Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Chintresting if True

2

Comments

  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,047 Founders Club
    MikeDamone said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    Contractors and farmers aren't looking for just any workforce. They are looking for a workforce that is willing to be paid at (let's be honest) below minimum wage. Tariffs have cut margins from farming, so they can't just hire anybody, the same goes for contractors because of the housing slowdown due to an already inflated housing market.
    Below minimum wage you say? A “market” wage then.

    Tariffs were a really stupid idea in retrospect, weren’t they?
    The real minimum wage is zero. Making it illegal for people to work is shameful.

    Tarriffs are a stupid idea. No retrospect needed.
    The real minimum wage is below zero. Sometimes the value of experience and training is worth paying for.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,884
    edited April 2019
    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    What a racist piece of shit you are.
    Obviously.
    "Poor whites can't pick crops. That's colored folk work."

    -HHusky, CSA
    We clearly need to make a lot more poor whites if you want the economy to grow in keeping with your racial preferences.
    I'm not the one with stated racial preferences, but there are plenty of poor whites in need of steady work. Tent city agrees with me.
    Heroin addicts are surprisingly unreliable employees.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    What a racist piece of shit you are.
    Obviously.
    "Poor whites can't pick crops. That's colored folk work."

    -HHusky, CSA
    We clearly need to make a lot more poor whites if you want the economy to grow in keeping with your racial preferences.
    I'm not the one with stated racial preferences, but there are plenty of poor whites in need of steady work. Tent city agrees with me.
    Heroin addicts are surprisingly unreliable employees.
    So keep giving them free needles then you racist piece of shit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,884
    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    What a racist piece of shit you are.
    Obviously.
    "Poor whites can't pick crops. That's colored folk work."

    -HHusky, CSA
    We clearly need to make a lot more poor whites if you want the economy to grow in keeping with your racial preferences.
    I'm not the one with stated racial preferences, but there are plenty of poor whites in need of steady work. Tent city agrees with me.
    Heroin addicts are surprisingly unreliable employees.
    So keep giving them free needles then you racist piece of shit.
    So you want a lot more blood borne disease. I don’t see how that makes them a more promising source of labor, but I’m sure you’ll explain.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    What a racist piece of shit you are.
    Obviously.
    "Poor whites can't pick crops. That's colored folk work."

    -HHusky, CSA
    We clearly need to make a lot more poor whites if you want the economy to grow in keeping with your racial preferences.
    I'm not the one with stated racial preferences, but there are plenty of poor whites in need of steady work. Tent city agrees with me.
    Heroin addicts are surprisingly unreliable employees.
    So keep giving them free needles then you racist piece of shit.
    So you want a lot more blood borne disease. I don’t see how that makes them a more promising source of labor, but I’m sure you’ll explain.
    Work or die. I'm sure they can sort themselves out when they aren't allowed to camp within city limits and get free needles. If they still choose to shoot up, that's fine. They can die and the problem solves itself. Awfully ignorant of you to assume that everyone that needs work is a heroin addict, but that's your business.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,884
    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    What a racist piece of shit you are.
    Obviously.
    "Poor whites can't pick crops. That's colored folk work."

    -HHusky, CSA
    We clearly need to make a lot more poor whites if you want the economy to grow in keeping with your racial preferences.
    I'm not the one with stated racial preferences, but there are plenty of poor whites in need of steady work. Tent city agrees with me.
    Heroin addicts are surprisingly unreliable employees.
    So keep giving them free needles then you racist piece of shit.
    So you want a lot more blood borne disease. I don’t see how that makes them a more promising source of labor, but I’m sure you’ll explain.
    Work or die. I'm sure they can sort themselves out when they aren't allowed to camp within city limits and get free needles. If they still choose to shoot up, that's fine. They can die and the problem solves itself. Awfully ignorant of you to assume that everyone that needs work is a heroin addict, but that's your business.
    Unsurprisingly ignorant of you to assume everyone in a tent is not already working.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    What a racist piece of shit you are.
    Obviously.
    "Poor whites can't pick crops. That's colored folk work."

    -HHusky, CSA
    We clearly need to make a lot more poor whites if you want the economy to grow in keeping with your racial preferences.
    I'm not the one with stated racial preferences, but there are plenty of poor whites in need of steady work. Tent city agrees with me.
    Heroin addicts are surprisingly unreliable employees.
    So keep giving them free needles then you racist piece of shit.
    So you want a lot more blood borne disease. I don’t see how that makes them a more promising source of labor, but I’m sure you’ll explain.
    Work or die. I'm sure they can sort themselves out when they aren't allowed to camp within city limits and get free needles. If they still choose to shoot up, that's fine. They can die and the problem solves itself. Awfully ignorant of you to assume that everyone that needs work is a heroin addict, but that's your business.
    Unsurprisingly ignorant of you to assume everyone in a tent is not already working.
    I never said that, but sure. I'm sure those guys are all working hard and just can't afford to share an apartment like every other minimum wage worker.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,017
    edited April 2019
    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    What a racist piece of shit you are.
    Obviously.
    "Poor whites won't can't pick crops. That's colored folk work."

    -HHusky, CSA
    FTFY.

    Enact meaningful entitlement reform, and maybe we have something.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    creepycoug said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    What a racist piece of shit you are.
    Obviously.
    "Poor whites won't can't pick crops. That's colored folk work."

    -HHusky, CSA
    FTFY.

    Enact meaningful entitlement reform, and maybe we have something.
    Can you fucking read?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,017
    PurpleJ said:

    creepycoug said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    What a racist piece of shit you are.
    Obviously.
    "Poor whites won't can't pick crops. That's colored folk work."

    -HHusky, CSA
    FTFY.

    Enact meaningful entitlement reform, and maybe we have something.
    Can you fucking read?
    Yes!!!!!!!!!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    creepycoug said:

    PurpleJ said:

    creepycoug said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    What a racist piece of shit you are.
    Obviously.
    "Poor whites won't can't pick crops. That's colored folk work."

    -HHusky, CSA
    FTFY.

    Enact meaningful entitlement reform, and maybe we have something.
    Can you fucking read?
    Yes!!!!!!!!!!
    Then put on your big boy pretend lawyer glasses and do it! Work or die motherfucker!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    PurpleJ said:

    creepycoug said:

    PurpleJ said:

    creepycoug said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    What a racist piece of shit you are.
    Obviously.
    "Poor whites won't can't pick crops. That's colored folk work."

    -HHusky, CSA
    FTFY.

    Enact meaningful entitlement reform, and maybe we have something.
    Can you fucking read?
    Yes!!!!!!!!!!
    Then put on your big boy pretend lawyer glasses and do it! Work or die motherfucker!
    Crepé put an estoppel to this faggy madness
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    Contractors and farmers aren't looking for just any workforce. They are looking for a workforce that is willing to be paid at (let's be honest) below minimum wage. Tariffs have cut margins from farming, so they can't just hire anybody, the same goes for contractors because of the housing slowdown due to an already inflated housing market.
    Below minimum wage you say? A “market” wage then.

    Tariffs were a really stupid idea in retrospect, weren’t they?
    I don't like tariffs but it was the only way to bring China to the floor to negotiate on the issue of intellectual property theft. Trump's tweets about tariffs lowering the trade deficit was borderline retarded. If the purpose was to hurt their economy, they were naturally going to import less goods, so an increase in the deficit was a given. People who don't know that are dumb. There was not a single alternative brought forth to fight the intellectual property theft China commits annually, outside of being left with our dicks hanging out and allowing the theft to continue. I posted months ago with Hondo that China's theft amounts to around $600 Billion a year. Which means that roughly 5% of China's entire GDP is raised through the theft of foreign governments and companies. 5% doesn't seem like much, but in most cases a 5% drop in annual GDP can send an entire country into chaos.

    Tariffs weren't ideal, but necessary given the true purpose of them.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,017
    PurpleJ said:

    creepycoug said:

    PurpleJ said:

    creepycoug said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    What a racist piece of shit you are.
    Obviously.
    "Poor whites won't can't pick crops. That's colored folk work."

    -HHusky, CSA
    FTFY.

    Enact meaningful entitlement reform, and maybe we have something.
    Can you fucking read?
    Yes!!!!!!!!!!
    Then put on your big boy pretend lawyer glasses and do it! Work or die motherfucker!
    Ok!!!!!!!!!!!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    PurpleJ said:

    creepycoug said:

    PurpleJ said:

    creepycoug said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    What a racist piece of shit you are.
    Obviously.
    "Poor whites won't can't pick crops. That's colored folk work."

    -HHusky, CSA
    FTFY.

    Enact meaningful entitlement reform, and maybe we have something.
    Can you fucking read?
    Yes!!!!!!!!!!
    Then put on your big boy pretend lawyer glasses and do it! Work or die motherfucker!
    Crepé put an estoppel to this faggy madness
    CREPO BASTa
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    Contractors and farmers aren't looking for just any workforce. They are looking for a workforce that is willing to be paid at (let's be honest) below minimum wage. Tariffs have cut margins from farming, so they can't just hire anybody, the same goes for contractors because of the housing slowdown due to an already inflated housing market.
    Below minimum wage you say? A “market” wage then.

    Tariffs were a really stupid idea in retrospect, weren’t they?
    I don't like tariffs but it was the only way to bring China to the floor to negotiate on the issue of intellectual property theft. Trump's tweets about tariffs lowering the trade deficit was borderline retarded. If the purpose was to hurt their economy, they were naturally going to import less goods, so an increase in the deficit was a given. People who don't know that are dumb. There was not a single alternative brought forth to fight the intellectual property theft China commits annually, outside of being left with our dicks hanging out and allowing the theft to continue. I posted months ago with Hondo that China's theft amounts to around $600 Billion a year. Which means that roughly 5% of China's entire GDP is raised through the theft of foreign governments and companies. 5% doesn't seem like much, but in most cases a 5% drop in annual GDP can send an entire country into chaos.

    Tariffs weren't ideal, but necessary given the true purpose of them.
    So according to trumptards, tariffs are stupid unless they aren’t.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    Contractors and farmers aren't looking for just any workforce. They are looking for a workforce that is willing to be paid at (let's be honest) below minimum wage. Tariffs have cut margins from farming, so they can't just hire anybody, the same goes for contractors because of the housing slowdown due to an already inflated housing market.
    Below minimum wage you say? A “market” wage then.

    Tariffs were a really stupid idea in retrospect, weren’t they?
    I don't like tariffs but it was the only way to bring China to the floor to negotiate on the issue of intellectual property theft. Trump's tweets about tariffs lowering the trade deficit was borderline retarded. If the purpose was to hurt their economy, they were naturally going to import less goods, so an increase in the deficit was a given. People who don't know that are dumb. There was not a single alternative brought forth to fight the intellectual property theft China commits annually, outside of being left with our dicks hanging out and allowing the theft to continue. I posted months ago with Hondo that China's theft amounts to around $600 Billion a year. Which means that roughly 5% of China's entire GDP is raised through the theft of foreign governments and companies. 5% doesn't seem like much, but in most cases a 5% drop in annual GDP can send an entire country into chaos.

    Tariffs weren't ideal, but necessary given the true purpose of them.
    So according to trumptards, tariffs are stupid unless they aren’t.
    Ironic

    Learn to read, then maybe you can refer to things as stupid. Until then, stupid is is stupid does Forrest.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    Contractors and farmers aren't looking for just any workforce. They are looking for a workforce that is willing to be paid at (let's be honest) below minimum wage. Tariffs have cut margins from farming, so they can't just hire anybody, the same goes for contractors because of the housing slowdown due to an already inflated housing market.
    Below minimum wage you say? A “market” wage then.

    Tariffs were a really stupid idea in retrospect, weren’t they?
    I don't like tariffs but it was the only way to bring China to the floor to negotiate on the issue of intellectual property theft. Trump's tweets about tariffs lowering the trade deficit was borderline retarded. If the purpose was to hurt their economy, they were naturally going to import less goods, so an increase in the deficit was a given. People who don't know that are dumb. There was not a single alternative brought forth to fight the intellectual property theft China commits annually, outside of being left with our dicks hanging out and allowing the theft to continue. I posted months ago with Hondo that China's theft amounts to around $600 Billion a year. Which means that roughly 5% of China's entire GDP is raised through the theft of foreign governments and companies. 5% doesn't seem like much, but in most cases a 5% drop in annual GDP can send an entire country into chaos.

    Tariffs weren't ideal, but necessary given the true purpose of them.
    So according to trumptards, tariffs are stupid unless they aren’t.
    Ironic

    Learn to read, then maybe you can refer to things as stupid. Until then, stupid is is stupid does Forrest.
    I read your dumbfuck post again. Here’s my reassessment:
    You are stupid. Dumb as a fucking post. A total fucking retard.
    Instead of “reading” and posting on HH, you might want to research and study micro-economics, and then get back to the board regarding your grand insights into tariffs.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    Contractors and farmers aren't looking for just any workforce. They are looking for a workforce that is willing to be paid at (let's be honest) below minimum wage. Tariffs have cut margins from farming, so they can't just hire anybody, the same goes for contractors because of the housing slowdown due to an already inflated housing market.
    Below minimum wage you say? A “market” wage then.

    Tariffs were a really stupid idea in retrospect, weren’t they?
    I don't like tariffs but it was the only way to bring China to the floor to negotiate on the issue of intellectual property theft. Trump's tweets about tariffs lowering the trade deficit was borderline retarded. If the purpose was to hurt their economy, they were naturally going to import less goods, so an increase in the deficit was a given. People who don't know that are dumb. There was not a single alternative brought forth to fight the intellectual property theft China commits annually, outside of being left with our dicks hanging out and allowing the theft to continue. I posted months ago with Hondo that China's theft amounts to around $600 Billion a year. Which means that roughly 5% of China's entire GDP is raised through the theft of foreign governments and companies. 5% doesn't seem like much, but in most cases a 5% drop in annual GDP can send an entire country into chaos.

    Tariffs weren't ideal, but necessary given the true purpose of them.
    So according to trumptards, tariffs are stupid unless they aren’t.
    Ironic

    Learn to read, then maybe you can refer to things as stupid. Until then, stupid is is stupid does Forrest.
    I read your dumbfuck post again. Here’s my reassessment:
    You are stupid. Dumb as a fucking post. A total fucking retard.
    Instead of “reading” and posting on HH, you might want to research and study micro-economics, and then get back to the board regarding your grand insights into tariffs.

    That’s not an argument. Do better.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,725 Founders Club
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    Contractors and farmers aren't looking for just any workforce. They are looking for a workforce that is willing to be paid at (let's be honest) below minimum wage. Tariffs have cut margins from farming, so they can't just hire anybody, the same goes for contractors because of the housing slowdown due to an already inflated housing market.
    Below minimum wage you say? A “market” wage then.

    Tariffs were a really stupid idea in retrospect, weren’t they?
    I don't like tariffs but it was the only way to bring China to the floor to negotiate on the issue of intellectual property theft. Trump's tweets about tariffs lowering the trade deficit was borderline retarded. If the purpose was to hurt their economy, they were naturally going to import less goods, so an increase in the deficit was a given. People who don't know that are dumb. There was not a single alternative brought forth to fight the intellectual property theft China commits annually, outside of being left with our dicks hanging out and allowing the theft to continue. I posted months ago with Hondo that China's theft amounts to around $600 Billion a year. Which means that roughly 5% of China's entire GDP is raised through the theft of foreign governments and companies. 5% doesn't seem like much, but in most cases a 5% drop in annual GDP can send an entire country into chaos.

    Tariffs weren't ideal, but necessary given the true purpose of them.
    So according to trumptards, tariffs are stupid unless they aren’t.
    Ironic

    Learn to read, then maybe you can refer to things as stupid. Until then, stupid is is stupid does Forrest.
    I read your dumbfuck post again. Here’s my reassessment:
    You are stupid. Dumb as a fucking post. A total fucking retard.
    Instead of “reading” and posting on HH, you might want to research and study micro-economics, and then get back to the board regarding your grand insights into tariffs.

    So angry
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,017
    Somehow I feel responsible for all of this acrimony.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    MikeDamone said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    Contractors and farmers aren't looking for just any workforce. They are looking for a workforce that is willing to be paid at (let's be honest) below minimum wage. Tariffs have cut margins from farming, so they can't just hire anybody, the same goes for contractors because of the housing slowdown due to an already inflated housing market.
    Below minimum wage you say? A “market” wage then.

    Tariffs were a really stupid idea in retrospect, weren’t they?
    I don't like tariffs but it was the only way to bring China to the floor to negotiate on the issue of intellectual property theft. Trump's tweets about tariffs lowering the trade deficit was borderline retarded. If the purpose was to hurt their economy, they were naturally going to import less goods, so an increase in the deficit was a given. People who don't know that are dumb. There was not a single alternative brought forth to fight the intellectual property theft China commits annually, outside of being left with our dicks hanging out and allowing the theft to continue. I posted months ago with Hondo that China's theft amounts to around $600 Billion a year. Which means that roughly 5% of China's entire GDP is raised through the theft of foreign governments and companies. 5% doesn't seem like much, but in most cases a 5% drop in annual GDP can send an entire country into chaos.

    Tariffs weren't ideal, but necessary given the true purpose of them.
    So according to trumptards, tariffs are stupid unless they aren’t.
    Ironic

    Learn to read, then maybe you can refer to things as stupid. Until then, stupid is is stupid does Forrest.
    I read your dumbfuck post again. Here’s my reassessment:
    You are stupid. Dumb as a fucking post. A total fucking retard.
    Instead of “reading” and posting on HH, you might want to research and study micro-economics, and then get back to the board regarding your grand insights into tariffs.

    That’s not an argument. Do better.
    Here’s the argument:
    1) tariffs are taxes on US consumers
    2) they decrease the productivity, efficiency, and profitability of the US economy
    3) tariffs damage US economic dominance by dragging our standards to the lowest common denominator
    4) tariffs attack US competitive advantages in the highest margin sectors of the economy to appease domestic laggards (hi @greenblood )
    5) Lowering US economic goals, objectives and strategies to address China economic manipulation is abdication, failure and surrender
    6) foregoing US economic dominance to protect unskilled, ucompetive, uneducated domestic trump constituentlcies is suicide and and an abomination towards those with skills to succeed.

    @greenblood has been promulgating this “strategic” tariff imbecility for a long time now. He’s had long enough time to figure it about by now.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    MikeDamone said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    Contractors and farmers aren't looking for just any workforce. They are looking for a workforce that is willing to be paid at (let's be honest) below minimum wage. Tariffs have cut margins from farming, so they can't just hire anybody, the same goes for contractors because of the housing slowdown due to an already inflated housing market.
    Below minimum wage you say? A “market” wage then.

    Tariffs were a really stupid idea in retrospect, weren’t they?
    I don't like tariffs but it was the only way to bring China to the floor to negotiate on the issue of intellectual property theft. Trump's tweets about tariffs lowering the trade deficit was borderline retarded. If the purpose was to hurt their economy, they were naturally going to import less goods, so an increase in the deficit was a given. People who don't know that are dumb. There was not a single alternative brought forth to fight the intellectual property theft China commits annually, outside of being left with our dicks hanging out and allowing the theft to continue. I posted months ago with Hondo that China's theft amounts to around $600 Billion a year. Which means that roughly 5% of China's entire GDP is raised through the theft of foreign governments and companies. 5% doesn't seem like much, but in most cases a 5% drop in annual GDP can send an entire country into chaos.

    Tariffs weren't ideal, but necessary given the true purpose of them.
    So according to trumptards, tariffs are stupid unless they aren’t.
    Ironic

    Learn to read, then maybe you can refer to things as stupid. Until then, stupid is is stupid does Forrest.
    I read your dumbfuck post again. Here’s my reassessment:
    You are stupid. Dumb as a fucking post. A total fucking retard.
    Instead of “reading” and posting on HH, you might want to research and study micro-economics, and then get back to the board regarding your grand insights into tariffs.

    That’s not an argument. Do better.
    Here’s the argument:
    1) tariffs are taxes on US consumers
    2) they decrease the productivity, efficiency, and profitability of the US economy
    3) tariffs damage US economic dominance by dragging our standards to the lowest common denominator
    4) tariffs attack US competitive advantages in the highest margin sectors of the economy to appease domestic laggards (hi @greenblood )
    5) Lowering US economic goals, objectives and strategies to address China economic manipulation is abdication, failure and surrender
    6) foregoing US economic dominance to protect unskilled, ucompetive, uneducated domestic trump constituentlcies is suicide and and an abomination towards those with skills to succeed.

    @greenblood has been promulgating this “strategic” tariff imbecility for a long time now. He’s had long enough time to figure it about by now.
    Disagree.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    MikeDamone said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    Contractors and farmers aren't looking for just any workforce. They are looking for a workforce that is willing to be paid at (let's be honest) below minimum wage. Tariffs have cut margins from farming, so they can't just hire anybody, the same goes for contractors because of the housing slowdown due to an already inflated housing market.
    Below minimum wage you say? A “market” wage then.

    Tariffs were a really stupid idea in retrospect, weren’t they?
    I don't like tariffs but it was the only way to bring China to the floor to negotiate on the issue of intellectual property theft. Trump's tweets about tariffs lowering the trade deficit was borderline retarded. If the purpose was to hurt their economy, they were naturally going to import less goods, so an increase in the deficit was a given. People who don't know that are dumb. There was not a single alternative brought forth to fight the intellectual property theft China commits annually, outside of being left with our dicks hanging out and allowing the theft to continue. I posted months ago with Hondo that China's theft amounts to around $600 Billion a year. Which means that roughly 5% of China's entire GDP is raised through the theft of foreign governments and companies. 5% doesn't seem like much, but in most cases a 5% drop in annual GDP can send an entire country into chaos.

    Tariffs weren't ideal, but necessary given the true purpose of them.
    So according to trumptards, tariffs are stupid unless they aren’t.
    Ironic

    Learn to read, then maybe you can refer to things as stupid. Until then, stupid is is stupid does Forrest.
    I read your dumbfuck post again. Here’s my reassessment:
    You are stupid. Dumb as a fucking post. A total fucking retard.
    Instead of “reading” and posting on HH, you might want to research and study micro-economics, and then get back to the board regarding your grand insights into tariffs.

    That’s not an argument. Do better.
    Here’s the argument:
    1) tariffs are taxes on US consumers
    2) they decrease the productivity, efficiency, and profitability of the US economy
    3) tariffs damage US economic dominance by dragging our standards to the lowest common denominator
    4) tariffs attack US competitive advantages in the highest margin sectors of the economy to appease domestic laggards (hi @greenblood )
    5) Lowering US economic goals, objectives and strategies to address China economic manipulation is abdication, failure and surrender
    6) foregoing US economic dominance to protect unskilled, ucompetive, uneducated domestic trump constituentlcies is suicide and and an abomination towards those with skills to succeed.

    @greenblood has been promulgating this “strategic” tariff imbecility for a long time now. He’s had long enough time to figure it about by now.
    LOL...rent free bitch.

    If you read you’d see I don’t like tariffs either. But there is no other way to combat China’s intellectual property theft. Do you have another solution to that? Instead of mentioning another solution to that problem, you just continue to state the consequences of said tariffs. News flash, i don’t disagree. There is the long game and the short game. If short term tariffs solves a major problem, the consequences are worth it. You must be in the intellectual property theft is part of the free market crowd. Sad.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    MikeDamone said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    Contractors and farmers aren't looking for just any workforce. They are looking for a workforce that is willing to be paid at (let's be honest) below minimum wage. Tariffs have cut margins from farming, so they can't just hire anybody, the same goes for contractors because of the housing slowdown due to an already inflated housing market.
    Below minimum wage you say? A “market” wage then.

    Tariffs were a really stupid idea in retrospect, weren’t they?
    I don't like tariffs but it was the only way to bring China to the floor to negotiate on the issue of intellectual property theft. Trump's tweets about tariffs lowering the trade deficit was borderline retarded. If the purpose was to hurt their economy, they were naturally going to import less goods, so an increase in the deficit was a given. People who don't know that are dumb. There was not a single alternative brought forth to fight the intellectual property theft China commits annually, outside of being left with our dicks hanging out and allowing the theft to continue. I posted months ago with Hondo that China's theft amounts to around $600 Billion a year. Which means that roughly 5% of China's entire GDP is raised through the theft of foreign governments and companies. 5% doesn't seem like much, but in most cases a 5% drop in annual GDP can send an entire country into chaos.

    Tariffs weren't ideal, but necessary given the true purpose of them.
    So according to trumptards, tariffs are stupid unless they aren’t.
    Ironic

    Learn to read, then maybe you can refer to things as stupid. Until then, stupid is is stupid does Forrest.
    I read your dumbfuck post again. Here’s my reassessment:
    You are stupid. Dumb as a fucking post. A total fucking retard.
    Instead of “reading” and posting on HH, you might want to research and study micro-economics, and then get back to the board regarding your grand insights into tariffs.

    That’s not an argument. Do better.
    Here’s the argument:
    1) tariffs are taxes on US consumers
    2) they decrease the productivity, efficiency, and profitability of the US economy
    3) tariffs damage US economic dominance by dragging our standards to the lowest common denominator
    4) tariffs attack US competitive advantages in the highest margin sectors of the economy to appease domestic laggards (hi @greenblood )
    5) Lowering US economic goals, objectives and strategies to address China economic manipulation is abdication, failure and surrender
    6) foregoing US economic dominance to protect unskilled, ucompetive, uneducated domestic trump constituentlcies is suicide and and an abomination towards those with skills to succeed.

    @greenblood has been promulgating this “strategic” tariff imbecility for a long time now. He’s had long enough time to figure it about by now.
    LOL...rent free bitch.

    If you read you’d see I don’t like tariffs either. But there is no other way to combat China’s intellectual property theft. Do you have another solution to that? Instead of mentioning another solution to that problem, you just continue to state the consequences of said tariffs. News flash, i don’t disagree. There is the long game and the short game. If short term tariffs solves a major problem, the consequences are worth it. You must be in the intellectual property theft is part of the free market crowd. Sad.
    You dont like tariffs? Tough stand!
    US economic interests win when domestic ingenuity and competitiveness are allowed to prevail and win. Winners win. That means you lose.

    You think it’s ok that US taxpayers pay increased taxes for this fiasco? To subsidize failure and inefficiency?
    Tariffs have been in place a long time now with deleterious impacts and no end in sight. Short term or long term.
    The obese fool trump is going to negotiate a long term win? You’ve been shoveling this bullshit and apology for your failure for months now. It was stupid then and is self-evidently ignorant today.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559
    edited April 2019
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    MikeDamone said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    Contractors and farmers aren't looking for just any workforce. They are looking for a workforce that is willing to be paid at (let's be honest) below minimum wage. Tariffs have cut margins from farming, so they can't just hire anybody, the same goes for contractors because of the housing slowdown due to an already inflated housing market.
    Below minimum wage you say? A “market” wage then.

    Tariffs were a really stupid idea in retrospect, weren’t they?
    I don't like tariffs but it was the only way to bring China to the floor to negotiate on the issue of intellectual property theft. Trump's tweets about tariffs lowering the trade deficit was borderline retarded. If the purpose was to hurt their economy, they were naturally going to import less goods, so an increase in the deficit was a given. People who don't know that are dumb. There was not a single alternative brought forth to fight the intellectual property theft China commits annually, outside of being left with our dicks hanging out and allowing the theft to continue. I posted months ago with Hondo that China's theft amounts to around $600 Billion a year. Which means that roughly 5% of China's entire GDP is raised through the theft of foreign governments and companies. 5% doesn't seem like much, but in most cases a 5% drop in annual GDP can send an entire country into chaos.

    Tariffs weren't ideal, but necessary given the true purpose of them.
    So according to trumptards, tariffs are stupid unless they aren’t.
    Ironic

    Learn to read, then maybe you can refer to things as stupid. Until then, stupid is is stupid does Forrest.
    I read your dumbfuck post again. Here’s my reassessment:
    You are stupid. Dumb as a fucking post. A total fucking retard.
    Instead of “reading” and posting on HH, you might want to research and study micro-economics, and then get back to the board regarding your grand insights into tariffs.

    That’s not an argument. Do better.
    Here’s the argument:
    1) tariffs are taxes on US consumers
    2) they decrease the productivity, efficiency, and profitability of the US economy
    3) tariffs damage US economic dominance by dragging our standards to the lowest common denominator
    4) tariffs attack US competitive advantages in the highest margin sectors of the economy to appease domestic laggards (hi @greenblood )
    5) Lowering US economic goals, objectives and strategies to address China economic manipulation is abdication, failure and surrender
    6) foregoing US economic dominance to protect unskilled, ucompetive, uneducated domestic trump constituentlcies is suicide and and an abomination towards those with skills to succeed.

    @greenblood has been promulgating this “strategic” tariff imbecility for a long time now. He’s had long enough time to figure it about by now.
    LOL...rent free bitch.

    If you read you’d see I don’t like tariffs either. But there is no other way to combat China’s intellectual property theft. Do you have another solution to that? Instead of mentioning another solution to that problem, you just continue to state the consequences of said tariffs. News flash, i don’t disagree. There is the long game and the short game. If short term tariffs solves a major problem, the consequences are worth it. You must be in the intellectual property theft is part of the free market crowd. Sad.
    You dont like tariffs? Tough stand!
    US economic interests win when domestic ingenuity and competitiveness are allowed to prevail and win. Winners win. That means you lose.

    You think it’s ok that US taxpayers pay increased taxes for this fiasco? To subsidize failure and inefficiency?
    Tariffs have been in place a long time now with deleterious impacts and no end in sight. Short term or long term.
    The obese fool trump is going to negotiate a long term win? You’ve been shoveling this bullshit and apology for your failure for months now. It was stupid then and is self-evidently ignorant today.
    No solution I see. Just some more bitching and moaning.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    I have a better solution for the China probrem (hint...it's FINAL)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,725 Founders Club
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    MikeDamone said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    Contractors and farmers aren't looking for just any workforce. They are looking for a workforce that is willing to be paid at (let's be honest) below minimum wage. Tariffs have cut margins from farming, so they can't just hire anybody, the same goes for contractors because of the housing slowdown due to an already inflated housing market.
    Below minimum wage you say? A “market” wage then.

    Tariffs were a really stupid idea in retrospect, weren’t they?
    I don't like tariffs but it was the only way to bring China to the floor to negotiate on the issue of intellectual property theft. Trump's tweets about tariffs lowering the trade deficit was borderline retarded. If the purpose was to hurt their economy, they were naturally going to import less goods, so an increase in the deficit was a given. People who don't know that are dumb. There was not a single alternative brought forth to fight the intellectual property theft China commits annually, outside of being left with our dicks hanging out and allowing the theft to continue. I posted months ago with Hondo that China's theft amounts to around $600 Billion a year. Which means that roughly 5% of China's entire GDP is raised through the theft of foreign governments and companies. 5% doesn't seem like much, but in most cases a 5% drop in annual GDP can send an entire country into chaos.

    Tariffs weren't ideal, but necessary given the true purpose of them.
    So according to trumptards, tariffs are stupid unless they aren’t.
    Ironic

    Learn to read, then maybe you can refer to things as stupid. Until then, stupid is is stupid does Forrest.
    I read your dumbfuck post again. Here’s my reassessment:
    You are stupid. Dumb as a fucking post. A total fucking retard.
    Instead of “reading” and posting on HH, you might want to research and study micro-economics, and then get back to the board regarding your grand insights into tariffs.

    That’s not an argument. Do better.
    Here’s the argument:
    1) tariffs are taxes on US consumers
    2) they decrease the productivity, efficiency, and profitability of the US economy
    3) tariffs damage US economic dominance by dragging our standards to the lowest common denominator
    4) tariffs attack US competitive advantages in the highest margin sectors of the economy to appease domestic laggards (hi @greenblood )
    5) Lowering US economic goals, objectives and strategies to address China economic manipulation is abdication, failure and surrender
    6) foregoing US economic dominance to protect unskilled, ucompetive, uneducated domestic trump constituentlcies is suicide and and an abomination towards those with skills to succeed.

    @greenblood has been promulgating this “strategic” tariff imbecility for a long time now. He’s had long enough time to figure it about by now.
    LOL...rent free bitch.

    If you read you’d see I don’t like tariffs either. But there is no other way to combat China’s intellectual property theft. Do you have another solution to that? Instead of mentioning another solution to that problem, you just continue to state the consequences of said tariffs. News flash, i don’t disagree. There is the long game and the short game. If short term tariffs solves a major problem, the consequences are worth it. You must be in the intellectual property theft is part of the free market crowd. Sad.
    You dont like tariffs? Tough stand!
    US economic interests win when domestic ingenuity and competitiveness are allowed to prevail and win. Winners win. That means you lose.

    You think it’s ok that US taxpayers pay increased taxes for this fiasco? To subsidize failure and inefficiency?
    Tariffs have been in place a long time now with deleterious impacts and no end in sight. Short term or long term.
    The obese fool trump is going to negotiate a long term win? You’ve been shoveling this bullshit and apology for your failure for months now. It was stupid then and is self-evidently ignorant today.
    Sounds like you can't handle the ups and downs of a business model dependent on cheap illegal labor and unfair trade practices. Sad

    Sell the lawn care business and get a REAL job that AMERICANS want to do!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    MikeDamone said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    Contractors and farmers aren't looking for just any workforce. They are looking for a workforce that is willing to be paid at (let's be honest) below minimum wage. Tariffs have cut margins from farming, so they can't just hire anybody, the same goes for contractors because of the housing slowdown due to an already inflated housing market.
    Below minimum wage you say? A “market” wage then.

    Tariffs were a really stupid idea in retrospect, weren’t they?
    I don't like tariffs but it was the only way to bring China to the floor to negotiate on the issue of intellectual property theft. Trump's tweets about tariffs lowering the trade deficit was borderline retarded. If the purpose was to hurt their economy, they were naturally going to import less goods, so an increase in the deficit was a given. People who don't know that are dumb. There was not a single alternative brought forth to fight the intellectual property theft China commits annually, outside of being left with our dicks hanging out and allowing the theft to continue. I posted months ago with Hondo that China's theft amounts to around $600 Billion a year. Which means that roughly 5% of China's entire GDP is raised through the theft of foreign governments and companies. 5% doesn't seem like much, but in most cases a 5% drop in annual GDP can send an entire country into chaos.

    Tariffs weren't ideal, but necessary given the true purpose of them.
    So according to trumptards, tariffs are stupid unless they aren’t.
    Ironic

    Learn to read, then maybe you can refer to things as stupid. Until then, stupid is is stupid does Forrest.
    I read your dumbfuck post again. Here’s my reassessment:
    You are stupid. Dumb as a fucking post. A total fucking retard.
    Instead of “reading” and posting on HH, you might want to research and study micro-economics, and then get back to the board regarding your grand insights into tariffs.

    That’s not an argument. Do better.
    Here’s the argument:
    1) tariffs are taxes on US consumers
    2) they decrease the productivity, efficiency, and profitability of the US economy
    3) tariffs damage US economic dominance by dragging our standards to the lowest common denominator
    4) tariffs attack US competitive advantages in the highest margin sectors of the economy to appease domestic laggards (hi @greenblood )
    5) Lowering US economic goals, objectives and strategies to address China economic manipulation is abdication, failure and surrender
    6) foregoing US economic dominance to protect unskilled, ucompetive, uneducated domestic trump constituentlcies is suicide and and an abomination towards those with skills to succeed.

    @greenblood has been promulgating this “strategic” tariff imbecility for a long time now. He’s had long enough time to figure it about by now.
    LOL...rent free bitch.

    If you read you’d see I don’t like tariffs either. But there is no other way to combat China’s intellectual property theft. Do you have another solution to that? Instead of mentioning another solution to that problem, you just continue to state the consequences of said tariffs. News flash, i don’t disagree. There is the long game and the short game. If short term tariffs solves a major problem, the consequences are worth it. You must be in the intellectual property theft is part of the free market crowd. Sad.
    You dont like tariffs? Tough stand!
    US economic interests win when domestic ingenuity and competitiveness are allowed to prevail and win. Winners win. That means you lose.

    You think it’s ok that US taxpayers pay increased taxes for this fiasco? To subsidize failure and inefficiency?
    Tariffs have been in place a long time now with deleterious impacts and no end in sight. Short term or long term.
    The obese fool trump is going to negotiate a long term win? You’ve been shoveling this bullshit and apology for your failure for months now. It was stupid then and is self-evidently ignorant today.
    No solution I see. Just some more bitching and moaning.
    Real US competitors make China look like WSU playing football in the snow.
    Engineering, tech, financial, legal, entertainment.

    We beat them by being better.
    Not by bitching and moaning. Not by penalizing ourselves and helping them in the long term with tariffs.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,725 Founders Club
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    MikeDamone said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    greenblood said:

    HHusky said:

    greenblood said:

    I love how farmers and contractors openly say they have a need for a more exploited workforce.

    I think they'd like any workforce. You can't grow an economy with our demographics while hating on immigration.
    Contractors and farmers aren't looking for just any workforce. They are looking for a workforce that is willing to be paid at (let's be honest) below minimum wage. Tariffs have cut margins from farming, so they can't just hire anybody, the same goes for contractors because of the housing slowdown due to an already inflated housing market.
    Below minimum wage you say? A “market” wage then.

    Tariffs were a really stupid idea in retrospect, weren’t they?
    I don't like tariffs but it was the only way to bring China to the floor to negotiate on the issue of intellectual property theft. Trump's tweets about tariffs lowering the trade deficit was borderline retarded. If the purpose was to hurt their economy, they were naturally going to import less goods, so an increase in the deficit was a given. People who don't know that are dumb. There was not a single alternative brought forth to fight the intellectual property theft China commits annually, outside of being left with our dicks hanging out and allowing the theft to continue. I posted months ago with Hondo that China's theft amounts to around $600 Billion a year. Which means that roughly 5% of China's entire GDP is raised through the theft of foreign governments and companies. 5% doesn't seem like much, but in most cases a 5% drop in annual GDP can send an entire country into chaos.

    Tariffs weren't ideal, but necessary given the true purpose of them.
    So according to trumptards, tariffs are stupid unless they aren’t.
    Ironic

    Learn to read, then maybe you can refer to things as stupid. Until then, stupid is is stupid does Forrest.
    I read your dumbfuck post again. Here’s my reassessment:
    You are stupid. Dumb as a fucking post. A total fucking retard.
    Instead of “reading” and posting on HH, you might want to research and study micro-economics, and then get back to the board regarding your grand insights into tariffs.

    That’s not an argument. Do better.
    Here’s the argument:
    1) tariffs are taxes on US consumers
    2) they decrease the productivity, efficiency, and profitability of the US economy
    3) tariffs damage US economic dominance by dragging our standards to the lowest common denominator
    4) tariffs attack US competitive advantages in the highest margin sectors of the economy to appease domestic laggards (hi @greenblood )
    5) Lowering US economic goals, objectives and strategies to address China economic manipulation is abdication, failure and surrender
    6) foregoing US economic dominance to protect unskilled, ucompetive, uneducated domestic trump constituentlcies is suicide and and an abomination towards those with skills to succeed.

    @greenblood has been promulgating this “strategic” tariff imbecility for a long time now. He’s had long enough time to figure it about by now.
    LOL...rent free bitch.

    If you read you’d see I don’t like tariffs either. But there is no other way to combat China’s intellectual property theft. Do you have another solution to that? Instead of mentioning another solution to that problem, you just continue to state the consequences of said tariffs. News flash, i don’t disagree. There is the long game and the short game. If short term tariffs solves a major problem, the consequences are worth it. You must be in the intellectual property theft is part of the free market crowd. Sad.
    You dont like tariffs? Tough stand!
    US economic interests win when domestic ingenuity and competitiveness are allowed to prevail and win. Winners win. That means you lose.

    You think it’s ok that US taxpayers pay increased taxes for this fiasco? To subsidize failure and inefficiency?
    Tariffs have been in place a long time now with deleterious impacts and no end in sight. Short term or long term.
    The obese fool trump is going to negotiate a long term win? You’ve been shoveling this bullshit and apology for your failure for months now. It was stupid then and is self-evidently ignorant today.
    No solution I see. Just some more bitching and moaning.
    Real US competitors make China look like WSU playing football in the snow.
    Engineering, tech, financial, legal, entertainment.

    We beat them by being better.
    Not by bitching and moaning. Not by penalizing ourselves and helping them in the long term with tariffs.
    They steal our work and co opt American lackeys to do their bidding

    Do you know any?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter