Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Known turncoat pops off

1235789

Comments

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Why was the economy so shitty five years into the New Deal? Unemployment remained in double digits until 1941, eight years after the New policies had started. The New Deal actually retarded economic growth and crippled a strong and sustained economic recovery. Just like with Obama's recovery, all of the government spending and all of the new regulations hurt economic growth and lead to an anemic recovery.

    Bob do you want to talk about the role the collapse of banks in that time period had on the economy?
    Yes, Hondo I'm dying to chase after you into the weeds while you ignore everything I actually said.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    edited January 2019

    SFGbob said:

    Why was the economy so shitty five years into the New Deal? Unemployment remained in double digits until 1941, eight years after the New policies had started. The New Deal actually retarded economic growth and crippled a strong and sustained economic recovery. Just like with Obama's recovery, all of the government spending and all of the new regulations hurt economic growth and lead to an anemic recovery.

    Economic lightweight. The stimulus failed because it was not nearly big enough. Needed to be $2 trillion or more but investment bankers Larry Summers and Timmy Geithner kneecapped it by capping it at $500 billion. It also included massive tax cuts that were saved instead of spent, just like always. And the foreclosure crisis that wiped out the net worth of millions of middle and lower class families.

    It wasn’t regulations moron.
    Ah yes, the stimulus failed because it just wasn't BIG enough and "real" Socialism just hasn't been tried yet.


    The economy was out of recession in June of 2009. Given the depth of the decline the economy should have come roaring back but it didn't. Just like it didn't during the 1930s. Gosh I wonder why?


    Shocking how you dodged like a Kunt every question I asked.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,596 Founders Club

    The stimulus also favored short term projects over longer term investments, another reason it sucked.

    I guess the jobs weren't shovel ready

    Another big lie by Obama btw
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188

    The stimulus also favored short term projects over longer term investments, another reason it sucked.

    I guess the jobs weren't shovel ready

    Another big lie by Obama btw
    Weren't most of the "massive tax cuts" in the form of a temporary pay roll tax cut that we were told is one of the best ways to stimulate an economy because most the people getting that money will spend it immediately? Was that just another lie we were told? Now this guy is claiming the "massive tax cuts" were all just saved.

  • HardlyClothed
    HardlyClothed Member Posts: 937
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Why was the economy so shitty five years into the New Deal? Unemployment remained in double digits until 1941, eight years after the New policies had started. The New Deal actually retarded economic growth and crippled a strong and sustained economic recovery. Just like with Obama's recovery, all of the government spending and all of the new regulations hurt economic growth and lead to an anemic recovery.

    Economic lightweight. The stimulus failed because it was not nearly big enough. Needed to be $2 trillion or more but investment bankers Larry Summers and Timmy Geithner kneecapped it by capping it at $500 billion. It also included massive tax cuts that were saved instead of spent, just like always. And the foreclosure crisis that wiped out the net worth of millions of middle and lower class families.

    It wasn’t regulations moron.
    Ah yes, the stimulus failed because it just wasn't BIG enough and "real" Socialism just hasn't been tried yet.


    The economy was out of recession in June of 2009. Given the depth of the decline the economy should have come roaring back but it didn't. Just like it didn't during the 1930s. Gosh I wonder why?


    Shocking how you dodged like a Kunt every question I asked.
    Wow, it’s almost as if without sufficient government investment (like the Keynesian wartime economy) getting out of a recession takes longer, which is exactly what I said in my last post. It didn’t come roaring back because the $500 billion stimilus was a joke.
  • HardlyClothed
    HardlyClothed Member Posts: 937

    The stimulus also favored short term projects over longer term investments, another reason it sucked.

    I guess the jobs weren't shovel ready

    Another big lie by Obama btw

    Now you’re getting it
  • HardlyClothed
    HardlyClothed Member Posts: 937
    SFGbob said:

    The stimulus also favored short term projects over longer term investments, another reason it sucked.

    I guess the jobs weren't shovel ready

    Another big lie by Obama btw
    Weren't most of the "massive tax cuts" in the form of a temporary pay roll tax cut that we were told is one of the best ways to stimulate an economy because most the people getting that money will spend it immediately? Was that just another lie we were told? Now this guy is claiming the "massive tax cuts" were all just saved.

    They didn’t stimulate the economy because tax cuts never do. Try to follow along.
  • HardlyClothed
    HardlyClothed Member Posts: 937
    The austerity imposed by sequestration was also really stupid. Almost like I’m not defending Obama and his pro-banker economic team. How novel!
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    Here's some of the tax cuts in the Stimulus Fraud.

    Among other things, the mix of tax cuts includes a refundable credit of up to $400 per individual and $800 for married couples; a temporary increase of the earned income tax credit for disadvantaged families; and an extension of a program that allows businesses to recover the costs of capital expenditures faster than usual.

    Which part of these "massive tax cuts" were saved instead of being spent?
  • HardlyClothed
    HardlyClothed Member Posts: 937
    SFGbob said:

    Here's some of the tax cuts in the Stimulus Fraud.

    Among other things, the mix of tax cuts includes a refundable credit of up to $400 per individual and $800 for married couples; a temporary increase of the earned income tax credit for disadvantaged families; and an extension of a program that allows businesses to recover the costs of capital expenditures faster than usual.

    Which part of these "massive tax cuts" were saved instead of being spent?

    ARRA included $300 billion in tax cuts. Try to keep up.