Biden launches his campaign with a lie
Comments
-
It's awesome that you nod your head and agree at the bullshit bitchfork says. Then get triggered by what I said. Even acknowledging you don't even understand what I'm saying.SFGbob said:
Hondo worry more about you're own lying twat of mouth instead of others.2001400ex said:
Shocking that you'd make shit up like that. Where is Bob, the lie police, at?Pitchfork51 said:
Did you not think that being told that being white is evil would cause general resentment and some crazies to be crazier2001400ex said:
People are blind if they don't see that this administration has allowed people to be more vocal about their white supremacy. Step out of Cali and the Northwest and go to the deep South. That shit still exists.ApostleofGrief said:
It realize the history is not simple. The history is that the South declared their independence, but it was not wholly due to slavery. They said if Lincoln was elected they'd secede. He was and they did. Lincoln himself only ran on a platform of preventing the expansion of slavery. The South didn't want this kind of hegemony. But what it looks like now is that people that support keeping statues of Lee, Longstreet, etc (I assume there aren't any Pickett statues after that fuck up at Gettsyburg) support slavery. The history of the South is not just what happened in the Civil War, but the entire issue of KKK and segregation that came after that, and that the statues represent the wrong side of it.PurpleThrobber said:
That's pompous bullshit.ApostleofGrief said:
Trump was seemingly talking about the statue protesters, not necessarily the hooligan crowd... but ultimately the big difference is that one side of this is 1) approve of slavery, basically and racism, and 2) you don't approve. THAT is the main issue. On that count, in general, Biden is right. Trump makes a specious argument that the Founders had slaves too. But, they didn't fight years later to persist the practice of slavery as the South did, and then -- after losing -- erect statues of the main perpetrators of slavery persistence. But even more so, accusing somebody of a lie is not appropriate unless it is so disingenuous as to be patently false. Example: Trump's claim that the GOP "won the Senate 53-47." That makes it sound like 53 senator were voted in, but the reality is that only a handful of GOP senators were voted in since they only stand for reelection every 6 years.SFGbob said:As I predicted 6 months ago one of themes the Rats were going to use against Trump was that he was a racist and they were going to use Charlottesville in order to make their case. Claiming Trump was calling neo-Nazis ""fine people" is a lie. Trump was specifically talking about the the people who were protesting against the removal of all Confederate statues and the "fine people on both sides" referred to people on both sides of that issues.
But like the left's charge that Trump called all Mexicans rapists, this is another left-wing lie that's been repeated so many times it's now become an article of faith with the MSM/Rat party.
Will Cain had a solid take on this today on his show. The newest 'progressive' movement is 'cancel' history -don't like it, cancel it, wipe it off the face of existence. Ultimately, you too, will be cancelled because your beliefs or history offends someone in the future.
Because someone recognizes history exists, does not mean they condone the actions or beliefs of the times.
But keep bashing liberals who were the real racists and then damn progressives for not allowing people to speak up for white supremacism. -
I don't agree with anything other than what I say. Unlike you, I'm not a Kunt and I'm perfectly able to defend and support the claims I make. You should try it sometime Kunt.2001400ex said:
It's awesome that you nod your head and agree at the bullshit bitchfork says. Then get triggered by what I said. Even acknowledging you don't even understand what I'm saying.SFGbob said:
Hondo worry more about you're own lying twat of mouth instead of others.2001400ex said:
Shocking that you'd make shit up like that. Where is Bob, the lie police, at?Pitchfork51 said:
Did you not think that being told that being white is evil would cause general resentment and some crazies to be crazier2001400ex said:
People are blind if they don't see that this administration has allowed people to be more vocal about their white supremacy. Step out of Cali and the Northwest and go to the deep South. That shit still exists.ApostleofGrief said:
It realize the history is not simple. The history is that the South declared their independence, but it was not wholly due to slavery. They said if Lincoln was elected they'd secede. He was and they did. Lincoln himself only ran on a platform of preventing the expansion of slavery. The South didn't want this kind of hegemony. But what it looks like now is that people that support keeping statues of Lee, Longstreet, etc (I assume there aren't any Pickett statues after that fuck up at Gettsyburg) support slavery. The history of the South is not just what happened in the Civil War, but the entire issue of KKK and segregation that came after that, and that the statues represent the wrong side of it.PurpleThrobber said:
That's pompous bullshit.ApostleofGrief said:
Trump was seemingly talking about the statue protesters, not necessarily the hooligan crowd... but ultimately the big difference is that one side of this is 1) approve of slavery, basically and racism, and 2) you don't approve. THAT is the main issue. On that count, in general, Biden is right. Trump makes a specious argument that the Founders had slaves too. But, they didn't fight years later to persist the practice of slavery as the South did, and then -- after losing -- erect statues of the main perpetrators of slavery persistence. But even more so, accusing somebody of a lie is not appropriate unless it is so disingenuous as to be patently false. Example: Trump's claim that the GOP "won the Senate 53-47." That makes it sound like 53 senator were voted in, but the reality is that only a handful of GOP senators were voted in since they only stand for reelection every 6 years.SFGbob said:As I predicted 6 months ago one of themes the Rats were going to use against Trump was that he was a racist and they were going to use Charlottesville in order to make their case. Claiming Trump was calling neo-Nazis ""fine people" is a lie. Trump was specifically talking about the the people who were protesting against the removal of all Confederate statues and the "fine people on both sides" referred to people on both sides of that issues.
But like the left's charge that Trump called all Mexicans rapists, this is another left-wing lie that's been repeated so many times it's now become an article of faith with the MSM/Rat party.
Will Cain had a solid take on this today on his show. The newest 'progressive' movement is 'cancel' history -don't like it, cancel it, wipe it off the face of existence. Ultimately, you too, will be cancelled because your beliefs or history offends someone in the future.
Because someone recognizes history exists, does not mean they condone the actions or beliefs of the times.
But keep bashing liberals who were the real racists and then damn progressives for not allowing people to speak up for white supremacism.
You're an unbelievable fucking pussy who can't even support the endless string of bullshit that leaves your own lying twat of a mouth. -
I always mean what I say2001400ex said:
The moment when race realizes he read that comment completely wrong.RaceBannon said:
How does an administration allow people free speech you fucking statist moron2001400ex said:
People are blind if they don't see that this administration has allowed people to be more vocal about their white supremacy. Step out of Cali and the Northwest and go to the deep South. That shit still exists.ApostleofGrief said:
It realize the history is not simple. The history is that the South declared their independence, but it was not wholly due to slavery. They said if Lincoln was elected they'd secede. He was and they did. Lincoln himself only ran on a platform of preventing the expansion of slavery. The South didn't want this kind of hegemony. But what it looks like now is that people that support keeping statues of Lee, Longstreet, etc (I assume there aren't any Pickett statues after that fuck up at Gettsyburg) support slavery. The history of the South is not just what happened in the Civil War, but the entire issue of KKK and segregation that came after that, and that the statues represent the wrong side of it.PurpleThrobber said:
That's pompous bullshit.ApostleofGrief said:
Trump was seemingly talking about the statue protesters, not necessarily the hooligan crowd... but ultimately the big difference is that one side of this is 1) approve of slavery, basically and racism, and 2) you don't approve. THAT is the main issue. On that count, in general, Biden is right. Trump makes a specious argument that the Founders had slaves too. But, they didn't fight years later to persist the practice of slavery as the South did, and then -- after losing -- erect statues of the main perpetrators of slavery persistence. But even more so, accusing somebody of a lie is not appropriate unless it is so disingenuous as to be patently false. Example: Trump's claim that the GOP "won the Senate 53-47." That makes it sound like 53 senator were voted in, but the reality is that only a handful of GOP senators were voted in since they only stand for reelection every 6 years.SFGbob said:As I predicted 6 months ago one of themes the Rats were going to use against Trump was that he was a racist and they were going to use Charlottesville in order to make their case. Claiming Trump was calling neo-Nazis ""fine people" is a lie. Trump was specifically talking about the the people who were protesting against the removal of all Confederate statues and the "fine people on both sides" referred to people on both sides of that issues.
But like the left's charge that Trump called all Mexicans rapists, this is another left-wing lie that's been repeated so many times it's now become an article of faith with the MSM/Rat party.
Will Cain had a solid take on this today on his show. The newest 'progressive' movement is 'cancel' history -don't like it, cancel it, wipe it off the face of existence. Ultimately, you too, will be cancelled because your beliefs or history offends someone in the future.
Because someone recognizes history exists, does not mean they condone the actions or beliefs of the times.
But keep bashing liberals who were the real racists and then damn progressives for not allowing people to speak up for white supremacism.
But he'll double down and say he meant what he said. As always.
Answer the question -
Oh. So you are only triggered by "Liberals". Got it.SFGbob said:
I don't agree with anything other than what I say. Unlike you, I'm not a Kunt and I'm perfectly able to defend and support the claims I make. You should try it sometime Kunt.2001400ex said:
It's awesome that you nod your head and agree at the bullshit bitchfork says. Then get triggered by what I said. Even acknowledging you don't even understand what I'm saying.SFGbob said:
Hondo worry more about you're own lying twat of mouth instead of others.2001400ex said:
Shocking that you'd make shit up like that. Where is Bob, the lie police, at?Pitchfork51 said:
Did you not think that being told that being white is evil would cause general resentment and some crazies to be crazier2001400ex said:
People are blind if they don't see that this administration has allowed people to be more vocal about their white supremacy. Step out of Cali and the Northwest and go to the deep South. That shit still exists.ApostleofGrief said:
It realize the history is not simple. The history is that the South declared their independence, but it was not wholly due to slavery. They said if Lincoln was elected they'd secede. He was and they did. Lincoln himself only ran on a platform of preventing the expansion of slavery. The South didn't want this kind of hegemony. But what it looks like now is that people that support keeping statues of Lee, Longstreet, etc (I assume there aren't any Pickett statues after that fuck up at Gettsyburg) support slavery. The history of the South is not just what happened in the Civil War, but the entire issue of KKK and segregation that came after that, and that the statues represent the wrong side of it.PurpleThrobber said:
That's pompous bullshit.ApostleofGrief said:
Trump was seemingly talking about the statue protesters, not necessarily the hooligan crowd... but ultimately the big difference is that one side of this is 1) approve of slavery, basically and racism, and 2) you don't approve. THAT is the main issue. On that count, in general, Biden is right. Trump makes a specious argument that the Founders had slaves too. But, they didn't fight years later to persist the practice of slavery as the South did, and then -- after losing -- erect statues of the main perpetrators of slavery persistence. But even more so, accusing somebody of a lie is not appropriate unless it is so disingenuous as to be patently false. Example: Trump's claim that the GOP "won the Senate 53-47." That makes it sound like 53 senator were voted in, but the reality is that only a handful of GOP senators were voted in since they only stand for reelection every 6 years.SFGbob said:As I predicted 6 months ago one of themes the Rats were going to use against Trump was that he was a racist and they were going to use Charlottesville in order to make their case. Claiming Trump was calling neo-Nazis ""fine people" is a lie. Trump was specifically talking about the the people who were protesting against the removal of all Confederate statues and the "fine people on both sides" referred to people on both sides of that issues.
But like the left's charge that Trump called all Mexicans rapists, this is another left-wing lie that's been repeated so many times it's now become an article of faith with the MSM/Rat party.
Will Cain had a solid take on this today on his show. The newest 'progressive' movement is 'cancel' history -don't like it, cancel it, wipe it off the face of existence. Ultimately, you too, will be cancelled because your beliefs or history offends someone in the future.
Because someone recognizes history exists, does not mean they condone the actions or beliefs of the times.
But keep bashing liberals who were the real racists and then damn progressives for not allowing people to speak up for white supremacism.
You're an unbelievable fucking pussy who can't even support the endless string of bullshit that leaves your own lying twat of a mouth. -
And of course Hondo after running his mouth runs away and hides when asked to back it up.
-
People are blind if they don't see that this administration has allowed people to be more vocal about their white supremacy.
You knew the lying piece of crap was never going to back this bullshit up. -
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/new-zealand-shooting-highlights-rise-violence-linked-to-white-supremacy-2019-03-15/SFGbob said:People are blind if they don't see that this administration has allowed people to be more vocal about their white supremacy.
You knew the lying piece of crap was never going to back this bullshit up. -
Doesn't support your lying twat of a mouth.
Using your Kunt logic I could say that Obama allowed people to be more vocal about their white supremacy.
https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/charleston-church-shooting/dylann-roof-convicted-charleston-church-killer-wants-fire-jewish-indian-n802506
Talk out your fucking ass, and then either lie our struggle to back it up and if that doesn't work just run and hide like a Kunt. It's the Hondo way.
-
Two of the four examples cited in the article you linked to Hondo happened while Obama was in office. Why did Obama "allow" people to be more vocal about their white supremacy Hondo?2001400ex said:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/new-zealand-shooting-highlights-rise-violence-linked-to-white-supremacy-2019-03-15/SFGbob said:People are blind if they don't see that this administration has allowed people to be more vocal about their white supremacy.
You knew the lying piece of crap was never going to back this bullshit up.
You're such a pathetic dipshit Hondo. -
Exactly fucking this.UW_Doog_Bot said:I don't understand why you guys even engage with Hondo. At this point I'm pretty convinced he's willfully just derailing conversations. It's the equivalent of engaging Ballz on the recruiting board. It can be fun to trigger it every once in a while but is pointless to do every day.
The #clockworkshill #russiantroll script.
