Oh Alabama
Comments
-
While Krikorian and the current staff of CIS may not be avowed nativists, it’s harder to look favorably on John Tanton, the doctor and conservationist who founded CIS, FAIR, NumbersUSA, and the Social Contract Press — an entire network of organizations dedicated to the fight against immigration. Tanton has also openly favored eugenics, and is on record for harboring explicitly nativist views.RaceBannon said:Except I backed up my assertion and you didn't
According to Krikorian, Tanton hasn't been involved with CIS for decades. But Tanton was reportedly a close friend of Cordelia Scaife May, and that friendship lives on through the Colcom Foundation. All told, Colcom’s top beneficiaries include every one of Tanton’s anti-immigration groups, including FAIR (over $18 million), NumbersUSA (over $17 million), Tanton’s Social Contract Press (over $10 million), and CIS (over $8 million). It’s hard to avoid the impression that Colcom singlehandedly keeps Tanton’s network going.
https://www.insidephilanthropy.com/home/2017/4/21/center-for-immigration-studies-funders -
If you want to attack sources start with WHO and the UN
I provided stats you provided opinion -
Scratch an anti-immigration enthusiast find a eugenics endorser.RaceBannon said:If you want to attack sources start with WHO and the UN
I provided stats you provided opinion -
@Gwad needs a hysterectomy.
-
Hey Race lives within (x)Miles of the border, I think he knows what's going on.Gwad said:
Scratch an anti-immigration enthusiast find a eugenics endorser.RaceBannon said:If you want to attack sources start with WHO and the UN
I provided stats you provided opinion -
More so than you obviously
-
Yeah but I got the Canadian border down pat.RaceBannon said:More so than you obviously
-
Leave it to the states?creepycoug said:
But if that fails, or doesn't appease the masses, then the Supremes need to find it in the Constitution. Of course it's not there ... a lot of things aren't there. I guess that leaves us with Congress.creepycoug said:
It's a tough one.MikeDamone said:
How do you propose this consensus would be established?creepycoug said:Fair enough. But I go back to what I said yesterday: the entire nation ought to come to some consensus on whether a fetus has agency, or personhood, and if it does, when it acquires it. Because if there is ever a time when it doesn't have that status, that state - no state - should be able to intrude. If it always has that status - from the moment it is conceived - then there should be a national ban on abortion at all times and under every single circumstance.
I'd say, consult the Tug?
But with Congress it should be. It should be the law of the land, either way, I don't care. I can live with either answer. What I can't live with, or at least what I found intellectually lazy and crazy, is that the answer varies by state or region. We tried that with slavery and came to the conclusion that the Union isn't a union if you can hold slaves in some places and not others. Some things are so very fundamental that, if we can't agree on them, we ought not to be associated at all.
That's my take. -
Please keep an eye on them I don't trust CanucksUWhuskytskeet said:
Yeah but I got the Canadian border down pat.RaceBannon said:More so than you obviously
-
Old and melanin deficient is the new omnipresent.UWhuskytskeet said:
Hey Race lives within (x)Miles of the border, I think he knows what's going on.Gwad said:
Scratch an anti-immigration enthusiast find a eugenics endorser.RaceBannon said:If you want to attack sources start with WHO and the UN
I provided stats you provided opinion
