Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

You heard it on Fox news

2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
Chris Wallace calls Bob a liar.

“This will drive some of our viewers nuts,” the Fox News Sunday host noted. “The Trump investigation did not start with the FISA warrant and Carter Page and the dossier.”

Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”

Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”

Hemmer, meanwhile, said he thought they needed to “add we think in quotes” because “the story is not entirely yet revealed,” prompting Wallace to push back.

“I don’t think there is any doubt they started investigating—I mean, everybody agrees they started investigating in the summer of 2016,” Wallace declared. “Look, I’m not saying what they did was right or any of that but we know that’s when the investigation started. There has been documentation of that.”


And the best part is, Wallace calls out Rush as a liar. And if you objectively look at the facts, Rush is of course lying.

They began an investigation based on a phony dossier created and written by associates of Hillary Clinton. It was opposition research,” Limbaugh told Fox News anchor Bret Baier. “This is outrageous what has happened here. There needs to be an investigation into this. There needs to be accountability for everybody who participated in this.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-chris-wallace-muellers-russia-investigation-did-not-start-with-steele-dossier-on-trump
«1

Comments

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,206
    2001400ex said:

    Chris Wallace calls Bob a liar.

    “This will drive some of our viewers nuts,” the Fox News Sunday host noted. “The Trump investigation did not start with the FISA warrant and Carter Page and the dossier.”

    Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”

    Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”

    Hemmer, meanwhile, said he thought they needed to “add we think in quotes” because “the story is not entirely yet revealed,” prompting Wallace to push back.

    “I don’t think there is any doubt they started investigating—I mean, everybody agrees they started investigating in the summer of 2016,” Wallace declared. “Look, I’m not saying what they did was right or any of that but we know that’s when the investigation started. There has been documentation of that.”


    And the best part is, Wallace calls out Rush as a liar. And if you objectively look at the facts, Rush is of course lying.

    They began an investigation based on a phony dossier created and written by associates of Hillary Clinton. It was opposition research,” Limbaugh told Fox News anchor Bret Baier. “This is outrageous what has happened here. There needs to be an investigation into this. There needs to be accountability for everybody who participated in this.”

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-chris-wallace-muellers-russia-investigation-did-not-start-with-steele-dossier-on-trump

    Hondo you claimed the investigation of Trump didn't start until after the election and Mueller was appointed and that the dossier played no role in starting that investigation. Appears he is calling you a liar dumbfuck. And of course anyone who calls you a liar would be accurate.


    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Chris Wallace calls Bob a liar.

    “This will drive some of our viewers nuts,” the Fox News Sunday host noted. “The Trump investigation did not start with the FISA warrant and Carter Page and the dossier.”

    Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”

    Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”

    Hemmer, meanwhile, said he thought they needed to “add we think in quotes” because “the story is not entirely yet revealed,” prompting Wallace to push back.

    “I don’t think there is any doubt they started investigating—I mean, everybody agrees they started investigating in the summer of 2016,” Wallace declared. “Look, I’m not saying what they did was right or any of that but we know that’s when the investigation started. There has been documentation of that.”


    And the best part is, Wallace calls out Rush as a liar. And if you objectively look at the facts, Rush is of course lying.

    They began an investigation based on a phony dossier created and written by associates of Hillary Clinton. It was opposition research,” Limbaugh told Fox News anchor Bret Baier. “This is outrageous what has happened here. There needs to be an investigation into this. There needs to be accountability for everybody who participated in this.”

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-chris-wallace-muellers-russia-investigation-did-not-start-with-steele-dossier-on-trump

    Hondo you claimed the investigation of Trump didn't start until after the election and Mueller was appointed and that the dossier played no role in starting that investigation. Appears he is calling you a liar dumbfuck. And of course anyone who calls you a liar would be accurate.


    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
    What do you think "dirt on Hillary" means? Dumbfuck.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,790 Founders Club
    Sure did

    https://foxnews.com/politics/investigators-had-50-50-chance-of-securing-fisa-warrant-for-trump-aide-without-dossier-testimony

    The chances of securing a 2016 surveillance warrant for a Trump campaign aide were “50/50” without the controversial anti-Trump “dossier,” according to testimony in newly confirmed congressional transcripts.

    The October testimony from senior FBI lawyer Sally Moyer to House investigators appers to underscore how critical the dossier -- funded by the Democratic Party and Clinton campaign -- was in obtaining the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant, and appears to conflict with Democratic assertions that the dossier played a limited role in the process.

    Asked whether the FBI would have been able to establish probable cause if the application “did not have the Christopher Steele information in it,” Moyer responded: "So I think it's a close call, like 50/50, 51/49. I really think it's a close call."

    Moyer is a key witness as a lead attorney for the FBI’s 2016 Clinton email and Russia investigations. Her testimony about the dossier’s importance to the surveillance warrant application appears consistent with that of former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.

    According to a memo from Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee in February 2018 about the Page warrant, "McCabe testified before the Committee in December 2017 that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court] without the Steele dossier information."

    It's always special when a pathological liar like hondo calls someone a liar
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,206
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Chris Wallace calls Bob a liar.

    “This will drive some of our viewers nuts,” the Fox News Sunday host noted. “The Trump investigation did not start with the FISA warrant and Carter Page and the dossier.”

    Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”

    Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”

    Hemmer, meanwhile, said he thought they needed to “add we think in quotes” because “the story is not entirely yet revealed,” prompting Wallace to push back.

    “I don’t think there is any doubt they started investigating—I mean, everybody agrees they started investigating in the summer of 2016,” Wallace declared. “Look, I’m not saying what they did was right or any of that but we know that’s when the investigation started. There has been documentation of that.”


    And the best part is, Wallace calls out Rush as a liar. And if you objectively look at the facts, Rush is of course lying.

    They began an investigation based on a phony dossier created and written by associates of Hillary Clinton. It was opposition research,” Limbaugh told Fox News anchor Bret Baier. “This is outrageous what has happened here. There needs to be an investigation into this. There needs to be accountability for everybody who participated in this.”

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-chris-wallace-muellers-russia-investigation-did-not-start-with-steele-dossier-on-trump

    Hondo you claimed the investigation of Trump didn't start until after the election and Mueller was appointed and that the dossier played no role in starting that investigation. Appears he is calling you a liar dumbfuck. And of course anyone who calls you a liar would be accurate.


    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
    What do you think "dirt on Hillary" means? Dumbfuck.
    “Dirt” on Hillary could mean all kinds of things. But the two things we know for certain is that it isn’t a “documented fact” that the Russians offered to give the Trump team the stolen emails, and that you are a pathological liar.

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Sure did

    https://foxnews.com/politics/investigators-had-50-50-chance-of-securing-fisa-warrant-for-trump-aide-without-dossier-testimony

    The chances of securing a 2016 surveillance warrant for a Trump campaign aide were “50/50” without the controversial anti-Trump “dossier,” according to testimony in newly confirmed congressional transcripts.

    The October testimony from senior FBI lawyer Sally Moyer to House investigators appers to underscore how critical the dossier -- funded by the Democratic Party and Clinton campaign -- was in obtaining the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant, and appears to conflict with Democratic assertions that the dossier played a limited role in the process.

    Asked whether the FBI would have been able to establish probable cause if the application “did not have the Christopher Steele information in it,” Moyer responded: "So I think it's a close call, like 50/50, 51/49. I really think it's a close call."

    Moyer is a key witness as a lead attorney for the FBI’s 2016 Clinton email and Russia investigations. Her testimony about the dossier’s importance to the surveillance warrant application appears consistent with that of former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.

    According to a memo from Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee in February 2018 about the Page warrant, "McCabe testified before the Committee in December 2017 that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court] without the Steele dossier information."

    It's always special when a pathological liar like hondo calls someone a liar

    You aren't even talking the same thing man.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,790 Founders Club
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,790 Founders Club
    Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”


    This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,206
    2001400ex said:

    Sure did

    https://foxnews.com/politics/investigators-had-50-50-chance-of-securing-fisa-warrant-for-trump-aide-without-dossier-testimony

    The chances of securing a 2016 surveillance warrant for a Trump campaign aide were “50/50” without the controversial anti-Trump “dossier,” according to testimony in newly confirmed congressional transcripts.

    The October testimony from senior FBI lawyer Sally Moyer to House investigators appers to underscore how critical the dossier -- funded by the Democratic Party and Clinton campaign -- was in obtaining the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant, and appears to conflict with Democratic assertions that the dossier played a limited role in the process.

    Asked whether the FBI would have been able to establish probable cause if the application “did not have the Christopher Steele information in it,” Moyer responded: "So I think it's a close call, like 50/50, 51/49. I really think it's a close call."

    Moyer is a key witness as a lead attorney for the FBI’s 2016 Clinton email and Russia investigations. Her testimony about the dossier’s importance to the surveillance warrant application appears consistent with that of former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.

    According to a memo from Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee in February 2018 about the Page warrant, "McCabe testified before the Committee in December 2017 that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court] without the Steele dossier information."

    It's always special when a pathological liar like hondo calls someone a liar

    You aren't even talking the same thing man.
    We’re talking about one thing, you are a pathological liar Hondo.

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”


    This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it

    Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTH
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,206
    2001400ex said:

    Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”


    This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it

    Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTH
    And you've lied repeatedly about what the Russians offered to give the the Trump team. And you've double, tripled and quadrupled down on that lie by posting links that you claimed supported your statement when in truth they did no such thing.

    If anyone had lied to Mueller and the FBI about what the Russians had really offered, and if it really was a "documented fact" as you claimed that the Russians were offering to give the Trump team hacked DNC and Hillary emails everyone at that meeting would be under indictment. Hell Manafort probably could have used that information in order to get himself out of jail if it really was a "documented fact."

    But it's not a "documented fact" it's just a baseless claim by a pathological lying zero integrity piece of shit.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”


    This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it

    Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTH
    And you've lied repeatedly about what the Russians offered to give the the Trump team. And you've double, tripled and quadrupled down on that lie by posting links that you claimed supported your statement when in truth they did no such thing.

    If anyone had lied to Mueller and the FBI about what the Russians had really offered, and if it really was a "documented fact" as you claimed that the Russians were offering to give the Trump team hacked DNC and Hillary emails everyone at that meeting would be under indictment. Hell Manafort probably could have used that information in order to get himself out of jail if it really was a "documented fact."

    But it's not a "documented fact" it's just a baseless claim by a pathological lying zero integrity piece of shit.
    Bob, the DNC and Hillary related emails were released shortly after the meeting. What the fuck do you think "dirt on Hillary" means?

    Seriously, you are literally incapable of seeing the truth when it's right in front of you. You call me a liar. The truth is, you lie to yourself.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,206
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”


    This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it

    Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTH
    And you've lied repeatedly about what the Russians offered to give the the Trump team. And you've double, tripled and quadrupled down on that lie by posting links that you claimed supported your statement when in truth they did no such thing.

    If anyone had lied to Mueller and the FBI about what the Russians had really offered, and if it really was a "documented fact" as you claimed that the Russians were offering to give the Trump team hacked DNC and Hillary emails everyone at that meeting would be under indictment. Hell Manafort probably could have used that information in order to get himself out of jail if it really was a "documented fact."

    But it's not a "documented fact" it's just a baseless claim by a pathological lying zero integrity piece of shit.
    Bob, the DNC and Hillary related emails were released shortly after the meeting. What the fuck do you think "dirt on Hillary" means?

    Seriously, you are literally incapable of seeing the truth when it's right in front of you. You call me a liar. The truth is, you lie to yourself.
    It means you're a pathological liar.

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Fuck off dim wit
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    2001400ex said:

    Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”


    This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it

    Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTH
    You should let Mueller know.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,846 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”


    This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it

    Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTH
    And you've lied repeatedly about what the Russians offered to give the the Trump team. And you've double, tripled and quadrupled down on that lie by posting links that you claimed supported your statement when in truth they did no such thing.

    If anyone had lied to Mueller and the FBI about what the Russians had really offered, and if it really was a "documented fact" as you claimed that the Russians were offering to give the Trump team hacked DNC and Hillary emails everyone at that meeting would be under indictment. Hell Manafort probably could have used that information in order to get himself out of jail if it really was a "documented fact."

    But it's not a "documented fact" it's just a baseless claim by a pathological lying zero integrity piece of shit.
    Were they under oath?
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,206
    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”


    This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it

    Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTH
    And you've lied repeatedly about what the Russians offered to give the the Trump team. And you've double, tripled and quadrupled down on that lie by posting links that you claimed supported your statement when in truth they did no such thing.

    If anyone had lied to Mueller and the FBI about what the Russians had really offered, and if it really was a "documented fact" as you claimed that the Russians were offering to give the Trump team hacked DNC and Hillary emails everyone at that meeting would be under indictment. Hell Manafort probably could have used that information in order to get himself out of jail if it really was a "documented fact."

    But it's not a "documented fact" it's just a baseless claim by a pathological lying zero integrity piece of shit.
    Were they under oath?

    The FBI interviewed everyone from the "Trump team" that was present at the meeting. If it really were a "documented fact" that the Russians offered the hacked DNC emails, and the missing 30K Hillary emails, which to the best of my knowledge were never believed to have been hacked, just destroyed by Hillary, and anyone lied about this "documented fact" they would now be under indictment.

    Hondo is talking squarely out of his ass and falsely claiming that "dirt on Hillary" is limited only to the hacked Hillary and DNC emails. No one present at the meeting has said that was what the Russian were offering. In fact everyone says the when the Russians got to the meeting they offered up no dirt and wanted to talk about something complete different.

    Hondo is a poorly informed pathological liar.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”


    This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it

    Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTH
    And you've lied repeatedly about what the Russians offered to give the the Trump team. And you've double, tripled and quadrupled down on that lie by posting links that you claimed supported your statement when in truth they did no such thing.

    If anyone had lied to Mueller and the FBI about what the Russians had really offered, and if it really was a "documented fact" as you claimed that the Russians were offering to give the Trump team hacked DNC and Hillary emails everyone at that meeting would be under indictment. Hell Manafort probably could have used that information in order to get himself out of jail if it really was a "documented fact."

    But it's not a "documented fact" it's just a baseless claim by a pathological lying zero integrity piece of shit.
    Were they under oath?

    The FBI interviewed everyone from the "Trump team" that was present at the meeting. If it really were a "documented fact" that the Russians offered the hacked DNC emails, and the missing 30K Hillary emails, which to the best of my knowledge were never believed to have been hacked, just destroyed by Hillary, and anyone lied about this "documented fact" they would now be under indictment.

    Hondo is talking squarely out of his ass and falsely claiming that "dirt on Hillary" is limited only to the hacked Hillary and DNC emails. No one present at the meeting has said that was what the Russian were offering. In fact everyone says the when the Russians got to the meeting they offered up no dirt and wanted to talk about something complete different.

    Hondo is a poorly informed pathological liar.
    I never said anything about the 30k emails. Idiot. The Hillary emails I referred to are the ones released with the DNC emails, and were from hacked accounts of people she interacted with.

    Dude. You aren't even beating a dead horse. You are beating a horse that didn't exist.

    I do chuckle at you making a fool of yourself by copying that quote into every thread on the tug. And I'm not the only one laughing at you..... It's quite the hilarious obsession.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,790 Founders Club

    NOC


    Dems claimed Trump was a Russian agent for two years and ended up with nothing, essentially guaranteeing him victory over the shit ass group of Dem candidates running on pro-illegal-immigration, the environment, and reparations.

    Bears repeating

    They got their investigation

    They got their wire tap

    They got their special prosecutor

    They got shit.

    Good effort good job
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,206
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”


    This was a set up by the way and Popadopolous didn't fall for it

    Trump Jr was there too. And they said no to the information. And they lied about the purpose of the meeting when they were first questioned about it. HTH
    And you've lied repeatedly about what the Russians offered to give the the Trump team. And you've double, tripled and quadrupled down on that lie by posting links that you claimed supported your statement when in truth they did no such thing.

    If anyone had lied to Mueller and the FBI about what the Russians had really offered, and if it really was a "documented fact" as you claimed that the Russians were offering to give the Trump team hacked DNC and Hillary emails everyone at that meeting would be under indictment. Hell Manafort probably could have used that information in order to get himself out of jail if it really was a "documented fact."

    But it's not a "documented fact" it's just a baseless claim by a pathological lying zero integrity piece of shit.
    Were they under oath?

    The FBI interviewed everyone from the "Trump team" that was present at the meeting. If it really were a "documented fact" that the Russians offered the hacked DNC emails, and the missing 30K Hillary emails, which to the best of my knowledge were never believed to have been hacked, just destroyed by Hillary, and anyone lied about this "documented fact" they would now be under indictment.

    Hondo is talking squarely out of his ass and falsely claiming that "dirt on Hillary" is limited only to the hacked Hillary and DNC emails. No one present at the meeting has said that was what the Russian were offering. In fact everyone says the when the Russians got to the meeting they offered up no dirt and wanted to talk about something complete different.

    Hondo is a poorly informed pathological liar.
    I never said anything about the 30k emails. Idiot. The Hillary emails I referred to are the ones released with the DNC emails, and were from hacked accounts of people she interacted with.

    Dude. You aren't even beating a dead horse. You are beating a horse that didn't exist.

    I do chuckle at you making a fool of yourself by copying that quote into every thread on the tug. And I'm not the only one laughing at you..... It's quite the hilarious obsession.
    Got it, you weren't lying about the 30K emails you were lying about the Hillary DNC emails.

    I do chuckle that a pathological liar thinks this makes a difference.
Sign In or Register to comment.