Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Grandma didn't have access to Planned Parenthood

12357

Comments

  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,429
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,429
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    Contributions plunged from $62,912,331 in 2016 to $26,566,825 in 2017, recently released federal tax filings show.

    Revenue from speeches given by the Clintons also fell from a high of $3.6 million in 2015 to just under $300,000 in 2017. In 2016, during the presidential campaign, the non-profit took in no earnings from speeches, tax filings show.
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Or to show how contributions dried up when she lost

    A very different point. Imagine having a charitable foundation that does charity! Well, Daddy has to imagine it actually.
    If it was charity it wouldn't stop when she had no power

    These are basic concepts
    The money disappeared from that "charity" in about 10 seconds after she lost ans couldn't peddle influence.

    Uranium One paid her 125 million or so via the charity. It was really just a money laundering scheme used to buy influence in Washington. The Clinton's are the facilitators and take a cut. Haiti got .81 Cents.
    This is executive comp. You don't even know what money laundering is. Idiot.

    photo 87709FCA-ABDA-450B-B105-A5B33ABEA44D_zpsncblhycm.png
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes

    2001400ex said:

    Yes

    It does

    Race is right as always!!!!
    Use your own words - how much did they take in in 2018 compared to 2012- 2016 annually

    The 2018 audit isn't completed yet.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,429
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yes

    It does

    Race is right as always!!!!
    Use your own words - how much did they take in in 2018 compared to 2012- 2016 annually

    The 2018 audit isn't completed yet.
    2017 was bad enough


    Can't wait for 2018
  • Options
    GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,481
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    The Foundation used to be audited by bluechip PwC. Now it's CohnReznick. Probably doesn't mean anything, but probably doesn't mean nothing.
  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,832
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Or to show how contributions dried up when she lost

    A very different point. Imagine having a charitable foundation that does charity! Well, Daddy has to imagine it actually.
    If it was charity it wouldn't stop when she had no power

    These are basic concepts
    The money disappeared from that "charity" in about 10 seconds after she lost ans couldn't peddle influence.

    Uranium One paid her 125 million or so via the charity. It was really just a money laundering scheme used to buy influence in Washington. The Clinton's are the facilitators and take a cut. Haiti got .81 Cents.
    This is executive comp. You don't even know what money laundering is. Idiot.

    photo 87709FCA-ABDA-450B-B105-A5B33ABEA44D_zpsncblhycm.png
    Figures never lie. But liars figure.

    How about we look through it like they've looked at Trump?

    Prison for all the Clintons and all their cronies.
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yes

    It does

    Race is right as always!!!!
    Use your own words - how much did they take in in 2018 compared to 2012- 2016 annually

    The 2018 audit isn't completed yet.
    2017 was bad enough


    Can't wait for 2018
    So you have any comprehension on why revenues are lower for 2017? Or did your news source just say they are down, clearly they are closing the foundation.

    Your ignorance is showing.
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes

    The Foundation used to be audited by bluechip PwC. Now it's CohnReznick. Probably doesn't mean anything, but probably doesn't mean nothing.


    It's because PWC fucked up their audits. They had to reissue 11, 12, and 13 audits.
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Or to show how contributions dried up when she lost

    A very different point. Imagine having a charitable foundation that does charity! Well, Daddy has to imagine it actually.
    If it was charity it wouldn't stop when she had no power

    These are basic concepts
    The money disappeared from that "charity" in about 10 seconds after she lost ans couldn't peddle influence.

    Uranium One paid her 125 million or so via the charity. It was really just a money laundering scheme used to buy influence in Washington. The Clinton's are the facilitators and take a cut. Haiti got .81 Cents.
    This is executive comp. You don't even know what money laundering is. Idiot.

    photo 87709FCA-ABDA-450B-B105-A5B33ABEA44D_zpsncblhycm.png
    Figures never lie. But liars figure.

    How about we look through it like they've looked at Trump?

    Prison for all the Clintons and all their cronies.
    It gets a full audit and it's released on their website. While Trump has never released his tax returns.
  • Options
    GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,481
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    The Foundation used to be audited by bluechip PwC. Now it's CohnReznick. Probably doesn't mean anything, but probably doesn't mean nothing.


    It's because PWC fucked up their audits. They had to reissue 11, 12, and 13 audits.
    GIGO
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Here's the 17 combining financials. Followed by the 16. Followed by the 17 Clinton health access initiative that was spun out in 17. Just to show that Race's news source lied to him. And he regurgitated it on here like a good shill.

    photo 0675BDD3-8245-4163-951F-2F2106B46679_zpslkcjgbhf.png

    photo 73FBF3B8-099E-4C32-8EC3-6C36489A4916_zpszlqe0lgc.png

    photo F723FE15-2377-478F-BADB-A3B25D77B92D_zpsmvfnosgo.png
  • Options
    MariotaTheGawdMariotaTheGawd Member Posts: 1,441
    5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes Name Dropper


    whoa whoa, i thought google search results can't be trusted
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes

    Contributions plunged from $62,912,331 in 2016 to $26,566,825 in 2017, recently released federal tax filings show.

    I just saw this. Your news source lied to you. There's a reason why, explained above with the exact support to show it.
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes

    2001400ex said:

    The Foundation used to be audited by bluechip PwC. Now it's CohnReznick. Probably doesn't mean anything, but probably doesn't mean nothing.


    It's because PWC fucked up their audits. They had to reissue 11, 12, and 13 audits.
    GIGO
    You know some about auditing and like the truth. Explain to Race how his news source lied to him.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,429
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yes

    It does

    Race is right as always!!!!
    Use your own words - how much did they take in in 2018 compared to 2012- 2016 annually

    The 2018 audit isn't completed yet.
    2017 was bad enough


    Can't wait for 2018
    So you have any comprehension on why revenues are lower for 2017? Or did your news source just say they are down, clearly they are closing the foundation.

    Your ignorance is showing.
    I stated quite clearly that once she lost she had no influence to peddle

    Your on page 2 of trying to obfuscate that
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yes

    It does

    Race is right as always!!!!
    Use your own words - how much did they take in in 2018 compared to 2012- 2016 annually

    The 2018 audit isn't completed yet.
    2017 was bad enough


    Can't wait for 2018
    So you have any comprehension on why revenues are lower for 2017? Or did your news source just say they are down, clearly they are closing the foundation.

    Your ignorance is showing.
    I stated quite clearly that once she lost she had no influence to peddle

    Your on page 2 of trying to obfuscate that
    Read above. Lil lyin Race.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,429
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    Still nothing to offer I see
  • Options
    MariotaTheGawdMariotaTheGawd Member Posts: 1,441
    5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes Name Dropper
    Race has had a bad couple of days. You hate to see such a well respected poster struggling like that
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,429
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    I was right. As usual
Sign In or Register to comment.