But, but Trump and the Russians!!!
Comments
-
drip drip dripRaceBannon said:
Where do you think this information is coming from? Its an ongoing investigation of the whole ball of rancid wax. Not that you careHHusky said:
Charge her or STFU.RaceBannon said:
She should have been charged. Even the dumbfuck Comey said she committed crimes but didn't mean to. He was counting on true believers like yourself to put Hillary ahead of country
Any day now.
-
Unlike with Trump and myself, there is no evidence that we ever committed any crimes. Not so for Hillary.
In all, Clinton undertook to destroy over 30,000 emails, even though some of them had been demanded by congressional subpoena. And this would not be a Clinton story if we failed to note that, in the time-honored family tradition, Hillary lied her head off about the substance of the destroyed emails: We were to believe that, in thousands upon thousands of email exchanges, one of the busiest public officials and most obsessively political creatures on the planet had lolled her days away gabbing about yoga routines, family vacations, and her daughter’s wedding.
President Obama took care of undermining any prosecution for her mishandling of classified information. He had a deep interest in doing so: He had knowingly communicated with his secretary of state through the private system, and he had misled the public about it — claiming to have learned about Clinton’s private email practices from news reports, like everyone else. All of that could be neatly buried in two steps. First, invoke executive privilege (without calling it that — too Nixonian) to seal the Obama–Clinton emails from public view. Second, ensure that the Clinton-emails case would never be prosecuted: If Clinton was never accused of criminal conduct, then Obama’s role as a minor participant would not become evidence in a criminal case. -
No SOL problem. Charge her!SFGbob said:Unlike with Trump and myself, there is no evidence that we ever committed any crimes. Not so for Hillary.
In all, Clinton undertook to destroy over 30,000 emails, even though some of them had been demanded by congressional subpoena. And this would not be a Clinton story if we failed to note that, in the time-honored family tradition, Hillary lied her head off about the substance of the destroyed emails: We were to believe that, in thousands upon thousands of email exchanges, one of the busiest public officials and most obsessively political creatures on the planet had lolled her days away gabbing about yoga routines, family vacations, and her daughter’s wedding.
President Obama took care of undermining any prosecution for her mishandling of classified information. He had a deep interest in doing so: He had knowingly communicated with his secretary of state through the private system, and he had misled the public about it — claiming to have learned about Clinton’s private email practices from news reports, like everyone else. All of that could be neatly buried in two steps. First, invoke executive privilege (without calling it that — too Nixonian) to seal the Obama–Clinton emails from public view. Second, ensure that the Clinton-emails case would never be prosecuted: If Clinton was never accused of criminal conduct, then Obama’s role as a minor participant would not become evidence in a criminal case. -
Charge Trump or charge me or shut the fuck up O'Keefed. That's your standard, try living by it you hypocritical Kunt.HHusky said:
No SOL problem. Charge her!SFGbob said:Unlike with Trump and myself, there is no evidence that we ever committed any crimes. Not so for Hillary.
In all, Clinton undertook to destroy over 30,000 emails, even though some of them had been demanded by congressional subpoena. And this would not be a Clinton story if we failed to note that, in the time-honored family tradition, Hillary lied her head off about the substance of the destroyed emails: We were to believe that, in thousands upon thousands of email exchanges, one of the busiest public officials and most obsessively political creatures on the planet had lolled her days away gabbing about yoga routines, family vacations, and her daughter’s wedding.
President Obama took care of undermining any prosecution for her mishandling of classified information. He had a deep interest in doing so: He had knowingly communicated with his secretary of state through the private system, and he had misled the public about it — claiming to have learned about Clinton’s private email practices from news reports, like everyone else. All of that could be neatly buried in two steps. First, invoke executive privilege (without calling it that — too Nixonian) to seal the Obama–Clinton emails from public view. Second, ensure that the Clinton-emails case would never be prosecuted: If Clinton was never accused of criminal conduct, then Obama’s role as a minor participant would not become evidence in a criminal case. -
But unlike you, she can still be charged for her crimes. Don't be a pussy. Go for it!SFGbob said:
Charge Trump or charge me or shut the fuck up O'Keefed. That's your standard, try living by it you hypocritical Kunt.HHusky said:
No SOL problem. Charge her!SFGbob said:Unlike with Trump and myself, there is no evidence that we ever committed any crimes. Not so for Hillary.
In all, Clinton undertook to destroy over 30,000 emails, even though some of them had been demanded by congressional subpoena. And this would not be a Clinton story if we failed to note that, in the time-honored family tradition, Hillary lied her head off about the substance of the destroyed emails: We were to believe that, in thousands upon thousands of email exchanges, one of the busiest public officials and most obsessively political creatures on the planet had lolled her days away gabbing about yoga routines, family vacations, and her daughter’s wedding.
President Obama took care of undermining any prosecution for her mishandling of classified information. He had a deep interest in doing so: He had knowingly communicated with his secretary of state through the private system, and he had misled the public about it — claiming to have learned about Clinton’s private email practices from news reports, like everyone else. All of that could be neatly buried in two steps. First, invoke executive privilege (without calling it that — too Nixonian) to seal the Obama–Clinton emails from public view. Second, ensure that the Clinton-emails case would never be prosecuted: If Clinton was never accused of criminal conduct, then Obama’s role as a minor participant would not become evidence in a criminal case.
-
Again - where do you think this is coming from? An active investigationHHusky said:
But unlike you, she can still be charged for her crimes. Don't be a pussy. Go for it!SFGbob said:
Charge Trump or charge me or shut the fuck up O'Keefed. That's your standard, try living by it you hypocritical Kunt.HHusky said:
No SOL problem. Charge her!SFGbob said:Unlike with Trump and myself, there is no evidence that we ever committed any crimes. Not so for Hillary.
In all, Clinton undertook to destroy over 30,000 emails, even though some of them had been demanded by congressional subpoena. And this would not be a Clinton story if we failed to note that, in the time-honored family tradition, Hillary lied her head off about the substance of the destroyed emails: We were to believe that, in thousands upon thousands of email exchanges, one of the busiest public officials and most obsessively political creatures on the planet had lolled her days away gabbing about yoga routines, family vacations, and her daughter’s wedding.
President Obama took care of undermining any prosecution for her mishandling of classified information. He had a deep interest in doing so: He had knowingly communicated with his secretary of state through the private system, and he had misled the public about it — claiming to have learned about Clinton’s private email practices from news reports, like everyone else. All of that could be neatly buried in two steps. First, invoke executive privilege (without calling it that — too Nixonian) to seal the Obama–Clinton emails from public view. Second, ensure that the Clinton-emails case would never be prosecuted: If Clinton was never accused of criminal conduct, then Obama’s role as a minor participant would not become evidence in a criminal case.
Its Obama, Comey, Brennan and the rest that need to be charged. Hillary was a front. An incompetent criminal front and if she gets charged that's cool too
You waited three years to charge Trump with collusion and obstruction. What's the rush? -
Weird how O'Keefed has no interest in the subject matter. Running interference for Hillary is all he cares about.
-
Yeah, I'm very concerned that Hillary hasn't received enough investigatory attention.SFGbob said:Weird how O'Keefed has no interest in the subject matter. Running interference for Hillary is all he cares about.
I'm sure you've got her this time, girls!
-
You're right Hillary was "investigated" by the Obama DOJ with the expressed intent to exonerate her. As this latest news reveals. They knew she'd been hacked by the Chinese but Comey massaged that into "may" have been hacked and thus found another excuse not to charge her. She was never going to be charged by the Obama justice department and you do not give a fuck about whatever crimes she committed.HHusky said:
Yeah, I'm very concerned that Hillary hasn't received enough investigatory attention.SFGbob said:Weird how O'Keefed has no interest in the subject matter. Running interference for Hillary is all he cares about.
I'm sure you've got her this time, girls! -
It's current unlike Trumps tax dodges you bitch about.HHusky said:
Charge her or STFU.RaceBannon said:
