This is the fact check on prior use of emergencies. Contrary to the bullshit argued above by Race and others, there is no similar precedent in the US.https://apnews.com/03d60f47b89d49139d948fec0deeadaf What bullshitI listed the 28 active ones from CNNTake it up with them You don't have to read much of the article. The main point is that prior presidents did not declare national emergencies for projects Congress won't fund. There is no precedent for that, and it's a flagrant constitutional violation.As anyone with half a brain can see.
This is the fact check on prior use of emergencies. Contrary to the bullshit argued above by Race and others, there is no similar precedent in the US.https://apnews.com/03d60f47b89d49139d948fec0deeadaf What bullshitI listed the 28 active ones from CNNTake it up with them
This is the fact check on prior use of emergencies. Contrary to the bullshit argued above by Race and others, there is no similar precedent in the US.https://apnews.com/03d60f47b89d49139d948fec0deeadaf
This is the fact check on prior use of emergencies. Contrary to the bullshit argued above by Race and others, there is no similar precedent in the US.https://apnews.com/03d60f47b89d49139d948fec0deeadaf What bullshitI listed the 28 active ones from CNNTake it up with them You don't have to read much of the article. The main point is that prior presidents did not declare national emergencies for projects Congress won't fund. There is no precedent for that, and it's a flagrant constitutional violation.As anyone with half a brain can see. That's a different point than saying I posted bullshit. I posted the actual evidence of the national emergencies. The reader can decide
This is the fact check on prior use of emergencies. Contrary to the bullshit argued above by Race and others, there is no similar precedent in the US.https://apnews.com/03d60f47b89d49139d948fec0deeadaf What bullshitI listed the 28 active ones from CNNTake it up with them You don't have to read much of the article. The main point is that prior presidents did not declare national emergencies for projects Congress won't fund. There is no precedent for that, and it's a flagrant constitutional violation.As anyone with half a brain can see. Since 2001 POTUS have used NE to appropriate funds 18 times.
An open border certainly qualifies to people that love the countrySo not you H
This is the fact check on prior use of emergencies. Contrary to the bullshit argued above by Race and others, there is no similar precedent in the US.https://apnews.com/03d60f47b89d49139d948fec0deeadaf What bullshitI listed the 28 active ones from CNNTake it up with them You don't have to read much of the article. The main point is that prior presidents did not declare national emergencies for projects Congress won't fund. There is no precedent for that, and it's a flagrant constitutional violation.As anyone with half a brain can see. That's a different point than saying I posted bullshit. I posted the actual evidence of the national emergencies. The reader can decide You're hairsplitting. By posting that list, you implied "everybody is doing it" and national emergencies are the norm.
We’ve never had a Government Coup taking down an elected President before now, either.
This is the fact check on prior use of emergencies. Contrary to the bullshit argued above by Race and others, there is no similar precedent in the US.https://apnews.com/03d60f47b89d49139d948fec0deeadaf What bullshitI listed the 28 active ones from CNNTake it up with them You don't have to read much of the article. The main point is that prior presidents did not declare national emergencies for projects Congress won't fund. There is no precedent for that, and it's a flagrant constitutional violation.As anyone with half a brain can see. That's a different point than saying I posted bullshit. I posted the actual evidence of the national emergencies. The reader can decide Yes and which one of those in equivalent or setting precedent to what Trump is doing now?
Congress has specifically granted the President express statutory authority to make this declaration.
We’ve never had a Government Coup taking down an elected President before now, either. IDRGAF about the wall. the $ is irrelevant. the rhetoric for it is a bit unfortunate and overblown, but if it makes people happy, fucking build it so we? can move on.but this is a quick dodge. there's no fucking coup; that's about as dramatic as people threatening to leave the country if Trump's election stood up. and, it's not relevant to the issue being discussed. I thought we? didn't like but but but. that's a but but but of the first order.
An open border certainly qualifies to people that love the countrySo not you H We’ve got an open border? Tell us another one.
