The Daily Ilhan
Comments
-
I'm cool with Iran holding @HardlyClothed and his family captive for 444 days with no retaliation as long as no one is killed.
Imagine thinking like this. -
“After 9/11 we should have started wars against three countries that had nothing to do with it”SFGbob said:After 9/11 our foreign policy should have been like the end of Godfather Part I. Settle business with all of the families. NK, Iraq and Iran.
-The dumbest person on the planet -
HillsboroDuck said:
I'm cool with Iran holding @HardlyClothed and his family captive for 444 days with no retaliation as long as no one is killed.
Imagine thinking like this.
So justify why war was a preferable alternative as a result of the embassy seizure and hostage taking where no blood was shed. If you really wanted to get the hostages killed dropping a few bombs on Tehran would have done the trick. Imagine thinking like this. -
Second dumbest at best. Everyone recognizes you as #1.HardlyClothed said:
“After 9/11 we should have started wars against three countries that had nothing to do with it”SFGbob said:After 9/11 our foreign policy should have been like the end of Godfather Part I. Settle business with all of the families. NK, Iraq and Iran.
-The dumbest person on the planet -
We did weigh that before the invasion. Along with 10 years of UN sanctions, no fly zones in the North & South and a host of other regime offenses prior to 2003.HardlyClothed said:
Good thing we weighed that before going in. How could we have known that creating a power vacuum would explode sectarian tensions into violence when the Iraqis would welcome us like liberated Parisians according to Cheney.TurdBuffer said:
100,000 dead Kurds, 200,000 dead Shiia and 1.8 million refugees in the post-war suppression by Hussein in 1991 would say the sectarian violence before 2003 was significant.HardlyClothed said:PostGameOrangeSlices said:HardlyClothed said:
Was it? The Iraqi invasion was repelled and it ended in stalemate with the Iranian regime still in place and close to a million dead on each side when the fighting ended. Of course an idiot like you thinks that’s brilliant “realpolitik”. Mass unnecessarily death for the sake of your high-minded “realpolitik”. Was overthrowing Saddam in ‘03 brilliant “realpolitik” as well?SFGbob said:
Supporting Saddam was great realpolitikHardlyClothed said:Supporting Saddam in the brutal Iran-Iraq war was bad enough, but these chickenhawks think we should’ve gotten our own troops involved and bombed a few thousand Persians ourselves. Just a “common sense” response to an “act of war” like seizing an embassy.
I like to blame America for Sunni vs Shia violence
How much sectarian violence was there in Iraq before we made it explode in 2003?
What are you, ten years old? How do you not know this shit? -
What the fuck are you talking about? I’m referencing that we were promised that we would be greeted as liberators and that democratizing Iraq would be easy. Also that we’d find WMD.TurdBuffer said:
We did weigh that before the invasion. Along with 10 years of UN sanctions, no fly zones in the North & South and a host of other regime offenses prior to 2003.HardlyClothed said:
Good thing we weighed that before going in. How could we have known that creating a power vacuum would explode sectarian tensions into violence when the Iraqis would welcome us like liberated Parisians according to Cheney.TurdBuffer said:
100,000 dead Kurds, 200,000 dead Shiia and 1.8 million refugees in the post-war suppression by Hussein in 1991 would say the sectarian violence before 2003 was significant.HardlyClothed said:PostGameOrangeSlices said:HardlyClothed said:
Was it? The Iraqi invasion was repelled and it ended in stalemate with the Iranian regime still in place and close to a million dead on each side when the fighting ended. Of course an idiot like you thinks that’s brilliant “realpolitik”. Mass unnecessarily death for the sake of your high-minded “realpolitik”. Was overthrowing Saddam in ‘03 brilliant “realpolitik” as well?SFGbob said:
Supporting Saddam was great realpolitikHardlyClothed said:Supporting Saddam in the brutal Iran-Iraq war was bad enough, but these chickenhawks think we should’ve gotten our own troops involved and bombed a few thousand Persians ourselves. Just a “common sense” response to an “act of war” like seizing an embassy.
I like to blame America for Sunni vs Shia violence
How much sectarian violence was there in Iraq before we made it explode in 2003?
What are you, ten years old? How do you not know this shit?
Clearly the years of sanctions and enforced no fly zones didn’t inform us enough to avoid fucking up the country for well over a decade. -
Bob got destroyed in this thread.
-
That country was already severely fucked up and divided along ethnic and sectarian lines for decades before we invaded. It wasn't all candy and roses like Michael Moore portrayed it. Wake up, dummy.HardlyClothed said:
What the fuck are you talking about? I’m referencing that we were promised that we would be greeted as liberators and that democratizing Iraq would be easy. Also that we’d find WMD.TurdBuffer said:
We did weigh that before the invasion. Along with 10 years of UN sanctions, no fly zones in the North & South and a host of other regime offenses prior to 2003.HardlyClothed said:
Good thing we weighed that before going in. How could we have known that creating a power vacuum would explode sectarian tensions into violence when the Iraqis would welcome us like liberated Parisians according to Cheney.TurdBuffer said:
100,000 dead Kurds, 200,000 dead Shiia and 1.8 million refugees in the post-war suppression by Hussein in 1991 would say the sectarian violence before 2003 was significant.HardlyClothed said:
How much sectarian violence was there in Iraq before we made it explode in 2003?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I like to blame America for Sunni vs Shia violenceHardlyClothed said:
Was it? The Iraqi invasion was repelled and it ended in stalemate with the Iranian regime still in place and close to a million dead on each side when the fighting ended. Of course an idiot like you thinks that’s brilliant “realpolitik”. Mass unnecessarily death for the sake of your high-minded “realpolitik”. Was overthrowing Saddam in ‘03 brilliant “realpolitik” as well?SFGbob said:
Supporting Saddam was great realpolitikHardlyClothed said:Supporting Saddam in the brutal Iran-Iraq war was bad enough, but these chickenhawks think we should’ve gotten our own troops involved and bombed a few thousand Persians ourselves. Just a “common sense” response to an “act of war” like seizing an embassy.
What are you, ten years old? How do you not know this shit?
Clearly the years of sanctions and enforced no fly zones didn’t inform us enough to avoid fucking up the country for well over a decade. -
Imagine defending this idiot
-
Imagine not understanding the meaning of destroyed.2001400ex said:Bob got destroyed in this thread.



