Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Husky Jacks open thread [2019]

1318319321323324354

Comments

  • minion_doog
    minion_doog Member Posts: 2,024
    Soooo you gonna transcribe that shit or nah?
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter

    Soooo you gonna transcribe that shit or nah?
    Nah. Oregon should win, Mario might screw it up. Not much different than what we?ve saying this week.
  • minion_doog
    minion_doog Member Posts: 2,024

    Soooo you gonna transcribe that shit or nah?
    Nah. Oregon should win, Mario might screw it up. Not much different than what we?ve saying this week.


    I was just givin ya the business. Thanks for the summary tho
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,386 Standard Supporter
    Houhusky said:

    Does anyone want to explain how UCLAs shit defense can hold Stanford to less than 100 total yards halfway through the 3rd quarter....?

    Also how did WE lose to Stanford? They look fucking awful against an awful UCLA

    Worst defensive game in a long time. We let Scarlett, a very average RB run all over us.

    Mills is a lot better than the Stanford QB that played tonight. Horrible, inexcusable loss. The PAC 12 is strange this year. We beat USC who smacked Stanford. Stanford sucks against everyone else.
  • 1to392831weretaken
    1to392831weretaken Member Posts: 7,696
    edited October 2019

    Read the article on Westover in the Seattle Times. He’s a really good athlete who got hurt in the 2nd game his senior year. He’s going to be good. I said last game, I would bet money he ends up being better than Culp.

    Apparently Bush said to Fain that “maybe the outside noise wasn’t wrong” in regards to playing Puka earlier.

    ¿da fuq? Source?
    Yesterday's Softy show. Dick Fain usually has interviews with players or coaches throughout the week. I usually don't listen to those because I find coach speak boring as shit.

    But on the regular show as they were going into a Husky segment, they started it with Fain saying that when he talked with Bush this week, that Bush gave him the quote above.
    I guess I'd have to hear the quote itself in context to know where Hamdan was busting balls. But on its own, for me that's bad.


    Fuck @GrundleStiltzkin, you're really making me work for it. I didn't hear the actual interview, just the reference from Dick about it. But I went out and found it for you, and listened, and transcribed.

    Everything you need below. I don't think it was Hamdan busting balls. He was being honest:





    https://www.iheart.com/podcast/139-dave-softy-mahler-25095845/episode/softy-and-dick-h1-ms-51274131/

    Questions about why this was the week for Puka to get so many snaps at 17:45.

    "We felt it was time. We felt it was time to give guys some more chances. I don't think, uh, you know, I don't think the outside noise is necessarily wrong. Right? I think, uh. You know we just kind of felt Stanford, it was, we need to get guys, more guys involved. And not give a couple of those guys as many of the reps as they do take."





    TYFYS, @DoogCourics!

    Jesus Fucking Christ, BushPete! Maybe you could put a guy like Puka out there during the Stanford game, when it was going shitty. Maybe putting in Haener against Cal last year has them gun-shy, but playing a couple of new receivers is not the same as putting in turnover shrimp at QB.
    The early games should have been used to get Puka comfortable and ready to roll. The coaches know he can play. It was just strange how little they used him for reasons that don’t really make sense. He knows how to run 5 routes and block a CB or safety.


    He knows how to block defensive ends, too, apparently.
  • 1to392831weretaken
    1to392831weretaken Member Posts: 7,696
    Well fuck, I've tried ten times to make that clip playable, buttfuck Vanilla. Just go to that play and watch Puka block.
  • minion_doog
    minion_doog Member Posts: 2,024

    Read the article on Westover in the Seattle Times. He’s a really good athlete who got hurt in the 2nd game his senior year. He’s going to be good. I said last game, I would bet money he ends up being better than Culp.

    Apparently Bush said to Fain that “maybe the outside noise wasn’t wrong” in regards to playing Puka earlier.

    ¿da fuq? Source?
    Yesterday's Softy show. Dick Fain usually has interviews with players or coaches throughout the week. I usually don't listen to those because I find coach speak boring as shit.

    But on the regular show as they were going into a Husky segment, they started it with Fain saying that when he talked with Bush this week, that Bush gave him the quote above.
    I guess I'd have to hear the quote itself in context to know where Hamdan was busting balls. But on its own, for me that's bad.


    Fuck @GrundleStiltzkin, you're really making me work for it. I didn't hear the actual interview, just the reference from Dick about it. But I went out and found it for you, and listened, and transcribed.

    Everything you need below. I don't think it was Hamdan busting balls. He was being honest:





    https://www.iheart.com/podcast/139-dave-softy-mahler-25095845/episode/softy-and-dick-h1-ms-51274131/

    Questions about why this was the week for Puka to get so many snaps at 17:45.

    "We felt it was time. We felt it was time to give guys some more chances. I don't think, uh, you know, I don't think the outside noise is necessarily wrong. Right? I think, uh. You know we just kind of felt Stanford, it was, we need to get guys, more guys involved. And not give a couple of those guys as many of the reps as they do take."





    TYFYS, @DoogCourics!

    Jesus Fucking Christ, BushPete! Maybe you could put a guy like Puka out there during the Stanford game, when it was going shitty. Maybe putting in Haener against Cal last year has them gun-shy, but playing a couple of new receivers is not the same as putting in turnover shrimp at QB.
    The early games should have been used to get Puka comfortable and ready to roll. The coaches know he can play. It was just strange how little they used him for reasons that don’t really make sense. He knows how to run 5 routes and block a CB or safety.


    He knows how to block defensive ends, too, apparently.

  • DoogCourics
    DoogCourics Member Posts: 5,739
    I was listening to a betting analyst from Action Network. He was saying he’s taking UW.

    He mentioned that their offensive line ranks top 15-20 in havoc allowed. Essentially no TFLs or sacks or plays blown up. I believe havoc also is int and fumbles as well.

    Apparently we? are just good at not fucking up between the 20’s or something. All the metrics say we? Have a top 25 or so offense.

    Fucking Baffling.

    Luckily we have Henry playing like a boss to make up for offensive failures.