The Court keeps referencing Remington violated the Consumer Protection Statute by somehow advertising "illegal or criminal activity ". Of course Remington doesn't do that. How could Remington's advertising have made Lanza murder his mother and steal her weapons?
This is what happens when courts try to legislate their political opinions via the bench.
Please just live with the fact that Congress caved and it will be reversed. You have no idea what evidence was presented.
I see Remington advertising. So yes I have seen what would be considered "evidence".
If someone steals your Prius and runs someone over your gonna be in deep shit!
You don't know what you're talking about.
It's OK. This isn't going to stand. Just try to be happy.
Yes I do.
Anyone that thinks a person or entity should be responsible for the criminal actions of another under the circumstances of this case isn't thinking clearly.
Of course Lanza;s mom thinking shooting is good thing for her son, whom she knew to nutty, is crazy. She doesn't have any money so they go after Remington. That and the whole gun control agenda of wanting to bankrupt gun manufacturers as a form of gun control.
I wish they'd get the lawsuits on weed sellers going.
The Court keeps referencing Remington violated the Consumer Protection Statute by somehow advertising "illegal or criminal activity ". Of course Remington doesn't do that. How could Remington's advertising have made Lanza murder his mother and steal her weapons?
This is what happens when courts try to legislate their political opinions via the bench.
Please just live with the fact that Congress caved and it will be reversed. You have no idea what evidence was presented.
I see Remington advertising. So yes I have seen what would be considered "evidence".
If someone steals your Prius and runs someone over your gonna be in deep shit!
You don't know what you're talking about.
It's OK. This isn't going to stand. Just try to be happy.
Yes I do.
Anyone that thinks a person or entity should be responsible for the criminal actions of another under the circumstances of this case isn't thinking clearly.
Of course Lanza;s mom thinking shooting is good thing for her son, whom she knew to nutty, is crazy. She doesn't have any money so they go after Remington. That and the whole gun control agenda of wanting to bankrupt gun manufacturers as a form of gun control.
I wish they'd get the lawsuits on weed sellers going.
Whoa
Like Sledog being a fucking retard had escaped your attention until now.
The Court keeps referencing Remington violated the Consumer Protection Statute by somehow advertising "illegal or criminal activity ". Of course Remington doesn't do that. How could Remington's advertising have made Lanza murder his mother and steal her weapons?
This is what happens when courts try to legislate their political opinions via the bench.
Please just live with the fact that Congress caved and it will be reversed. You have no idea what evidence was presented.
I see Remington advertising. So yes I have seen what would be considered "evidence".
If someone steals your Prius and runs someone over your gonna be in deep shit!
You don't know what you're talking about.
It's OK. This isn't going to stand. Just try to be happy.
Yes I do.
Anyone that thinks a person or entity should be responsible for the criminal actions of another under the circumstances of this case isn't thinking clearly.
Of course Lanza;s mom thinking shooting is good thing for her son, whom she knew to nutty, is crazy. She doesn't have any money so they go after Remington. That and the whole gun control agenda of wanting to bankrupt gun manufacturers as a form of gun control.
I wish they'd get the lawsuits on weed sellers going.
Whoa
If they can sue a federally protected industry how do you think it'll go for an industry the feds say is illegal?
The Court keeps referencing Remington violated the Consumer Protection Statute by somehow advertising "illegal or criminal activity ". Of course Remington doesn't do that. How could Remington's advertising have made Lanza murder his mother and steal her weapons?
This is what happens when courts try to legislate their political opinions via the bench.
Please just live with the fact that Congress caved and it will be reversed. You have no idea what evidence was presented.
I see Remington advertising. So yes I have seen what would be considered "evidence".
If someone steals your Prius and runs someone over your gonna be in deep shit!
You don't know what you're talking about.
It's OK. This isn't going to stand. Just try to be happy.
Yes I do.
Anyone that thinks a person or entity should be responsible for the criminal actions of another under the circumstances of this case isn't thinking clearly.
Of course Lanza;s mom thinking shooting is good thing for her son, whom she knew to nutty, is crazy. She doesn't have any money so they go after Remington. That and the whole gun control agenda of wanting to bankrupt gun manufacturers as a form of gun control.
I wish they'd get the lawsuits on weed sellers going.
Whoa
If they can sue a federally protected industry how do you think it'll go for an industry the feds say is illegal?
The Court keeps referencing Remington violated the Consumer Protection Statute by somehow advertising "illegal or criminal activity ". Of course Remington doesn't do that. How could Remington's advertising have made Lanza murder his mother and steal her weapons?
This is what happens when courts try to legislate their political opinions via the bench.
Please just live with the fact that Congress caved and it will be reversed. You have no idea what evidence was presented.
I see Remington advertising. So yes I have seen what would be considered "evidence".
If someone steals your Prius and runs someone over your gonna be in deep shit!
You don't know what you're talking about.
It's OK. This isn't going to stand. Just try to be happy.
Yes I do.
Anyone that thinks a person or entity should be responsible for the criminal actions of another under the circumstances of this case isn't thinking clearly.
Of course Lanza;s mom thinking shooting is good thing for her son, whom she knew to nutty, is crazy. She doesn't have any money so they go after Remington. That and the whole gun control agenda of wanting to bankrupt gun manufacturers as a form of gun control.
I wish they'd get the lawsuits on weed sellers going.
Whoa
If they can sue a federally protected industry how do you think it'll go for an industry the feds say is illegal?
Comments
But some things cross the line here