Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





Show your support for what this community means to you:


Choose a Donation Amount
Username (required for credit)



Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. If you dare criticize Jimmy Lake, you won't last long.

Sandy Hook Families Can Sue Remington

2

Comments

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Posts: 23,904
    Swaye's Wigwam 10000 Comments 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary
    edited March 14

    2001400ex said:

    Imagine if we were able to sue Coors and Ford if some drunk driver in an Explorer killed somebody...

    Imagine if we were able to sue tobacco companies for people dying from cigarettes.

    Are we done with strawman now?
    Can we sue their banks?
    Were they complicit in criminal activity?
    MikeDamonepawzSledogDawgtonaLoneStarDawgSoutherndawg
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Posts: 42,087
    Swaye's Wigwam 25000 Comments 250 Answers Sixth Anniversary
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Imagine if we were able to sue Coors and Ford if some drunk driver in an Explorer killed somebody...

    Imagine if we were able to sue tobacco companies for people dying from cigarettes.

    Are we done with strawman now?
    Can we sue their banks?
    We're they complicit in criminal activity?
    Why are you asking me that question?
    MikeDamonepawz
  • greenbloodgreenblood Posts: 9,148
    5000 Comments 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary 500 Awesomes
    How about bullet and metal manufactures?
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Posts: 23,904
    Swaye's Wigwam 10000 Comments 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Imagine if we were able to sue Coors and Ford if some drunk driver in an Explorer killed somebody...

    Imagine if we were able to sue tobacco companies for people dying from cigarettes.

    Are we done with strawman now?
    Can we sue their banks?
    We're they complicit in criminal activity?
    Why are you asking me that question?
    Why do you not understand the question?
    MikeDamoneSledogSoutherndawg
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Posts: 42,087
    Swaye's Wigwam 25000 Comments 250 Answers Sixth Anniversary
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Imagine if we were able to sue Coors and Ford if some drunk driver in an Explorer killed somebody...

    Imagine if we were able to sue tobacco companies for people dying from cigarettes.

    Are we done with strawman now?
    Can we sue their banks?
    We're they complicit in criminal activity?
    Why are you asking me that question?
    Why do you not understand the question?
    Did I say I didn't understand the question? You need to read for comprehension
    MikeDamonepawzSledogSoutherndawg
  • HHuskyHHusky Posts: 1,860
    250 Answers 500 Up Votes 1000 Comments 100 Awesomes

    How about bullet and metal manufactures?

    I know you gals love hypotheticals, but the lawsuit is based on marketing decisions.
    MikeDamoneSledogSoutherndawg
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Posts: 23,904
    Swaye's Wigwam 10000 Comments 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Imagine if we were able to sue Coors and Ford if some drunk driver in an Explorer killed somebody...

    Imagine if we were able to sue tobacco companies for people dying from cigarettes.

    Are we done with strawman now?
    Can we sue their banks?
    We're they complicit in criminal activity?
    Why are you asking me that question?
    Why do you not understand the question?
    Did I say I didn't understand the question? You need to read for comprehension
    So you want to avoid the question.
    pawzSledogSoutherndawg
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Posts: 14,964
    Swaye's Wigwam 10000 Comments 250 Answers Sixth Anniversary
    I going to wait to comment until @SandyHooker weighs in.
    RaceBannonpawzDawgtonaSoutherndawg
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Posts: 42,087
    Swaye's Wigwam 25000 Comments 250 Answers Sixth Anniversary
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Imagine if we were able to sue Coors and Ford if some drunk driver in an Explorer killed somebody...

    Imagine if we were able to sue tobacco companies for people dying from cigarettes.

    Are we done with strawman now?
    Can we sue their banks?
    We're they complicit in criminal activity?
    Why are you asking me that question?
    Why do you not understand the question?
    Did I say I didn't understand the question? You need to read for comprehension
    So you want to avoid the question.
    What question?
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Posts: 34,017
    Swaye's Wigwam 25000 Comments 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary
    HHusky said:
    Gotta admit, I find that bravado shit kinda distasteful.
    HHusky
  • SwayeSwaye Posts: 27,530
    Swaye's Wigwam Solar Eclipse Donator 25000 Comments Sixth Anniversary
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    The Court keeps referencing Remington violated the Consumer Protection Statute by somehow advertising "illegal or criminal activity ". Of course Remington doesn't do that. How could Remington's advertising have made Lanza murder his mother and steal her weapons?

    This is what happens when courts try to legislate their political opinions via the bench.

    Please just live with the fact that Congress caved and it will be reversed. You have no idea what evidence was presented.
    I see Remington advertising. So yes I have seen what would be considered "evidence".

    If someone steals your Prius and runs someone over your gonna be in deep shit!
    You don't know what you're talking about.

    It's OK. This isn't going to stand. Just try to be happy.
    Yes I do.

    Anyone that thinks a person or entity should be responsible for the criminal actions of another under the circumstances of this case isn't thinking clearly.

    Of course Lanza;s mom thinking shooting is good thing for her son, whom she knew to nutty, is crazy. She doesn't have any money so they go after Remington. That and the whole gun control agenda of wanting to bankrupt gun manufacturers as a form of gun control.

    I wish they'd get the lawsuits on weed sellers going.
    easy there turbo
    GrundleStiltzkinRaceBannonDawgtona
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Posts: 42,087
    Swaye's Wigwam 25000 Comments 250 Answers Sixth Anniversary

    HHusky said:
    Gotta admit, I find that bravado shit kinda distasteful.
    Agree but it's not aimed at school shooters. More of a militia focus group
    GrundleStiltzkinSwaye
  • pawzpawz Posts: 6,520
    Swaye's Wigwam 5000 Comments 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Imagine if we were able to sue Coors and Ford if some drunk driver in an Explorer killed somebody...

    Imagine if we were able to sue tobacco companies for people dying from cigarettes.

    Are we done with strawman now?
    Can we sue their banks?
    Were they complicit in criminal activity?
    What a fucking idiot.
    SwayeRaceBannonSoutherndawg
  • dfleadflea Posts: 4,481
    Butler Cabin Supporter 2500 Comments 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    The Court keeps referencing Remington violated the Consumer Protection Statute by somehow advertising "illegal or criminal activity ". Of course Remington doesn't do that. How could Remington's advertising have made Lanza murder his mother and steal her weapons?

    This is what happens when courts try to legislate their political opinions via the bench.

    Please just live with the fact that Congress caved and it will be reversed. You have no idea what evidence was presented.
    I see Remington advertising. So yes I have seen what would be considered "evidence".

    If someone steals your Prius and runs someone over your gonna be in deep shit!
    You don't know what you're talking about.

    It's OK. This isn't going to stand. Just try to be happy.
    Yes I do.

    Anyone that thinks a person or entity should be responsible for the criminal actions of another under the circumstances of this case isn't thinking clearly.

    Of course Lanza;s mom thinking shooting is good thing for her son, whom she knew to nutty, is crazy. She doesn't have any money so they go after Remington. That and the whole gun control agenda of wanting to bankrupt gun manufacturers as a form of gun control.

    I wish they'd get the lawsuits on weed sellers going.
    Whoa
    Like Sledog being a fucking retard had escaped your attention until now.
    HHuskyRaceBannonCirrhosisDawgSledogBennyBeaver
  • SledogSledog Posts: 9,333
    5000 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    The Court keeps referencing Remington violated the Consumer Protection Statute by somehow advertising "illegal or criminal activity ". Of course Remington doesn't do that. How could Remington's advertising have made Lanza murder his mother and steal her weapons?

    This is what happens when courts try to legislate their political opinions via the bench.

    Please just live with the fact that Congress caved and it will be reversed. You have no idea what evidence was presented.
    I see Remington advertising. So yes I have seen what would be considered "evidence".

    If someone steals your Prius and runs someone over your gonna be in deep shit!
    You don't know what you're talking about.

    It's OK. This isn't going to stand. Just try to be happy.
    Yes I do.

    Anyone that thinks a person or entity should be responsible for the criminal actions of another under the circumstances of this case isn't thinking clearly.

    Of course Lanza;s mom thinking shooting is good thing for her son, whom she knew to nutty, is crazy. She doesn't have any money so they go after Remington. That and the whole gun control agenda of wanting to bankrupt gun manufacturers as a form of gun control.

    I wish they'd get the lawsuits on weed sellers going.
    Whoa
    If they can sue a federally protected industry how do you think it'll go for an industry the feds say is illegal?
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Posts: 42,087
    Swaye's Wigwam 25000 Comments 250 Answers Sixth Anniversary
    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    The Court keeps referencing Remington violated the Consumer Protection Statute by somehow advertising "illegal or criminal activity ". Of course Remington doesn't do that. How could Remington's advertising have made Lanza murder his mother and steal her weapons?

    This is what happens when courts try to legislate their political opinions via the bench.

    Please just live with the fact that Congress caved and it will be reversed. You have no idea what evidence was presented.
    I see Remington advertising. So yes I have seen what would be considered "evidence".

    If someone steals your Prius and runs someone over your gonna be in deep shit!
    You don't know what you're talking about.

    It's OK. This isn't going to stand. Just try to be happy.
    Yes I do.

    Anyone that thinks a person or entity should be responsible for the criminal actions of another under the circumstances of this case isn't thinking clearly.

    Of course Lanza;s mom thinking shooting is good thing for her son, whom she knew to nutty, is crazy. She doesn't have any money so they go after Remington. That and the whole gun control agenda of wanting to bankrupt gun manufacturers as a form of gun control.

    I wish they'd get the lawsuits on weed sellers going.
    Whoa
    If they can sue a federally protected industry how do you think it'll go for an industry the feds say is illegal?
    I understood your point

    But some things cross the line here
    SwayeGrundleStiltzkinpawzdflea
  • pawzpawz Posts: 6,520
    Swaye's Wigwam 5000 Comments 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    The Court keeps referencing Remington violated the Consumer Protection Statute by somehow advertising "illegal or criminal activity ". Of course Remington doesn't do that. How could Remington's advertising have made Lanza murder his mother and steal her weapons?

    This is what happens when courts try to legislate their political opinions via the bench.

    Please just live with the fact that Congress caved and it will be reversed. You have no idea what evidence was presented.
    I see Remington advertising. So yes I have seen what would be considered "evidence".

    If someone steals your Prius and runs someone over your gonna be in deep shit!
    You don't know what you're talking about.

    It's OK. This isn't going to stand. Just try to be happy.
    Yes I do.

    Anyone that thinks a person or entity should be responsible for the criminal actions of another under the circumstances of this case isn't thinking clearly.

    Of course Lanza;s mom thinking shooting is good thing for her son, whom she knew to nutty, is crazy. She doesn't have any money so they go after Remington. That and the whole gun control agenda of wanting to bankrupt gun manufacturers as a form of gun control.

    I wish they'd get the lawsuits on weed sellers going.
    Whoa
    If they can sue a federally protected industry how do you think it'll go for an industry the feds say is illegal?
    I understood your point

    But some things cross the line here
    Sleedoog is JeffSessionsFS
    dflea
Sign In or Register to comment.