Tulsi brings lefty foreign policy to righty audience and it works

MariotaTheGawd

TurdBuffer said:

MariotaTheGawd said:

TurdBuffer said:

MariotaTheGawd said:

TurdBuffer said:

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

Just stop with the lefty talking point bullshit. This is an establishment vs libertarian issue.

The people are tired of the "bi-partisan" war mongering, regime change foreign policy directives. When Trump plays the tune you accuse him of being an isolationist.

If only you cared about BigTech censorship since they are now working to silence those voices so the establishment-elite can profit off more war for oil. For recent example, see media coverage on Venezuela.

I’ve never called Trump an isolationist. He’s a con man that says one thing and does another because he knows libertarians are too dumb to figure it out.

I find Libertarians as a whole to be the most critical thinking of the bunch. The take the best of both sides of the aisle and piss on the worst.

We know you won't agree because Libertarian, but still.

I don’t think you know what critical thinking is.

Years ago, I noticed theists hijacking atheist and skeptical language in attempt to make their ideas sound more legitimate. This was the “intelligent design” crowd. And you see the same thing with libertarians. Look no further than Damone. Who runs around calling everything out as a logical fallacy but he’s wrong half the time. A lot of people would see his posts and think he’s smart because of the language he uses but he doesn’t really know how to use it.

My point is using language you don’t understand doesn’t make you a critical thinker. Being open to all ideas doesn’t make you good at critical thinking. You have to be able to discern between what has actual reason behind it and what is bullshit.

If libertarians were so good at critical thinking they would think their positions all the way through and realize they wouldn’t work thus making them not libertarians.

Things people say when they can't admit Libertarians are smarter and have more balls than they.

this is a top 5 post i've seen since i've been on here

That's because you're an idiot.

it's because you have zero self-awareness

not that i'd expect any from ohio trash. i'd say there's at least a 35% chance you have barbed wire tattooed somewhere on your body

Irony meters, everywhere.

any other insult than "i know you are but what am i" seems to be beyond your brainpower. sad.

TurdBomber

MariotaTheGawd said:

TurdBuffer said:

MariotaTheGawd said:

TurdBuffer said:

MariotaTheGawd said:

TurdBuffer said:

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

Just stop with the lefty talking point bullshit. This is an establishment vs libertarian issue.

The people are tired of the "bi-partisan" war mongering, regime change foreign policy directives. When Trump plays the tune you accuse him of being an isolationist.

If only you cared about BigTech censorship since they are now working to silence those voices so the establishment-elite can profit off more war for oil. For recent example, see media coverage on Venezuela.

I’ve never called Trump an isolationist. He’s a con man that says one thing and does another because he knows libertarians are too dumb to figure it out.

I find Libertarians as a whole to be the most critical thinking of the bunch. The take the best of both sides of the aisle and piss on the worst.

We know you won't agree because Libertarian, but still.

I don’t think you know what critical thinking is.

Years ago, I noticed theists hijacking atheist and skeptical language in attempt to make their ideas sound more legitimate. This was the “intelligent design” crowd. And you see the same thing with libertarians. Look no further than Damone. Who runs around calling everything out as a logical fallacy but he’s wrong half the time. A lot of people would see his posts and think he’s smart because of the language he uses but he doesn’t really know how to use it.

My point is using language you don’t understand doesn’t make you a critical thinker. Being open to all ideas doesn’t make you good at critical thinking. You have to be able to discern between what has actual reason behind it and what is bullshit.

If libertarians were so good at critical thinking they would think their positions all the way through and realize they wouldn’t work thus making them not libertarians.

Things people say when they can't admit Libertarians are smarter and have more balls than they.

this is a top 5 post i've seen since i've been on here

That's because you're an idiot.

it's because you have zero self-awareness

not that i'd expect any from ohio trash. i'd say there's at least a 35% chance you have barbed wire tattooed somewhere on your body

Irony meters, everywhere.

any other insult than "i know you are but what am i" seems to be beyond your brainpower. sad.

Whooooooooosh.

MariotaTheGawd

TurdBuffer said:

MariotaTheGawd said:

TurdBuffer said:

MariotaTheGawd said:

TurdBuffer said:

MariotaTheGawd said:

TurdBuffer said:

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

Just stop with the lefty talking point bullshit. This is an establishment vs libertarian issue.

The people are tired of the "bi-partisan" war mongering, regime change foreign policy directives. When Trump plays the tune you accuse him of being an isolationist.

If only you cared about BigTech censorship since they are now working to silence those voices so the establishment-elite can profit off more war for oil. For recent example, see media coverage on Venezuela.

I’ve never called Trump an isolationist. He’s a con man that says one thing and does another because he knows libertarians are too dumb to figure it out.

I find Libertarians as a whole to be the most critical thinking of the bunch. The take the best of both sides of the aisle and piss on the worst.

We know you won't agree because Libertarian, but still.

I don’t think you know what critical thinking is.

Years ago, I noticed theists hijacking atheist and skeptical language in attempt to make their ideas sound more legitimate. This was the “intelligent design” crowd. And you see the same thing with libertarians. Look no further than Damone. Who runs around calling everything out as a logical fallacy but he’s wrong half the time. A lot of people would see his posts and think he’s smart because of the language he uses but he doesn’t really know how to use it.

My point is using language you don’t understand doesn’t make you a critical thinker. Being open to all ideas doesn’t make you good at critical thinking. You have to be able to discern between what has actual reason behind it and what is bullshit.

If libertarians were so good at critical thinking they would think their positions all the way through and realize they wouldn’t work thus making them not libertarians.

Things people say when they can't admit Libertarians are smarter and have more balls than they.

this is a top 5 post i've seen since i've been on here

That's because you're an idiot.

it's because you have zero self-awareness

not that i'd expect any from ohio trash. i'd say there's at least a 35% chance you have barbed wire tattooed somewhere on your body

Irony meters, everywhere.

any other insult than "i know you are but what am i" seems to be beyond your brainpower. sad.

Whooooooooosh.

lol sure bud. you can have the last word. i'm sure you'll use it wisely.

TurdBomber

Come see homophobic @MariotaTheGawd struggle in every thread.

MariotaTheGawd

UW_Doog_Bot

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

Just stop with the lefty talking point bullshit. This is an establishment vs libertarian issue.

The people are tired of the "bi-partisan" war mongering, regime change foreign policy directives. When Trump plays the tune you accuse him of being an isolationist.



If only you cared about BigTech censorship since they are now working to silence those voices so the establishment-elite can profit off more war for oil. For recent example, see media coverage on Venezuela.

I’ve never called Trump an isolationist. He’s a con man that says one thing and does another because he knows libertarians are too dumb to figure it out.

I find Libertarians as a whole to be the most critical thinking of the bunch. The take the best of both sides of the aisle and piss on the worst.

We know you won't agree because Libertarian, but still.

I don’t think you know what critical thinking is.

Years ago, I noticed theists hijacking atheist and skeptical language in attempt to make their ideas sound more legitimate. This was the “intelligent design” crowd. And you see the same thing with libertarians. Look no further than Damone. Who runs around calling everything out as a logical fallacy but he’s wrong half the time. A lot of people would see his posts and think he’s smart because of the language he uses but he doesn’t really know how to use it.

My point is using language you don’t understand doesn’t make you a critical thinker. Being open to all ideas doesn’t make you good at critical thinking. You have to be able to discern between what has actual reason behind it and what is bullshit.

If libertarians progressives were so good at critical thinking they would think their positions all the way through and realize they wouldn’t work thus making them not libertarians progressives.

It's funny, because I'm not sure you even really understand what libertarianism is or what the historical criticisms of it actually are.

The fact that you think Damone is applying logical fallacies incorrectly only shows your own ignorance. It's not as if this stuff is subjective. This is all Philo 115 critical thinking and logic freshman year argumentation. It's not like anyone in here is arguing Wittgenstein's "What can be shown, cannot be said."

The whole tug is filled with red herring, tu quoque, false binary, equivocation, appeal to pity, moving goalposts, etc.

MikeDamone

UW_Doog_Bot said:

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

Just stop with the lefty talking point bullshit. This is an establishment vs libertarian issue.

The people are tired of the "bi-partisan" war mongering, regime change foreign policy directives. When Trump plays the tune you accuse him of being an isolationist.



If only you cared about BigTech censorship since they are now working to silence those voices so the establishment-elite can profit off more war for oil. For recent example, see media coverage on Venezuela.

I’ve never called Trump an isolationist. He’s a con man that says one thing and does another because he knows libertarians are too dumb to figure it out.

I find Libertarians as a whole to be the most critical thinking of the bunch. The take the best of both sides of the aisle and piss on the worst.

We know you won't agree because Libertarian, but still.

I don’t think you know what critical thinking is.

Years ago, I noticed theists hijacking atheist and skeptical language in attempt to make their ideas sound more legitimate. This was the “intelligent design” crowd. And you see the same thing with libertarians. Look no further than Damone. Who runs around calling everything out as a logical fallacy but he’s wrong half the time. A lot of people would see his posts and think he’s smart because of the language he uses but he doesn’t really know how to use it.

My point is using language you don’t understand doesn’t make you a critical thinker. Being open to all ideas doesn’t make you good at critical thinking. You have to be able to discern between what has actual reason behind it and what is bullshit.

If libertarians progressives were so good at critical thinking they would think their positions all the way through and realize they wouldn’t work thus making them not libertarians progressives.

It's funny, because I'm not sure you even really understand what libertarianism is or what the historical criticisms of it actually are.

The fact that you think Damone is applying logical fallacies incorrectly only shows your own ignorance. It's not as if this stuff is subjective. This is all Philo 115 critical thinking and logic freshman year argumentation. It's not like anyone in here is arguing Wittgenstein's "What can be shown, cannot be said."

The whole tug is filled with red herring, tu quoque, false binary, equivocation, appeal to pity, moving goalposts, etc.

Just admit you’re wrong I will gladly have a broader discussion with you. Until then, burn books.