I would LIPO with Petersen. It's a risky move, but it does have some upside. There are better options, but I wouldn't hate it.
Honestly I think I would feel about Peterson how I felt about Sark. Has upside and I'd let it play out, but it would still be a disappointment.
Better hire than Sark was, IMO. Not a homerun hire, more like a solid B. Sark was C-, at best.
I agree he is better than Sark, I just think I'd feel about the same since I am less optimistic now. Additionally Sark was much more of an unknown. I have seen a lot of Peterson and I think I have a better sense of what he does.
Comments
Peterson's concern is Hawkins and that other BS fuckwad.
Maybe Mark Few in disguise.
Still better than Sark though.
But his players love him - long after their BSU tenure. Players get better through the program as well. Something we've all longed for many moons...
Just because you are an upgrade over a fucking turd doesn't mean you are good either.
http://cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/div_ia/mountainwest/boise_state/2010-2014_yearly_results.php
and
http://cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/div_ia/mountainwest/boise_state/2005-2009_yearly_results.php
I think it would be a substantial upgrade.