If you want to understand why Global Warming is a religion...
Comments
-
Huh? Its published raw data.2001400ex said:
It's those journalists and politicians telling you that data is fixed to make the 30s look cooler. HTHHoustonHusky said:
Its amazing how much cooler the 1930s got between 1980 and the data today. One could say it was almost magic...GDS said:HoustonHusky said:Add to that the 1930s were WAY warmer than it is now...that's why they have to keep changing the historical data to hide it.
Its all "facts" and "truth" until it falls apart, just like all the studies showing global cooling in the 1970s...i.e. the upcoming Ice Age, just like Hansen's models in the 1980s that have failed spectacularly in linking "global temperature" to CO2, just like Mann's fraudulent hockey stick in the 1990s that got debunked for using shitty statistics and selective data, just like all the studies Gores cited saying the ice caps were going to melt in 10 years in the 2000s. But I'm sure this batch of mentally ill (according to David Corn) scientists will be different.
As a point of reference...in 1936 this week it was over a 100 F across most of the country and got over 110 F across most of the Midwest even up into Canada. You can say it is out of context, but you can use simple measures such as the numbers of days a year cities like Chicago have gotten over 90 F to see that the 1930s were WAY, WAY hotter than it is today in the United States.
The year 1934 was a very hot year in the United States, ranking sixth behind 2012, 2016, 2015, 2006, and 1998. However, global warming takes into account temperatures over the entire planet, including the oceans. The land area of the U.S. accounts for only 2% of Earth's total surface area. Despite the U.S. sweltering in 1934, that year was not especially hot over the rest of the planet, as you can see on the 1934 map below. Globally, 1934 temperatures were actually cooler than average for the 20th century.
But hey....it was really hot on July 9th 1936 in shitdickville so no way climate change is real...jfc
Or one could look at the actual raw data and see how the average US temperature was much hotter in the 1930s than it was today. Simple fact. It is why it needs to get "corrected" by scientists. And who wouldn't trust scientists like the mentally ill ones at the beginning of this thread that can't sleep at night or get out of bed because of people like Trump and their religious belief of the world collapsing in 10 years along with their economic livelihood (i.e. grant money) to accurately and unbiasedly modify the data in a scientific manner.
Like I said, I'm sure this round of climate scientists will be so much more accurate than the last 50 years have been in getting things right...
God you are a fucking moron... -
You are still confusing weather with climate. Nice work.HoustonHusky said:
Yeah...raw data of daily and monthly average US temperatures is confusing for a burger flipper...2001400ex said:
From the dude who just confused weather with climate.HoustonHusky said:
I find it amazing that somehow, someway someone out there is stupid enough to think those two concepts are linked.2001400ex said:Every time one of these threads shows up. It amazes me how many people trust journalists and politicians over scientists who study the climate for a living.
HondoFS... -
-
Talking point2001400ex said:
You are still confusing weather with climate. Nice work.HoustonHusky said:
Yeah...raw data of daily and monthly average US temperatures is confusing for a burger flipper...2001400ex said:
From the dude who just confused weather with climate.HoustonHusky said:
I find it amazing that somehow, someway someone out there is stupid enough to think those two concepts are linked.2001400ex said:Every time one of these threads shows up. It amazes me how many people trust journalists and politicians over scientists who study the climate for a living.
HondoFS...
And hondo has no idea what it even means -
How 10 year average global temperature compares to 1851 to 1900 average global temperature
-
Not when you exclude data that doesn't fit your predetermined outcome. That's not science it's "I want the grant money to keep coming".allpurpleallgold said:Yes, facts backed up by research and evidence are exactly the same as religion.
-
WHATS THE TREND WITH THESE GRAPHS? I got gold stars for the Tug Tavern kinder with the right answer.
-
This one is one I love the most...pretty much all the measurement points that go back any meaningful amount of time are in the US. So for at least a while before they decided to just change the historical data they were on the 'the US hasn't been warming but the Global Temperatures have'. Its an easy claim when there are no data sets...you just write a computer "model" that says what you want it to and make all sorts of pretty pictures.
-
But scientists around the world are paid to do their job and prove that climate change is real man.Gwad said:WHATS THE TREND WITH THESE GRAPHS? I got gold stars for the Tug Tavern kinder with the right answer.
