AOC update from Quinnipiac University poll
Comments
-
Humor understood and noted. That said, I feel like "scared" isn't the right word for her. It's more so a curiosity as to why she's such a rising star. Young voters in this country are motivated by the stupidest shit.MikeDamone said:Imagine being scared of a little brown girl.
-
2001400ex said:
She's too young to run. Not surprised you don't know that.PurpleJ said:Sounds like people without degrees are smarter than those with them.
Also looks like she could win a Democratic nomination (if it wasn't rigged against her) and then get trounced by Trump.
That being said, why do you think Democrats and Independents are almost twice as likely to never have heard of her?
J is talking about AOC getting her ass kicked by IVANKA Trump in 2028.
*too lazy too look whether AOC will be 40 in 2028. -
Even staying away for a little while puts you at risk for inside jokesYellowSnow said:
Humor understood and noted. That said, I feel like "scared" isn't the right word for her. It's more so a curiosity as to why she's such a rising star. Young voters in this country are motivated by the stupidest shit.MikeDamone said:Imagine being scared of a little brown girl.
Hondo like to think that when we discuss someone who embarrasses him because of their ideas we are scared of that person
Of course its ridiculous. Its hondo -
IronicSFGbob said:
Because they're poorly informed dipshits like you?2001400ex said:
She's too young to run. Not surprised you don't know that.PurpleJ said:Sounds like people without degrees are smarter than those with them.
Also looks like she could win a Democratic nomination (if it wasn't rigged against her) and then get trounced by Trump.
That being said, why do you think Democrats and Independents are almost twice as likely to never have heard of her? -
Yeah, I see what you mean.2001400ex said:
IronicSFGbob said:
Because they're poorly informed dipshits like you?2001400ex said:
She's too young to run. Not surprised you don't know that.PurpleJ said:Sounds like people without degrees are smarter than those with them.
Also looks like she could win a Democratic nomination (if it wasn't rigged against her) and then get trounced by Trump.
That being said, why do you think Democrats and Independents are almost twice as likely to never have heard of her?
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump. -
AOC is a disaster for the dems. It's hilarious.
She's become the shining star to the super progressives and everyone else is embarrassed of her. -
-
Favorable/unfavorable among dems is 47 to 7. What a disaster.
Her numbers in that poll are very good, if you can’t see that it’s because you don’t know how to read polls. -
According to hondo Democrats haven't heard of her
Depends on how the 44% breaks
Very good is a stretch
They aren't horrible -
We can have different interpretations of these numbers, it’s really messy when the proportion of people that don’t know who she is so large. But for me, the fact that you’re willing to concede that they aren’t horrible just reaffirms my position that they’re actually very good.RaceBannon said:According to hondo Democrats haven't heard of her
Depends on how the 44% breaks
Very good is a stretch
They aren't horrible
It’s pretty clear how the 44% is going to break. The people least likely to have heard her are women, young people, blacks and Hispanics. Those are the people most likely to give her a favorable rating.
I also think the independent numbers are misleading. There was a poll a few weeks ago with similar numbers but it had a political leaning numbers for liberal, moderate and conservative and she did better with moderate there. It wasn’t amazing, iirc it was 30% favorable and 36% unfavorable, but an ok number. I think that’s the middle ground voter you want to find. My hunch is libertarians are fucking up the polling numbers for “independents”.
