National Emergencies

sarktastic

but still

RaceBannon

ApostleofGrief said:

RaceBannon said:

ApostleofGrief said:

This is the fact check on prior use of emergencies. Contrary to the bullshit argued above by Race and others, there is no similar precedent in the US.

https://apnews.com/03d60f47b89d49139d948fec0deeadaf

What bullshit

I listed the 28 active ones from CNN

Take it up with them

You don't have to read much of the article. The main point is that prior presidents did not declare national emergencies for projects Congress won't fund. There is no precedent for that, and it's a flagrant constitutional violation.

As anyone with half a brain can see.

That's a different point than saying I posted bullshit. I posted the actual evidence of the national emergencies. The reader can decide

ApostleofGrief

RaceBannon said:

ApostleofGrief said:

RaceBannon said:

ApostleofGrief said:

This is the fact check on prior use of emergencies. Contrary to the bullshit argued above by Race and others, there is no similar precedent in the US.

https://apnews.com/03d60f47b89d49139d948fec0deeadaf

What bullshit

I listed the 28 active ones from CNN

Take it up with them

You don't have to read much of the article. The main point is that prior presidents did not declare national emergencies for projects Congress won't fund. There is no precedent for that, and it's a flagrant constitutional violation.

As anyone with half a brain can see.

That's a different point than saying I posted bullshit. I posted the actual evidence of the national emergencies. The reader can decide

You're hairsplitting. By posting that list, you implied "everybody is doing it" and national emergencies are the norm.

sarktastic

Dude61 said:

ApostleofGrief said:

RaceBannon said:

ApostleofGrief said:

This is the fact check on prior use of emergencies. Contrary to the bullshit argued above by Race and others, there is no similar precedent in the US.

https://apnews.com/03d60f47b89d49139d948fec0deeadaf

What bullshit

I listed the 28 active ones from CNN

Take it up with them

You don't have to read much of the article. The main point is that prior presidents did not declare national emergencies for projects Congress won't fund. There is no precedent for that, and it's a flagrant constitutional violation.

As anyone with half a brain can see.

Since 2001 POTUS have used NE to appropriate funds 18 times.

huh?

HHusky

RaceBannon said:

An open border certainly qualifies to people that love the country

So not you H

We’ve got an open border? Tell us another one.

2001400ex

RaceBannon said:

ApostleofGrief said:

RaceBannon said:

ApostleofGrief said:

This is the fact check on prior use of emergencies. Contrary to the bullshit argued above by Race and others, there is no similar precedent in the US.

https://apnews.com/03d60f47b89d49139d948fec0deeadaf

What bullshit

I listed the 28 active ones from CNN

Take it up with them

You don't have to read much of the article. The main point is that prior presidents did not declare national emergencies for projects Congress won't fund. There is no precedent for that, and it's a flagrant constitutional violation.

As anyone with half a brain can see.

That's a different point than saying I posted bullshit. I posted the actual evidence of the national emergencies. The reader can decide

Yes and which one of those in equivalent or setting precedent to what Trump is doing now?

sarktastic

We’ve never had a Government Coup taking down an elected President before now, either.

RaceBannon

ApostleofGrief said:

RaceBannon said:

ApostleofGrief said:

RaceBannon said:

ApostleofGrief said:

This is the fact check on prior use of emergencies. Contrary to the bullshit argued above by Race and others, there is no similar precedent in the US.

https://apnews.com/03d60f47b89d49139d948fec0deeadaf

What bullshit

I listed the 28 active ones from CNN

Take it up with them

You don't have to read much of the article. The main point is that prior presidents did not declare national emergencies for projects Congress won't fund. There is no precedent for that, and it's a flagrant constitutional violation.

As anyone with half a brain can see.

That's a different point than saying I posted bullshit. I posted the actual evidence of the national emergencies. The reader can decide

You're hairsplitting. By posting that list, you implied "everybody is doing it" and national emergencies are the norm.

I didn't imply anything. You seem upset. Were you this upset about the other 31?

HHusky

sarktastic said:

We’ve never had a Government Coup taking down an elected President before now, either.

Do you remember
Your President Nixon

RaceBannon

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

ApostleofGrief said:

RaceBannon said:

ApostleofGrief said:

This is the fact check on prior use of emergencies. Contrary to the bullshit argued above by Race and others, there is no similar precedent in the US.

https://apnews.com/03d60f47b89d49139d948fec0deeadaf

What bullshit

I listed the 28 active ones from CNN

Take it up with them

You don't have to read much of the article. The main point is that prior presidents did not declare national emergencies for projects Congress won't fund. There is no precedent for that, and it's a flagrant constitutional violation.

As anyone with half a brain can see.

That's a different point than saying I posted bullshit. I posted the actual evidence of the national emergencies. The reader can decide

Yes and which one of those in equivalent or setting precedent to what Trump is doing now?

And what was the precedent for the other 31?

Who cares? You don't want a wall. I do. Cry some more