Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Tucker Carlson wants a new party in the US

135

Comments

  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,490 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    ZoneUW said:

    Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still

    Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP

    HTH


    Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?

    Open question

    You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or Chinese

    I'd vote neither myself

    But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country


    For now
    *100 million in total

    A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
    How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?
    Are you actually insinuating Communism is better than Democracy? Jesus dude. You've lost it.
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,296 Founders Club
    Swaye said:

    2001400ex said:

    ZoneUW said:

    Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still

    Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP

    HTH


    Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?

    Open question

    You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or Chinese

    I'd vote neither myself

    But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country


    For now
    *100 million in total

    A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
    How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?
    Are you actually insinuating Communism is better than Democracy? Jesus dude. You've lost it.

    HondoFS gonna HondoFS



  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    ZoneUW said:

    Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still

    Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP

    HTH


    Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?

    Open question

    You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or Chinese

    I'd vote neither myself

    But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country


    For now
    *100 million in total

    A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
    How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?
    But but but.... says the purveyor of logical fallacies. Hondo mounts his defense of socialism and communism.
    Damoan goes in his ignorant rant again.
    You tell me all the “democracies” in the last 20 years that put their citizens in labor camps and prisons because of political descent, created famines, sent people to reeducation centers and killed “undesirables” (i.e gays, retards, and cripples). I haven’t actually done the research. You seem to know.
    Mike is ignorant to wars in the name of democracy in the last 20 years.
    Tell me about them. I genuinely want to know about wars started “in the name of democracy”. In your own words.

    And as predicted, Hondo is ok with 100 million dead in socialist regimes. No comment about that. But but but...
    Are you that Ignorant?

    https://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/06/politics/in-bushs-words-iraqi-democracy-will-succeed.html


    Now answer what political candidate is advocating the same policies that led to 100 million dead.

    Sounds like Bush was right. https://www.wsj.com/articles/iraqs-surprise-the-persistence-of-democracy-1510933773

    So you can’t tell me in your own words how democracy killed 100 million people. Got it.


    Bernie is. Warren is.
    Mike just moved the goal posts. I didn't say democracy killed 100 million people. You asked what wars were started in the name of democracy. And I answered it.

    That being said, explain in your words Bernie's and Warren's policies that are akin to the policies that killed 100 million people.
    I didn’t ask that. You asked how many did Democracy kill. I said I don’t know, you tell me, in your own words. Which you didn’t do. Typical hondo. My original prediction that hondo would be ok with socialist deaths is right, as always. Didn’t say a word about it and immediately when to the but but but argument.
    Mike, this is your point. Explain how Bennie and Warren's policies are akin to those that killed 100 million people.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Swaye said:

    2001400ex said:

    ZoneUW said:

    Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still

    Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP

    HTH


    Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?

    Open question

    You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or Chinese

    I'd vote neither myself

    But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country


    For now
    *100 million in total

    A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
    How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?
    Are you actually insinuating Communism is better than Democracy? Jesus dude. You've lost it.
    Not at all. Just making a point. One that's lost on you in the trailer park.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,168 Standard Supporter
    Swaye said:

    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    2001400ex said:

    ZoneUW said:

    Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still

    Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP

    HTH


    Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?

    Open question

    You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or Chinese

    I'd vote neither myself

    But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country


    For now
    *100 million in total

    A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
    How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?
    Are you actually insinuating Communism is better than Democracy? Jesus dude. You've lost it.
    Not at all. Just making a point. One that's lost on you in the trailer park.
    Even dumbasses in the trailer park know that comparing the War in Iraq to 100 million killed in various purges and mass executions due to Communism is a reach only a dumb donkey would make.
    @moralequivalencedawg, true?
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    ZoneUW said:

    Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still

    Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP

    HTH


    Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?

    Open question

    You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or Chinese

    I'd vote neither myself

    But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country


    For now
    *100 million in total

    A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
    How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?
    But but but.... says the purveyor of logical fallacies. Hondo mounts his defense of socialism and communism.
    Damoan goes in his ignorant rant again.
    You tell me all the “democracies” in the last 20 years that put their citizens in labor camps and prisons because of political descent, created famines, sent people to reeducation centers and killed “undesirables” (i.e gays, retards, and cripples). I haven’t actually done the research. You seem to know.
    Mike is ignorant to wars in the name of democracy in the last 20 years.
    Tell me about them. I genuinely want to know about wars started “in the name of democracy”. In your own words.

    And as predicted, Hondo is ok with 100 million dead in socialist regimes. No comment about that. But but but...
    Are you that Ignorant?

    https://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/06/politics/in-bushs-words-iraqi-democracy-will-succeed.html


    Now answer what political candidate is advocating the same policies that led to 100 million dead.

    Sounds like Bush was right. https://www.wsj.com/articles/iraqs-surprise-the-persistence-of-democracy-1510933773

    So you can’t tell me in your own words how democracy killed 100 million people. Got it.


    Bernie is. Warren is.
    Mike just moved the goal posts. I didn't say democracy killed 100 million people. You asked what wars were started in the name of democracy. And I answered it.

    That being said, explain in your words Bernie's and Warren's policies that are akin to the policies that killed 100 million people.
    I didn’t ask that. You asked how many did Democracy kill. I said I don’t know, you tell me, in your own words. Which you didn’t do. Typical hondo. My original prediction that hondo would be ok with socialist deaths is right, as always. Didn’t say a word about it and immediately when to the but but but argument.
    Mike, this is your point. Explain how Bennie and Warren's policies are akin to those that killed 100 million people.
    At least Hondo is consistent in that he won’t answer the original question but spays the thread with logical fallacies. You can’t answer the original question or defend your original point. Got it.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,964 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    ZoneUW said:

    Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still

    Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP

    HTH


    Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?

    Open question

    You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or Chinese

    I'd vote neither myself

    But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country


    For now
    *100 million in total

    A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
    How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?
    But but but.... says the purveyor of logical fallacies. Hondo mounts his defense of socialism and communism.
    Damoan goes in his ignorant rant again.
    You tell me all the “democracies” in the last 20 years that put their citizens in labor camps and prisons because of political descent, created famines, sent people to reeducation centers and killed “undesirables” (i.e gays, retards, and cripples). I haven’t actually done the research. You seem to know.
    Mike is ignorant to wars in the name of democracy in the last 20 years.
    Tell me about them. I genuinely want to know about wars started “in the name of democracy”. In your own words.

    And as predicted, Hondo is ok with 100 million dead in socialist regimes. No comment about that. But but but...
    Are you that Ignorant?

    https://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/06/politics/in-bushs-words-iraqi-democracy-will-succeed.html


    Now answer what political candidate is advocating the same policies that led to 100 million dead.

    Sounds like Bush was right. https://www.wsj.com/articles/iraqs-surprise-the-persistence-of-democracy-1510933773

    So you can’t tell me in your own words how democracy killed 100 million people. Got it.


    Bernie is. Warren is.
    Mike just moved the goal posts. I didn't say democracy killed 100 million people. You asked what wars were started in the name of democracy. And I answered it.

    That being said, explain in your words Bernie's and Warren's policies that are akin to the policies that killed 100 million people.
    I didn’t ask that. You asked how many did Democracy kill. I said I don’t know, you tell me, in your own words. Which you didn’t do. Typical hondo. My original prediction that hondo would be ok with socialist deaths is right, as always. Didn’t say a word about it and immediately when to the but but but argument.
    Mike, this is your point. Explain how Bennie and Warren's policies are akin to those that killed 100 million people.
    A "special kind of stupid" you said? How about a special kind of ignorance, like yours.

    You don't know shit about human history. Stick to burger flipping.
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,798 Founders Club

    ZoneUW said:

    Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still

    Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP

    HTH


    Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?

    Open question

    You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or Chinese

    I'd vote neither myself

    But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country


    For now
    Probably 5-6 times that number but the point stands. What's 120,000,000? They believe the Earth needs another thinning out anyway.
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,885

    ZoneUW said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    ZoneUW said:

    Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still

    Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP

    HTH


    Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?

    Open question

    You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or Chinese

    I'd vote neither myself

    But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country


    For now
    *100 million in total

    A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
    How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?
    But but but.... says the purveyor of logical fallacies. Hondo mounts his defense of socialism and communism.
    Damoan goes in his ignorant rant again.
    You tell me all the “democracies” in the last 20 years that put their citizens in labor camps and prisons because of political descent, created famines, sent people to reeducation centers and killed “undesirables” (i.e gays, retards, and cripples). I haven’t actually done the research. You seem to know.
    Mike is ignorant to wars in the name of democracy in the last 20 years.
    Tell me about them. I genuinely want to know about wars started “in the name of democracy”. In your own words.

    And as predicted, Hondo is ok with 100 million dead in socialist regimes. No comment about that. But but but...
    If there is major support for a political ideology that led to the deaths of hundreds of millions, are all the supporters evil and stupid or is there something wrong with the status quo?
    Huh? Yes there is major support. Ask AOG. He has all the polls he needs.

    And didn’t you bitch out of here a year ago because HH was ruining your life. pussy
    Ironic.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    ZoneUW said:

    Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still

    Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP

    HTH


    Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?

    Open question

    You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or Chinese

    I'd vote neither myself

    But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country


    For now
    *100 million in total

    A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
    How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?
    But but but.... says the purveyor of logical fallacies. Hondo mounts his defense of socialism and communism.
    Damoan goes in his ignorant rant again.
    You tell me all the “democracies” in the last 20 years that put their citizens in labor camps and prisons because of political descent, created famines, sent people to reeducation centers and killed “undesirables” (i.e gays, retards, and cripples). I haven’t actually done the research. You seem to know.
    Mike is ignorant to wars in the name of democracy in the last 20 years.
    Tell me about them. I genuinely want to know about wars started “in the name of democracy”. In your own words.

    And as predicted, Hondo is ok with 100 million dead in socialist regimes. No comment about that. But but but...
    Are you that Ignorant?

    https://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/06/politics/in-bushs-words-iraqi-democracy-will-succeed.html


    Now answer what political candidate is advocating the same policies that led to 100 million dead.

    Sounds like Bush was right. https://www.wsj.com/articles/iraqs-surprise-the-persistence-of-democracy-1510933773

    So you can’t tell me in your own words how democracy killed 100 million people. Got it.


    Bernie is. Warren is.
    Mike just moved the goal posts. I didn't say democracy killed 100 million people. You asked what wars were started in the name of democracy. And I answered it.

    That being said, explain in your words Bernie's and Warren's policies that are akin to the policies that killed 100 million people.
    I didn’t ask that. You asked how many did Democracy kill. I said I don’t know, you tell me, in your own words. Which you didn’t do. Typical hondo. My original prediction that hondo would be ok with socialist deaths is right, as always. Didn’t say a word about it and immediately when to the but but but argument.
    Mike, this is your point. Explain how Bennie and Warren's policies are akin to those that killed 100 million people.
    At least Hondo is consistent in that he won’t answer the original question but spays the thread with logical fallacies. You can’t answer the original question or defend your original point. Got it.
    My original point is that democracy killed people too. Both are wrong. But the ultimate point is that Bernie's and Warren's policies are not akin to the policies that led to 100 million dead people. A point you clearly stated and won't defend.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Swaye said:

    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    2001400ex said:

    ZoneUW said:

    Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still

    Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP

    HTH


    Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?

    Open question

    You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or Chinese

    I'd vote neither myself

    But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country


    For now
    *100 million in total

    A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
    How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?
    Are you actually insinuating Communism is better than Democracy? Jesus dude. You've lost it.
    Not at all. Just making a point. One that's lost on you in the trailer park.
    Even dumbasses in the trailer park know that comparing the War in Iraq to 100 million killed in various purges and mass executions due to Communism is a reach only a dumb donkey would make.
    Hondo, I seldom jump on you and have even come to your defense a time or two. I have the shrapnel in my ass to prove it.

    But you're off the rails on this one and holding on to it is like a Strongballz rant. Just let it go.

    I'm not saying the two are similar. I just point out that America and democracy are not free from their share of deaths in the name of democracy.

    The larger point however, is that the liberals in the race do not have policies that are akin to what brought about 100 million people dead. And no one has brought forth any meaningful discussion to demonstrate that contention. And Mike is walking back like a pussy right now.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,211
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    ZoneUW said:

    Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still

    Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP

    HTH


    Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?

    Open question

    You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or Chinese

    I'd vote neither myself

    But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country


    For now
    *100 million in total

    A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
    How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?
    But but but.... says the purveyor of logical fallacies. Hondo mounts his defense of socialism and communism.
    Damoan goes in his ignorant rant again.
    You tell me all the “democracies” in the last 20 years that put their citizens in labor camps and prisons because of political descent, created famines, sent people to reeducation centers and killed “undesirables” (i.e gays, retards, and cripples). I haven’t actually done the research. You seem to know.
    Mike is ignorant to wars in the name of democracy in the last 20 years.
    Tell me about them. I genuinely want to know about wars started “in the name of democracy”. In your own words.

    And as predicted, Hondo is ok with 100 million dead in socialist regimes. No comment about that. But but but...
    Are you that Ignorant?

    https://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/06/politics/in-bushs-words-iraqi-democracy-will-succeed.html


    Now answer what political candidate is advocating the same policies that led to 100 million dead.

    Sounds like Bush was right. https://www.wsj.com/articles/iraqs-surprise-the-persistence-of-democracy-1510933773

    So you can’t tell me in your own words how democracy killed 100 million people. Got it.


    Bernie is. Warren is.
    Mike just moved the goal posts. I didn't say democracy killed 100 million people. You asked what wars were started in the name of democracy. And I answered it.

    That being said, explain in your words Bernie's and Warren's policies that are akin to the policies that killed 100 million people.
    I didn’t ask that. You asked how many did Democracy kill. I said I don’t know, you tell me, in your own words. Which you didn’t do. Typical hondo. My original prediction that hondo would be ok with socialist deaths is right, as always. Didn’t say a word about it and immediately when to the but but but argument.
    Mike, this is your point. Explain how Bennie and Warren's policies are akin to those that killed 100 million people.
    At least Hondo is consistent in that he won’t answer the original question but spays the thread with logical fallacies. You can’t answer the original question or defend your original point. Got it.
    My original point is that democracy killed people too. Both are wrong. But the ultimate point is that Bernie's and Warren's policies are not akin to the policies that led to 100 million dead people. A point you clearly stated and won't defend.
    Laura Bush killed people. Hitler killed people. Both are wrong.

    Kunt logic, is there anything it can't do?
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,168 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    2001400ex said:

    ZoneUW said:

    Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still

    Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP

    HTH


    Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?

    Open question

    You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or Chinese

    I'd vote neither myself

    But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country


    For now
    *100 million in total

    A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
    How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?
    Are you actually insinuating Communism is better than Democracy? Jesus dude. You've lost it.
    Not at all. Just making a point. One that's lost on you in the trailer park.
    Even dumbasses in the trailer park know that comparing the War in Iraq to 100 million killed in various purges and mass executions due to Communism is a reach only a dumb donkey would make.
    Hondo, I seldom jump on you and have even come to your defense a time or two. I have the shrapnel in my ass to prove it.

    But you're off the rails on this one and holding on to it is like a Strongballz rant. Just let it go.

    I'm not saying the two are similar. I just point out that America and democracy are not free from their share of deaths in the name of democracy.

    The larger point however, is that the liberals in the race do not have policies that are akin to what brought about 100 million people dead. And no one has brought forth any meaningful discussion to demonstrate that contention. And Mike is walking back like a pussy right now.
    Neither did Stalin. Or, fuck, even Tito.

    https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/SOD.CHAP9.HTM

    https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/SOD.CHAP13.HTM

    Putting together all the subtotals (lines 333 to 350), in this century the United States probably murdered about 583,000 people (line 350), conceivable even as many as 1,641,000 all told. Virtually all of these were foreigners killed during foreign wars. Domestically, throughout this century the American Federal or state governments were responsible for the murder of about 1 out of every 1,111,000 Americans per year.

  • GreenRiverGatorzGreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165

    ZoneUW said:

    Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still

    Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP

    HTH


    Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?

    Open question

    You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or Chinese

    I'd vote neither myself

    But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country


    For now
    Probably 5-6 times that number but the point stands. What's 120,000,000? They believe the Earth needs another thinning out anyway.
    I'd vote for a candidate with the balls to admit we're overcrowded and puts sterilization on the platform.

    I draw the line at genocide though. I just won't.
  • HardlyClothedHardlyClothed Member Posts: 937

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    ZoneUW said:

    Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still

    Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP

    HTH


    Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?

    Open question

    You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or Chinese

    I'd vote neither myself

    But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country


    For now
    *100 million in total

    A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
    How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?
    But but but.... says the purveyor of logical fallacies. Hondo mounts his defense of socialism and communism.
    Damoan goes in his ignorant rant again.
    You tell me all the “democracies” in the last 20 years that put their citizens in labor camps and prisons because of political descent, created famines, sent people to reeducation centers and killed “undesirables” (i.e gays, retards, and cripples). I haven’t actually done the research. You seem to know.
    What is the Rohingya genocide in Myanmar, a parliamentary democracy Alex.
  • HardlyClothedHardlyClothed Member Posts: 937
    Being so brain poisoned by right-wing media you think democratic socialism is comparable to Soviet or Chinese communism.
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,885

    Being so brain poisoned by right-wing media you think democratic socialism is comparable to Soviet or Chinese communism.

    Look who's back for more!!! Who would have thunk that you would have any ass left to hand over. But apparently you do. T's and P's.
Sign In or Register to comment.