Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
«1345

Comments

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    How is that bad news Mike?

    Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    How is that bad news Mike?

    Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot.

    They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm.
    But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    How is that bad news Mike?

    Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot.

    They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm.
    But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS
    That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.

    Neither has happened. As always.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,812 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    How is that bad news Mike?

    Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot.

    They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm.
    But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS
    That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.

    Neither has happened. As always.
    Liar
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    How is that bad news Mike?

    Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot.

    They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm.
    But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS
    That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.

    Neither has happened. As always.
    Liar
    El oh El.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    How is that bad news Mike?

    Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot.

    They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm.
    But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS
    That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.

    Neither has happened. As always.
    So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....

    Keep beating that retarded drum retard.

    Keep lying...
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    How is that bad news Mike?

    Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot.

    They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm.
    But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS
    That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.

    Neither has happened. As always.
    So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....

    Keep beating that retarded drum retard.

    Keep lying...
    Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike.
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    How is that bad news Mike?

    Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot.

    They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm.
    But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS
    That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.

    Neither has happened. As always.
    So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....

    Keep beating that retarded drum retard.

    Keep lying...
    Moreover, the trains are running on time too.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    How is that bad news Mike?

    Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot.

    They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm.
    But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS
    That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.

    Neither has happened. As always.
    So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....

    Keep beating that retarded drum retard.

    Keep lying...
    Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike.
    Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.


    Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep.

    If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded.
    The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right?
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    How is that bad news Mike?

    Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot.

    They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm.
    But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS
    That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.

    Neither has happened. As always.
    So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....

    Keep beating that retarded drum retard.

    Keep lying...
    Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike.
    Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.


    Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep.

    If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded.
    The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right?
    If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity?
    Oh so the more productivity we have, the less per capita we need to spend to run the government? That's how it works now? I know you think there should be no taxes at all. Because the free market will shake everything out. But you can't be that Dumb.

    Ok I'll play along tho. Revenues are growing slower than the economy. And expenditures are growing faster than the economy. What do you foresee Republicans doing about this problem?
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    How is that bad news Mike?

    Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot.

    They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm.
    But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS
    That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.

    Neither has happened. As always.
    So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....

    Keep beating that retarded drum retard.

    Keep lying...
    Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike.
    Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.


    Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep.

    If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded.
    The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right?
    If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity?
    Oh so the more productivity we have, the less per capita we need to spend to run the government? That's how it works now? I know you think there should be no taxes at all. Because the free market will shake everything out. But you can't be that Dumb.

    Ok I'll play along tho. Revenues are growing slower than the economy. And expenditures are growing faster than the economy. What do you foresee Republicans doing about this problem?
    Simple. Congress needs to stop increasing expenditures. JFC. How dumb are you? But they won’t. Meanwhile, I’ll be happy to see hardworking Americans making more money and keeping more of it. I know that pisses you off. Like I said, bad news for the HondoBros. You didn’t disappoint.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    How is that bad news Mike?

    Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot.

    They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm.
    But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS
    That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.

    Neither has happened. As always.
    So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....

    Keep beating that retarded drum retard.

    Keep lying...
    Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike.
    Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.


    Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep.

    If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded.
    The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right?
    If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity?
    Oh so the more productivity we have, the less per capita we need to spend to run the government? That's how it works now? I know you think there should be no taxes at all. Because the free market will shake everything out. But you can't be that Dumb.

    Ok I'll play along tho. Revenues are growing slower than the economy. And expenditures are growing faster than the economy. What do you foresee Republicans doing about this problem?
    Simple. Congress needs to stop increasing expenditures. JFC. How dumb are you? But they won’t. Meanwhile, I’ll be happy to see hardworking Americans making more money and keeping more of it. I know that pisses you off. Like I said, bad news for the HondoBros. You didn’t disappoint.
    I would agree with you if the majority of the tax cuts actually went to the working class. But they didn't.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited July 2019
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    How is that bad news Mike?

    Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot.

    They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm.
    But the tax cuts were “sold” that they would improve hiring and wages!!!!!! - HondoFS
    That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.

    Neither has happened. As always.
    So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....

    Keep beating that retarded drum retard.

    Keep lying...
    Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike.
    Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.


    Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep.

    If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded.
    The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right?
    If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity?
    Oh so the more productivity we have, the less per capita we need to spend to run the government? That's how it works now? I know you think there should be no taxes at all. Because the free market will shake everything out. But you can't be that Dumb.

    Ok I'll play along tho. Revenues are growing slower than the economy. And expenditures are growing faster than the economy. What do you foresee Republicans doing about this problem?
    Simple. Congress needs to stop increasing expenditures. JFC. How dumb are you? But they won’t. Meanwhile, I’ll be happy to see hardworking Americans making more money and keeping more of it. I know that pisses you off. Like I said, bad news for the HondoBros. You didn’t disappoint.
    I would agree with you if the majority of the tax cuts actually went to the working class. But they didn't.
    Your new source is lying to you.

    Taxes cut, employment up, wages up. HondoBros are mad. Mad that even though government receipts are up, they aren’t up “as a % of gpd”. JFC. You’re pathetic.
Sign In or Register to comment.