Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
2019: Washington Has Joined The Elite
Comments
-
I don't understand two of these words. Asshole.TacoSoup said:
At risk of going to the Gulag...
This is extremely myopic and cynical even for Hardcore Husky -
Gu·lagSwaye said:
I don't understand two of these words. Asshole.TacoSoup said:
At risk of going to the Gulag...
This is extremely myopic and cynical even for Hardcore Husky
/ˈɡo͞oläɡ/
noun
a system of labor camps maintained in the Soviet Union from 1930 to 1955 in which many people died.
a camp in the Gulag system, or any political labor camp.
noun: gulag; plural noun: gulags
ex·treme·ly
/ikˈstrēmlē/
adverb
to a very great degree; very.
"this is an extremely difficult thing to do" -
Let me help our noble red savage by putting these into terms he might understand.DoogCourics said:
Gu·lagSwaye said:
I don't understand two of these words. Asshole.TacoSoup said:
At risk of going to the Gulag...
This is extremely myopic and cynical even for Hardcore Husky
/ˈɡo͞oläɡ/
noun
a system of labor camps maintained in the Soviet Union from 1930 to 1955 in which many people died.
a camp in the Gulag system, or any political labor camp.
noun: gulag; plural noun: gulags
ex·treme·ly
/ikˈstrēmlē/
adverb
to a very great degree; very.
"this is an extremely difficult thing to do"
A gulag is like a reservation but worse.
Extreme is like saying you're going to scalp someone because they said NTD, BB about your squaw.
HTH -
CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Let me help our noble red savage by putting these into terms he might understand.DoogCourics said:
Gu·lagSwaye said:
I don't understand two of these words. Asshole.TacoSoup said:
At risk of going to the Gulag...
This is extremely myopic and cynical even for Hardcore Husky
/ˈɡo͞oläɡ/
noun
a system of labor camps maintained in the Soviet Union from 1930 to 1955 in which many people died.
a camp in the Gulag system, or any political labor camp.
noun: gulag; plural noun: gulags
ex·treme·ly
/ikˈstrēmlē/
adverb
to a very great degree; very.
"this is an extremely difficult thing to do"
A gulag is like a reservation but worse.
Extreme is like saying you're going to scalp someone because they said NTD, BB about your squaw.
HTH
-
Added point to Pete’s consistency and ability thus far with less heralded recruits and optimism for what can be accomplished with influx of higher end talent:DoogCourics said:
I agree with you on multiple points:DerekJohnson said:
We never stood a chance against Penn State, Alabama and Ohio State. They all could have boat raced us if they hadn't let up on the throttle. And the sad thing is we could have beaten Ohio State with a better game plan. You're making Pete sound like he was a valiant warrior who gave it everything he had going down in defeat. You're being an enabler.DoogCourics said:
Correct. Most of the Blue Chips we have are underclassmen.DerekJohnson said:We really haven't beaten anyone. Good lord.
At the time of our losses to the big boys:
2016: 24th in Country in 5 Year Talent - 0 Five Stars - 21 Four Stars - 56 Three Stars - 8 Two Stars (or less) - 85.73 Average Composite Score - 21 Blue Chip
Lost to Bama in Peach Bowl - 1st in Country in 5 Year Talent - 17 Five Stars - 44 Four Stars - 20 Three Stars - 1 Two Star (or Less) - 92.72 Average Composite Score - 61 Blue Chip
2017: 24th in Country in 5 Year Talent - 0 Five Stars - 23 Four Stars - 55 Three Stars - 7 Two Stars (or less) - 85.98 Average Composite Score - 23 Blue Chip
Lost to PSU in Fiesta Bowl - 19th in Country in 5 Year Talent - 1 Five Star - 33 Four Stars - 48 Three Stars - 3 Two Stars (or less) - 87.89 Average - 34 Blue Chip
2018: 20th in Country in 5 Year Talent - 1 Five Star - 31 Four Stars - 47 Three Stars - 6 Two Stars (or Less) - 87.25 Average Composite Score - 31 Blue Chip
Lost to tOSU in Rose Bowl - 1st in Country in 5 Year Talent - 11 Five Stars - 55 Four Stars - 17 Three Stars - 2 Two Stars (or less) - 92.89 Average Composite Score - 66 Blue Chip
Pete was attempting to punch well above his weight class in the NY6 Bowels, and unfortunately it wasn't happening. Yet the Dawgs never got boat raced.
Next season he is going to have DOUBLE the Blue Chip talent he had in those years, and now there will be Blue Chips filling the full 2 deep.
It isn’t microwave popcorn Derek.
And you could also ask why we were saddled with Browning to begin with -- and whose fault was that? Why weren't other competent QBs recruited in that span? Again, that's on Petersen.
Look at UCLA - you can have blue chips coming out your ears. If you don't win big games with them then who cares?
This doesn't mean I think Petersen is shit, or I don't acknowledge his exciting recruiting of late. It means UW doesn't deserve to be named among the nation's elite until they actually beat somebody of note.
We never stood a chance against PSU, Bama, or tOSU in regards to our offense. Our defense was on par. They did let up on the throttle, but it was also a case of the team clearly starting out uncomfortable and taking a quarter and a half before they realized they could play with these guys.
That's on Pete.
It's also on Pete that he has not won a single one of the big games in his tenure. As Race said, he punched above his weight class while at BSU, so why has he not done it at UW? Poor play calling, poor game planning, poor roster choices. Had he done his job and corrected those issues, he could have won at least one of those game. He has yet to do it, and that is a major knock on him that is becoming increasingly irritating.
My point, is that we are not UCLA or USC. We have not had blue chips coming out our ears while simultaneously losing the big games. Pete has won 10 games 3 straight seasons for the first time in UW history. He has won 2 out of 3 conference championships. And he has done all this with this piece of shit leading his offense (which as you said is Pete's own fault):
If you weren't sure, that is retarded chicken running with his head cut off. Yet Pete's consistency has led this team to 3 straight NY6 bowls despite that retard and despite having half the number of blue chips recruits on his roster that all the teams in the same stratosphere have done.
This post was a chance to highlight that UW is finally getting the same amount of talent into the 2 and 3 deeps that the rest the elite teams have. With this talent level, his consistent approach, his record of development, and hopefully some self reflection on his own short comings, I expect him to start winning these games outright.
Plus I'm a fucking doog who never misses the opportunity to shine a bright light on the program that I love and to doogitup.gif
PS. I love you and for having higher expectations and not accepting bullshit excuses.
-
Hmm. Oregon lost to Ohio St. in the 2015 Natty by 22. -
-
Maybe they didn't make the list because their number would be much much more than 4.
Article should say ‘fewest +20 point losses in CFP era’. -
Or most 49 point losses to UWdOgmaster said:Maybe they didn't make the list because their number would be much much more than 4.
Article should say ‘fewest +20 point losses in CFP era’. -







