I agree with APAG here. I find the banning of the hat childish and quite frankly cowardly. But, there is a difference between discriminating against somebody's sexual preference and somebody's political affiliation, in that one is federally protected and the other isn't.
For all the talk of inclusion that's the left has forced down our throats the last decade, making a distinction here is antithetical to those mores.
You want to actually be inclusive, fine. But don't be a fucking hypocrite when it doesn't serve your agenda.
Being a hypocrite doesn’t make you wrong.
I do not think the MAGA hat is a symbol for hate or like a KKK hood. I would prefer people not banning it but I understand why some do view it that way.
Maybe you guys should try doing a better job explaining your positions so it isn’t so easily confused with racism.
Please, the left's go to attack is accuse the other side of being racist. There's no "confusing" with racism. Every single Republican President and Republican Presidential candidate since Nixon, including the Sainted McCain and even Romney were called racists by the left.
I agree with APAG here. I find the banning of the hat childish and quite frankly cowardly. But, there is a difference between discriminating against somebody's sexual preference and somebody's political affiliation, in that one is federally protected and the other isn't.
An individual being forced to do art for someone for any reason is aggression on that individual. Not surprised the leftists have no issue with it.
And this is how you justify whites only restaurants.
We have a lot of them, don't we?
No, we don’t. Because libertarians can’t win elections.
So why try to take this into the weeds by bringing it up?
I agree with APAG here. I find the banning of the hat childish and quite frankly cowardly. But, there is a difference between discriminating against somebody's sexual preference and somebody's political affiliation, in that one is federally protected and the other isn't.
An individual being forced to do art for someone for any reason is aggression on that individual. Not surprised the leftists have no issue with it.
And this is how you justify whites only restaurants.
We have a lot of them, don't we?
No, we don’t. Because libertarians can’t win elections.
Fun History Fact of the Day: Slaves were taken away from Democrats.
I agree with APAG here. I find the banning of the hat childish and quite frankly cowardly. But, there is a difference between discriminating against somebody's sexual preference and somebody's political affiliation, in that one is federally protected and the other isn't.
An individual being forced to do art for someone for any reason is aggression on that individual. Not surprised the leftists have no issue with it.
And this is how you justify whites only restaurants.
We have a lot of them, don't we?
No, we don’t. Because libertarians can’t win elections.
Fun History Fact of the Day: Slaves were taken away from Democrats.
Hope this helps.
Before or after they magically became R's? This is so confusing. I'll ax George Wallace.
I agree with APAG here. I find the banning of the hat childish and quite frankly cowardly. But, there is a difference between discriminating against somebody's sexual preference and somebody's political affiliation, in that one is federally protected and the other isn't.
An individual being forced to do art for someone for any reason is aggression on that individual. Not surprised the leftists have no issue with it.
And this is how you justify whites only restaurants.
We have a lot of them, don't we?
No, we don’t. Because libertarians can’t win elections.
So why try to take this into the weeds by bringing it up?
I agree with APAG here. I find the banning of the hat childish and quite frankly cowardly. But, there is a difference between discriminating against somebody's sexual preference and somebody's political affiliation, in that one is federally protected and the other isn't.
An individual being forced to do art for someone for any reason is aggression on that individual. Not surprised the leftists have no issue with it.
And this is how you justify whites only restaurants.
We have a lot of them, don't we?
No, we don’t. Because libertarians can’t win elections.
So why try to take this into the weeds by bringing it up?
I agree with APAG here. I find the banning of the hat childish and quite frankly cowardly. But, there is a difference between discriminating against somebody's sexual preference and somebody's political affiliation, in that one is federally protected and the other isn't.
An individual being forced to do art for someone for any reason is aggression on that individual. Not surprised the leftists have no issue with it.
And this is how you justify whites only restaurants.
We have a lot of them, don't we?
No, we don’t. Because libertarians can’t win elections.
So why try to take this into the weeds by bringing it up?
Because I hate libertarians.
Why? They basically want the same thing you do with regards to the establishment - save the size and scope of government.
I agree with APAG here. I find the banning of the hat childish and quite frankly cowardly. But, there is a difference between discriminating against somebody's sexual preference and somebody's political affiliation, in that one is federally protected and the other isn't.
For all the talk of inclusion that's the left has forced down our throats the last decade, making a distinction here is antithetical to those mores.
You want to actually be inclusive, fine. But don't be a fucking hypocrite when it doesn't serve your agenda.
Being a hypocrite doesn’t make you wrong.
I do not think the MAGA hat is a symbol for hate or like a KKK hood. I would prefer people not banning it but I understand why some do view it that way.
Maybe you guys should try doing a better job explaining your positions so it isn’t so easily confused with racism.
Please, the left's go to attack is accuse the other side of being racist. There's no "confusing" with racism. Every single Republican President and Republican Presidential candidate since Nixon, including the Sainted McCain and even Romney were called racists by the left.
I agree with APAG here. I find the banning of the hat childish and quite frankly cowardly. But, there is a difference between discriminating against somebody's sexual preference and somebody's political affiliation, in that one is federally protected and the other isn't.
An individual being forced to do art for someone for any reason is aggression on that individual. Not surprised the leftists have no issue with it.
And this is how you justify whites only restaurants.
We have a lot of them, don't we?
No, we don’t. Because libertarians can’t win elections.
So why try to take this into the weeds by bringing it up?
Because I hate libertarians.
Because you know what’s best for other people and like to use the force and violence of government so individuals will comply with your good ideas.
I agree with APAG here. I find the banning of the hat childish and quite frankly cowardly. But, there is a difference between discriminating against somebody's sexual preference and somebody's political affiliation, in that one is federally protected and the other isn't.
An individual being forced to do art for someone for any reason is aggression on that individual. Not surprised the leftists have no issue with it.
And this is how you justify whites only restaurants.
We have a lot of them, don't we?
No, we don’t. Because libertarians can’t win elections.
So why try to take this into the weeds by bringing it up?
Because I hate libertarians.
Because you know what’s best for other people and like to use the force and violence of government so individuals will comply with your good ideas.
Yet you want to teach in schools that a family should only have 2 married straight parents.
I agree with APAG here. I find the banning of the hat childish and quite frankly cowardly. But, there is a difference between discriminating against somebody's sexual preference and somebody's political affiliation, in that one is federally protected and the other isn't.
An individual being forced to do art for someone for any reason is aggression on that individual. Not surprised the leftists have no issue with it.
And this is how you justify whites only restaurants.
We have a lot of them, don't we?
No, we don’t. Because libertarians can’t win elections.
So why try to take this into the weeds by bringing it up?
Because I hate libertarians.
Because you know what’s best for other people and like to use the force and violence of government so individuals will comply with your good ideas.
Yet you want to teach in schools that a family should only have 2 married straight parents.
I agree with APAG here. I find the banning of the hat childish and quite frankly cowardly. But, there is a difference between discriminating against somebody's sexual preference and somebody's political affiliation, in that one is federally protected and the other isn't.
An individual being forced to do art for someone for any reason is aggression on that individual. Not surprised the leftists have no issue with it.
And this is how you justify whites only restaurants.
We have a lot of them, don't we?
No, we don’t. Because libertarians can’t win elections.
So why try to take this into the weeds by bringing it up?
Because I hate libertarians.
Because you know what’s best for other people and like to use the force and violence of government so individuals will comply with your good ideas.
What is this force and violence stuff? Is this about fucking taxes?
I agree with APAG here. I find the banning of the hat childish and quite frankly cowardly. But, there is a difference between discriminating against somebody's sexual preference and somebody's political affiliation, in that one is federally protected and the other isn't.
An individual being forced to do art for someone for any reason is aggression on that individual. Not surprised the leftists have no issue with it.
And this is how you justify whites only restaurants.
We have a lot of them, don't we?
No, we don’t. Because libertarians can’t win elections.
So why try to take this into the weeds by bringing it up?
Because I hate libertarians.
Because you know what’s best for other people and like to use the force and violence of government so individuals will comply with your good ideas.
Yet you want to teach in schools that a family should only have 2 married straight parents.
I agree with APAG here. I find the banning of the hat childish and quite frankly cowardly. But, there is a difference between discriminating against somebody's sexual preference and somebody's political affiliation, in that one is federally protected and the other isn't.
An individual being forced to do art for someone for any reason is aggression on that individual. Not surprised the leftists have no issue with it.
And this is how you justify whites only restaurants.
We have a lot of them, don't we?
No, we don’t. Because libertarians can’t win elections.
So why try to take this into the weeds by bringing it up?
Because I hate libertarians.
Because you know what’s best for other people and like to use the force and violence of government so individuals will comply with your good ideas.
Yet you want to teach in schools that a family should only have 2 married straight parents.
Again...Hondo making stuff up. Find my quote you bitch. Thats not what I said...
But you did say Newsom was buying Reagans old house.. El Oh Fucking El...
I agree with APAG here. I find the banning of the hat childish and quite frankly cowardly. But, there is a difference between discriminating against somebody's sexual preference and somebody's political affiliation, in that one is federally protected and the other isn't.
An individual being forced to do art for someone for any reason is aggression on that individual. Not surprised the leftists have no issue with it.
And this is how you justify whites only restaurants.
We have a lot of them, don't we?
No, we don’t. Because libertarians can’t win elections.
So why try to take this into the weeds by bringing it up?
Because I hate libertarians.
Because you know what’s best for other people and like to use the force and violence of government so individuals will comply with your good ideas.
Yet you want to teach in schools that a family should only have 2 married straight parents.
Again...Hondo making stuff up. Find my quote you bitch. Thats not what I said...
But you did say Newsom was buying Reagans old house.. El Oh Fucking El...
You argue like Gaybob. "I didn't say that!!! I'm not lying!!!" Then mentions an obvious mistake I made. As if that changes your argument or the stupid shit you just said.
I agree with APAG here. I find the banning of the hat childish and quite frankly cowardly. But, there is a difference between discriminating against somebody's sexual preference and somebody's political affiliation, in that one is federally protected and the other isn't.
An individual being forced to do art for someone for any reason is aggression on that individual. Not surprised the leftists have no issue with it.
And this is how you justify whites only restaurants.
We have a lot of them, don't we?
No, we don’t. Because libertarians can’t win elections.
So why try to take this into the weeds by bringing it up?
Because I hate libertarians.
Because you know what’s best for other people and like to use the force and violence of government so individuals will comply with your good ideas.
Yet you want to teach in schools that a family should only have 2 married straight parents.
Again...Hondo making stuff up. Find my quote you bitch. Thats not what I said...
But you did say Newsom was buying Reagans old house.. El Oh Fucking El...
You argue like Gaybob. "I didn't say that!!! I'm not lying!!!" Then mentions an obvious mistake I made. As if that changes your argument or the stupid shit you just said.
Find the quote then bitch.
Only a leftist would find informing kids that staying in school, don’t have kids before you’re married, and don’t commit crimes gives them a better chance to out of poverty to be offensive and “forcing values” on them.
Didn’t you say something about a “system that works” earlier?
Dumbfuck
Brb. I’m looking at listings of Reagan’s houses for sale. El oh fucking el. Ok!
Comments
Hope this helps.
This is so confusing. I'll ax George Wallace.
But you did say Newsom was buying Reagans old house.. El Oh Fucking El...
Only a leftist would find informing kids that staying in school, don’t have kids before you’re married, and don’t commit crimes gives them a better chance to out of poverty to be offensive and “forcing values” on them.
Didn’t you say something about a “system that works” earlier?
Dumbfuck
Brb. I’m looking at listings of Reagan’s houses for sale. El oh fucking el. Ok!