Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The Daily Ilhan

11112131416

Comments

  • HardlyClothed
    HardlyClothed Member Posts: 937
    SFGbob said:

    After 9/11 our foreign policy should have been like the end of Godfather Part I. Settle business with all of the families. NK, Iraq and Iran.

    “After 9/11 we should have started wars against three countries that had nothing to do with it”

    -The dumbest person on the planet
  • HardlyClothed
    HardlyClothed Member Posts: 937

    I'm cool with Iran holding @HardlyClothed and his family captive for 444 days with no retaliation as long as no one is killed.










    Imagine thinking like this.


    So justify why war was a preferable alternative as a result of the embassy seizure and hostage taking where no blood was shed. If you really wanted to get the hostages killed dropping a few bombs on Tehran would have done the trick. Imagine thinking like this.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:

    After 9/11 our foreign policy should have been like the end of Godfather Part I. Settle business with all of the families. NK, Iraq and Iran.

    “After 9/11 we should have started wars against three countries that had nothing to do with it”

    -The dumbest person on the planet
    Second dumbest at best. Everyone recognizes you as #1.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:

    Supporting Saddam in the brutal Iran-Iraq war was bad enough, but these chickenhawks think we should’ve gotten our own troops involved and bombed a few thousand Persians ourselves. Just a “common sense” response to an “act of war” like seizing an embassy.

    Supporting Saddam was great realpolitik
    Was it? The Iraqi invasion was repelled and it ended in stalemate with the Iranian regime still in place and close to a million dead on each side when the fighting ended. Of course an idiot like you thinks that’s brilliant “realpolitik”. Mass unnecessarily death for the sake of your high-minded “realpolitik”. Was overthrowing Saddam in ‘03 brilliant “realpolitik” as well?

    I like to blame America for Sunni vs Shia violence

    How much sectarian violence was there in Iraq before we made it explode in 2003?
    100,000 dead Kurds, 200,000 dead Shiia and 1.8 million refugees in the post-war suppression by Hussein in 1991 would say the sectarian violence before 2003 was significant.
    Good thing we weighed that before going in. How could we have known that creating a power vacuum would explode sectarian tensions into violence when the Iraqis would welcome us like liberated Parisians according to Cheney.
    We did weigh that before the invasion. Along with 10 years of UN sanctions, no fly zones in the North & South and a host of other regime offenses prior to 2003.

    What are you, ten years old? How do you not know this shit?
  • HardlyClothed
    HardlyClothed Member Posts: 937

    SFGbob said:

    Supporting Saddam in the brutal Iran-Iraq war was bad enough, but these chickenhawks think we should’ve gotten our own troops involved and bombed a few thousand Persians ourselves. Just a “common sense” response to an “act of war” like seizing an embassy.

    Supporting Saddam was great realpolitik
    Was it? The Iraqi invasion was repelled and it ended in stalemate with the Iranian regime still in place and close to a million dead on each side when the fighting ended. Of course an idiot like you thinks that’s brilliant “realpolitik”. Mass unnecessarily death for the sake of your high-minded “realpolitik”. Was overthrowing Saddam in ‘03 brilliant “realpolitik” as well?

    I like to blame America for Sunni vs Shia violence

    How much sectarian violence was there in Iraq before we made it explode in 2003?
    100,000 dead Kurds, 200,000 dead Shiia and 1.8 million refugees in the post-war suppression by Hussein in 1991 would say the sectarian violence before 2003 was significant.
    Good thing we weighed that before going in. How could we have known that creating a power vacuum would explode sectarian tensions into violence when the Iraqis would welcome us like liberated Parisians according to Cheney.
    We did weigh that before the invasion. Along with 10 years of UN sanctions, no fly zones in the North & South and a host of other regime offenses prior to 2003.

    What are you, ten years old? How do you not know this shit?
    What the fuck are you talking about? I’m referencing that we were promised that we would be greeted as liberators and that democratizing Iraq would be easy. Also that we’d find WMD.

    Clearly the years of sanctions and enforced no fly zones didn’t inform us enough to avoid fucking up the country for well over a decade.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Bob got destroyed in this thread.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    edited April 2019

    SFGbob said:

    Supporting Saddam in the brutal Iran-Iraq war was bad enough, but these chickenhawks think we should’ve gotten our own troops involved and bombed a few thousand Persians ourselves. Just a “common sense” response to an “act of war” like seizing an embassy.

    Supporting Saddam was great realpolitik
    Was it? The Iraqi invasion was repelled and it ended in stalemate with the Iranian regime still in place and close to a million dead on each side when the fighting ended. Of course an idiot like you thinks that’s brilliant “realpolitik”. Mass unnecessarily death for the sake of your high-minded “realpolitik”. Was overthrowing Saddam in ‘03 brilliant “realpolitik” as well?
    I like to blame America for Sunni vs Shia violence
    How much sectarian violence was there in Iraq before we made it explode in 2003?
    100,000 dead Kurds, 200,000 dead Shiia and 1.8 million refugees in the post-war suppression by Hussein in 1991 would say the sectarian violence before 2003 was significant.
    Good thing we weighed that before going in. How could we have known that creating a power vacuum would explode sectarian tensions into violence when the Iraqis would welcome us like liberated Parisians according to Cheney.
    We did weigh that before the invasion. Along with 10 years of UN sanctions, no fly zones in the North & South and a host of other regime offenses prior to 2003.

    What are you, ten years old? How do you not know this shit?
    What the fuck are you talking about? I’m referencing that we were promised that we would be greeted as liberators and that democratizing Iraq would be easy. Also that we’d find WMD.

    Clearly the years of sanctions and enforced no fly zones didn’t inform us enough to avoid fucking up the country for well over a decade.
    That country was already severely fucked up and divided along ethnic and sectarian lines for decades before we invaded. It wasn't all candy and roses like Michael Moore portrayed it. Wake up, dummy.
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    Bob got destroyed in this thread.

    Imagine not understanding the meaning of destroyed.