Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Benning listed as Dline.
Comments
-
Yeah but who will replace Feeney and Littleton?Dennis_DeYoung said:
BRO, HE'S STANDING. That's where SAMS play. Just like Elijah Qualls played SAM some.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Well no, he's on the left tackle's outside shoulder playing at the LOS. That's literally the definition of the 5-tech alignment.Dennis_DeYoung said:
I love it when we don't recognize that we teach our players multiple positions. That is called SAM you shit head.GreenRiverGatorz said:
wE oNlY gO As wIdE aS a 3 TeChDennis_DeYoung said:Can I get a fucking trigger warning for threads in which people seriously talk about who is going to play 5-tech in our defense???
And that it goes unchallenged??
Fucking kill yourselves.
Here's a picture of our defensive tackle lined up at the 5T you ornery fuck. We like to have multiple looks, go figure.
I get that all the fucking Doogs cannot let go of the idea we play DEs, but we don't.
Do we OCCASIONALLY line people up at the 5 or 7 tech and have their hand down? YES.
But it's not a position in our defense. It happens less than 15% of the time in games I've charted.
Our base defense is the following (which you can see in that picture):
2 "DOWN" DLs (usually a 1 and a 2 Tech)
2 "UP" OLBs (usually a 5-7 Tech; SAM plays field side, BUCK plays weak)
2 ILBs (MIK and WIL)
Slot (kind of a hybrid LB/CB)
2 CBs
2 Ss
that's what we are in there and that's what we are almost always in.
When we say Benning is moving to the DL, we are talking about taking him from his outside, stand up alignment there (5-7 Tech, whatever) to a DOWN, interior 1-2 Tech alignment.
Got it fucker? -
Semantics. I get what you’re saying about a 3-1-2 but there really is no such thing in traditional alignments. A safety in the box is still a safety. A MLB covering a TE outside or in the slot still isn’t a corner.Dennis_DeYoung said:
I have no idea, but after 4 straight years of being the #1 D in the Pac and recruiting the body types for the 2-2-2-5 D, it would surprise me a little if we went to a 3-1-2, but I suppose it’s possible.Neighbor2972 said:
But is Benning actually going to play DT? Or is he going to play SAM/3rd defensive tackle?Dennis_DeYoung said:
When we say Benning is moving to the DL, we are talking about taking him from his outside, stand up alignment there (5-7 Tech, whatever) to a DOWN, interior 1-2 Tech alignment.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Well no, he's on the left tackle's outside shoulder playing at the LOS. That's literally the definition of the 5-tech alignment.Dennis_DeYoung said:
I love it when we don't recognize that we teach our players multiple positions. That is called SAM you shit head.GreenRiverGatorz said:
wE oNlY gO As wIdE aS a 3 TeChDennis_DeYoung said:Can I get a fucking trigger warning for threads in which people seriously talk about who is going to play 5-tech in our defense???
And that it goes unchallenged??
Fucking kill yourselves.
Here's a picture of our defensive tackle lined up at the 5T you ornery fuck. We like to have multiple looks, go figure.
Got it fucker?
String & Qualls did both, but there were at least 295. Is Benning going to gain 20 pounds so he can rotate in at DT? (Which he probably should) -
Preseason all pac12 team disagrees.RoadDawg55 said:
Semantics. I get what you’re saying about a 3-1-2 but there really is no such thing in traditional alignments. A safety in the box is still a safety. A MLB covering a TE outside or in the slot still isn’t a corner.Dennis_DeYoung said:
I have no idea, but after 4 straight years of being the #1 D in the Pac and recruiting the body types for the 2-2-2-5 D, it would surprise me a little if we went to a 3-1-2, but I suppose it’s possible.Neighbor2972 said:
But is Benning actually going to play DT? Or is he going to play SAM/3rd defensive tackle?Dennis_DeYoung said:
When we say Benning is moving to the DL, we are talking about taking him from his outside, stand up alignment there (5-7 Tech, whatever) to a DOWN, interior 1-2 Tech alignment.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Well no, he's on the left tackle's outside shoulder playing at the LOS. That's literally the definition of the 5-tech alignment.Dennis_DeYoung said:
I love it when we don't recognize that we teach our players multiple positions. That is called SAM you shit head.GreenRiverGatorz said:
wE oNlY gO As wIdE aS a 3 TeChDennis_DeYoung said:Can I get a fucking trigger warning for threads in which people seriously talk about who is going to play 5-tech in our defense???
And that it goes unchallenged??
Fucking kill yourselves.
Here's a picture of our defensive tackle lined up at the 5T you ornery fuck. We like to have multiple looks, go figure.
Got it fucker?
String & Qualls did both, but there were at least 295. Is Benning going to gain 20 pounds so he can rotate in at DT? (Which he probably should)
