Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

You heard it on Fox news

2

Comments

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,227
    2001400ex said:

    Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”


    This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it

    Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTH
    And you've lied repeatedly about what the Russians offered to give the the Trump team. And you've double, tripled and quadrupled down on that lie by posting links that you claimed supported your statement when in truth they did no such thing.

    If anyone had lied to Mueller and the FBI about what the Russians had really offered, and if it really was a "documented fact" as you claimed that the Russians were offering to give the Trump team hacked DNC and Hillary emails everyone at that meeting would be under indictment. Hell Manafort probably could have used that information in order to get himself out of jail if it really was a "documented fact."

    But it's not a "documented fact" it's just a baseless claim by a pathological lying zero integrity piece of shit.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”


    This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it

    Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTH
    And you've lied repeatedly about what the Russians offered to give the the Trump team. And you've double, tripled and quadrupled down on that lie by posting links that you claimed supported your statement when in truth they did no such thing.

    If anyone had lied to Mueller and the FBI about what the Russians had really offered, and if it really was a "documented fact" as you claimed that the Russians were offering to give the Trump team hacked DNC and Hillary emails everyone at that meeting would be under indictment. Hell Manafort probably could have used that information in order to get himself out of jail if it really was a "documented fact."

    But it's not a "documented fact" it's just a baseless claim by a pathological lying zero integrity piece of shit.
    Bob, the DNC and Hillary related emails were released shortly after the meeting. What the fuck do you think "dirt on Hillary" means?

    Seriously, you are literally incapable of seeing the truth when it's right in front of you. You call me a liar. The truth is, you lie to yourself.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,227
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”


    This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it

    Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTH
    And you've lied repeatedly about what the Russians offered to give the the Trump team. And you've double, tripled and quadrupled down on that lie by posting links that you claimed supported your statement when in truth they did no such thing.

    If anyone had lied to Mueller and the FBI about what the Russians had really offered, and if it really was a "documented fact" as you claimed that the Russians were offering to give the Trump team hacked DNC and Hillary emails everyone at that meeting would be under indictment. Hell Manafort probably could have used that information in order to get himself out of jail if it really was a "documented fact."

    But it's not a "documented fact" it's just a baseless claim by a pathological lying zero integrity piece of shit.
    Bob, the DNC and Hillary related emails were released shortly after the meeting. What the fuck do you think "dirt on Hillary" means?

    Seriously, you are literally incapable of seeing the truth when it's right in front of you. You call me a liar. The truth is, you lie to yourself.
    It means you're a pathological liar.

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Fuck off dim wit
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    2001400ex said:

    Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”


    This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it

    Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTH
    You should let Mueller know.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 39,288 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”


    This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it

    Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTH
    And you've lied repeatedly about what the Russians offered to give the the Trump team. And you've double, tripled and quadrupled down on that lie by posting links that you claimed supported your statement when in truth they did no such thing.

    If anyone had lied to Mueller and the FBI about what the Russians had really offered, and if it really was a "documented fact" as you claimed that the Russians were offering to give the Trump team hacked DNC and Hillary emails everyone at that meeting would be under indictment. Hell Manafort probably could have used that information in order to get himself out of jail if it really was a "documented fact."

    But it's not a "documented fact" it's just a baseless claim by a pathological lying zero integrity piece of shit.
    Were they under oath?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,227
    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”


    This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it

    Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTH
    And you've lied repeatedly about what the Russians offered to give the the Trump team. And you've double, tripled and quadrupled down on that lie by posting links that you claimed supported your statement when in truth they did no such thing.

    If anyone had lied to Mueller and the FBI about what the Russians had really offered, and if it really was a "documented fact" as you claimed that the Russians were offering to give the Trump team hacked DNC and Hillary emails everyone at that meeting would be under indictment. Hell Manafort probably could have used that information in order to get himself out of jail if it really was a "documented fact."

    But it's not a "documented fact" it's just a baseless claim by a pathological lying zero integrity piece of shit.
    Were they under oath?

    The FBI interviewed everyone from the "Trump team" that was present at the meeting. If it really were a "documented fact" that the Russians offered the hacked DNC emails, and the missing 30K Hillary emails, which to the best of my knowledge were never believed to have been hacked, just destroyed by Hillary, and anyone lied about this "documented fact" they would now be under indictment.

    Hondo is talking squarely out of his ass and falsely claiming that "dirt on Hillary" is limited only to the hacked Hillary and DNC emails. No one present at the meeting has said that was what the Russian were offering. In fact everyone says the when the Russians got to the meeting they offered up no dirt and wanted to talk about something complete different.

    Hondo is a poorly informed pathological liar.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”


    This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it

    Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTH
    And you've lied repeatedly about what the Russians offered to give the the Trump team. And you've double, tripled and quadrupled down on that lie by posting links that you claimed supported your statement when in truth they did no such thing.

    If anyone had lied to Mueller and the FBI about what the Russians had really offered, and if it really was a "documented fact" as you claimed that the Russians were offering to give the Trump team hacked DNC and Hillary emails everyone at that meeting would be under indictment. Hell Manafort probably could have used that information in order to get himself out of jail if it really was a "documented fact."

    But it's not a "documented fact" it's just a baseless claim by a pathological lying zero integrity piece of shit.
    Were they under oath?

    The FBI interviewed everyone from the "Trump team" that was present at the meeting. If it really were a "documented fact" that the Russians offered the hacked DNC emails, and the missing 30K Hillary emails, which to the best of my knowledge were never believed to have been hacked, just destroyed by Hillary, and anyone lied about this "documented fact" they would now be under indictment.

    Hondo is talking squarely out of his ass and falsely claiming that "dirt on Hillary" is limited only to the hacked Hillary and DNC emails. No one present at the meeting has said that was what the Russian were offering. In fact everyone says the when the Russians got to the meeting they offered up no dirt and wanted to talk about something complete different.

    Hondo is a poorly informed pathological liar.
    I never said anything about the 30k emails. Idiot. The Hillary emails I referred to are the ones released with the DNC emails, and were from hacked accounts of people she interacted with.

    Dude. You aren't even beating a dead horse. You are beating a horse that didn't exist.

    I do chuckle at you making a fool of yourself by copying that quote into every thread on the tug. And I'm not the only one laughing at you..... It's quite the hilarious obsession.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,650 Founders Club

    NOC


    Dems claimed Trump was a Russian agent for two years and ended up with nothing, essentially guaranteeing him victory over the shit ass group of Dem candidates running on pro-illegal-immigration, the environment, and reparations.

    Bears repeating

    They got their investigation

    They got their wire tap

    They got their special prosecutor

    They got shit.

    Good effort good job
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,227
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”


    This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it

    Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTH
    And you've lied repeatedly about what the Russians offered to give the the Trump team. And you've double, tripled and quadrupled down on that lie by posting links that you claimed supported your statement when in truth they did no such thing.

    If anyone had lied to Mueller and the FBI about what the Russians had really offered, and if it really was a "documented fact" as you claimed that the Russians were offering to give the Trump team hacked DNC and Hillary emails everyone at that meeting would be under indictment. Hell Manafort probably could have used that information in order to get himself out of jail if it really was a "documented fact."

    But it's not a "documented fact" it's just a baseless claim by a pathological lying zero integrity piece of shit.
    Were they under oath?

    The FBI interviewed everyone from the "Trump team" that was present at the meeting. If it really were a "documented fact" that the Russians offered the hacked DNC emails, and the missing 30K Hillary emails, which to the best of my knowledge were never believed to have been hacked, just destroyed by Hillary, and anyone lied about this "documented fact" they would now be under indictment.

    Hondo is talking squarely out of his ass and falsely claiming that "dirt on Hillary" is limited only to the hacked Hillary and DNC emails. No one present at the meeting has said that was what the Russian were offering. In fact everyone says the when the Russians got to the meeting they offered up no dirt and wanted to talk about something complete different.

    Hondo is a poorly informed pathological liar.
    I never said anything about the 30k emails. Idiot. The Hillary emails I referred to are the ones released with the DNC emails, and were from hacked accounts of people she interacted with.

    Dude. You aren't even beating a dead horse. You are beating a horse that didn't exist.

    I do chuckle at you making a fool of yourself by copying that quote into every thread on the tug. And I'm not the only one laughing at you..... It's quite the hilarious obsession.
    Got it, you weren't lying about the 30K emails you were lying about the Hillary DNC emails.

    I do chuckle that a pathological liar thinks this makes a difference.