Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Break up Big Tech?
Comments
-
Opposing private monopolies and supporting public monopolies aren’t in conflict.GrundleStiltzkin said:Opposes alleged tech monopolies.
Supports single-payer healthcare. -
Go on, elaborate.HHusky said:
Opposing private monopolies and supporting public monopolies aren’t in conflict.GrundleStiltzkin said:Opposes alleged tech monopolies.
Supports single-payer healthcare. -
I know that makes a nice headline. But it's almost like health Care and tech businesses are completely different things.GrundleStiltzkin said:Opposes alleged tech monopolies.
Supports single-payer healthcare. -
You mean like Bell, Standard Oil and Microsoft?2001400ex said:
I know that makes a nice headline. But it's almost like health Care and tech businesses are completely different things.GrundleStiltzkin said:Opposes alleged tech monopolies.
Supports single-payer healthcare.
What's your poont?
-
I am just so relieved we have hondo, maritoto and allpurp working so hard to make the world a better place fighting for the little guy. Warms my heart.
-
Those businesses had similar traits that made the government want to break them up. So I'm not sure how they come into the conversation of Government run medical insurance.GrundleStiltzkin said:
You mean like Bell, Standard Oil and Microsoft?2001400ex said:
I know that makes a nice headline. But it's almost like health Care and tech businesses are completely different things.GrundleStiltzkin said:Opposes alleged tech monopolies.
Supports single-payer healthcare.
What's your poont? -
You said, "health Care and tech businesses."2001400ex said:
Those businesses had similar traits that made the government want to break them up. So I'm not sure how they come into the conversation of Government run medical insurance.GrundleStiltzkin said:
You mean like Bell, Standard Oil and Microsoft?2001400ex said:
I know that makes a nice headline. But it's almost like health Care and tech businesses are completely different things.GrundleStiltzkin said:Opposes alleged tech monopolies.
Supports single-payer healthcare.
What's your poont? -
But do they send any of their own money?jecornel said:I am just so relieved we have hondo, maritoto and allpurp working so hard to make the world a better place fighting for the little guy. Warms my heart.
-
Many things are done more efficiently through a state monopoly or a state granted monopoly than by a lightly regulated market. Single payer is markedly more efficient than what we have now.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Go on, elaborate.HHusky said:
Opposing private monopolies and supporting public monopolies aren’t in conflict.GrundleStiltzkin said:Opposes alleged tech monopolies.
Supports single-payer healthcare.
A private monopoly may be highly efficient and provide a good value to the customer, but the price we pay may also be measured in the suppression of competition by other innovators. Innovation being a hallmark of capitalism, you must agree that suppressing innovation isn’t good for our society. -
Holy fuck. I'm surprised I'm surprised.HHusky said:
Many things are done more efficiently through a state monopoly or a state granted monopoly than by a lightly regulated market. Single payer is markedly more efficient than what we have now.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Go on, elaborate.HHusky said:
Opposing private monopolies and supporting public monopolies aren’t in conflict.GrundleStiltzkin said:Opposes alleged tech monopolies.
Supports single-payer healthcare.
A private monopoly may be highly efficient and provide a good value to the customer, but the price we pay may also be measured in the suppression of competition by other innovators. Innovation being a hallmark of capitalism, you must agree that suppressing innovation isn’t good for our society.





