In the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), a show-cause penalty is an order saying that for a set period of time, any NCAA penalties imposed on a coach involved in major rules violations at a university's athletic program will remain in force if he is hired by any other NCAA member institution. Both the school and coach are required to send letters to the NCAA agreeing to abide by any restrictions imposed, and report back to the NCAA every 6 months until the end of employment or the show-cause, whichever comes first. If the school wishes to avoid the NCAA restrictions imposed on that individual, it must appear before the NCAA Committee on Infractions and "show cause" as to why it should not be penalized for hiring him.[1] The penalty is intended to follow a coach for violations that he had a role in committing. It is the most severe penalty that can be handed down to a coach.
Contrary to popular belief, an NCAA member school is allowed to hire a coach with a show-cause order outstanding. In practice, however, the show-cause restrictions make it prohibitively difficult for a coach with a show-cause order to get another collegiate job. As mentioned above, any school that hires a coach with a show-cause order in effect can be penalized merely for doing so. Additionally, that school can face severe penalties if a coach commits another violation during the length of the penalty.[2] Consequently, most schools will not even consider hiring a coach with a show-cause penalty in effect. For this reason, a show-cause penalty usually has the effect of blackballing a coach from the collegiate ranks for the duration of the penalty. Many coaches who are given such a penalty never coach again, even after the expiration of the penalty.
In the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), a show-cause penalty is an order saying that for a set period of time, any NCAA penalties imposed on a coach involved in major rules violations at a university's athletic program will remain in force if he is hired by any other NCAA member institution. Both the school and coach are required to send letters to the NCAA agreeing to abide by any restrictions imposed, and report back to the NCAA every 6 months until the end of employment or the show-cause, whichever comes first. If the school wishes to avoid the NCAA restrictions imposed on that individual, it must appear before the NCAA Committee on Infractions and "show cause" as to why it should not be penalized for hiring him.[1] The penalty is intended to follow a coach for violations that he had a role in committing. It is the most severe penalty that can be handed down to a coach.
Contrary to popular belief, an NCAA member school is allowed to hire a coach with a show-cause order outstanding. In practice, however, the show-cause restrictions make it prohibitively difficult for a coach with a show-cause order to get another collegiate job. As mentioned above, any school that hires a coach with a show-cause order in effect can be penalized merely for doing so. Additionally, that school can face severe penalties if a coach commits another violation during the length of the penalty.[2] Consequently, most schools will not even consider hiring a coach with a show-cause penalty in effect. For this reason, a show-cause penalty usually has the effect of blackballing a coach from the collegiate ranks for the duration of the penalty. Many coaches who are given such a penalty never coach again, even after the expiration of the penalty.
It's about time someone took that illegal restraint of trade to court.
I don't care anymore. Throw every fucking penny at Tressel, Miles, Dantonio, Franklin, Saban, Graham, I don't give a fuck. Just someone who isn't currently cutting their teeth as an assistant or non head coach.
This was a shitty fucking day. I officially acknowledged my apathy when we got beat out by a basketball school.
I'm all in for Tressell or les miles. Lsu beat the fightin Malzahns by a couple tds, but hard to see the fans there too broken up about a guy that hasnt gotten over on Saban. Pl_ss aside, the pac12 dreckfest is there fir the taking, and I could see Les as the guy to do it.
I'm all in for Tressell or les miles. Lsu beat the fightin Malzahns by a couple tds, but hard to see the fans there too broken up about a guy that hasnt gotten over on Saban. Pl_ss aside, the pac12 dreckfest is there fir the taking, and I could see Les as the guy to do it.
I'm all in for Tressell or les miles. Lsu beat the fightin Malzahns by a couple tds, but hard to see the fans there too broken up about a guy that hasnt gotten over on Saban. Pl_ss aside, the pac12 dreckfest is there fir the taking, and I could see Les as the guy to do it.
If the LSU Half Brains I work with are any resemblance to the fan base ... "The Hat" has worn out his welcome.
Normally I would say that type of coach is toxic ... however, the fucking guy wins.
In the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), a show-cause penalty is an order saying that for a set period of time, any NCAA penalties imposed on a coach involved in major rules violations at a university's athletic program will remain in force if he is hired by any other NCAA member institution. Both the school and coach are required to send letters to the NCAA agreeing to abide by any restrictions imposed, and report back to the NCAA every 6 months until the end of employment or the show-cause, whichever comes first. If the school wishes to avoid the NCAA restrictions imposed on that individual, it must appear before the NCAA Committee on Infractions and "show cause" as to why it should not be penalized for hiring him.[1] The penalty is intended to follow a coach for violations that he had a role in committing. It is the most severe penalty that can be handed down to a coach.
Contrary to popular belief, an NCAA member school is allowed to hire a coach with a show-cause order outstanding. In practice, however, the show-cause restrictions make it prohibitively difficult for a coach with a show-cause order to get another collegiate job. As mentioned above, any school that hires a coach with a show-cause order in effect can be penalized merely for doing so. Additionally, that school can face severe penalties if a coach commits another violation during the length of the penalty.[2] Consequently, most schools will not even consider hiring a coach with a show-cause penalty in effect. For this reason, a show-cause penalty usually has the effect of blackballing a coach from the collegiate ranks for the duration of the penalty. Many coaches who are given such a penalty never coach again, even after the expiration of the penalty.
tl;dr hire Tressel and Emmert drops THE HAMMER on the dub Oregon style? Sign me up.
He would be banned for the first 5 games ... championship games ... and bowl games.
In addition Washington would have to accept sanctions ... unless they could show cause on why they shouldn't ... much like they were able to fend off the NCAA police with James and Neuheisal.
He would be banned for the first 5 games ... championship games ... and bowl games.
In addition Washington would have to accept sanctions ... unless they could show cause on why they shouldn't ... much like they were able to fend off the NCAA police with James and Neuheisal.
This is where you send Pool Boy back for his old intern duties in Emmert's office.
He would be banned for the first 5 games ... championship games ... and bowl games.
In addition Washington would have to accept sanctions ... unless they could show cause on why they shouldn't ... much like they were able to fend off the NCAA police with James and Neuheisal.
This is where you send Pool Boy back for his old intern duties in Emmert's office.
I'm all in for Tressell or les miles. Lsu beat the fightin Malzahns by a couple tds, but hard to see the fans there too broken up about a guy that hasnt gotten over on Saban. Pl_ss aside, the pac12 dreckfest is there fir the taking, and I could see Les as the guy to do it.
If you like eating grass, wasting timeouts, a constant barrage of fake field goals, toss dives, and pass plays from the 20 yards line with 6 seconds left in the game down by 2, then Les Miles is your man.
Comments
Contrary to popular belief, an NCAA member school is allowed to hire a coach with a show-cause order outstanding. In practice, however, the show-cause restrictions make it prohibitively difficult for a coach with a show-cause order to get another collegiate job. As mentioned above, any school that hires a coach with a show-cause order in effect can be penalized merely for doing so. Additionally, that school can face severe penalties if a coach commits another violation during the length of the penalty.[2] Consequently, most schools will not even consider hiring a coach with a show-cause penalty in effect. For this reason, a show-cause penalty usually has the effect of blackballing a coach from the collegiate ranks for the duration of the penalty. Many coaches who are given such a penalty never coach again, even after the expiration of the penalty.
This was a shitty fucking day. I officially acknowledged my apathy when we got beat out by a basketball school.
Chip Kelly not available until 2015
Normally I would say that type of coach is toxic ... however, the fucking guy wins.
I'm sending in Sven's $20 if we make this happen.
tl;dr hire Tressel and Emmert drops THE HAMMER on the dub Oregon style? Sign me up.
UW could get away with it.
He would be banned for the first 5 games ... championship games ... and bowl games.
In addition Washington would have to accept sanctions ... unless they could show cause on why they shouldn't ... much like they were able to fend off the NCAA police with James and Neuheisal.
He won 80% of his games. I'd hire that dirty motherfucker and not lose a minute of sleep.