First of all. The dates are wrong. Secondly, lying by omission. Third, they use the number for all immigration and ignore the number for all environment, cherry picking data.
First of all. The dates are wrong. Secondly, lying by omission. Third, they use the number for all immigration and ignore the number for all environment, cherry picking data.
First of all. The dates are wrong. Secondly, lying by omission. Third, they use the number for all immigration and ignore the number for all environment, cherry picking data.
All things you’re well versed in.
Exactly. Example number 4,325 of where I called out your news source for lying. Yet you keep coming back to watch. You enjoy the comfort Fox news provides by lying to you.
First of all. The dates are wrong. Secondly, lying by omission. Third, they use the number for all immigration and ignore the number for all environment, cherry picking data.
Again, most of those sources are perceived as liberal. I want to see all requests for the last 10 years. Other than that, I can't really make a judgement based on this information. It's too small of a sample and comparing an irrelevant apple to a consequential
First of all. The dates are wrong. Secondly, lying by omission. Third, they use the number for all immigration and ignore the number for all environment, cherry picking data.
First of all. The dates are wrong. Secondly, lying by omission. Third, they use the number for all immigration and ignore the number for all environment, cherry picking data.
Again, most of those sources are perceived as liberal. I want to see all requests for the last 10 years. Other than that, I can't really make a judgement based on this information. It's too small of a sample and comparing an irrelevant apple to a consequential
Again, most of those sources are perceived as liberal. I want to see all requests for the last 10 years. Other than that, I can't really make a judgement based on this information. It's too small of a sample and comparing an irrelevant apple to a consequential
Again, most of those sources are perceived as liberal. I want to see all requests for the last 10 years. Other than that, I can't really make a judgement based on this information. It's too small of a sample and comparing an irrelevant apple to a consequential
Finish the quote if you are going to copy pasta.
Imagine saying copy pasta. Even MTG thinks that’s a dumb cliche. And he? is a literal retard.
Again, most of those sources are perceived as liberal. I want to see all requests for the last 10 years. Other than that, I can't really make a judgement based on this information. It's too small of a sample and comparing an irrelevant apple to a consequential orange.
Climate change ranks higher than- Poverty Jobs Trade Integrity Women rights Human rights Racial equality Deficit National Security Supporting the military Smaller government Upholding the constitution Social security And finally, *none*
Comments
Again, most of those sources are perceived as liberal. I want to see all requests for the last 10 years. Other than that, I can't really make a judgement based on this information. It's too small of a sample and comparing an irrelevant apple to a consequential
What did Tucker get wrong?
Finish the quote if you are going to copy pasta.
Again, most of those sources are perceived as liberal. I want to see all requests for the last 10 years. Other than that, I can't really make a judgement based on this information. It's too small of a sample and comparing an irrelevant apple to a consequential
Again, most of those sources are perceived as liberal. I want to see all requests for the last 10 years. Other than that, I can't really make a judgement based on this information. It's too small of a sample and comparing an irrelevant apple to a consequential orange.
Poverty
Jobs
Trade
Integrity
Women rights
Human rights
Racial equality
Deficit
National Security
Supporting the military
Smaller government
Upholding the constitution
Social security
And finally, *none*
Helps AOC.
In both cases.