Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
...I am very excited to see what Wilcox's defense does in year-2. The LBs look great (crossing my fingers over Feeney's return), Sean Parker should be all-conference caliber, and it sounds (knock on wood) like Marcus Peters is starting to assert himself.
The obvious question mark will be (shocking) the ability of the D-line to penetrate. In this conference, you have to ease the pressure on your CBs by giving the opposing QB VERY little time to throw the ball. He needs to feel anxious in the pocket. With Jamora's future in doubt, and some real question marks across the front, I'm not sure one way or the other. Yes, Shirley is small, but he has "beast" potential. Hudson is a question mark, and the others are really hard to get excited about. Lastly, it's difficult to get excited about incoming freshmen DLs since the position takes so long to develop (minus Jadaveon Clowney).
HOWEVER, I am very pleased with the turnaround last year under Wilcox, and I'm hopeful that Lupoi can teach these guys some techniques.
0 ·
Comments
Hopefully Mathis, Qualls, Farria, and Basham get in. I know we should not count on much from them next season, but we need them in the mix. It won't be that hard for them to pass Potoa, Tani, Finau, Turpin.
The WSU and Boise losses stemmed from one man: Sark
I meant Boise smart ass.
Discipline...something that Sark does not instill.
Look, perhaps I am too much of an optimist, but I actually am hopeful that Sark can turn this program (and himself) into a winner. That doesn't mean hope = you get to keep your job. I need proof (i.e., winning). IMO, my "hope" runs out at the end of 2013.
Also a few days ago I read something and I think it mentioned that Wilcox is very strict and detail oriented in his practices. He's clearly a 180 from Sark.
The D coaches are quite good. And Sirmon and Tosh are great recruiters. They immediately bolstered the 2012 class which was basically average before they showed up. Tosh brought in a strong D-line class this year and the LB's also look good. The problem is 7-6 is holding them back.
I know its not the company line but everything doesn't suck about the program. New stadium and strong d coaches are big strengthes. Nuss was hired at Alabama. Do you think the offense would have been better last year with Nuss there?
90% of the problem is Sark.
Does everyone say so?
I don't think Wilcox sucks, but I'm not ready to heap as much praise as you. Saying that Texas wanted him isn't proof. Did you know Sark rebuffed several teams this year? You're making a lot of the same arguments for Wilcox that doogs make for Sark. Check yourself before you wreck yourself. And as always, let it play out.