Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
QB expert offers opinion on Eason
UWhuskytskeet
Member Posts: 7,110
Maybe only a couple, are maybe saying Eason is not the real deal.
Also depends on what mean by real deal.
Is Eason gping to be a ok, semi above average, semi good to semi great QB?
Yes.
Bit that said there are the following concerns about Eason.
1. Him being a Statue.
A. Can his OL protect a statue?
Probably yes.
B. Can UW's RB take heat off the Statue QB Eason?
Maybe.
C. Does, is UW's Offense geared toward a semi Power Run Offense that sets up the pass, and as such wont matter as much if Eason is a Statue, etc?
Yes.
2.How is Eason's Arm, Skill, etc?
Answer:
Altho Eason is ok, to semi above average, to semo good, to semi great, there is the following concern:
A. At Georgia, AFTER HE WAS HEALTHY, HE WAS EITHER BENCHED because not good, an or beat out by Fromm.
So Eason was a BACK UP QB.
Now that may not mean anything because Gordon was a BACK UP QB.
3. Does Eason have enough around him?
A. WR?
Altho there is the possibility that the True Freshman, RS Freshman, True Sophmore, etc, 3,4, 5 star, inexperienced WR maybe, maybe, might, theoretically be ok, good, enough for Eason to throw to, there is no marque names, they are YOUNG, inexperienced, etc.
That may hurt UW even with their run to set up the pass offense.
B. Defense?
Same as WR situation. Maybe 1 returning starter.
So if the offense sputters, because of concerns about Eason, RB, WR's, etc, can the defense keep UW in games?
MAYBE.
We'll see.
Or Maybe not, maybe we wont see.
It is a concern tho.
Because of these concerns, there is reason to be concerned about Eason as a ok, above average, good to great, gama managing QB.
Some QB's are so good that they can help the team, even if there are concerns about OL, RB, WR, Defense.
Eason though is not that good. So because there are legit concerns about the rest of team, there are legit concerns about Eason.
Now If Eason were WSU's QB, since WSU RB, WR, OL SO GOOD, unlike UW, then there would be no reason to be concerned.
But just because there are legit reasons to be concerned about Eason, UW(for UW fans, WSU fans shoild care less), that does not mean that Eason isnt a real deal ok, average, to above average to good to semi great QB
Eason is a real deal, ok, average to above average to semi good to semi great, gamae managing QB, that has some legit concerns about him as a QB, and legit concerns about his UW, QB, support system(AKA his team, RB, WR, defense)
So Most to Almost all are NOT saying that Eason isnt the real deal, and instead, arecsaying that Eason is a real deal or at least a semi real deal
Also depends on what mean by real deal.
Is Eason gping to be a ok, semi above average, semi good to semi great QB?
Yes.
Bit that said there are the following concerns about Eason.
1. Him being a Statue.
A. Can his OL protect a statue?
Probably yes.
B. Can UW's RB take heat off the Statue QB Eason?
Maybe.
C. Does, is UW's Offense geared toward a semi Power Run Offense that sets up the pass, and as such wont matter as much if Eason is a Statue, etc?
Yes.
2.How is Eason's Arm, Skill, etc?
Answer:
Altho Eason is ok, to semi above average, to semo good, to semi great, there is the following concern:
A. At Georgia, AFTER HE WAS HEALTHY, HE WAS EITHER BENCHED because not good, an or beat out by Fromm.
So Eason was a BACK UP QB.
Now that may not mean anything because Gordon was a BACK UP QB.
3. Does Eason have enough around him?
A. WR?
Altho there is the possibility that the True Freshman, RS Freshman, True Sophmore, etc, 3,4, 5 star, inexperienced WR maybe, maybe, might, theoretically be ok, good, enough for Eason to throw to, there is no marque names, they are YOUNG, inexperienced, etc.
That may hurt UW even with their run to set up the pass offense.
B. Defense?
Same as WR situation. Maybe 1 returning starter.
So if the offense sputters, because of concerns about Eason, RB, WR's, etc, can the defense keep UW in games?
MAYBE.
We'll see.
Or Maybe not, maybe we wont see.
It is a concern tho.
Because of these concerns, there is reason to be concerned about Eason as a ok, above average, good to great, gama managing QB.
Some QB's are so good that they can help the team, even if there are concerns about OL, RB, WR, Defense.
Eason though is not that good. So because there are legit concerns about the rest of team, there are legit concerns about Eason.
Now If Eason were WSU's QB, since WSU RB, WR, OL SO GOOD, unlike UW, then there would be no reason to be concerned.
But just because there are legit reasons to be concerned about Eason, UW(for UW fans, WSU fans shoild care less), that does not mean that Eason isnt a real deal ok, average, to above average to good to semi great QB
Eason is a real deal, ok, average to above average to semi good to semi great, gamae managing QB, that has some legit concerns about him as a QB, and legit concerns about his UW, QB, support system(AKA his team, RB, WR, defense)
So Most to Almost all are NOT saying that Eason isnt the real deal, and instead, arecsaying that Eason is a real deal or at least a semi real deal
Comments
Hypothetically this man, woman, person, individual, etc what have you, is, in theory, could be, should have been, might possibly be in the future, a front runner in Derek's poll of posters to be most worried about.
In any case, it was glorious.
random soul
Hall Of Fame
CognitiveDissonance said: ↑
Is this what a WSU degree gets you?
What in the living **** did I just read?
Yeah mik isn't really the best writing sample our fanbase can provide. I just scroll past most of what he puts up
I always know it's Mikalas when this shit is poasted. And it's straight schizophrenia at the beginning stages. It won't be long until he's on the sidewalk having these discussions with himself. It's sad really.
Oh, and 60 commas.
FUCKING 60 COMMAS.