Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Fuck the 9th Circuit Court in the face

2

Comments

  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 38,029 Founders Club

    Currently going through this in OC. Fuck ballz judge Carter is using this as a means to pressure all of the cities into opening "navigation centers" bc they've worked so well in SF and LA to solve homelessness. HB just defeated their new proposed location literally adjacent to the High School.

    If this goes to SCOTUS and gets knocked down you can move me from sometimes Trump apologist to full on Trumpanzee.

    If Trump’s SCOTUS gets the bums out of Seattle I will buy a MAGA hat and wear it with pride.
    But I don't understand how you think SCOTUS is going to get rid of your city council.
    This was an attempt at humor you robot.
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,833 Founders Club

    Currently going through this in OC. Fuck ballz judge Carter is using this as a means to pressure all of the cities into opening "navigation centers" bc they've worked so well in SF and LA to solve homelessness. HB just defeated their new proposed location literally adjacent to the High School.

    If this goes to SCOTUS and gets knocked down you can move me from sometimes Trump apologist to full on Trumpanzee.

    If Trump’s SCOTUS gets the bums out of Seattle I will buy a MAGA hat and wear it with pride.
    But I don't understand how you think SCOTUS is going to get rid of your city council.
    This was an attempt at humor you robot.

  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 38,029 Founders Club

    Currently going through this in OC. Fuck ballz judge Carter is using this as a means to pressure all of the cities into opening "navigation centers" bc they've worked so well in SF and LA to solve homelessness. HB just defeated their new proposed location literally adjacent to the High School.

    If this goes to SCOTUS and gets knocked down you can move me from sometimes Trump apologist to full on Trumpanzee.

    If Trump’s SCOTUS gets the bums out of Seattle I will buy a MAGA hat and wear it with pride.
    But I don't understand how you think SCOTUS is going to get rid of your city council.
    This was an attempt at humor you robot.

    Fuck Disneyland for killing Bear Country Jamboree.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 39,235 Standard Supporter
    When did it become a citites obligation to provide "shelters"?
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club

    Currently going through this in OC. Fuck ballz judge Carter is using this as a means to pressure all of the cities into opening "navigation centers" bc they've worked so well in SF and LA to solve homelessness. HB just defeated their new proposed location literally adjacent to the High School.

    If this goes to SCOTUS and gets knocked down you can move me from sometimes Trump apologist to full on Trumpanzee.

    If Trump’s SCOTUS gets the bums out of Seattle I will buy a MAGA hat and wear it with pride.
    What about your two dads?
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 38,029 Founders Club
    pawz said:

    Currently going through this in OC. Fuck ballz judge Carter is using this as a means to pressure all of the cities into opening "navigation centers" bc they've worked so well in SF and LA to solve homelessness. HB just defeated their new proposed location literally adjacent to the High School.

    If this goes to SCOTUS and gets knocked down you can move me from sometimes Trump apologist to full on Trumpanzee.

    If Trump’s SCOTUS gets the bums out of Seattle I will buy a MAGA hat and wear it with pride.
    What about your two dads?
    They voted for him.
  • Purple_Pills
    Purple_Pills Member Posts: 2,110
    As long as there is no option of sleeping indoors, the government cannot criminalize indigent, homeless people for sleeping outdoors, on public property, on the false premise they had a choice in the matter... A municipality cannot criminalize such behavior consistently with the Eighth Amendment when no sleeping space is practically available in any shelter.

    An easy end around for Boise is to make homeless shelters drug free and require a negative drug test for admittance. The shelters would be mostly empty allowing the city to evict the drug addicted homeless.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,221

    As long as there is no option of sleeping indoors, the government cannot criminalize indigent, homeless people for sleeping outdoors, on public property, on the false premise they had a choice in the matter... A municipality cannot criminalize such behavior consistently with the Eighth Amendment when no sleeping space is practically available in any shelter.

    An easy end around for Boise is to make homeless shelters drug free and require a negative drug test for admittance. The shelters would be mostly empty allowing the city to evict the drug addicted homeless.

    I can’t imagine that it’s much different in other areas but the homeless turn down spaces in shelters here in SF all the time, because they can’t do drugs and the can’t drink booze in the shelters

    They are making a choice to live on the streets because they can do whatever the fuck they want
  • Doog_de_Jour
    Doog_de_Jour Member Posts: 8,042 Standard Supporter
    I’m too lazy to look this up, but has anyone taken city governments to court for not enforcing the laws? I think of the boutique shop owner in the KOMO piece who had to move because of the damage done to her shop and how the crime drove away her customers. Could she sue for damages?

    I’d be interested to hear the HH in house counsel’s thoughts.
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,702

    I’m too lazy to look this up, but has anyone taken city governments to court for not enforcing the laws? I think of the boutique shop owner in the KOMO piece who had to move because of the damage done to her shop and how the crime drove away her customers. Could she sue for damages?

    I’d be interested to hear the HH in house counsel’s thoughts.

    Focus on the bradley Cooper woman