Fuck the 9th Circuit Court in the face
Comments
-
This was an attempt at humor you robot.UW_Doog_Bot said:
But I don't understand how you think SCOTUS is going to get rid of your city council.YellowSnow said:
If Trump’s SCOTUS gets the bums out of Seattle I will buy a MAGA hat and wear it with pride.UW_Doog_Bot said:Currently going through this in OC. Fuck ballz judge Carter is using this as a means to pressure all of the cities into opening "navigation centers" bc they've worked so well in SF and LA to solve homelessness. HB just defeated their new proposed location literally adjacent to the High School.
If this goes to SCOTUS and gets knocked down you can move me from sometimes Trump apologist to full on Trumpanzee. -
YellowSnow said:
This was an attempt at humor you robot.UW_Doog_Bot said:
But I don't understand how you think SCOTUS is going to get rid of your city council.YellowSnow said:
If Trump’s SCOTUS gets the bums out of Seattle I will buy a MAGA hat and wear it with pride.UW_Doog_Bot said:Currently going through this in OC. Fuck ballz judge Carter is using this as a means to pressure all of the cities into opening "navigation centers" bc they've worked so well in SF and LA to solve homelessness. HB just defeated their new proposed location literally adjacent to the High School.
If this goes to SCOTUS and gets knocked down you can move me from sometimes Trump apologist to full on Trumpanzee.
-
Fuck Disneyland for killing Bear Country Jamboree.UW_Doog_Bot said:YellowSnow said:
This was an attempt at humor you robot.UW_Doog_Bot said:
But I don't understand how you think SCOTUS is going to get rid of your city council.YellowSnow said:
If Trump’s SCOTUS gets the bums out of Seattle I will buy a MAGA hat and wear it with pride.UW_Doog_Bot said:Currently going through this in OC. Fuck ballz judge Carter is using this as a means to pressure all of the cities into opening "navigation centers" bc they've worked so well in SF and LA to solve homelessness. HB just defeated their new proposed location literally adjacent to the High School.
If this goes to SCOTUS and gets knocked down you can move me from sometimes Trump apologist to full on Trumpanzee.
-
When did it become a citites obligation to provide "shelters"?
-
What about your two dads?YellowSnow said:
If Trump’s SCOTUS gets the bums out of Seattle I will buy a MAGA hat and wear it with pride.UW_Doog_Bot said:Currently going through this in OC. Fuck ballz judge Carter is using this as a means to pressure all of the cities into opening "navigation centers" bc they've worked so well in SF and LA to solve homelessness. HB just defeated their new proposed location literally adjacent to the High School.
If this goes to SCOTUS and gets knocked down you can move me from sometimes Trump apologist to full on Trumpanzee. -
They voted for him.pawz said:
What about your two dads?YellowSnow said:
If Trump’s SCOTUS gets the bums out of Seattle I will buy a MAGA hat and wear it with pride.UW_Doog_Bot said:Currently going through this in OC. Fuck ballz judge Carter is using this as a means to pressure all of the cities into opening "navigation centers" bc they've worked so well in SF and LA to solve homelessness. HB just defeated their new proposed location literally adjacent to the High School.
If this goes to SCOTUS and gets knocked down you can move me from sometimes Trump apologist to full on Trumpanzee. -
As long as there is no option of sleeping indoors, the government cannot criminalize indigent, homeless people for sleeping outdoors, on public property, on the false premise they had a choice in the matter... A municipality cannot criminalize such behavior consistently with the Eighth Amendment when no sleeping space is practically available in any shelter.
An easy end around for Boise is to make homeless shelters drug free and require a negative drug test for admittance. The shelters would be mostly empty allowing the city to evict the drug addicted homeless. -
I can’t imagine that it’s much different in other areas but the homeless turn down spaces in shelters here in SF all the time, because they can’t do drugs and the can’t drink booze in the sheltersPurple_Pills said:As long as there is no option of sleeping indoors, the government cannot criminalize indigent, homeless people for sleeping outdoors, on public property, on the false premise they had a choice in the matter... A municipality cannot criminalize such behavior consistently with the Eighth Amendment when no sleeping space is practically available in any shelter.
An easy end around for Boise is to make homeless shelters drug free and require a negative drug test for admittance. The shelters would be mostly empty allowing the city to evict the drug addicted homeless.
They are making a choice to live on the streets because they can do whatever the fuck they want -
I’m too lazy to look this up, but has anyone taken city governments to court for not enforcing the laws? I think of the boutique shop owner in the KOMO piece who had to move because of the damage done to her shop and how the crime drove away her customers. Could she sue for damages?
I’d be interested to hear the HH in house counsel’s thoughts. -
Focus on the bradley Cooper womanDoog_de_Jour said:I’m too lazy to look this up, but has anyone taken city governments to court for not enforcing the laws? I think of the boutique shop owner in the KOMO piece who had to move because of the damage done to her shop and how the crime drove away her customers. Could she sue for damages?
I’d be interested to hear the HH in house counsel’s thoughts.







