Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Beyond parody’: PolitiFact rules 100% real photo of Biden w/former KKK ldr Bob Byrd as mostly-false

2»

Comments

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,213
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    DJDuck said:

    Sure Scott. As usual your understanding leaves something to be desired.

    No wonder your world view is so screwed up when you can’t even analyze a simple article or post accurately.

    and by "desired" as usual you mean you wish people wouldn't call out conservative lies.
    Do you draw a big distinction between a Klan member who is a Grand Wizard and Klan member who is an exalted cyclops? Is one more excusable than the other in your mind Scotty?
    I think he can understand that people change and what they did in the 40s isn't relevant to the 2000s.
    Not according to the democrat party. Kavanaugh much?
    Again, the bar for a supreme Court Justice is a little different than someone Biden shook hands with 10 years ago.
    Kunt logic, is their anything it can't do?

    Yeah, you can smear a Supreme Court nominee with pure unsubstantiated bullshit, while Hondo defends the Klan membership of the Rat party Senate leader as just some guy Biden shook hands with.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,862 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    DJDuck said:

    Sure Scott. As usual your understanding leaves something to be desired.

    No wonder your world view is so screwed up when you can’t even analyze a simple article or post accurately.

    and by "desired" as usual you mean you wish people wouldn't call out conservative lies.
    Do you draw a big distinction between a Klan member who is a Grand Wizard and Klan member who is an exalted cyclops? Is one more excusable than the other in your mind Scotty?
    I think he can understand that people change and what they did in the 40s isn't relevant to the 2000s.
    Not according to the democrat party. Kavanaugh much?
    Again, the bar for a supreme Court Justice is a little different than someone Biden shook hands with 10 years ago.
    Really? Different than for a senator?

    I guess so on your side:

    One of your hero's. How is she not on a terrorist watch list?




  • GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    DJDuck said:

    Sure Scott. As usual your understanding leaves something to be desired.

    No wonder your world view is so screwed up when you can’t even analyze a simple article or post accurately.

    and by "desired" as usual you mean you wish people wouldn't call out conservative lies.
    Do you draw a big distinction between a Klan member who is a Grand Wizard and Klan member who is an exalted cyclops? Is one more excusable than the other in your mind Scotty?
    I think he can understand that people change and what they did in the 40s isn't relevant to the 2000s.
    Not according to the democrat party. Kavanaugh much?
    Again, the bar for a supreme Court Justice is a little different than someone Biden shook hands with 10 years ago.
    Really? Different than for a senator?

    I guess so on your side:

    One of your hero's. How is she not on a terrorist watch list?




    you cannot be this fucking stupid can you...JFC

    https://www.truthorfiction.com/was-rep-ilhan-omar-photographed-at-an-al-qaeda-training-camp/
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,862 Standard Supporter
    As a liberal would say "prove her innocence". This should be fun!
  • GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    Sledog said:

    As a liberal would say "prove her innocence". This should be fun!

    The picture was taken in 1978. She was born in 1981. Al Qaeda didn't even exist until the 90's. FFS
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,862 Standard Supporter
    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    As a liberal would say "prove her innocence". This should be fun!

    The picture was taken in 1978. She was born in 1981. Al Qaeda didn't even exist until the 90's. FFS
    Prove it.
  • GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    As a liberal would say "prove her innocence". This should be fun!

    The picture was taken in 1978. She was born in 1981. Al Qaeda didn't even exist until the 90's. FFS
    Prove it.

  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,862 Standard Supporter
    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    As a liberal would say "prove her innocence". This should be fun!

    The picture was taken in 1978. She was born in 1981. Al Qaeda didn't even exist until the 90's. FFS
    Prove it.

    look I'm applying liberal standards here like the Kavenaugh hearings. Now get on with the defense! Some wonky lib website says it's not true doesn't cut it.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,862 Standard Supporter
    You can't prove it's not here?

    Needs to be impeached then.

  • GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    Sledog said:

    You can't prove it's not here?

    Needs to be impeached then.

    I can prove that you are a fucking idiot by showing people this thread where you thought a picture taken in 1978 showed a woman born in 1981 in a training camp for a terrorist group that wasn't around until the 90's.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,862 Standard Supporter
    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    You can't prove it's not here?

    Needs to be impeached then.

    I can prove that you are a fucking idiot by showing people this thread where you thought a picture taken in 1978 showed a woman born in 1981 in a training camp for a terrorist group that wasn't around until the 90's.
    I see you that you can't prove shit. Somehow you expect everyone else to do so.
Sign In or Register to comment.