Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Where my code breakers at?

2

Comments

  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,856 Founders Club
    WeakarmCobra said:

    this thread is worthless without roaddawg

    Yes, he just might be the guy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DawgFader
    DawgFader Member Posts: 1,414
    EsophagealFeces said:

    Bread said:

    Trigger warning. Math ahead.







    6, 6, 9, 10, 11, 10
    no sequences of interest match this sequence.


    4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14

    Numbers n such that numbers 24n+11 are primes. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 27...

    a(1)=3; for n>=2, a(n) is the smallest m>a(n-1) such that odd part of a(1) + ... + a(n-1) + m is prime. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 24, 26, 27...

    a(1)=3; for n>=2, a(n) is the smallest m>a(n-1) such that odd part of a(1) + ... + a(n-1) + m is prime. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 24, 26, 27...

    a(n+1) = smallest number greater a(n) that ends in binary representation with floor(a(n)/4); a(1)=1. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 29...

    Numbers n such that 10^n - 71 is prime 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 22, 98...

    Is it just me, or does that look like Nicholas Cage's face photoshopped onto David Schwimmer's body?
    Interesting stuff











    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,856 Founders Club
    edited February 2019
    NEsnake12 said:

    2nd number is UW's total # of blue chips signed

    So the first sequence is the number of blue chips singed by Dabo in his first 6 recruiting classes. In years 4- 6 you'll see that Peterman has inked 33 blue chips compared to 31 for Dabo in years 4- 6. And in fact, Dabo has never had more than 13 (once) in a class. I found this really chinteresting given the general perception the Dabo is fun and can recruit better than Pete.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HillsboroDuck
    HillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    YellowSnow said:

    NEsnake12 said:

    2nd number is UW's total # of blue chips signed

    So the first sequence is the number of blue chips singed by Dabo in his first 6 recruiting classes. In years 4- 6 you'll see that Peterman has inked 33 blue chips compared to 31 for Dabo in years 4- 6. And in fact, Dabo has never had more than 13 (once) in a class. I found this really chinteresting given the general perception the Dabo is fun and can recruit better than Pete.
    I went back and researched Clemson's classes thinking it had to be them but didn't go back far enough. Good chit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,856 Founders Club
    HillsboroDuck said:

    YellowSnow said:

    NEsnake12 said:

    2nd number is UW's total # of blue chips signed

    So the first sequence is the number of blue chips singed by Dabo in his first 6 recruiting classes. In years 4- 6 you'll see that Peterman has inked 33 blue chips compared to 31 for Dabo in years 4- 6. And in fact, Dabo has never had more than 13 (once) in a class. I found this really chinteresting given the general perception the Dabo is fun and can recruit better than Pete.
    I went back and researched Clemson's classes thinking it had to be them but didn't go back far enough. Good chit.
    Admittedly, I have a comparing Pete's early returns to Dabo's fetish. But, if Pete can continue to stock pile, 10 - 12 BCs per year, then we're basically recruiting at Clempson's level. I know we're all frustrated as hell with the lack of signature OOC win 5 years in, but we've got to stay the course and see what happens with the massive leveling up in talent. The class is NT level on the defensive side of the ball rather easily.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,856 Founders Club
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

    YellowSnow said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    YellowSnow said:

    NEsnake12 said:

    2nd number is UW's total # of blue chips signed

    So the first sequence is the number of blue chips singed by Dabo in his first 6 recruiting classes. In years 4- 6 you'll see that Peterman has inked 33 blue chips compared to 31 for Dabo in years 4- 6. And in fact, Dabo has never had more than 13 (once) in a class. I found this really chinteresting given the general perception the Dabo is fun and can recruit better than Pete.
    I went back and researched Clemson's classes thinking it had to be them but didn't go back far enough. Good chit.
    Admittedly, I have a comparing Pete's early returns to Dabo's fetish. But, if Pete can continue to stock pile, 10 - 12 BCs per year, then we're basically recruiting at Clempson's level. I know we're all frustrated as hell with the lack of signature OOC win 5 years in, but we've got to stay the course and see what happens with the massive leveling up in talent. The class is NT level on the defensive side of the ball rather easily.
    How many chances at signature wins were blown because of the talent definciency at QB?
    Pete is a stubborn fuck but we need to move on from his getting it wrong on Jake as see if one of these other guys can play. I have faith.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,884 Standard Supporter
    YellowSnow said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    YellowSnow said:

    NEsnake12 said:

    2nd number is UW's total # of blue chips signed

    So the first sequence is the number of blue chips singed by Dabo in his first 6 recruiting classes. In years 4- 6 you'll see that Peterman has inked 33 blue chips compared to 31 for Dabo in years 4- 6. And in fact, Dabo has never had more than 13 (once) in a class. I found this really chinteresting given the general perception the Dabo is fun and can recruit better than Pete.
    I went back and researched Clemson's classes thinking it had to be them but didn't go back far enough. Good chit.
    Admittedly, I have a comparing Pete's early returns to Dabo's fetish. But, if Pete can continue to stock pile, 10 - 12 BCs per year, then we're basically recruiting at Clempson's level. I know we're all frustrated as hell with the lack of signature OOC win 5 years in, but we've got to stay the course and see what happens with the massive leveling up in talent. The class is NT level on the defensive side of the ball rather easily.
    Ngata lot we can do other than watch this class develop and hope they close on their top targets the next couple years. Pete is safe - they continue to win 10+ a year and he can go without ever getting a signature win and he's not going to be fired.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 70,131 Founders Club
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

    YellowSnow said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    YellowSnow said:

    NEsnake12 said:

    2nd number is UW's total # of blue chips signed

    So the first sequence is the number of blue chips singed by Dabo in his first 6 recruiting classes. In years 4- 6 you'll see that Peterman has inked 33 blue chips compared to 31 for Dabo in years 4- 6. And in fact, Dabo has never had more than 13 (once) in a class. I found this really chinteresting given the general perception the Dabo is fun and can recruit better than Pete.
    I went back and researched Clemson's classes thinking it had to be them but didn't go back far enough. Good chit.
    Admittedly, I have a comparing Pete's early returns to Dabo's fetish. But, if Pete can continue to stock pile, 10 - 12 BCs per year, then we're basically recruiting at Clempson's level. I know we're all frustrated as hell with the lack of signature OOC win 5 years in, but we've got to stay the course and see what happens with the massive leveling up in talent. The class is NT level on the defensive side of the ball rather easily.
    How many chances at signature wins were blown because of the talent definciency at QB?

    Does Gary Oldman get a royalty for the hundreds of times we've used this wonderful gif?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter