Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Known turncoat pops off

1234579

Comments

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    The austerity imposed by sequestration was also really stupid. Almost like I’m not defending Obama and his pro-banker economic team. How novel!

    Ah yes the "austerity."


    Federal Spending in 2007 - $2.729 trillion

    Federal Spending in 2008 - $2.902 trillion

    Federal Spending in 2009 - Obama's first year in office - $3.518 trillion

    Federal Spending in 2010 - $3.456 trillion

    Federal Spending in 2011 - $3.603 trillion

    Federal Spending in 2011 -$3.537 trillion

    Federal Spending in 2013 - the first year of the "austerity" - $3.45 trillion

    Federal Spending in 2014 - $3.506 trillion.


    Feel the austerity!!!! Obama spent as much in 2013 or more in 2014 after sequestration and the supposed "austerity." Also note that Obama budgets all contain a nearly a $700 - $800 billion increase from Bush's reckless spending. The 2009 Budget contains what were supposedly "one time" costs from TARP and Obama's Stimulus fraud but as you can see, the budget barely dipped in 2010 and these "one time" expenditures were now baked into the budgetary pie. But Obama's recovery sucked, we're told because we just didn't "invest" enough.









    Why do you lie? Obama was inaugurated almost 4 months into 09 and it was Bush's budget with a huge increase from TARP, a bill pushed by Bush.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    edited January 2019
    Yes, and who can forget how Obama voted against TARP. Just because you're stupid Hondo doesn't mean what I said is a lie. Yes, it was Bush's budget but Obama also added to that spending with the Stimulus fraud part of which was also paid for out of the 2009 budget.

    Both TARP and the stimulus fraud were said to be "one time" expenditures. So why is it that 2010 budget contains almost all of that very same increase in spending? TARP was a $700 Billion budget item for 2009. Why didn't the spending drop by that amount in 2010 Hondo?

    Btw, I never said 2009 was Obama budget, I said it was his first year in office. Once again, statements of fact that make Hondo's Kunt hurt he likes to call "lies."
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    Yes, and who can forget how Obama voted against TARP. Just because you're stupid Hondo doesn't mean what I said is a lie. Yes, it was Bush's budget but Obama also added to that spending with the Stimulus fraud part of which was also paid for out of the 2009 budget.

    Both TARP and the stimulus fraud were said to be "one time" expenditures. So why is it that 2010 budget contains almost all of that very same increase in spending? TARP was a $700 Billion budget item for 2009. Why didn't the spending drop by that amount in 2010 Hondo?

    Btw, I never said 2009 was Obama budget, I said it was his first year in office. Once again, statements of fact that make Hondo's Kunt hurt he likes to call "lies."

    Yes that's a lie.

    Answer me this. How much of the stimulus bill was spent on the 09 budget year? Remember all the bagging on "shovel read projects"?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,596 Founders Club

    https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-isnt-the-future-of-the-democratic-party-joe-lieberman

    Please continue putting the words “future of the Democratic Party” and “Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez” in the same sentence.

    if everything was the same but she looked like Hillary you wouldn't be posting about her at all
    Do you wanna take the gloves off, Derek?

    You can go back two years and you’ll find post after post of me gushing over Bernie Sanders. They have my support because they hold many of the same positions and, I will admit, there is something about both of them that I find inspiring. Something that gives me hope. It has nothing to do with who I want to stick my dick in.

    That was, honestly, one of the nastiest things anyone has ever said to me. I can’t tell if you meant it in a general sense, like no one would be talking about her if she wasn’t attractive, but I took it as pointed and personal. So, I have, in recent months, grown increasingly frustrated with where we are politically as a country. That frustration has sometimes boiled over and resulted in me saying some pretty mean things on this board. If that’s what led to your comment then I apologize. I still have internet love for all of my fellow half brains. Even if I want you to hurry up and die so we can turn the country into Venezuela.
    I appreciate your sensitivity and sincerity. Seriously

    Not sure this is the place. Believe it or not I have doubts about my behavior here because of the half brain brotherhood

    But what the fuck I can't quit this place
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    What's a lie Hondo? Did Obama vote against TARP Hondo? I don't how much of it was spent in 2009. I never claimed that all of it was spent in 2009 but I do know that the cost of it was covered in part by the 2009 budget that you claim Obama was in no way responsible for despite the fact that both he and his party vote in favor of it.

    Now why didn't the budget drop by $700 Billion in 2010?
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    What's a lie Hondo? Did Obama vote against TARP Hondo? I don't how much of it was spent in 2009. I never claimed that all of it was spent in 2009 but I do know that the cost of it was covered in part by the 2009 budget that you claim Obama was in no way responsible for despite the fact that both he and his party vote in favor of it.

    Now why didn't the budget drop by $700 Billion in 2010?

    Why don't you look up how much of the stimulus was expended in 2009. You look silly.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    Why don't you just tell me? I was talking specifically about how much of it was budgeted to 2009 not spent dumbfuck. Shocking how you once again dodge every question put to you like the Kunt you are Hondo.

    So what was my "lie" Kunt?
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771

    https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-isnt-the-future-of-the-democratic-party-joe-lieberman

    Please continue putting the words “future of the Democratic Party” and “Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez” in the same sentence.

    if everything was the same but she looked like Hillary you wouldn't be posting about her at all
    Do you wanna take the gloves off, Derek?

    You can go back two years and you’ll find post after post of me gushing over Bernie Sanders. They have my support because they hold many of the same positions and, I will admit, there is something about both of them that I find inspiring. Something that gives me hope. It has nothing to do with who I want to stick my dick in.

    That was, honestly, one of the nastiest things anyone has ever said to me. I can’t tell if you meant it in a general sense, like no one would be talking about her if she wasn’t attractive, but I took it as pointed and personal. So, I have, in recent months, grown increasingly frustrated with where we are politically as a country. That frustration has sometimes boiled over and resulted in me saying some pretty mean things on this board. If that’s what led to your comment then I apologize. I still have internet love for all of my fellow half brains. Even if I want you to hurry up and die so we can turn the country into Venezuela.
    I appreciate your sensitivity and sincerity. Seriously

    Not sure this is the place. Believe it or not I have doubts about my behavior here because of the half brain brotherhood

    But what the fuck I can't quit this place
    Well I’m glad you still post here. And just think, in a year and half we can team up again to defeat Biden or whatever hack the idiot democrats run out there.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    So where the fuck is the "austerity?"

    Federal Spending in 2007 - $2.729 trillion

    Federal Spending in 2008 - $2.902 trillion

    Federal Spending in 2009 - Obama's first year in office - $3.518 trillion

    Federal Spending in 2010 - $3.456 trillion

    Federal Spending in 2011 - $3.603 trillion

    Federal Spending in 2011 -$3.537 trillion

    Federal Spending in 2013 - the first year of the "austerity" - $3.45 trillion

    Federal Spending in 2014 - $3.506 trillion.


    Feel the austerity!!!! Obama spent as much in 2013 or more in 2014 after sequestration and the supposed "austerity." Also note that Obama budgets all contain a nearly a $700 - $800 billion increase from Bush's reckless spending. The 2009 Budget contains what were supposedly "one time" costs from TARP and Obama's Stimulus fraud but as you can see, the budget barely dipped in 2010 and these "one time" expenditures were now baked into the budgetary pie. But Obama's recovery sucked, we're told because we just didn't "invest" enough.


  • HardlyClothed
    HardlyClothed Member Posts: 937
    SFGbob said:

    So where the fuck is the "austerity?"

    Federal Spending in 2007 - $2.729 trillion

    Federal Spending in 2008 - $2.902 trillion

    Federal Spending in 2009 - Obama's first year in office - $3.518 trillion

    Federal Spending in 2010 - $3.456 trillion

    Federal Spending in 2011 - $3.603 trillion

    Federal Spending in 2011 -$3.537 trillion

    Federal Spending in 2013 - the first year of the "austerity" - $3.45 trillion

    Federal Spending in 2014 - $3.506 trillion.


    Feel the austerity!!!! Obama spent as much in 2013 or more in 2014 after sequestration and the supposed "austerity." Also note that Obama budgets all contain a nearly a $700 - $800 billion increase from Bush's reckless spending. The 2009 Budget contains what were supposedly "one time" costs from TARP and Obama's Stimulus fraud but as you can see, the budget barely dipped in 2010 and these "one time" expenditures were now baked into the budgetary pie. But Obama's recovery sucked, we're told because we just didn't "invest" enough.


    Hey look you’re being intelectually dishonest again by posting the raw expenditure totals.

    In 2009 Fed spending as a % of GDP was about 25% and declined to 20% by 2013 and stayed flat until the end of Obama’s presidency. So when you consider even the slightest context your raw totals look stupid. Who could have guessed!?