Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Dem Governor 1st to veto National Popular Vote Bill
DJDuck
Member Posts: 5,970
There are actually a few sane Democrats afterall
BREAKING: Democratic governor becomes the FIRST to veto National Popular Vote bill
https://therightscoop.com/breaking-democratic-governor-becomes-the-first-to-veto-national-popular-vote-bill/
“
Governor Sisolak
✔
@GovSisolak
“Once effective, the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact could diminish the role of smaller states like Nevada in national electoral contests and force Nevada’s electors to side with whoever wins the nationwide popular vote, rather than the candidate Nevadans choose”
BREAKING: Democratic governor becomes the FIRST to veto National Popular Vote bill
https://therightscoop.com/breaking-democratic-governor-becomes-the-first-to-veto-national-popular-vote-bill/
“
Governor Sisolak
✔
@GovSisolak
“Once effective, the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact could diminish the role of smaller states like Nevada in national electoral contests and force Nevada’s electors to side with whoever wins the nationwide popular vote, rather than the candidate Nevadans choose”
Comments
-
HRYK.
It will be funny as fuck when California has to give all it’s votes to a republican. -
The founders obviously saw one or two large cities determining the vote. Can't have that.
-
His reason is of course pure bullshit but if he's looking for the voters of his state to have the largest impact his ultimate decision isn't wrong.
-
The 2020 presidential election will likely boil down to about 200,000 voters in three states. Whomever wins at least two out of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan likely wins the election. How is the electoral college not an example of a few states holding the rest of the country hostage?Sledog said:The founders obviously saw one or two large cities determining the vote. Can't have that.
-
True. And trump will lose the popular vote again by 3 million votes minimum.GDS said:
The 2020 presidential election will likely boil down to about 200,000 voters in three states. Whomever wins at least two out of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan likely wins the election. How is the electoral college not an example of a few states holding the rest of the country hostage?Sledog said:The founders obviously saw one or two large cities determining the vote. Can't have that.
-
Good thing we don't rely on the popular vote to elect Presidents isn't it El Monte.CirrhosisDawg said:
True. And trump will lose the popular vote again by 3 million votes minimum.GDS said:
The 2020 presidential election will likely boil down to about 200,000 voters in three states. Whomever wins at least two out of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan likely wins the election. How is the electoral college not an example of a few states holding the rest of the country hostage?Sledog said:The founders obviously saw one or two large cities determining the vote. Can't have that.
-
Is that a substantive comment GayBob?SFGbob said:
Good thing we don't rely on the popular vote to elect Presidents isn't it El Monte.CirrhosisDawg said:
True. And trump will lose the popular vote again by 3 million votes minimum.GDS said:
The 2020 presidential election will likely boil down to about 200,000 voters in three states. Whomever wins at least two out of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan likely wins the election. How is the electoral college not an example of a few states holding the rest of the country hostage?Sledog said:The founders obviously saw one or two large cities determining the vote. Can't have that.
-
You assume the other states are static which they aren'tGDS said:
The 2020 presidential election will likely boil down to about 200,000 voters in three states. Whomever wins at least two out of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan likely wins the election. How is the electoral college not an example of a few states holding the rest of the country hostage?Sledog said:The founders obviously saw one or two large cities determining the vote. Can't have that.
-
I'd be curious to know how many voters are out there like myself. I didn't vote for Trump in 2016, but I'd vote for him now. Trump's popular vote totals could increase.RaceBannon said:
You assume the other states are static which they aren'tGDS said:
The 2020 presidential election will likely boil down to about 200,000 voters in three states. Whomever wins at least two out of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan likely wins the election. How is the electoral college not an example of a few states holding the rest of the country hostage?Sledog said:The founders obviously saw one or two large cities determining the vote. Can't have that.
-
And you still need Ohio and Florida if you are GOP in particular
I expect Trump's total to go up as well as the states he wins
How can they not with Putin helping him? -
I said likely - not certain. You could still boil it down to 6-7 states if you want to expand beyond the three I mentioned. How is that not a few states holding the nation hostage via the EC something sled argued shouldn't happen in an election?RaceBannon said:
You assume the other states are static which they aren'tGDS said:
The 2020 presidential election will likely boil down to about 200,000 voters in three states. Whomever wins at least two out of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan likely wins the election. How is the electoral college not an example of a few states holding the rest of the country hostage?Sledog said:The founders obviously saw one or two large cities determining the vote. Can't have that.
-
Those states aren't holding the nation hostage, they are in play and could go either way. Your way would allow New York and California and Illinois and a handful of other large population liberal states to hold the entire country hostage. It would also create a system much more susceptible to fraud.GDS said:
I said likely - not certain. You could still boil it down to 6-7 states if you want to expand beyond the three I mentioned. How is that not a few states holding the nation hostage via the EC something sled argued shouldn't happen in an election?RaceBannon said:
You assume the other states are static which they aren'tGDS said:
The 2020 presidential election will likely boil down to about 200,000 voters in three states. Whomever wins at least two out of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan likely wins the election. How is the electoral college not an example of a few states holding the rest of the country hostage?Sledog said:The founders obviously saw one or two large cities determining the vote. Can't have that.
-
California and NY used to go GOPGDS said:
I said likely - not certain. You could still boil it down to 6-7 states if you want to expand beyond the three I mentioned. How is that not a few states holding the nation hostage via the EC something sled argued shouldn't happen in an election?RaceBannon said:
You assume the other states are static which they aren'tGDS said:
The 2020 presidential election will likely boil down to about 200,000 voters in three states. Whomever wins at least two out of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan likely wins the election. How is the electoral college not an example of a few states holding the rest of the country hostage?Sledog said:The founders obviously saw one or two large cities determining the vote. Can't have that.
Nothing is set in concrete. That's why we have the University of Electoral
You guys lost this one. Get the fuck over it already -
Come on, you know they always want to change the rules when they lose an election.RaceBannon said:
California and NY used to go GOPGDS said:
I said likely - not certain. You could still boil it down to 6-7 states if you want to expand beyond the three I mentioned. How is that not a few states holding the nation hostage via the EC something sled argued shouldn't happen in an election?RaceBannon said:
You assume the other states are static which they aren'tGDS said:
The 2020 presidential election will likely boil down to about 200,000 voters in three states. Whomever wins at least two out of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan likely wins the election. How is the electoral college not an example of a few states holding the rest of the country hostage?Sledog said:The founders obviously saw one or two large cities determining the vote. Can't have that.
Nothing is set in concrete. That's why we have the University of Electoral
You guys lost this one. Get the fuck over it already -
A single voter in LA or NYC has the same power as a single voter in Cheyenne, Wyoming or Tulsa, Oklahoma in a popular vote election. Under the EC none of those votes really matter. Every other election I have seen or participated in whether it's school counsel, senate, mayor etc etc means whomever gets the most votes wins. For some reason president is the only elected office in this country that is elected in a different manner.SFGbob said:
Those states aren't holding the nation hostage, they are in play and could go either way. Your way would allow New York and California and Illinois and a handful of other large population liberal states to hold the entire country hostage. It would also create a system much more susceptible to fraud.GDS said:
I said likely - not certain. You could still boil it down to 6-7 states if you want to expand beyond the three I mentioned. How is that not a few states holding the nation hostage via the EC something sled argued shouldn't happen in an election?RaceBannon said:
You assume the other states are static which they aren'tGDS said:
The 2020 presidential election will likely boil down to about 200,000 voters in three states. Whomever wins at least two out of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan likely wins the election. How is the electoral college not an example of a few states holding the rest of the country hostage?Sledog said:The founders obviously saw one or two large cities determining the vote. Can't have that.
I actually don't want us to scrap the EC but would to see us go to a proportional system or voting by CDs like in Nebraska and Maine. Then you might actually see candidates campaigning in places like California, Illinois, New York, Alabama, Louisiana etc etc whereby those states currently never see a presidential candidate. -
GDS said:
A single voter in LA or NYC has the same power as a single voter in Cheyenne, Wyoming or Tulsa, Oklahoma in a popular vote election. Under the EC none of those votes really matter. Every other election I have seen or participated in whether it's school counsel, senate, mayor etc etc means whomever gets the most votes wins. For some reason president is the only elected office in this country that is elected in a different manner.SFGbob said:
Those states aren't holding the nation hostage, they are in play and could go either way. Your way would allow New York and California and Illinois and a handful of other large population liberal states to hold the entire country hostage. It would also create a system much more susceptible to fraud.GDS said:
I said likely - not certain. You could still boil it down to 6-7 states if you want to expand beyond the three I mentioned. How is that not a few states holding the nation hostage via the EC something sled argued shouldn't happen in an election?RaceBannon said:
You assume the other states are static which they aren'tGDS said:
The 2020 presidential election will likely boil down to about 200,000 voters in three states. Whomever wins at least two out of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan likely wins the election. How is the electoral college not an example of a few states holding the rest of the country hostage?Sledog said:The founders obviously saw one or two large cities determining the vote. Can't have that.
I actually don't want us to scrap the EC but would to see us go to a proportional system or voting by CDs like in Nebraska and Maine. Then you might actually see candidates campaigning in places like California, Illinois, New York, Alabama, Louisiana etc etc whereby those states currently never see a presidential candidate.GDS said:
A single voter in LA or NYC has the same power as a single voter in Cheyenne, Wyoming or Tulsa, Oklahoma in a popular vote election. Under the EC none of those votes really matter. Every other election I have seen or participated in whether it's school counsel, senate, mayor etc etc means whomever gets the most votes wins. For some reason president is the only elected office in this country that is elected in a different manner.SFGbob said:
Those states aren't holding the nation hostage, they are in play and could go either way. Your way would allow New York and California and Illinois and a handful of other large population liberal states to hold the entire country hostage. It would also create a system much more susceptible to fraud.GDS said:
I said likely - not certain. You could still boil it down to 6-7 states if you want to expand beyond the three I mentioned. How is that not a few states holding the nation hostage via the EC something sled argued shouldn't happen in an election?RaceBannon said:
You assume the other states are static which they aren'tGDS said:
The 2020 presidential election will likely boil down to about 200,000 voters in three states. Whomever wins at least two out of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan likely wins the election. How is the electoral college not an example of a few states holding the rest of the country hostage?Sledog said:The founders obviously saw one or two large cities determining the vote. Can't have that.
I actually don't want us to scrap the EC but would to see us go to a proportional system or voting by CDs like in Nebraska and Maine. Then you might actually see candidates campaigning in places like California, Illinois, New York, Alabama, Louisiana etc etc whereby those states currently never see a presidential candidate.
Good Christ you’re dense.GDS said:
A single voter in LA or NYC has the same power as a single voter in Cheyenne, Wyoming or Tulsa, Oklahoma in a popular vote election. Under the EC none of those votes really matter. Every other election I have seen or participated in whether it's school counsel, senate, mayor etc etc means whomever gets the most votes wins. For some reason president is the only elected office in this country that is elected in a different manner.SFGbob said:
Those states aren't holding the nation hostage, they are in play and could go either way. Your way would allow New York and California and Illinois and a handful of other large population liberal states to hold the entire country hostage. It would also create a system much more susceptible to fraud.GDS said:
I said likely - not certain. You could still boil it down to 6-7 states if you want to expand beyond the three I mentioned. How is that not a few states holding the nation hostage via the EC something sled argued shouldn't happen in an election?RaceBannon said:
You assume the other states are static which they aren'tGDS said:
The 2020 presidential election will likely boil down to about 200,000 voters in three states. Whomever wins at least two out of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan likely wins the election. How is the electoral college not an example of a few states holding the rest of the country hostage?Sledog said:The founders obviously saw one or two large cities determining the vote. Can't have that.
I actually don't want us to scrap the EC but would to see us go to a proportional system or voting by CDs like in Nebraska and Maine. Then you might actually see candidates campaigning in places like California, Illinois, New York, Alabama, Louisiana etc etc whereby those states currently never see a presidential candidate. -
Beverly Hills saw Obama multiple times collecting money
-
The systems has worked for over 200 years and as soon as you lose an election you no longer like the system.
-
Better than LA and New York holding the nation hostage. Winning states should count more than buying votes with our tax dollars. That's all you get in the big slums of the USA. California shouldn't even be allowed for their votes to count as they register illegals to vote as a matter of state law.GDS said:
The 2020 presidential election will likely boil down to about 200,000 voters in three states. Whomever wins at least two out of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan likely wins the election. How is the electoral college not an example of a few states holding the rest of the country hostage?Sledog said:The founders obviously saw one or two large cities determining the vote. Can't have that.
-
Yes!!! Let's let the welfare States of NY, Calif and Illinois choose our President!!!!!!!!
-
True. With the Dems courting prisoners, welfare recipients, illegals and High School students votes, How can they lose????CirrhosisDawg said:
True. And trump will lose the popular vote again by 3 million votes minimum.GDS said:
The 2020 presidential election will likely boil down to about 200,000 voters in three states. Whomever wins at least two out of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan likely wins the election. How is the electoral college not an example of a few states holding the rest of the country hostage?Sledog said:The founders obviously saw one or two large cities determining the vote. Can't have that.
Afterall these people are the brain trust of our country!!!! -
Salem cuog’s “brain trust?”salemcoog said:
True. With the Dems courting prisoners, welfare recipients, illegals and High School students votes, How can they lose????CirrhosisDawg said:
True. And trump will lose the popular vote again by 3 million votes minimum.GDS said:
The 2020 presidential election will likely boil down to about 200,000 voters in three states. Whomever wins at least two out of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan likely wins the election. How is the electoral college not an example of a few states holding the rest of the country hostage?Sledog said:The founders obviously saw one or two large cities determining the vote. Can't have that.
Afterall these people are the brain trust of our country!!!!
I’m refinancing my home mortgage again this week Cuog. Trump’s trade wars have deflated capital markets and significantly reduced interest rates as investors flee to safety in US treasuries. Still claim mortgage refinance is a bad move because tax law caps combined SLT and home mortgage interest itemized deductions at $10k?
SalemCuogFS -
You have a mortgage?
Sad -
Borrow at 4 pct.RaceBannon said:You have a mortgage?
Sad
Earn at 10 pct.
Do you need additional help with the math? -
No not at all. I'm sure its great
For you -
I'm refi-ing next week. No PMI from the get go. Only way my value is going to eat it is if we are all dead in 12 years.CirrhosisDawg said:
Salem cuog’s “brain trust?”salemcoog said:
True. With the Dems courting prisoners, welfare recipients, illegals and High School students votes, How can they lose????CirrhosisDawg said:
True. And trump will lose the popular vote again by 3 million votes minimum.GDS said:
The 2020 presidential election will likely boil down to about 200,000 voters in three states. Whomever wins at least two out of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan likely wins the election. How is the electoral college not an example of a few states holding the rest of the country hostage?Sledog said:The founders obviously saw one or two large cities determining the vote. Can't have that.
Afterall these people are the brain trust of our country!!!!
I’m refinancing my home mortgage again this week Cuog. Trump’s trade wars have deflated capital markets and significantly reduced interest rates as investors flee to safety in US treasuries. Still claim mortgage refinance is a bad move because tax law caps combined SLT and home mortgage interest itemized deductions at $10k?
SalemCuogFS -
RaceBannon said:
Beverly Hills saw Obama multiple times collecting money
I am so tired of their incessant infantile whining when they lose. I have met more mature 3 year olds than what the country is seeing with democrats.SFGbob said:The systems has worked for over 200 years and as soon as you lose an election you no longer like the system.
-
Constitution bad if we can’t have liberal judges manipulate it’s meaning.
-
Home not paid for? Pour you must be. After all these year mom should have paid off your basement. Did she just refi for your Wyo Tech school?CirrhosisDawg said:
Salem cuog’s “brain trust?”salemcoog said:
True. With the Dems courting prisoners, welfare recipients, illegals and High School students votes, How can they lose????CirrhosisDawg said:
True. And trump will lose the popular vote again by 3 million votes minimum.GDS said:
The 2020 presidential election will likely boil down to about 200,000 voters in three states. Whomever wins at least two out of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan likely wins the election. How is the electoral college not an example of a few states holding the rest of the country hostage?Sledog said:The founders obviously saw one or two large cities determining the vote. Can't have that.
Afterall these people are the brain trust of our country!!!!
I’m refinancing my home mortgage again this week Cuog. Trump’s trade wars have deflated capital markets and significantly reduced interest rates as investors flee to safety in US treasuries. Still claim mortgage refinance is a bad move because tax law caps combined SLT and home mortgage interest itemized deductions at $10k?
SalemCuogFS -
Financial genius
