Tulsi brings lefty foreign policy to righty audience and it works

allpurpleallgold

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KKQLGO4ULC4

pawz

Just stop with the lefty talking point bullshit. This is an establishment vs libertarian issue.

The people are tired of the "bi-partisan" war mongering, regime change foreign policy directives. When Trump plays the tune you accuse him of being an isolationist.



If only you cared about BigTech censorship since they are now working to silence those voices so the establishment-elite can profit off more war for oil. For recent example, see media coverage on Venezuela.

Kaepsknee

Tulsi is one of the few if not the only grown up in the room with her hat in the ring. Unfortunately the race to the left edge of the earth by her competitors and How the Left is eating it up, gives her little chance of winning the nomination in 2020.

The Left is on an all or nothing mission with no tolerance for compromise or moderation. They actually believe in the viability of the Socialist utopia and seemingly will settle for no less when they cast their ballot in 2020.

BennyBeaver

allpurpleallgold said:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KKQLGO4ULC4

Wood Tulsi.

allpurpleallgold

salemcoog said:

Tulsi is one of the few if not the only grown up in the room with her hat in the ring. Unfortunately the race to the left edge of the earth by her competitors and How the Left is eating it up, gives her little chance of winning the nomination in 2020.

The Left is on an all or nothing mission with no tolerance for compromise or moderation. They actually believe in the viability of the Socialist utopia and seemingly will settle for no less when they cast their ballot in 2020.

This is a distorted view of reality.

Tulsi is the far left. Tulsi supported Bernie in 2016. Tulsi has a bill to get the US to 100% renewable energy by 2035. Tulsi supports Medicare For All. She support a $15 minimum wage. You don’t know what you’re talking about.

allpurpleallgold

pawz said:

Just stop with the lefty talking point bullshit. This is an establishment vs libertarian issue.

The people are tired of the "bi-partisan" war mongering, regime change foreign policy directives. When Trump plays the tune you accuse him of being an isolationist.



If only you cared about BigTech censorship since they are now working to silence those voices so the establishment-elite can profit off more war for oil. For recent example, see media coverage on Venezuela.

I’ve never called Trump an isolationist. He’s a con man that says one thing and does another because he knows libertarians are too dumb to figure it out.

DerekJohnson

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

Just stop with the lefty talking point bullshit. This is an establishment vs libertarian issue.

The people are tired of the "bi-partisan" war mongering, regime change foreign policy directives. When Trump plays the tune you accuse him of being an isolationist.



If only you cared about BigTech censorship since they are now working to silence those voices so the establishment-elite can profit off more war for oil. For recent example, see media coverage on Venezuela.

I’ve never called Trump an isolationist. He’s a con man that says one thing and does another because he knows libertarians are too dumb to figure it out.

If Trump was a hot Latina with her hair up in a pony tail, you'd have a proud collection of MAGA hats

allpurpleallgold

Disagree.

HardlyClothed

I don’t think Gabbard is genuinely anti-interventionist. She would have been fine with us intervening in Syria if our clients were reversed and we helped Assad massacre the rebels.

jecornel

The idea of wanting to put a stop to endless wars is certainly not a revolutionary concept. Ron Paul has talked about it for 30 years.

I certainly don't have a problem with it, but we certainly need to be in strategic areas. Having military bases in 120 countries is over the top.

Sledog

HardlyClothed said:

I don’t think Gabbard is genuinely anti-interventionist. She would have been fine with us intervening in Syria if our clients were reversed and we helped Assad massacre the rebels.

So she would have built and armed ISIS just like Obozo did?

pawz

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

Just stop with the lefty talking point bullshit. This is an establishment vs libertarian issue.

The people are tired of the "bi-partisan" war mongering, regime change foreign policy directives. When Trump plays the tune you accuse him of being an isolationist.



If only you cared about BigTech censorship since they are now working to silence those voices so the establishment-elite can profit off more war for oil. For recent example, see media coverage on Venezuela.

I’ve never called Trump an isolationist. He’s a con man that says one thing and does another because he knows libertarians are too dumb to figure it out.

I find Libertarians as a whole to be the most critical thinking of the bunch. The take the best of both sides of the aisle and piss on the worst.

We know you won't agree because Libertarian, but still.

PurpleThrobber

salemcoog said:

Tulsi is one of the few if not the only grown up in the room with her hat in the ring. Unfortunately the race to the left edge of the earth by her competitors and How the Left is eating it up, gives her little chance of winning the nomination in 2020.

The Left is on an all or nothing mission with no tolerance for compromise or moderation. They actually believe in the viability of the Socialist utopia and seemingly will settle for no less when they cast their ballot in 2020.

Translated; the Dems are fucked again.

PurpleThrobber

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

Just stop with the lefty talking point bullshit. This is an establishment vs libertarian issue.

The people are tired of the "bi-partisan" war mongering, regime change foreign policy directives. When Trump plays the tune you accuse him of being an isolationist.



If only you cared about BigTech censorship since they are now working to silence those voices so the establishment-elite can profit off more war for oil. For recent example, see media coverage on Venezuela.

I’ve never called Trump an isolationist. He’s a con man that says one thing and does another because he knows libertarians are too dumb to figure it out.

That’s a new spin on the left’s “We’re smarter than you” slant...

Lulz, ‘you guys’ will never learn.

Right winning again in 2020.

AOC, forevah though! July 4 sex tape premiere will be special.

allpurpleallgold

pawz said:

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

Just stop with the lefty talking point bullshit. This is an establishment vs libertarian issue.

The people are tired of the "bi-partisan" war mongering, regime change foreign policy directives. When Trump plays the tune you accuse him of being an isolationist.



If only you cared about BigTech censorship since they are now working to silence those voices so the establishment-elite can profit off more war for oil. For recent example, see media coverage on Venezuela.

I’ve never called Trump an isolationist. He’s a con man that says one thing and does another because he knows libertarians are too dumb to figure it out.

I find Libertarians as a whole to be the most critical thinking of the bunch. The take the best of both sides of the aisle and piss on the worst.

We know you won't agree because Libertarian, but still.

I don’t think you know what critical thinking is.

Years ago, I noticed theists hijacking atheist and skeptical language in attempt to make their ideas sound more legitimate. This was the “intelligent design” crowd. And you see the same thing with libertarians. Look no further than Damone. Who runs around calling everything out as a logical fallacy but he’s wrong half the time. A lot of people would see his posts and think he’s smart because of the language he uses but he doesn’t really know how to use it.

My point is using language you don’t understand doesn’t make you a critical thinker. Being open to all ideas doesn’t make you good at critical thinking. You have to be able to discern between what has actual reason behind it and what is bullshit.

If libertarians were so good at critical thinking they would think their positions all the way through and realize they wouldn’t work thus making them not libertarians.

2001400ex

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

Just stop with the lefty talking point bullshit. This is an establishment vs libertarian issue.

The people are tired of the "bi-partisan" war mongering, regime change foreign policy directives. When Trump plays the tune you accuse him of being an isolationist.



If only you cared about BigTech censorship since they are now working to silence those voices so the establishment-elite can profit off more war for oil. For recent example, see media coverage on Venezuela.

I’ve never called Trump an isolationist. He’s a con man that says one thing and does another because he knows libertarians are too dumb to figure it out.

I find Libertarians as a whole to be the most critical thinking of the bunch. The take the best of both sides of the aisle and piss on the worst.

We know you won't agree because Libertarian, but still.

I don’t think you know what critical thinking is.

Years ago, I noticed theists hijacking atheist and skeptical language in attempt to make their ideas sound more legitimate. This was the “intelligent design” crowd. And you see the same thing with libertarians. Look no further than Damone. Who runs around calling everything out as a logical fallacy but he’s wrong half the time. A lot of people would see his posts and think he’s smart because of the language he uses but he doesn’t really know how to use it.

My point is using language you don’t understand doesn’t make you a critical thinker. Being open to all ideas doesn’t make you good at critical thinking. You have to be able to discern between what has actual reason behind it and what is bullshit.

If libertarians were so good at critical thinking they would think their positions all the way through and realize they wouldn’t work thus making them not libertarians.

My favorite one is his use the last week of virtue signaling. It's like his news source comes up with the buzzword of the month and he feels compelled to use it.

That being said, the downfall to libertarians is their answer to everything is "no Government". They don't care what the question is, unless it's military, the answer is "no Government".

Sledog

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

Just stop with the lefty talking point bullshit. This is an establishment vs libertarian issue.

The people are tired of the "bi-partisan" war mongering, regime change foreign policy directives. When Trump plays the tune you accuse him of being an isolationist.



If only you cared about BigTech censorship since they are now working to silence those voices so the establishment-elite can profit off more war for oil. For recent example, see media coverage on Venezuela.

I’ve never called Trump an isolationist. He’s a con man that says one thing and does another because he knows libertarians are too dumb to figure it out.

I find Libertarians as a whole to be the most critical thinking of the bunch. The take the best of both sides of the aisle and piss on the worst.

We know you won't agree because Libertarian, but still.

I don’t think you know what critical thinking is.

Years ago, I noticed theists hijacking atheist and skeptical language in attempt to make their ideas sound more legitimate. This was the “intelligent design” crowd. And you see the same thing with libertarians. Look no further than Damone. Who runs around calling everything out as a logical fallacy but he’s wrong half the time. A lot of people would see his posts and think he’s smart because of the language he uses but he doesn’t really know how to use it.

My point is using language you don’t understand doesn’t make you a critical thinker. Being open to all ideas doesn’t make you good at critical thinking. You have to be able to discern between what has actual reason behind it and what is bullshit.

If libertarians were so good at critical thinking they would think their positions all the way through and realize they wouldn’t work thus making them not libertarians.

That was a lot of typing to say he doesn't know what he's fucking talking about. Save a few brain cells next time.

allpurpleallgold

Sledog said:

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

Just stop with the lefty talking point bullshit. This is an establishment vs libertarian issue.

The people are tired of the "bi-partisan" war mongering, regime change foreign policy directives. When Trump plays the tune you accuse him of being an isolationist.



If only you cared about BigTech censorship since they are now working to silence those voices so the establishment-elite can profit off more war for oil. For recent example, see media coverage on Venezuela.

I’ve never called Trump an isolationist. He’s a con man that says one thing and does another because he knows libertarians are too dumb to figure it out.

I find Libertarians as a whole to be the most critical thinking of the bunch. The take the best of both sides of the aisle and piss on the worst.

We know you won't agree because Libertarian, but still.

I don’t think you know what critical thinking is.

Years ago, I noticed theists hijacking atheist and skeptical language in attempt to make their ideas sound more legitimate. This was the “intelligent design” crowd. And you see the same thing with libertarians. Look no further than Damone. Who runs around calling everything out as a logical fallacy but he’s wrong half the time. A lot of people would see his posts and think he’s smart because of the language he uses but he doesn’t really know how to use it.

My point is using language you don’t understand doesn’t make you a critical thinker. Being open to all ideas doesn’t make you good at critical thinking. You have to be able to discern between what has actual reason behind it and what is bullshit.

If libertarians were so good at critical thinking they would think their positions all the way through and realize they wouldn’t work thus making them not libertarians.

That was a lot of typing to say he doesn't know what he's fucking talking about. Save a few brain cells next time.

I like pawz so I’m willing to explain where I’m coming from. If thought he was a pos I’d just tell him to go fuck himself.

Also, go fuck yourself.

Southerndawg

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

Just stop with the lefty talking point bullshit. This is an establishment vs libertarian issue.

The people are tired of the "bi-partisan" war mongering, regime change foreign policy directives. When Trump plays the tune you accuse him of being an isolationist.



If only you cared about BigTech censorship since they are now working to silence those voices so the establishment-elite can profit off more war for oil. For recent example, see media coverage on Venezuela.

I’ve never called Trump an isolationist. He’s a con man that says one thing and does another because he knows libertarians are too dumb to figure it out.

I find Libertarians as a whole to be the most critical thinking of the bunch. The take the best of both sides of the aisle and piss on the worst.

We know you won't agree because Libertarian, but still.

I don’t think you know what critical thinking is.

Years ago, I noticed theists hijacking atheist and skeptical language in attempt to make their ideas sound more legitimate. This was the “intelligent design” crowd. And you see the same thing with libertarians. Look no further than Damone. Who runs around calling everything out as a logical fallacy but he’s wrong half the time. A lot of people would see his posts and think he’s smart because of the language he uses but he doesn’t really know how to use it.

My point is using language you don’t understand doesn’t make you a critical thinker. Being open to all ideas doesn’t make you good at critical thinking. You have to be able to discern between what has actual reason behind it and what is bullshit.

If libertarians were so good at critical thinking they would think their positions all the way through and realize they wouldn’t work thus making them not.

You just did a wonderful job of describing progressives except they hijacked the liberal monicker.

Kaepsknee

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

Just stop with the lefty talking point bullshit. This is an establishment vs libertarian issue.

The people are tired of the "bi-partisan" war mongering, regime change foreign policy directives. When Trump plays the tune you accuse him of being an isolationist.



If only you cared about BigTech censorship since they are now working to silence those voices so the establishment-elite can profit off more war for oil. For recent example, see media coverage on Venezuela.

I’ve never called Trump an isolationist. He’s a con man that says one thing and does another because he knows libertarians are too dumb to figure it out.

I find Libertarians as a whole to be the most critical thinking of the bunch. The take the best of both sides of the aisle and piss on the worst.

We know you won't agree because Libertarian, but still.

I don’t think you know what critical thinking is.

Years ago, I noticed theists hijacking atheist and skeptical language in attempt to make their ideas sound more legitimate. This was the “intelligent design” crowd. And you see the same thing with libertarians. Look no further than Damone. Who runs around calling everything out as a logical fallacy but he’s wrong half the time. A lot of people would see his posts and think he’s smart because of the language he uses but he doesn’t really know how to use it.

My point is using language you don’t understand doesn’t make you a critical thinker. Being open to all ideas doesn’t make you good at critical thinking. You have to be able to discern between what has actual reason behind it and what is bullshit.

If libertarians were so good at critical thinking they would think their positions all the way through and realize they wouldn’t work thus making them not libertarians.

You are the best tail chaser on this board, no one can deny this.

Six paragraphs to say just because you use big words, it doesn’t make you smart mixed in with some jibberish about how being open to new ideas makes you stupid.

All brought to us by the torch bearer for the Male Lesbian movement.

MariotaTheGawd

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

Just stop with the lefty talking point bullshit. This is an establishment vs libertarian issue.

The people are tired of the "bi-partisan" war mongering, regime change foreign policy directives. When Trump plays the tune you accuse him of being an isolationist.



If only you cared about BigTech censorship since they are now working to silence those voices so the establishment-elite can profit off more war for oil. For recent example, see media coverage on Venezuela.

I’ve never called Trump an isolationist. He’s a con man that says one thing and does another because he knows libertarians are too dumb to figure it out.

I find Libertarians as a whole to be the most critical thinking of the bunch. The take the best of both sides of the aisle and piss on the worst.

We know you won't agree because Libertarian, but still.

I don’t think you know what critical thinking is.

Years ago, I noticed theists hijacking atheist and skeptical language in attempt to make their ideas sound more legitimate. This was the “intelligent design” crowd. And you see the same thing with libertarians. Look no further than Damone. Who runs around calling everything out as a logical fallacy but he’s wrong half the time. A lot of people would see his posts and think he’s smart because of the language he uses but he doesn’t really know how to use it.

My point is using language you don’t understand doesn’t make you a critical thinker. Being open to all ideas doesn’t make you good at critical thinking. You have to be able to discern between what has actual reason behind it and what is bullshit.

If libertarians were so good at critical thinking they would think their positions all the way through and realize they wouldn’t work thus making them not libertarians.

This is a pretty good summation of damone and a lot of libertarians in general. Lots of bluster, little substance. And their arguments die under the smallest bit of scrutiny. These idiots were seriously arguing that an infant should be free to decide whether to vaccinate itself the other day. And then when pressed on this they retreated to the typical "that's not what I said" defense and changed the subject without ever elaborating. Sad.