Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Racist Democrat doesn't want to doorknock in a 'N****r District'
Comments
-
Let me help:
“Race, your assertion that Cohen lied is incorrect because _______________ (fill in the blank).
I realize its much easier to say “talking points memo”! As a dumb ass with no argument would do. -
oldRaceBannon said:
I know you are but what am I?MariotaTheGawd said:
when was the last time you brought something interesting anywhere? 1993?RaceBannon said:
Remember that one time @MariotaTheGawd brought something interesting here?MariotaTheGawd said:remember that one time shepherd smith said something not nice about trump? check mate lib
Me neither -
No it wasn't. But you've been fed that line of bullshit and you repeat it like the good little parrot you are.2001400ex said:
Wait what? The heritage foundation medical plan isn't the basis for Obamacare?SFGbob said:
Lie but one made out of stupidity and the fact that you're a liberal talking point parrot not malice. Hondo is more interested in fact!!!2001400ex said:
Well heritage foundation did invent Obamacare. So there's that.SFGbob said:
Kunt logic, is there anything it can't do? Lets compare to things that aren't equal and draw some kind of conclusion from that comparison. Read Buzzfeed and then read a Heritage Foundation article on the same topic. Obviously the liberals aren't interested in facts.2001400ex said:
No one. Just gathered that from reading each respective side. Read a Vox article then read a daily caller article on the same topic. Granted this is TV, but watch Rachel maddow then watch Tucker Carlson. Watch their style in how they present information.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Who told you that?2001400ex said:
Yeah you know more about their history than I do. I have never been to their website, just some of their columns come up in my feed and they are never ones negative about Democrats. I read some of the articles, some are awful.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No, I don't care your question, nor the issue that much. Mariot said HuffPo turned away from "looking the other way" on Dem misdeeds a decade ago, as if to say HuffPo became less strident. I don't know how much HuffPo ignores now or then, but the site was started with help from Andrew Breitbart in 2004-05 as more left-of-centerish answer to Drudge. Greg Gutfeld was still writing there in mid-2008. Other conservatives or libertarians wrote there in that time too, but I don't remember who. My point is that HuffPo turned harder left about 10-11 years ago, as Adriana's politics turned harder left. It didn't moderate, just the opposite. If you take that as railing, that's on you.2001400ex said:
Oh you don't like the question?GrundleStiltzkin said:
Oh Hondo...2001400ex said:GrundleStiltzkin said:
You miss the point. It started turning hard progressive about a decade ago.MariotaTheGawd said:
Huffington Post's bias was always overstated. People acted like it was the Nation or something, but it was closer to a tabloid for Democrats.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Greg Gutfeld was still writing there in 2008.MariotaTheGawd said:
This is a trope that hasnt been true for probably a decadeDerekJohnson said:I sincerely give credit to the HuffPo for writing that about a liberal. They usually seem to look the other way for those with the "D" next to their name.
But why do you rail on a news source with a progressive tilt not say anything about a news source with a conservative tilt?
As a "policy stance," for lack of a better term, I really don't care much about any media outlet's ideological or partisan bent. The important thing is to recognize all media sources and all individual journalists have a point of view.
Well each side plays to their respective base in the media. You might not agree with this, but Conservatives generally want to read more opinionated writing and liberals general want to read more factual based writing (I'm not meaning truth, as you can lie with facts, more meaning the writing style). Especially news sources like Vox, which is liberal but everything is written in a factual context. But you read daily caller and it's more from an emotional context.
That's why it's important to read both sides.
I'm not saying conservative sites aren't factual. Just pay attention to the style on how the information is laid out.
Stupid, pathological liar and a Kunt. You're a hell of guy Hondo.
https://www.heritage.org/health-care-reform/commentary/dont-blame-heritage-obamacare-mandate -
Liar or moron?MariotaTheGawd said:
The core of Obamacare came out of Heritage in the 90s and was supported by congressional republicans at the time, and then was implemented by Mitt Romney when he was the governor of Massachusetts. Maybe you should take a break for awhile, bob.SFGbob said:
Lie but one made out of stupidity and the fact that you're a liberal talking point parrot not malice. Hondo is more interested in fact!!!2001400ex said:
Well heritage foundation did invent Obamacare. So there's that.SFGbob said:
Kunt logic, is there anything it can't do? Lets compare to things that aren't equal and draw some kind of conclusion from that comparison. Read Buzzfeed and then read a Heritage Foundation article on the same topic. Obviously the liberals aren't interested in facts.2001400ex said:
No one. Just gathered that from reading each respective side. Read a Vox article then read a daily caller article on the same topic. Granted this is TV, but watch Rachel maddow then watch Tucker Carlson. Watch their style in how they present information.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Who told you that?2001400ex said:
Yeah you know more about their history than I do. I have never been to their website, just some of their columns come up in my feed and they are never ones negative about Democrats. I read some of the articles, some are awful.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No, I don't care your question, nor the issue that much. Mariot said HuffPo turned away from "looking the other way" on Dem misdeeds a decade ago, as if to say HuffPo became less strident. I don't know how much HuffPo ignores now or then, but the site was started with help from Andrew Breitbart in 2004-05 as more left-of-centerish answer to Drudge. Greg Gutfeld was still writing there in mid-2008. Other conservatives or libertarians wrote there in that time too, but I don't remember who. My point is that HuffPo turned harder left about 10-11 years ago, as Adriana's politics turned harder left. It didn't moderate, just the opposite. If you take that as railing, that's on you.2001400ex said:
Oh you don't like the question?GrundleStiltzkin said:
Oh Hondo...2001400ex said:GrundleStiltzkin said:
You miss the point. It started turning hard progressive about a decade ago.MariotaTheGawd said:
Huffington Post's bias was always overstated. People acted like it was the Nation or something, but it was closer to a tabloid for Democrats.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Greg Gutfeld was still writing there in 2008.MariotaTheGawd said:
This is a trope that hasnt been true for probably a decadeDerekJohnson said:I sincerely give credit to the HuffPo for writing that about a liberal. They usually seem to look the other way for those with the "D" next to their name.
But why do you rail on a news source with a progressive tilt not say anything about a news source with a conservative tilt?
As a "policy stance," for lack of a better term, I really don't care much about any media outlet's ideological or partisan bent. The important thing is to recognize all media sources and all individual journalists have a point of view.
Well each side plays to their respective base in the media. You might not agree with this, but Conservatives generally want to read more opinionated writing and liberals general want to read more factual based writing (I'm not meaning truth, as you can lie with facts, more meaning the writing style). Especially news sources like Vox, which is liberal but everything is written in a factual context. But you read daily caller and it's more from an emotional context.
That's why it's important to read both sides.
I'm not saying conservative sites aren't factual. Just pay attention to the style on how the information is laid out.
Stupid, pathological liar and a Kunt. You're a hell of guy Hondo.
Take your pick
https://www.heritage.org/health-care-reform/commentary/dont-blame-heritage-obamacare-mandate -
MariotaTheGawd said:
oldRaceBannon said:
I know you are but what am I?MariotaTheGawd said:
when was the last time you brought something interesting anywhere? 1993?RaceBannon said:
Remember that one time @MariotaTheGawd brought something interesting here?MariotaTheGawd said:remember that one time shepherd smith said something not nice about trump? check mate lib
Me neither
-
No more stupid than you comparing Vox to Daily Caller.2001400ex said:
Sadly that's not the dumbest thing he did on this thread. Comparing BuzzFeed to heritage foundation isn't the dumbest thing either.MariotaTheGawd said:
The core of Obamacare came out of Heritage in the 90s and was supported by congressional republicans at the time, and then was implemented by Mitt Romney when he was the governor of Massachusetts. Maybe you should take a break for awhile, bob.SFGbob said:
Lie but one made out of stupidity and the fact that you're a liberal talking point parrot not malice. Hondo is more interested in fact!!!2001400ex said:
Well heritage foundation did invent Obamacare. So there's that.SFGbob said:
Kunt logic, is there anything it can't do? Lets compare to things that aren't equal and draw some kind of conclusion from that comparison. Read Buzzfeed and then read a Heritage Foundation article on the same topic. Obviously the liberals aren't interested in facts.2001400ex said:
No one. Just gathered that from reading each respective side. Read a Vox article then read a daily caller article on the same topic. Granted this is TV, but watch Rachel maddow then watch Tucker Carlson. Watch their style in how they present information.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Who told you that?2001400ex said:
Yeah you know more about their history than I do. I have never been to their website, just some of their columns come up in my feed and they are never ones negative about Democrats. I read some of the articles, some are awful.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No, I don't care your question, nor the issue that much. Mariot said HuffPo turned away from "looking the other way" on Dem misdeeds a decade ago, as if to say HuffPo became less strident. I don't know how much HuffPo ignores now or then, but the site was started with help from Andrew Breitbart in 2004-05 as more left-of-centerish answer to Drudge. Greg Gutfeld was still writing there in mid-2008. Other conservatives or libertarians wrote there in that time too, but I don't remember who. My point is that HuffPo turned harder left about 10-11 years ago, as Adriana's politics turned harder left. It didn't moderate, just the opposite. If you take that as railing, that's on you.2001400ex said:
Oh you don't like the question?GrundleStiltzkin said:
Oh Hondo...2001400ex said:GrundleStiltzkin said:
You miss the point. It started turning hard progressive about a decade ago.MariotaTheGawd said:
Huffington Post's bias was always overstated. People acted like it was the Nation or something, but it was closer to a tabloid for Democrats.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Greg Gutfeld was still writing there in 2008.MariotaTheGawd said:
This is a trope that hasnt been true for probably a decadeDerekJohnson said:I sincerely give credit to the HuffPo for writing that about a liberal. They usually seem to look the other way for those with the "D" next to their name.
But why do you rail on a news source with a progressive tilt not say anything about a news source with a conservative tilt?
As a "policy stance," for lack of a better term, I really don't care much about any media outlet's ideological or partisan bent. The important thing is to recognize all media sources and all individual journalists have a point of view.
Well each side plays to their respective base in the media. You might not agree with this, but Conservatives generally want to read more opinionated writing and liberals general want to read more factual based writing (I'm not meaning truth, as you can lie with facts, more meaning the writing style). Especially news sources like Vox, which is liberal but everything is written in a factual context. But you read daily caller and it's more from an emotional context.
That's why it's important to read both sides.
I'm not saying conservative sites aren't factual. Just pay attention to the style on how the information is laid out.
Stupid, pathological liar and a Kunt. You're a hell of guy Hondo.
Lots of stupidity Bob. -
WhooshMariotaTheGawd said:
oldRaceBannon said:
I know you are but what am I?MariotaTheGawd said:
when was the last time you brought something interesting anywhere? 1993?RaceBannon said:
Remember that one time @MariotaTheGawd brought something interesting here?MariotaTheGawd said:remember that one time shepherd smith said something not nice about trump? check mate lib
Me neither -
He’s been in a whooshicane sense his first post. Hasn’t dialed this place in.RaceBannon said:
WhooshMariotaTheGawd said:
oldRaceBannon said:
I know you are but what am I?MariotaTheGawd said:
when was the last time you brought something interesting anywhere? 1993?RaceBannon said:
Remember that one time @MariotaTheGawd brought something interesting here?MariotaTheGawd said:remember that one time shepherd smith said something not nice about trump? check mate lib
Me neither -
Hondo is such a big defender of obamacare that he blames a conservative organization for it
Kind of like his GND "defense" -
Before you shit posted it twice, did you even read it? He says no it's not the basis for Obamacare. Then goes on to explain how it is the basis for Obamacare. Then discusses why his position has evolved.SFGbob said:
Liar or moron?MariotaTheGawd said:
The core of Obamacare came out of Heritage in the 90s and was supported by congressional republicans at the time, and then was implemented by Mitt Romney when he was the governor of Massachusetts. Maybe you should take a break for awhile, bob.SFGbob said:
Lie but one made out of stupidity and the fact that you're a liberal talking point parrot not malice. Hondo is more interested in fact!!!2001400ex said:
Well heritage foundation did invent Obamacare. So there's that.SFGbob said:
Kunt logic, is there anything it can't do? Lets compare to things that aren't equal and draw some kind of conclusion from that comparison. Read Buzzfeed and then read a Heritage Foundation article on the same topic. Obviously the liberals aren't interested in facts.2001400ex said:
No one. Just gathered that from reading each respective side. Read a Vox article then read a daily caller article on the same topic. Granted this is TV, but watch Rachel maddow then watch Tucker Carlson. Watch their style in how they present information.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Who told you that?2001400ex said:
Yeah you know more about their history than I do. I have never been to their website, just some of their columns come up in my feed and they are never ones negative about Democrats. I read some of the articles, some are awful.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No, I don't care your question, nor the issue that much. Mariot said HuffPo turned away from "looking the other way" on Dem misdeeds a decade ago, as if to say HuffPo became less strident. I don't know how much HuffPo ignores now or then, but the site was started with help from Andrew Breitbart in 2004-05 as more left-of-centerish answer to Drudge. Greg Gutfeld was still writing there in mid-2008. Other conservatives or libertarians wrote there in that time too, but I don't remember who. My point is that HuffPo turned harder left about 10-11 years ago, as Adriana's politics turned harder left. It didn't moderate, just the opposite. If you take that as railing, that's on you.2001400ex said:
Oh you don't like the question?GrundleStiltzkin said:
Oh Hondo...2001400ex said:GrundleStiltzkin said:
You miss the point. It started turning hard progressive about a decade ago.MariotaTheGawd said:
Huffington Post's bias was always overstated. People acted like it was the Nation or something, but it was closer to a tabloid for Democrats.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Greg Gutfeld was still writing there in 2008.MariotaTheGawd said:
This is a trope that hasnt been true for probably a decadeDerekJohnson said:I sincerely give credit to the HuffPo for writing that about a liberal. They usually seem to look the other way for those with the "D" next to their name.
But why do you rail on a news source with a progressive tilt not say anything about a news source with a conservative tilt?
As a "policy stance," for lack of a better term, I really don't care much about any media outlet's ideological or partisan bent. The important thing is to recognize all media sources and all individual journalists have a point of view.
Well each side plays to their respective base in the media. You might not agree with this, but Conservatives generally want to read more opinionated writing and liberals general want to read more factual based writing (I'm not meaning truth, as you can lie with facts, more meaning the writing style). Especially news sources like Vox, which is liberal but everything is written in a factual context. But you read daily caller and it's more from an emotional context.
That's why it's important to read both sides.
I'm not saying conservative sites aren't factual. Just pay attention to the style on how the information is laid out.
Stupid, pathological liar and a Kunt. You're a hell of guy Hondo.
Take your pick
https://www.heritage.org/health-care-reform/commentary/dont-blame-heritage-obamacare-mandate
Fuck you are stupid.
