Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
«1

Comments

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,850 Founders Club
    China hacked her server and re routed all emails including classified ones

    Stroke boy was in charge of the "investigation"

    The FBI hid the damage she did

    Third world corrupt

    https://foxnews.com/politics/fbi-indifferent-to-possible-china-hack-of-hillary-clintons-server-as-state-department-fought-to-protect-her-interviews-suggest


    Interviews with intelligence community officials have revealed that senior FBI leaders "seemed indifferent to evidence of a possible intrusion by a foreign adversary" into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s non-government email server, and that State Department officials allegedly sought to "downgrade classified material found on the server," according to Senate investigators still probing the matter.

    The information was contained in a letter and interview transcripts sent Monday by the majority staff on the Senate Finance and Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committees to senior Senate Republicans including Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa. The letter also noted that “neither the committees nor the FBI were able to confirm whether an intrusion into the server occurred."

    The review began after two August 2018 news articles "alleged that a Chinese state-owned company hacked former Secretary Clinton’s nongovernment server and inserted code that forwarded nearly all of her emails to the foreign company," the letter stated, citing an article in The Daily Caller, and a later piece by Fox News.

    he letter to Grassley continued: "The reporting indicated that two Intelligence Community Inspector General [ICIG] officials – Frank Rucker and Jeanette McMillian – discovered the code and brought the possible intrusion to the attention of the FBI."

    In a December 2018 interview with Senate investigators concerning the reporting on the potential foreign hack, Rucker said Strzok -- then the deputy assistant director of the FBI’s counterintelligence division in charge of the Clinton investigation -- seemed "aloof and dismissive."

    And Strzok didn't ask many questions, according to Rucker.

    McMillian, meanwhile, said FBI employees were "poker-faced" during the roughly hourlong meeting about the potential breach, even though both the CIA and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) had "significant equities" in the information contained on the server.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,213
    In 2016, the incumbent Democratic administration of President Barack Obama put the awesome powers of the United States government’s law-enforcement and intelligence apparatus in the service of the Hillary Rodham Clinton presidential campaign, the Democratic party, and the progressive Beltway establishment. This scheme had two parts: Plan A, the objective; and Plan B, a fail-safe strategy in case Plan A imploded — which all the smartest people were supremely confident would never, ever happen . . . which is why you could bet the ranch that it would.

    Plan A was to get Mrs. Clinton elected president of the United States. This required exonerating her, at least ostensibly, from well-founded allegations of her felonious and politically disqualifying actions.

    Plan B was the insurance policy: an investigation that Donald Trump, in the highly unlikely event he was elected, would be powerless to shut down. An investigation that would simultaneously monitor and taint him. An investigation that internalized Clinton-campaign-generated opposition research, limning Trump and his campaign as complicit in Russian espionage. An investigation that would hunt for a crime under the guise of counterintelligence, build an impeachment case under the guise of hunting for a crime, and seek to make Trump un-reelectable under the guise of building an impeachment case.


    https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/08/ball-of-collusion-book-excerpt-hillary-clinton-ruins-the-plan/
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,850 Founders Club
    Unfortunately the gutless GOP sat on the sidelines for two years scared to act in case the bullshit was true

    Cost them the House and cost the country getting anything done

    Callous and calculated. And a high crime
  • Dude61Dude61 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,254 Swaye's Wigwam
    Hillary allowed the Chinese access to her home server in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation.

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,823
    Dude61 said:

    Hillary allowed the Chinese access to her home server in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation.

    If only the Justice Department had Republican leadership.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,850 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    Hillary allowed the Chinese access to her home server in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation.

    If only the Justice Department had Republican leadership.
    Like Comey

    JFC at least put some effort into it if you're going to run cover for treason

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,823

    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    Hillary allowed the Chinese access to her home server in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation.

    If only the Justice Department had Republican leadership.
    Like Comey

    JFC at least put some effort into it if you're going to run cover for treason

    Charge her or STFU.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,850 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    Hillary allowed the Chinese access to her home server in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation.

    If only the Justice Department had Republican leadership.
    Like Comey

    JFC at least put some effort into it if you're going to run cover for treason

    Charge her or STFU.
    Where do you think this information is coming from? Its an ongoing investigation of the whole ball of rancid wax. Not that you care

    She should have been charged. Even the dumbfuck Comey said she committed crimes but didn't mean to. He was counting on true believers like yourself to put Hillary ahead of country
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,213
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    Hillary allowed the Chinese access to her home server in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation.

    If only the Justice Department had Republican leadership.
    Like Comey

    JFC at least put some effort into it if you're going to run cover for treason

    Charge her or STFU.
    Oh the irony
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,823

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    Hillary allowed the Chinese access to her home server in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation.

    If only the Justice Department had Republican leadership.
    Like Comey

    JFC at least put some effort into it if you're going to run cover for treason

    Charge her or STFU.
    Where do you think this information is coming from? Its an ongoing investigation of the whole ball of rancid wax. Not that you care

    She should have been charged. Even the dumbfuck Comey said she committed crimes but didn't mean to. He was counting on true believers like yourself to put Hillary ahead of country
    drip drip drip

    Any day now.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,213
    Unlike with Trump and myself, there is no evidence that we ever committed any crimes. Not so for Hillary.

    In all, Clinton undertook to destroy over 30,000 emails, even though some of them had been demanded by congressional subpoena. And this would not be a Clinton story if we failed to note that, in the time-honored family tradition, Hillary lied her head off about the substance of the destroyed emails: We were to believe that, in thousands upon thousands of email exchanges, one of the busiest public officials and most obsessively political creatures on the planet had lolled her days away gabbing about yoga routines, family vacations, and her daughter’s wedding.

    President Obama took care of undermining any prosecution for her mishandling of classified information. He had a deep interest in doing so: He had knowingly communicated with his secretary of state through the private system, and he had misled the public about it — claiming to have learned about Clinton’s private email practices from news reports, like everyone else. All of that could be neatly buried in two steps. First, invoke executive privilege (without calling it that — too Nixonian) to seal the Obama–Clinton emails from public view. Second, ensure that the Clinton-emails case would never be prosecuted: If Clinton was never accused of criminal conduct, then Obama’s role as a minor participant would not become evidence in a criminal case.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,823
    SFGbob said:

    Unlike with Trump and myself, there is no evidence that we ever committed any crimes. Not so for Hillary.

    In all, Clinton undertook to destroy over 30,000 emails, even though some of them had been demanded by congressional subpoena. And this would not be a Clinton story if we failed to note that, in the time-honored family tradition, Hillary lied her head off about the substance of the destroyed emails: We were to believe that, in thousands upon thousands of email exchanges, one of the busiest public officials and most obsessively political creatures on the planet had lolled her days away gabbing about yoga routines, family vacations, and her daughter’s wedding.

    President Obama took care of undermining any prosecution for her mishandling of classified information. He had a deep interest in doing so: He had knowingly communicated with his secretary of state through the private system, and he had misled the public about it — claiming to have learned about Clinton’s private email practices from news reports, like everyone else. All of that could be neatly buried in two steps. First, invoke executive privilege (without calling it that — too Nixonian) to seal the Obama–Clinton emails from public view. Second, ensure that the Clinton-emails case would never be prosecuted: If Clinton was never accused of criminal conduct, then Obama’s role as a minor participant would not become evidence in a criminal case.

    No SOL problem. Charge her!
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,213
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Unlike with Trump and myself, there is no evidence that we ever committed any crimes. Not so for Hillary.

    In all, Clinton undertook to destroy over 30,000 emails, even though some of them had been demanded by congressional subpoena. And this would not be a Clinton story if we failed to note that, in the time-honored family tradition, Hillary lied her head off about the substance of the destroyed emails: We were to believe that, in thousands upon thousands of email exchanges, one of the busiest public officials and most obsessively political creatures on the planet had lolled her days away gabbing about yoga routines, family vacations, and her daughter’s wedding.

    President Obama took care of undermining any prosecution for her mishandling of classified information. He had a deep interest in doing so: He had knowingly communicated with his secretary of state through the private system, and he had misled the public about it — claiming to have learned about Clinton’s private email practices from news reports, like everyone else. All of that could be neatly buried in two steps. First, invoke executive privilege (without calling it that — too Nixonian) to seal the Obama–Clinton emails from public view. Second, ensure that the Clinton-emails case would never be prosecuted: If Clinton was never accused of criminal conduct, then Obama’s role as a minor participant would not become evidence in a criminal case.

    No SOL problem. Charge her!
    Charge Trump or charge me or shut the fuck up O'Keefed. That's your standard, try living by it you hypocritical Kunt.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,823
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Unlike with Trump and myself, there is no evidence that we ever committed any crimes. Not so for Hillary.

    In all, Clinton undertook to destroy over 30,000 emails, even though some of them had been demanded by congressional subpoena. And this would not be a Clinton story if we failed to note that, in the time-honored family tradition, Hillary lied her head off about the substance of the destroyed emails: We were to believe that, in thousands upon thousands of email exchanges, one of the busiest public officials and most obsessively political creatures on the planet had lolled her days away gabbing about yoga routines, family vacations, and her daughter’s wedding.

    President Obama took care of undermining any prosecution for her mishandling of classified information. He had a deep interest in doing so: He had knowingly communicated with his secretary of state through the private system, and he had misled the public about it — claiming to have learned about Clinton’s private email practices from news reports, like everyone else. All of that could be neatly buried in two steps. First, invoke executive privilege (without calling it that — too Nixonian) to seal the Obama–Clinton emails from public view. Second, ensure that the Clinton-emails case would never be prosecuted: If Clinton was never accused of criminal conduct, then Obama’s role as a minor participant would not become evidence in a criminal case.

    No SOL problem. Charge her!
    Charge Trump or charge me or shut the fuck up O'Keefed. That's your standard, try living by it you hypocritical Kunt.
    But unlike you, she can still be charged for her crimes. Don't be a pussy. Go for it!

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,850 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Unlike with Trump and myself, there is no evidence that we ever committed any crimes. Not so for Hillary.

    In all, Clinton undertook to destroy over 30,000 emails, even though some of them had been demanded by congressional subpoena. And this would not be a Clinton story if we failed to note that, in the time-honored family tradition, Hillary lied her head off about the substance of the destroyed emails: We were to believe that, in thousands upon thousands of email exchanges, one of the busiest public officials and most obsessively political creatures on the planet had lolled her days away gabbing about yoga routines, family vacations, and her daughter’s wedding.

    President Obama took care of undermining any prosecution for her mishandling of classified information. He had a deep interest in doing so: He had knowingly communicated with his secretary of state through the private system, and he had misled the public about it — claiming to have learned about Clinton’s private email practices from news reports, like everyone else. All of that could be neatly buried in two steps. First, invoke executive privilege (without calling it that — too Nixonian) to seal the Obama–Clinton emails from public view. Second, ensure that the Clinton-emails case would never be prosecuted: If Clinton was never accused of criminal conduct, then Obama’s role as a minor participant would not become evidence in a criminal case.

    No SOL problem. Charge her!
    Charge Trump or charge me or shut the fuck up O'Keefed. That's your standard, try living by it you hypocritical Kunt.
    But unlike you, she can still be charged for her crimes. Don't be a pussy. Go for it!

    Again - where do you think this is coming from? An active investigation

    Its Obama, Comey, Brennan and the rest that need to be charged. Hillary was a front. An incompetent criminal front and if she gets charged that's cool too


    You waited three years to charge Trump with collusion and obstruction. What's the rush?
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,213
    Weird how O'Keefed has no interest in the subject matter. Running interference for Hillary is all he cares about.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,823
    SFGbob said:

    Weird how O'Keefed has no interest in the subject matter. Running interference for Hillary is all he cares about.

    Yeah, I'm very concerned that Hillary hasn't received enough investigatory attention.

    I'm sure you've got her this time, girls!
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,213
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Weird how O'Keefed has no interest in the subject matter. Running interference for Hillary is all he cares about.

    Yeah, I'm very concerned that Hillary hasn't received enough investigatory attention.

    I'm sure you've got her this time, girls!
    You're right Hillary was "investigated" by the Obama DOJ with the expressed intent to exonerate her. As this latest news reveals. They knew she'd been hacked by the Chinese but Comey massaged that into "may" have been hacked and thus found another excuse not to charge her. She was never going to be charged by the Obama justice department and you do not give a fuck about whatever crimes she committed.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,862 Standard Supporter
    edited August 2019
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    Hillary allowed the Chinese access to her home server in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation.

    If only the Justice Department had Republican leadership.
    Like Comey

    JFC at least put some effort into it if you're going to run cover for treason

    Charge her or STFU.
    It's current unlike Trumps tax dodges you bitch about.
Sign In or Register to comment.