You heard it on Fox news
“This will drive some of our viewers nuts,” the Fox News Sunday host noted. “The Trump investigation did not start with the FISA warrant and Carter Page and the dossier.”
Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”
Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”
Hemmer, meanwhile, said he thought they needed to “add we think in quotes” because “the story is not entirely yet revealed,” prompting Wallace to push back.
“I don’t think there is any doubt they started investigating—I mean, everybody agrees they started investigating in the summer of 2016,” Wallace declared. “Look, I’m not saying what they did was right or any of that but we know that’s when the investigation started. There has been documentation of that.”
And the best part is, Wallace calls out Rush as a liar. And if you objectively look at the facts, Rush is of course lying.
“They began an investigation based on a phony dossier created and written by associates of Hillary Clinton. It was opposition research,” Limbaugh told Fox News anchor Bret Baier. “This is outrageous what has happened here. There needs to be an investigation into this. There needs to be accountability for everybody who participated in this.”
https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-chris-wallace-muellers-russia-investigation-did-not-start-with-steele-dossier-on-trump
Comments
-
NOC
Dems claimed Trump was a Russian agent for two years and ended up with nothing, essentially guaranteeing him victory over the shit ass group of Dem candidates running on pro-illegal-immigration, the environment, and reparations.
-
Hondo you claimed the investigation of Trump didn't start until after the election and Mueller was appointed and that the dossier played no role in starting that investigation. Appears he is calling you a liar dumbfuck. And of course anyone who calls you a liar would be accurate.2001400ex said:Chris Wallace calls Bob a liar.
“This will drive some of our viewers nuts,” the Fox News Sunday host noted. “The Trump investigation did not start with the FISA warrant and Carter Page and the dossier.”
Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”
Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”
Hemmer, meanwhile, said he thought they needed to “add we think in quotes” because “the story is not entirely yet revealed,” prompting Wallace to push back.
“I don’t think there is any doubt they started investigating—I mean, everybody agrees they started investigating in the summer of 2016,” Wallace declared. “Look, I’m not saying what they did was right or any of that but we know that’s when the investigation started. There has been documentation of that.”
And the best part is, Wallace calls out Rush as a liar. And if you objectively look at the facts, Rush is of course lying.
“They began an investigation based on a phony dossier created and written by associates of Hillary Clinton. It was opposition research,” Limbaugh told Fox News anchor Bret Baier. “This is outrageous what has happened here. There needs to be an investigation into this. There needs to be accountability for everybody who participated in this.”
https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-chris-wallace-muellers-russia-investigation-did-not-start-with-steele-dossier-on-trump
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump. -
What do you think "dirt on Hillary" means? Dumbfuck.SFGbob said:
Hondo you claimed the investigation of Trump didn't start until after the election and Mueller was appointed and that the dossier played no role in starting that investigation. Appears he is calling you a liar dumbfuck. And of course anyone who calls you a liar would be accurate.2001400ex said:Chris Wallace calls Bob a liar.
“This will drive some of our viewers nuts,” the Fox News Sunday host noted. “The Trump investigation did not start with the FISA warrant and Carter Page and the dossier.”
Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”
Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”
Hemmer, meanwhile, said he thought they needed to “add we think in quotes” because “the story is not entirely yet revealed,” prompting Wallace to push back.
“I don’t think there is any doubt they started investigating—I mean, everybody agrees they started investigating in the summer of 2016,” Wallace declared. “Look, I’m not saying what they did was right or any of that but we know that’s when the investigation started. There has been documentation of that.”
And the best part is, Wallace calls out Rush as a liar. And if you objectively look at the facts, Rush is of course lying.
“They began an investigation based on a phony dossier created and written by associates of Hillary Clinton. It was opposition research,” Limbaugh told Fox News anchor Bret Baier. “This is outrageous what has happened here. There needs to be an investigation into this. There needs to be accountability for everybody who participated in this.”
https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-chris-wallace-muellers-russia-investigation-did-not-start-with-steele-dossier-on-trump
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump. -
Sure did
https://foxnews.com/politics/investigators-had-50-50-chance-of-securing-fisa-warrant-for-trump-aide-without-dossier-testimony
The chances of securing a 2016 surveillance warrant for a Trump campaign aide were “50/50” without the controversial anti-Trump “dossier,” according to testimony in newly confirmed congressional transcripts.
The October testimony from senior FBI lawyer Sally Moyer to House investigators appers to underscore how critical the dossier -- funded by the Democratic Party and Clinton campaign -- was in obtaining the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant, and appears to conflict with Democratic assertions that the dossier played a limited role in the process.
Asked whether the FBI would have been able to establish probable cause if the application “did not have the Christopher Steele information in it,” Moyer responded: "So I think it's a close call, like 50/50, 51/49. I really think it's a close call."
Moyer is a key witness as a lead attorney for the FBI’s 2016 Clinton email and Russia investigations. Her testimony about the dossier’s importance to the surveillance warrant application appears consistent with that of former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.
According to a memo from Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee in February 2018 about the Page warrant, "McCabe testified before the Committee in December 2017 that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court] without the Steele dossier information."
It's always special when a pathological liar like hondo calls someone a liar -
“Dirt” on Hillary could mean all kinds of things. But the two things we know for certain is that it isn’t a “documented fact” that the Russians offered to give the Trump team the stolen emails, and that you are a pathological liar.2001400ex said:
What do you think "dirt on Hillary" means? Dumbfuck.SFGbob said:
Hondo you claimed the investigation of Trump didn't start until after the election and Mueller was appointed and that the dossier played no role in starting that investigation. Appears he is calling you a liar dumbfuck. And of course anyone who calls you a liar would be accurate.2001400ex said:Chris Wallace calls Bob a liar.
“This will drive some of our viewers nuts,” the Fox News Sunday host noted. “The Trump investigation did not start with the FISA warrant and Carter Page and the dossier.”
Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”
Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”
Hemmer, meanwhile, said he thought they needed to “add we think in quotes” because “the story is not entirely yet revealed,” prompting Wallace to push back.
“I don’t think there is any doubt they started investigating—I mean, everybody agrees they started investigating in the summer of 2016,” Wallace declared. “Look, I’m not saying what they did was right or any of that but we know that’s when the investigation started. There has been documentation of that.”
And the best part is, Wallace calls out Rush as a liar. And if you objectively look at the facts, Rush is of course lying.
“They began an investigation based on a phony dossier created and written by associates of Hillary Clinton. It was opposition research,” Limbaugh told Fox News anchor Bret Baier. “This is outrageous what has happened here. There needs to be an investigation into this. There needs to be accountability for everybody who participated in this.”
https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-chris-wallace-muellers-russia-investigation-did-not-start-with-steele-dossier-on-trump
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
-
You aren't even talking the same thing man.RaceBannon said:Sure did
https://foxnews.com/politics/investigators-had-50-50-chance-of-securing-fisa-warrant-for-trump-aide-without-dossier-testimony
The chances of securing a 2016 surveillance warrant for a Trump campaign aide were “50/50” without the controversial anti-Trump “dossier,” according to testimony in newly confirmed congressional transcripts.
The October testimony from senior FBI lawyer Sally Moyer to House investigators appers to underscore how critical the dossier -- funded by the Democratic Party and Clinton campaign -- was in obtaining the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant, and appears to conflict with Democratic assertions that the dossier played a limited role in the process.
Asked whether the FBI would have been able to establish probable cause if the application “did not have the Christopher Steele information in it,” Moyer responded: "So I think it's a close call, like 50/50, 51/49. I really think it's a close call."
Moyer is a key witness as a lead attorney for the FBI’s 2016 Clinton email and Russia investigations. Her testimony about the dossier’s importance to the surveillance warrant application appears consistent with that of former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.
According to a memo from Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee in February 2018 about the Page warrant, "McCabe testified before the Committee in December 2017 that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court] without the Steele dossier information."
It's always special when a pathological liar like hondo calls someone a liar -
Fuck off liar
-
Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”
This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it
-
We’re talking about one thing, you are a pathological liar Hondo.2001400ex said:
You aren't even talking the same thing man.RaceBannon said:Sure did
https://foxnews.com/politics/investigators-had-50-50-chance-of-securing-fisa-warrant-for-trump-aide-without-dossier-testimony
The chances of securing a 2016 surveillance warrant for a Trump campaign aide were “50/50” without the controversial anti-Trump “dossier,” according to testimony in newly confirmed congressional transcripts.
The October testimony from senior FBI lawyer Sally Moyer to House investigators appers to underscore how critical the dossier -- funded by the Democratic Party and Clinton campaign -- was in obtaining the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant, and appears to conflict with Democratic assertions that the dossier played a limited role in the process.
Asked whether the FBI would have been able to establish probable cause if the application “did not have the Christopher Steele information in it,” Moyer responded: "So I think it's a close call, like 50/50, 51/49. I really think it's a close call."
Moyer is a key witness as a lead attorney for the FBI’s 2016 Clinton email and Russia investigations. Her testimony about the dossier’s importance to the surveillance warrant application appears consistent with that of former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.
According to a memo from Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee in February 2018 about the Page warrant, "McCabe testified before the Committee in December 2017 that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court] without the Steele dossier information."
It's always special when a pathological liar like hondo calls someone a liar
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump. -
Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTHRaceBannon said:Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”
This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it -
And you've lied repeatedly about what the Russians offered to give the the Trump team. And you've double, tripled and quadrupled down on that lie by posting links that you claimed supported your statement when in truth they did no such thing.2001400ex said:
Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTHRaceBannon said:Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”
This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it
If anyone had lied to Mueller and the FBI about what the Russians had really offered, and if it really was a "documented fact" as you claimed that the Russians were offering to give the Trump team hacked DNC and Hillary emails everyone at that meeting would be under indictment. Hell Manafort probably could have used that information in order to get himself out of jail if it really was a "documented fact."
But it's not a "documented fact" it's just a baseless claim by a pathological lying zero integrity piece of shit. -
Bob, the DNC and Hillary related emails were released shortly after the meeting. What the fuck do you think "dirt on Hillary" means?SFGbob said:
And you've lied repeatedly about what the Russians offered to give the the Trump team. And you've double, tripled and quadrupled down on that lie by posting links that you claimed supported your statement when in truth they did no such thing.2001400ex said:
Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTHRaceBannon said:Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”
This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it
If anyone had lied to Mueller and the FBI about what the Russians had really offered, and if it really was a "documented fact" as you claimed that the Russians were offering to give the Trump team hacked DNC and Hillary emails everyone at that meeting would be under indictment. Hell Manafort probably could have used that information in order to get himself out of jail if it really was a "documented fact."
But it's not a "documented fact" it's just a baseless claim by a pathological lying zero integrity piece of shit.
Seriously, you are literally incapable of seeing the truth when it's right in front of you. You call me a liar. The truth is, you lie to yourself. -
It means you're a pathological liar.2001400ex said:
Bob, the DNC and Hillary related emails were released shortly after the meeting. What the fuck do you think "dirt on Hillary" means?SFGbob said:
And you've lied repeatedly about what the Russians offered to give the the Trump team. And you've double, tripled and quadrupled down on that lie by posting links that you claimed supported your statement when in truth they did no such thing.2001400ex said:
Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTHRaceBannon said:Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”
This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it
If anyone had lied to Mueller and the FBI about what the Russians had really offered, and if it really was a "documented fact" as you claimed that the Russians were offering to give the Trump team hacked DNC and Hillary emails everyone at that meeting would be under indictment. Hell Manafort probably could have used that information in order to get himself out of jail if it really was a "documented fact."
But it's not a "documented fact" it's just a baseless claim by a pathological lying zero integrity piece of shit.
Seriously, you are literally incapable of seeing the truth when it's right in front of you. You call me a liar. The truth is, you lie to yourself.
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump. -
Fuck off dim wit
-
You should let Mueller know.2001400ex said:
Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTHRaceBannon said:Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”
This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it -
Were they under oath?SFGbob said:
And you've lied repeatedly about what the Russians offered to give the the Trump team. And you've double, tripled and quadrupled down on that lie by posting links that you claimed supported your statement when in truth they did no such thing.2001400ex said:
Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTHRaceBannon said:Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”
This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it
If anyone had lied to Mueller and the FBI about what the Russians had really offered, and if it really was a "documented fact" as you claimed that the Russians were offering to give the Trump team hacked DNC and Hillary emails everyone at that meeting would be under indictment. Hell Manafort probably could have used that information in order to get himself out of jail if it really was a "documented fact."
But it's not a "documented fact" it's just a baseless claim by a pathological lying zero integrity piece of shit. -
Sledog said:
Were they under oath?SFGbob said:
And you've lied repeatedly about what the Russians offered to give the the Trump team. And you've double, tripled and quadrupled down on that lie by posting links that you claimed supported your statement when in truth they did no such thing.2001400ex said:
Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTHRaceBannon said:Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”
This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it
If anyone had lied to Mueller and the FBI about what the Russians had really offered, and if it really was a "documented fact" as you claimed that the Russians were offering to give the Trump team hacked DNC and Hillary emails everyone at that meeting would be under indictment. Hell Manafort probably could have used that information in order to get himself out of jail if it really was a "documented fact."
But it's not a "documented fact" it's just a baseless claim by a pathological lying zero integrity piece of shit.
The FBI interviewed everyone from the "Trump team" that was present at the meeting. If it really were a "documented fact" that the Russians offered the hacked DNC emails, and the missing 30K Hillary emails, which to the best of my knowledge were never believed to have been hacked, just destroyed by Hillary, and anyone lied about this "documented fact" they would now be under indictment.
Hondo is talking squarely out of his ass and falsely claiming that "dirt on Hillary" is limited only to the hacked Hillary and DNC emails. No one present at the meeting has said that was what the Russian were offering. In fact everyone says the when the Russians got to the meeting they offered up no dirt and wanted to talk about something complete different.
Hondo is a poorly informed pathological liar. -
I never said anything about the 30k emails. Idiot. The Hillary emails I referred to are the ones released with the DNC emails, and were from hacked accounts of people she interacted with.SFGbob said:Sledog said:
Were they under oath?SFGbob said:
And you've lied repeatedly about what the Russians offered to give the the Trump team. And you've double, tripled and quadrupled down on that lie by posting links that you claimed supported your statement when in truth they did no such thing.2001400ex said:
Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTHRaceBannon said:Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”
This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it
If anyone had lied to Mueller and the FBI about what the Russians had really offered, and if it really was a "documented fact" as you claimed that the Russians were offering to give the Trump team hacked DNC and Hillary emails everyone at that meeting would be under indictment. Hell Manafort probably could have used that information in order to get himself out of jail if it really was a "documented fact."
But it's not a "documented fact" it's just a baseless claim by a pathological lying zero integrity piece of shit.
The FBI interviewed everyone from the "Trump team" that was present at the meeting. If it really were a "documented fact" that the Russians offered the hacked DNC emails, and the missing 30K Hillary emails, which to the best of my knowledge were never believed to have been hacked, just destroyed by Hillary, and anyone lied about this "documented fact" they would now be under indictment.
Hondo is talking squarely out of his ass and falsely claiming that "dirt on Hillary" is limited only to the hacked Hillary and DNC emails. No one present at the meeting has said that was what the Russian were offering. In fact everyone says the when the Russians got to the meeting they offered up no dirt and wanted to talk about something complete different.
Hondo is a poorly informed pathological liar.
Dude. You aren't even beating a dead horse. You are beating a horse that didn't exist.
I do chuckle at you making a fool of yourself by copying that quote into every thread on the tug. And I'm not the only one laughing at you..... It's quite the hilarious obsession. -
Bears repeatingPitchfork51 said:NOC
Dems claimed Trump was a Russian agent for two years and ended up with nothing, essentially guaranteeing him victory over the shit ass group of Dem candidates running on pro-illegal-immigration, the environment, and reparations.
They got their investigation
They got their wire tap
They got their special prosecutor
They got shit.
Good effort good job -
Got it, you weren't lying about the 30K emails you were lying about the Hillary DNC emails.2001400ex said:
I never said anything about the 30k emails. Idiot. The Hillary emails I referred to are the ones released with the DNC emails, and were from hacked accounts of people she interacted with.SFGbob said:Sledog said:
Were they under oath?SFGbob said:
And you've lied repeatedly about what the Russians offered to give the the Trump team. And you've double, tripled and quadrupled down on that lie by posting links that you claimed supported your statement when in truth they did no such thing.2001400ex said:
Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTHRaceBannon said:Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”
This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it
If anyone had lied to Mueller and the FBI about what the Russians had really offered, and if it really was a "documented fact" as you claimed that the Russians were offering to give the Trump team hacked DNC and Hillary emails everyone at that meeting would be under indictment. Hell Manafort probably could have used that information in order to get himself out of jail if it really was a "documented fact."
But it's not a "documented fact" it's just a baseless claim by a pathological lying zero integrity piece of shit.
The FBI interviewed everyone from the "Trump team" that was present at the meeting. If it really were a "documented fact" that the Russians offered the hacked DNC emails, and the missing 30K Hillary emails, which to the best of my knowledge were never believed to have been hacked, just destroyed by Hillary, and anyone lied about this "documented fact" they would now be under indictment.
Hondo is talking squarely out of his ass and falsely claiming that "dirt on Hillary" is limited only to the hacked Hillary and DNC emails. No one present at the meeting has said that was what the Russian were offering. In fact everyone says the when the Russians got to the meeting they offered up no dirt and wanted to talk about something complete different.
Hondo is a poorly informed pathological liar.
Dude. You aren't even beating a dead horse. You are beating a horse that didn't exist.
I do chuckle at you making a fool of yourself by copying that quote into every thread on the tug. And I'm not the only one laughing at you..... It's quite the hilarious obsession.
I do chuckle that a pathological liar thinks this makes a difference. -
You are the one that didn't read the multiple Fox news links I provided.SFGbob said:
Got it, you weren't lying about the 30K emails you were lying about the Hillary DNC emails.2001400ex said:
I never said anything about the 30k emails. Idiot. The Hillary emails I referred to are the ones released with the DNC emails, and were from hacked accounts of people she interacted with.SFGbob said:Sledog said:
Were they under oath?SFGbob said:
And you've lied repeatedly about what the Russians offered to give the the Trump team. And you've double, tripled and quadrupled down on that lie by posting links that you claimed supported your statement when in truth they did no such thing.2001400ex said:
Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTHRaceBannon said:Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”
This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it
If anyone had lied to Mueller and the FBI about what the Russians had really offered, and if it really was a "documented fact" as you claimed that the Russians were offering to give the Trump team hacked DNC and Hillary emails everyone at that meeting would be under indictment. Hell Manafort probably could have used that information in order to get himself out of jail if it really was a "documented fact."
But it's not a "documented fact" it's just a baseless claim by a pathological lying zero integrity piece of shit.
The FBI interviewed everyone from the "Trump team" that was present at the meeting. If it really were a "documented fact" that the Russians offered the hacked DNC emails, and the missing 30K Hillary emails, which to the best of my knowledge were never believed to have been hacked, just destroyed by Hillary, and anyone lied about this "documented fact" they would now be under indictment.
Hondo is talking squarely out of his ass and falsely claiming that "dirt on Hillary" is limited only to the hacked Hillary and DNC emails. No one present at the meeting has said that was what the Russian were offering. In fact everyone says the when the Russians got to the meeting they offered up no dirt and wanted to talk about something complete different.
Hondo is a poorly informed pathological liar.
Dude. You aren't even beating a dead horse. You are beating a horse that didn't exist.
I do chuckle at you making a fool of yourself by copying that quote into every thread on the tug. And I'm not the only one laughing at you..... It's quite the hilarious obsession.
I do chuckle that a pathological liar thinks this makes a difference. -
You should know about to reading links posted...2001400ex said:
You are the one that didn't read the multiple Fox news links I provided.SFGbob said:
Got it, you weren't lying about the 30K emails you were lying about the Hillary DNC emails.2001400ex said:
I never said anything about the 30k emails. Idiot. The Hillary emails I referred to are the ones released with the DNC emails, and were from hacked accounts of people she interacted with.SFGbob said:Sledog said:
Were they under oath?SFGbob said:
And you've lied repeatedly about what the Russians offered to give the the Trump team. And you've double, tripled and quadrupled down on that lie by posting links that you claimed supported your statement when in truth they did no such thing.2001400ex said:
Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTHRaceBannon said:Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”
This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it
If anyone had lied to Mueller and the FBI about what the Russians had really offered, and if it really was a "documented fact" as you claimed that the Russians were offering to give the Trump team hacked DNC and Hillary emails everyone at that meeting would be under indictment. Hell Manafort probably could have used that information in order to get himself out of jail if it really was a "documented fact."
But it's not a "documented fact" it's just a baseless claim by a pathological lying zero integrity piece of shit.
The FBI interviewed everyone from the "Trump team" that was present at the meeting. If it really were a "documented fact" that the Russians offered the hacked DNC emails, and the missing 30K Hillary emails, which to the best of my knowledge were never believed to have been hacked, just destroyed by Hillary, and anyone lied about this "documented fact" they would now be under indictment.
Hondo is talking squarely out of his ass and falsely claiming that "dirt on Hillary" is limited only to the hacked Hillary and DNC emails. No one present at the meeting has said that was what the Russian were offering. In fact everyone says the when the Russians got to the meeting they offered up no dirt and wanted to talk about something complete different.
Hondo is a poorly informed pathological liar.
Dude. You aren't even beating a dead horse. You are beating a horse that didn't exist.
I do chuckle at you making a fool of yourself by copying that quote into every thread on the tug. And I'm not the only one laughing at you..... It's quite the hilarious obsession.
I do chuckle that a pathological liar thinks this makes a difference. -
Your problem is that I did read them Hondo. Not a one of them supported your lie. And no, "dirt on Hillary" doesn't make it a "documented fact" that they offered to given them the hacked DNC emails.2001400ex said:
You are the one that didn't read the multiple Fox news links I provided.SFGbob said:
Got it, you weren't lying about the 30K emails you were lying about the Hillary DNC emails.2001400ex said:
I never said anything about the 30k emails. Idiot. The Hillary emails I referred to are the ones released with the DNC emails, and were from hacked accounts of people she interacted with.SFGbob said:Sledog said:
Were they under oath?SFGbob said:
And you've lied repeatedly about what the Russians offered to give the the Trump team. And you've double, tripled and quadrupled down on that lie by posting links that you claimed supported your statement when in truth they did no such thing.2001400ex said:
Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTHRaceBannon said:Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”
This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it
If anyone had lied to Mueller and the FBI about what the Russians had really offered, and if it really was a "documented fact" as you claimed that the Russians were offering to give the Trump team hacked DNC and Hillary emails everyone at that meeting would be under indictment. Hell Manafort probably could have used that information in order to get himself out of jail if it really was a "documented fact."
But it's not a "documented fact" it's just a baseless claim by a pathological lying zero integrity piece of shit.
The FBI interviewed everyone from the "Trump team" that was present at the meeting. If it really were a "documented fact" that the Russians offered the hacked DNC emails, and the missing 30K Hillary emails, which to the best of my knowledge were never believed to have been hacked, just destroyed by Hillary, and anyone lied about this "documented fact" they would now be under indictment.
Hondo is talking squarely out of his ass and falsely claiming that "dirt on Hillary" is limited only to the hacked Hillary and DNC emails. No one present at the meeting has said that was what the Russian were offering. In fact everyone says the when the Russians got to the meeting they offered up no dirt and wanted to talk about something complete different.
Hondo is a poorly informed pathological liar.
Dude. You aren't even beating a dead horse. You are beating a horse that didn't exist.
I do chuckle at you making a fool of yourself by copying that quote into every thread on the tug. And I'm not the only one laughing at you..... It's quite the hilarious obsession.
I do chuckle that a pathological liar thinks this makes a difference.
I hope you and your imaginary friends are laughing at what a pathological liar you are Hondo. -
This guy is a drunk who eats at Taco Bell every week and even he totally gets it.Pitchfork51 said:NOC
Dems claimed Trump was a Russian agent for two years and ended up with nothing, essentially guaranteeing him victory over the shit ass group of Dem candidates running on pro-illegal-immigration, the environment, and reparations. -
It's been like 2 weeks. Sad!!Swaye said:
This guy is a drunk who eats at Taco Bell every week and even he totally gets it.Pitchfork51 said:NOC
Dems claimed Trump was a Russian agent for two years and ended up with nothing, essentially guaranteeing him victory over the shit ass group of Dem candidates running on pro-illegal-immigration, the environment, and reparations.
