about 3rd trimester abortion he said the “fetus MAY not be viable and May have a deformity. So if a “ fetus May not be viable but they don’t know or MAY have a deformity like spinabifida they can kill it. Which would lead to the obvious that you could kill any fetus for any reason.
And when the HELL HAS IT BEEN OK to kill a child that has been born whether it has a deformity or not.
Nuts like you are not only ghouls but cheapen the lives of the handicapped but also leads to discrimination of those that are handicapped as if their lives are not quite as important as those of Scott and his kids. You are a pretty lousy “person”.
of course - many instances where a baby has a prenatal terminal diagnosis but can "live" for a few days hooked up to neonatal devices.
Did Tran's bill only allow for a 3rd trimester abortion for non-viable babies?
This thread isn't about Tran's bill, it's about Northam's comment where he specifically referenced non viable fetuses...or as Deej refers to it - infanticide. Northam is even referring to current law in his comments as he notes it requires more than one physician to certify. Do you think it's infanticide for a mother and doctor to discuss best course of treatment for a baby born with a terminal condition?
What an absolute Kunt.
He was being asked specifically about Tran’s bill when he made the comment you fucking hack.
He was being asked if he supported her bill he wasn’t asked if he supported the existing law.
But as politicians do he dodged the question and referenced current Virginia law
Ralph Northam: You know, I wasn’t there, Julie, and I certainly can’t speak for Delegate Tran
There are — you know when we talk about third-trimester abortions, these are done with the consent of, obviously, the mother, with the consent of the physicians, more than one physician by the way.
So he says he can’t speak for Tran and he specifically addresses requiring consent of multiple physicians as per current Virginia law.
When Northam was talking about 3rd trimester abortion he said the “fetus MAY not be viable and May have a deformity. So if a “ fetus May not be viable but they don’t know or MAY have a deformity like spinabifida they can kill it. Which would lead to the obvious that you could kill any fetus for any reason.
And when the HELL HAS IT BEEN OK to kill a child that has been born whether it has a deformity or not.
Nuts like you are not only ghouls but cheapen the lives of the handicapped but also leads to discrimination of those that are handicapped as if their lives are not quite as important as those of Scott and his kids. You are a pretty lousy “person”.
It’s not ok to kill a child. Never has been never will be. But unfortunately since neither you, nor I, nor Northam are god there are fetuses which have conditions that are incompatible with life. When babies are born with terminal condition and they succumb to their condition minutes or hours after birth that’s not the doctor killing them but the baby dying due to said condition.
If I were god I’d make sure every baby was born healthy and that every boy would grow to be at least 6’4” and run a 4.4 40, and every female would be a knockout and look like Kate Upton. I’d also give you a modicum of intelligence so you didn’t fall for fake news all the time. Unfortunately for both you and I’m not god thus we will continue to have fetuses with neonatal terminal conditions and I trust doctors and parents to continue to make the best decision as to how to care...and when they unfortunately don’t make it it’s not because anyone “killed” them.
Northam wasn’t talking about just letting terminal babies die after they are born. They are not God either but they are acting like god, These children are human beings you ghoul. Do we let children die because they have a deformity? That was one category that Northam identified.
It looks like you are alright with letting a baby die that has been born with a deformity. Do these kids have the same right to life as your children. When a child is born they have the same protections as any of us. You and the doctors are the ones that want to play God. I knew you were pretty despicable but you are even worse than I thought.
Your attitude cheapens and leads to descrimination of handicapped children. You should be ashamed of yourself.
Nurse: I Witnessed the Infanticide Ralph Northam Defended
The Neonate as a Patient “A fundamental component of the ethical concept of the previable fetus as a patient is that this moral status is a function of the pregnant woman's autonomous decision to confer it.
In contrast, infants born alive in the presence of health care professionals become patients independently of the autonomy of their parents.
This is because the general ethical concept of being a patient requires only that the human being in question be presented to a physician or other health care professional and that there exist clinical interventions that are reliably expected to result in the greater balance of clinical goods over clinical harms to that human being.
Moreover, parents of a liveborn infant become his or her moral fiduciaries, and they, too, are obligated to protect and promote the health-related interests of their child.
Thus, a liveborn infant simultaneously acquires two kinds of mutually reinforcing moral status—one as a patient of health care professionals to whom the infant is presented and a second as a child of his or her parents. As their child's fiduciaries, parents have a beneficence-based obligation to authorize clinical intervention when their child's health care professionals have beneficence-based obligations to intervene “
of course - many instances where a baby has a prenatal terminal diagnosis but can "live" for a few days hooked up to neonatal devices.
Did Tran's bill only allow for a 3rd trimester abortion for non-viable babies?
This thread isn't about Tran's bill, it's about Northam's comment where he specifically referenced non viable fetuses...or as Deej refers to it - infanticide. Northam is even referring to current law in his comments as he notes it requires more than one physician to certify. Do you think it's infanticide for a mother and doctor to discuss best course of treatment for a baby born with a terminal condition?
What an absolute Kunt.
He was being asked specifically about Tran’s bill when he made the comment you fucking hack.
He was being asked if he supported her bill he wasn’t asked if he supported the existing law.
But as politicians do he dodged the question and referenced current Virginia law
Ralph Northam: You know, I wasn’t there, Julie, and I certainly can’t speak for Delegate Tran
There are — you know when we talk about third-trimester abortions, these are done with the consent of, obviously, the mother, with the consent of the physicians, more than one physician by the way.
So he says he can’t speak for Tran and he specifically addresses requiring consent of multiple physicians as per current Virginia law.
The reason Politifact and all the other “fact checking” websites lie about all of this is because they are trying to censor what people see on Facebook and other social media...when these frauds label something as not true then it allows Facebook and the other social media sites to block those stories from people.
You know, the open-minded everyone is allowed to have an opinion Left...
The reason Politifact and all the other “fact checking” websites lie about all of this is because they are trying to censor what people see on Facebook and other social media...when these frauds label something as not true then it allows Facebook and the other social media sites to block those stories from people.
You know, the open-minded everyone is allowed to have an opinion Left...
The reason Politifact and all the other “fact checking” websites lie about all of this is because they are trying to censor what people see on Facebook and other social media...when these frauds label something as not true then it allows Facebook and the other social media sites to block those stories from people.
You know, the open-minded everyone is allowed to have an opinion Left...
The reason Politifact and all the other “fact checking” websites lie about all of this is because they are trying to censor what people see on Facebook and other social media...when these frauds label something as not true then it allows Facebook and the other social media sites to block those stories from people.
You know, the open-minded everyone is allowed to have an opinion Left...
The reason Politifact and all the other “fact checking” websites lie about all of this is because they are trying to censor what people see on Facebook and other social media...when these frauds label something as not true then it allows Facebook and the other social media sites to block those stories from people.
You know, the open-minded everyone is allowed to have an opinion Left...
The reason Politifact and all the other “fact checking” websites lie about all of this is because they are trying to censor what people see on Facebook and other social media...when these frauds label something as not true then it allows Facebook and the other social media sites to block those stories from people.
You know, the open-minded everyone is allowed to have an opinion Left...
The reason Politifact and all the other “fact checking” websites lie about all of this is because they are trying to censor what people see on Facebook and other social media...when these frauds label something as not true then it allows Facebook and the other social media sites to block those stories from people.
You know, the open-minded everyone is allowed to have an opinion Left...
The reason Politifact and all the other “fact checking” websites lie about all of this is because they are trying to censor what people see on Facebook and other social media...when these frauds label something as not true then it allows Facebook and the other social media sites to block those stories from people.
You know, the open-minded everyone is allowed to have an opinion Left...
The reason Politifact and all the other “fact checking” websites lie about all of this is because they are trying to censor what people see on Facebook and other social media...when these frauds label something as not true then it allows Facebook and the other social media sites to block those stories from people.
You know, the open-minded everyone is allowed to have an opinion Left...
The reason Politifact and all the other “fact checking” websites lie about all of this is because they are trying to censor what people see on Facebook and other social media...when these frauds label something as not true then it allows Facebook and the other social media sites to block those stories from people.
You know, the open-minded everyone is allowed to have an opinion Left...
Let me get this straight. You are for the spreading of fake news on Facebook, right?
Btw your link doesn't support your comment. HTH.
I'm not for letting partisan hacks decide what is fake based on political opinion.
And yes, it does moron:
If the fact-checkers find the story to be "false," a warning label is attached to the original post in Facebook’s news feed, and Facebook’s algorithm makes it more difficult for the disputed post to spread virally.
I.e. the Joe Biden story which was correct got labeled as mostly false by these morons, and because of that Facebook prevents if from being linked to/spread.
The reason Politifact and all the other “fact checking” websites lie about all of this is because they are trying to censor what people see on Facebook and other social media...when these frauds label something as not true then it allows Facebook and the other social media sites to block those stories from people.
You know, the open-minded everyone is allowed to have an opinion Left...
Let me get this straight. You are for the spreading of fake news on Facebook, right?
Btw your link doesn't support your comment. HTH.
I'm not for letting partisan hacks decide what is fake based on political opinion.
And yes, it does moron:
If the fact-checkers find the story to be "false," a warning label is attached to the original post in Facebook’s news feed, and Facebook’s algorithm makes it more difficult for the disputed post to spread virally.
I.e. the Joe Biden story which was correct got labeled as mostly false by these morons, and because of that Facebook prevents if from being linked to/spread.
Keep lying HondoRFS...
Oh the Biden story that said he was with the grand wizard when he wasn't with the grand wizard? That "true" story you want to perpetuate?
And no that quote you just put in there still doesn't agree with what it said.
Comments
He was being asked specifically about Tran’s bill when he made the comment you fucking hack.
He was being asked if he supported her bill he wasn’t asked if he supported the existing law.
You moron
When Northam was talking about 3rd trimester abortion he said the “fetus MAY not be viable and May have a deformity. So if a “ fetus May not be viable but they don’t know or MAY have a deformity like spinabifida they can kill it. Which would lead to the obvious that you could kill any fetus for any reason.
And when the HELL HAS IT BEEN OK to kill a child that has been born whether it has a deformity or not.
Nuts like you are not only ghouls but cheapen the lives of the handicapped but also leads to discrimination of those that are handicapped as if their lives are not quite as important as those of Scott and his kids. You are a pretty lousy “person”.
Ralph Northam: You know, I wasn’t there, Julie, and I certainly can’t speak for Delegate Tran
There are — you know when we talk about third-trimester abortions, these are done with the consent of, obviously, the mother, with the consent of the physicians, more than one physician by the way.
So he says he can’t speak for Tran and he specifically addresses requiring consent of multiple physicians as per current Virginia law.
If I were god I’d make sure every baby was born healthy and that every boy would grow to be at least 6’4” and run a 4.4 40, and every female would be a knockout and look like Kate Upton. I’d also give you a modicum of intelligence so you didn’t fall for fake news all the time. Unfortunately for both you and I’m not god thus we will continue to have fetuses with neonatal terminal conditions and I trust doctors and parents to continue to make the best decision as to how to care...and when they unfortunately don’t make it it’s not because anyone “killed” them.
It looks like you are alright with letting a baby die that has been born with a deformity. Do these kids have the same right to life as your children. When a child is born they have the same protections as any of us. You and the doctors are the ones that want to play God. I knew you were pretty despicable but you are even worse than I thought.
Your attitude cheapens and leads to descrimination of handicapped children. You should be ashamed of yourself.
Nurse: I Witnessed the Infanticide
Ralph Northam Defended
https://www.lucianne.com/2019/09/10/nurse_i_witnessed_the_infanticidebr_ralph_northam_defended_14791.html
You would be a Gosnell supporter.
The Neonate as a Patient
“A fundamental component of the ethical concept of the previable fetus as a patient is that this moral status is a function of the pregnant woman's autonomous decision to confer it.
In contrast, infants born alive in the presence of health care professionals become patients independently of the autonomy of their parents.
This is because the general ethical concept of being a patient requires only that the human being in question be presented to a physician or other health care professional and that there exist clinical interventions that are reliably expected to result in the greater balance of clinical goods over clinical harms to that human being.
Moreover, parents of a liveborn infant become his or her moral fiduciaries, and they, too, are obligated to protect and promote the health-related interests of their child.
Thus, a liveborn infant simultaneously acquires two kinds of mutually reinforcing moral status—one as a patient of health care professionals to whom the infant is presented and a second as a child of his or her parents. As their child's fiduciaries, parents have a beneficence-based obligation to authorize clinical intervention when their child's health care professionals have beneficence-based obligations to intervene “
He was asked if he supported her bill.
You know, the open-minded everyone is allowed to have an opinion Left...
GFY.
Btw your link doesn't support your comment. HTH.
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
And yes, it does moron:
If the fact-checkers find the story to be "false," a warning label is attached to the original post in Facebook’s news feed, and Facebook’s algorithm makes it more difficult for the disputed post to spread virally.
I.e. the Joe Biden story which was correct got labeled as mostly false by these morons, and because of that Facebook prevents if from being linked to/spread.
Keep lying HondoRFS...
And no that quote you just put in there still doesn't agree with what it said.
It's awesome that you love fake news.