Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

AOC update from Quinnipiac University poll

RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,791 Founders Club
in Tug Tavern

· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«134

Comments

  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,412
    And people wonder why democrats want to lower the voting age...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BennyBeaverBennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    greenblood said:

    And people wonder why democrats want to lower the voting age...

    No one wonders that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,159 Standard Supporter
    She needs to get the editing finished on her sex tape so The Throbber can move into the somewhat favorable column.

    Without that, she's just a loud mouth.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,791 Founders Club
    BennyBeaver said:

    greenblood said:

    And people wonder why democrats want to lower the voting age...

    No one wonders that.
    I do
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,255 Founders Club
    Sounds like people without degrees are smarter than those with them.

    Also looks like she could win a Democratic nomination (if it wasn't rigged against her) and then get trounced by Trump.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    PurpleJ said:

    Sounds like people without degrees are smarter than those with them.

    Also looks like she could win a Democratic nomination (if it wasn't rigged against her) and then get trounced by Trump.

    She's too young to run. Not surprised you don't know that.

    That being said, why do you think Democrats and Independents are almost twice as likely to never have heard of her?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,791 Founders Club
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Sounds like people without degrees are smarter than those with them.

    Also looks like she could win a Democratic nomination (if it wasn't rigged against her) and then get trounced by Trump.

    She's too young to run. Not surprised you don't know that.

    That being said, why do you think Democrats and Independents are almost twice as likely to never have heard of her?
    Because they're poorly informed dipshits like you?
    Beat me to it

    Older conservative males are smarter
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,206
    RaceBannon said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Sounds like people without degrees are smarter than those with them.

    Also looks like she could win a Democratic nomination (if it wasn't rigged against her) and then get trounced by Trump.

    She's too young to run. Not surprised you don't know that.

    That being said, why do you think Democrats and Independents are almost twice as likely to never have heard of her?
    Because they're poorly informed dipshits like you?
    Beat me to it

    Older conservative males are smarter
    Jokes write themselves with Hondo.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,405 Founders Club
    MikeDamone said:

    Imagine being scared of a little brown girl.

    Humor understood and noted. That said, I feel like "scared" isn't the right word for her. It's more so a curiosity as to why she's such a rising star. Young voters in this country are motivated by the stupidest shit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,159 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Sounds like people without degrees are smarter than those with them.

    Also looks like she could win a Democratic nomination (if it wasn't rigged against her) and then get trounced by Trump.

    She's too young to run. Not surprised you don't know that.

    That being said, why do you think Democrats and Independents are almost twice as likely to never have heard of her?




    J is talking about AOC getting her ass kicked by IVANKA Trump in 2028.

    *too lazy too look whether AOC will be 40 in 2028.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,791 Founders Club
    YellowSnow said:

    MikeDamone said:

    Imagine being scared of a little brown girl.

    Humor understood and noted. That said, I feel like "scared" isn't the right word for her. It's more so a curiosity as to why she's such a rising star. Young voters in this country are motivated by the stupidest shit.
    Even staying away for a little while puts you at risk for inside jokes

    Hondo like to think that when we discuss someone who embarrasses him because of their ideas we are scared of that person

    Of course its ridiculous. Its hondo
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Sounds like people without degrees are smarter than those with them.

    Also looks like she could win a Democratic nomination (if it wasn't rigged against her) and then get trounced by Trump.

    She's too young to run. Not surprised you don't know that.

    That being said, why do you think Democrats and Independents are almost twice as likely to never have heard of her?
    Because they're poorly informed dipshits like you?
    Ironic
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,206
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Sounds like people without degrees are smarter than those with them.

    Also looks like she could win a Democratic nomination (if it wasn't rigged against her) and then get trounced by Trump.

    She's too young to run. Not surprised you don't know that.

    That being said, why do you think Democrats and Independents are almost twice as likely to never have heard of her?
    Because they're poorly informed dipshits like you?
    Ironic
    Yeah, I see what you mean.

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,949
    AOC is a disaster for the dems. It's hilarious.
    She's become the shining star to the super progressives and everyone else is embarrassed of her.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,791 Founders Club

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • allpurpleallgoldallpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    Favorable/unfavorable among dems is 47 to 7. What a disaster.

    Her numbers in that poll are very good, if you can’t see that it’s because you don’t know how to read polls.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,791 Founders Club
    According to hondo Democrats haven't heard of her

    Depends on how the 44% breaks

    Very good is a stretch

    They aren't horrible
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • allpurpleallgoldallpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    RaceBannon said:

    According to hondo Democrats haven't heard of her

    Depends on how the 44% breaks

    Very good is a stretch

    They aren't horrible

    We can have different interpretations of these numbers, it’s really messy when the proportion of people that don’t know who she is so large. But for me, the fact that you’re willing to concede that they aren’t horrible just reaffirms my position that they’re actually very good.

    It’s pretty clear how the 44% is going to break. The people least likely to have heard her are women, young people, blacks and Hispanics. Those are the people most likely to give her a favorable rating.

    I also think the independent numbers are misleading. There was a poll a few weeks ago with similar numbers but it had a political leaning numbers for liberal, moderate and conservative and she did better with moderate there. It wasn’t amazing, iirc it was 30% favorable and 36% unfavorable, but an ok number. I think that’s the middle ground voter you want to find. My hunch is libertarians are fucking up the polling numbers for “independents”.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.