Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Semi good to semi great QB evaluator heard from
Options
Sources
Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,856 
Maybe only a couple, are maybe saying Eason is not the real deal.
Also depends on what mean by real deal.
Is Eason going to be a ok, semi above average, semi good to semi great QB?
Yes.
But that said there are the following concerns about Eason.
1. Him being a statue.
A. Can his OL protect a statue?
Probably yes.
B. Can UW's RB take heat off the statue QB Eason?
Maybe.
C. Does, is UW's Offense geared toward a semi Power Run Offense that sets up the pass, and as such wont matter as much if Eason is a statue, etc?
Yes.
2.How is Eason's arm, skill, etc?
Answer:
Altho Eason is ok, to semi above average, to semo good, to semi great, there is the following concern:
A. At Georgia, AFTER HE WAS HEALTHY, HE WAS EITHER BENCHED because not good, an or beat out by Fromm.
So Eason was a BACK UP QB.
Now that may not mean anything because Gordon was a BACK UP QB.
3. Does Eason have enough around him?
A. WR?
Altho there is the possibility that the True Freshman, RS Freshman, True Sophmore, etc, 3,4, 5 star, inexperienced WR maybe, might, theoretically be ok, good, enough for Eason to throw to, there is no marquee names, they are YOUNG, inexperienced, etc.
That may hurt UW even with their run to set up the pass offense.
B. Defense?
Same as WR situation. Maybe 1 returning starter.
So if the offense sputters, because of concerns about Eason, RB, WR's, etc, can the defense keep UW in games?
MAYBE.
We'll see.
Or maybe not, maybe we wont see.
It is a concern tho.
Because of these concerns, there is reason to be concerned about Eason as a ok, above average, good to great, gama managing QB.
Some QB's are so good that they can help the team, even if there are concerns about OL, RB, WR, Defense.
Eason though is not that good. So because there are legit concerns about the rest of team, there are legit concerns about Eason.
Now If Eason were WSU's QB, since WSU RB, WR, OL SO GOOD, unlike UW, then there would be no reason to be concerned.
But just because there are legit reasons to be concerned about Eason, UW(for UW fans, WSU fans should care less), that does not mean that Eason isnt a real deal, ok, average, to above average, to good, to semi great QB.
Eason is a real deal, ok, average, to above average, to semi good, to semi great, game managing QB, that has some legit concerns about him as a QB, and legit concerns about his UW, QB, support system(AKA his team, RB, WR, defense).
So most to almost all are NOT saying that Eason isnt the real deal, and instead, are saying that Eason is a real deal or at least a semi real deal
https://washingtonstate.forums.rivals.com/threads/wsu-and-uw-shouldnt-read-too-much-into-their-wins.18554/
Also depends on what mean by real deal.
Is Eason going to be a ok, semi above average, semi good to semi great QB?
Yes.
But that said there are the following concerns about Eason.
1. Him being a statue.
A. Can his OL protect a statue?
Probably yes.
B. Can UW's RB take heat off the statue QB Eason?
Maybe.
C. Does, is UW's Offense geared toward a semi Power Run Offense that sets up the pass, and as such wont matter as much if Eason is a statue, etc?
Yes.
2.How is Eason's arm, skill, etc?
Answer:
Altho Eason is ok, to semi above average, to semo good, to semi great, there is the following concern:
A. At Georgia, AFTER HE WAS HEALTHY, HE WAS EITHER BENCHED because not good, an or beat out by Fromm.
So Eason was a BACK UP QB.
Now that may not mean anything because Gordon was a BACK UP QB.
3. Does Eason have enough around him?
A. WR?
Altho there is the possibility that the True Freshman, RS Freshman, True Sophmore, etc, 3,4, 5 star, inexperienced WR maybe, might, theoretically be ok, good, enough for Eason to throw to, there is no marquee names, they are YOUNG, inexperienced, etc.
That may hurt UW even with their run to set up the pass offense.
B. Defense?
Same as WR situation. Maybe 1 returning starter.
So if the offense sputters, because of concerns about Eason, RB, WR's, etc, can the defense keep UW in games?
MAYBE.
We'll see.
Or maybe not, maybe we wont see.
It is a concern tho.
Because of these concerns, there is reason to be concerned about Eason as a ok, above average, good to great, gama managing QB.
Some QB's are so good that they can help the team, even if there are concerns about OL, RB, WR, Defense.
Eason though is not that good. So because there are legit concerns about the rest of team, there are legit concerns about Eason.
Now If Eason were WSU's QB, since WSU RB, WR, OL SO GOOD, unlike UW, then there would be no reason to be concerned.
But just because there are legit reasons to be concerned about Eason, UW(for UW fans, WSU fans should care less), that does not mean that Eason isnt a real deal, ok, average, to above average, to good, to semi great QB.
Eason is a real deal, ok, average, to above average, to semi good, to semi great, game managing QB, that has some legit concerns about him as a QB, and legit concerns about his UW, QB, support system(AKA his team, RB, WR, defense).
So most to almost all are NOT saying that Eason isnt the real deal, and instead, are saying that Eason is a real deal or at least a semi real deal
https://washingtonstate.forums.rivals.com/threads/wsu-and-uw-shouldnt-read-too-much-into-their-wins.18554/
Comments
-
Math facts stats
-
-
-
Worth the double poast imo.UWhuskytskeet said: -
mikalalalalllals is legitimately slow/or affected by serious brain disorders. Think KrisVashon except with dementia and Assbergers. He or she makes pinpoint prediction like 47.5% win probabilities
-
Kid has a fucking cannon
This offense is going to be incredible to watch.
Anything else being said and people can fuck the right off -
All I know is somebody needs to get @mikalalas a Youtube channel stat.
I *need* his/her/zee's shit in gif form.
