Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Known turncoat pops off

245

Comments

  • Blu82Blu82 Member Posts: 1,570
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Hondo likes to call facts that make his Kunt hurt "lies."

    Meanwhile Hondo that champion strawman ass fucker loves to attribute statements and claims to others that they never said and that's not a lie.

    According to you, people don't need to include SS and Medicare in the federal taxes they pay now.

    Hondo you're what you get when you cross someone who is really fucking stupid with someone who is unbelievable dishonest with a full blown Kunt.

    You call me stupid and dishonest. Ok. Why don't you do the same to Lil boy Blu for his Pelosi picture? The same picture you were posting in agreement with.
    Hey, Rump Ranger I didn't lie, I went deeper into the subject than the deep thinkers and researchers at Snopes went. I did this before poasting and toasting (your ass).
    As is common, you spouted off well known liberal "research" and took it as Christ's words to Paul while keeping your head in a position of cranial-rectal inversion.
    If you and Little Boy Bennie weren't such entertaining dolts I would suggest you go away. As it is, with the help of CD, your poastings provide a great deal of comedy to those with an intellect beyond a that of a 5th grader.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Blu82 said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Hondo likes to call facts that make his Kunt hurt "lies."

    Meanwhile Hondo that champion strawman ass fucker loves to attribute statements and claims to others that they never said and that's not a lie.

    According to you, people don't need to include SS and Medicare in the federal taxes they pay now.

    Hondo you're what you get when you cross someone who is really fucking stupid with someone who is unbelievable dishonest with a full blown Kunt.

    You call me stupid and dishonest. Ok. Why don't you do the same to Lil boy Blu for his Pelosi picture? The same picture you were posting in agreement with.
    Hey, Rump Ranger I didn't lie, I went deeper into the subject than the deep thinkers and researchers at Snopes went. I did this before poasting and toasting (your ass).
    As is common, you spouted off well known liberal "research" and took it as Christ's words to Paul while keeping your head in a position of cranial-rectal inversion.
    If you and Little Boy Bennie weren't such entertaining dolts I would suggest you go away. As it is, with the help of CD, your poastings provide a great deal of comedy to those with an intellect beyond a that of a 5th grader.
    Ok then post up your support. Until then you are a liar. (Well even after then you are a liar too as I know you are full of shit).
  • allpurpleallgoldallpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    salemcoog said:

    I just love the narrative that when someone remarks about and challenges her FS claims and political stances. It’s because they are AFRAID OF HER!!!


    And obligatory. Can Hondo and Bob refrain from Fagging out EVERY thread on here. Challenge yourselves to sit out like half of the threads on the Tug. Do it for Humanity.

    You’re seeing that response because the challenges of her are stupid, filled with hypocrisy and lies and clear projections of your own faults.

    You guys are great at making arguments that will make people that already agree with you nod their heads. But AOC was never going to win those people over anyways. Not a single challenge or argument around her has made me concerned. Not because she’s so amazing that she’s untouchable but because you guys just suck at arguing.

    Trump figured out how to squeeze just enough out to beat a massively unpopular Hillary. You better pray AOC fucks up on her own because that 40% Trump tops out at won’t hold forever.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    Nothing is more "inspirational" than someone who advocates using the government to steal the wealth of others on behalf of an economic and political philosophy that has repeatedly been shown to bankrupt and a failure.

    I find it very inspirational when people encourage young folks to use heroin and became alcoholics.
  • HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186

    https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-isnt-the-future-of-the-democratic-party-joe-lieberman

    Please continue putting the words “future of the Democratic Party” and “Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez” in the same sentence.

    if everything was the same but she looked like Hillary you wouldn't be posting about her at all
    Do you wanna take the gloves off, Derek?

    You can go back two years and you’ll find post after post of me gushing over Bernie Sanders. They have my support because they hold many of the same positions and, I will admit, there is something about both of them that I find inspiring. Something that gives me hope. It has nothing to do with who I want to stick my dick in.

    That was, honestly, one of the nastiest things anyone has ever said to me. I can’t tell if you meant it in a general sense, like no one would be talking about her if she wasn’t attractive, but I took it as pointed and personal. So, I have, in recent months, grown increasingly frustrated with where we are politically as a country. That frustration has sometimes boiled over and resulted in me saying some pretty mean things on this board. If that’s what led to your comment then I apologize. I still have internet love for all of my fellow half brains. Even if I want you to hurry up and die so we can turn the country into Venezuela.
    Can confirm APAG was a YUGE Bernie bro.

    I don't think he's in this for the looks.

    He does have a well documented thing for Latinas, though. Probably doesn't hurt.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-isnt-the-future-of-the-democratic-party-joe-lieberman

    Please continue putting the words “future of the Democratic Party” and “Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez” in the same sentence.

    if everything was the same but she looked like Hillary you wouldn't be posting about her at all
    Do you wanna take the gloves off, Derek?

    You can go back two years and you’ll find post after post of me gushing over Bernie Sanders. They have my support because they hold many of the same positions and, I will admit, there is something about both of them that I find inspiring. Something that gives me hope. It has nothing to do with who I want to stick my dick in.

    That was, honestly, one of the nastiest things anyone has ever said to me. I can’t tell if you meant it in a general sense, like no one would be talking about her if she wasn’t attractive, but I took it as pointed and personal. So, I have, in recent months, grown increasingly frustrated with where we are politically as a country. That frustration has sometimes boiled over and resulted in me saying some pretty mean things on this board. If that’s what led to your comment then I apologize. I still have internet love for all of my fellow half brains. Even if I want you to hurry up and die so we can turn the country into Venezuela.
    Can confirm APAG was a YUGE Bernie bro.

    I don't think he's in this for the looks.

    He does have a well documented thing for Latinas, though. Probably doesn't hurt.
    He?
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,885

    salemcoog said:

    I just love the narrative that when someone remarks about and challenges her FS claims and political stances. It’s because they are AFRAID OF HER!!!


    And obligatory. Can Hondo and Bob refrain from Fagging out EVERY thread on here. Challenge yourselves to sit out like half of the threads on the Tug. Do it for Humanity.

    You’re seeing that response because the challenges of her are stupid, filled with hypocrisy and lies and clear projections of your own faults.

    You guys are great at making arguments that will make people that already agree with you nod their heads. But AOC was never going to win those people over anyways. Not a single challenge or argument around her has made me concerned. Not because she’s so amazing that she’s untouchable but because you guys just suck at arguing.

    Trump figured out how to squeeze just enough out to beat a massively unpopular Hillary. You better pray AOC fucks up on her own because that 40% Trump tops out at won’t hold forever.
    The DSA will be a laughable memory by the time AOC is old enough to run for President.

    But what a ride it will be!!!!
  • HardlyClothedHardlyClothed Member Posts: 937
    SFGbob said:

    Five years into the New Deal in 1938 Unemployment was at 19% and you had a GDP rate of -3.3% That's New Deal economics.

    1938 is the only year that New Deal economics were in place. You heard it here first folks.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    My response clearly states that the New Deal had been in place for 5 years in 1938 you lying sack of shit. Is every liberal a fucking liar or are all liars liberals?
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    My response clearly states that the New Deal had been in place for 5 years in 1938 you lying sack of shit. Is every liberal a fucking liar or are all liars liberals?

    Bob hates context. Just one number from one year that represents the entirety of the new deal. Nothing else matters.
  • HardlyClothedHardlyClothed Member Posts: 937
    SFGbob said:

    My response clearly states that the New Deal had been in place for 5 years in 1938 you lying sack of shit. Is every liberal a fucking liar or are all liars liberals?

    You cherrypicked 1938 to say the New Deal was actually bad because the economy contracted that year. You’re laughably intellectually dishonest and then accuse others of lying when they point that out.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,790 Founders Club
    The economy sucked until WW2

    Hth
  • HardlyClothedHardlyClothed Member Posts: 937
    edited January 2019

    The economy sucked until WW2

    Hth

    Caused by a crisis of capitalism and only saved by a Keynesian, labor-friendly economy.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    The economy sucked until WW2

    Hth

    Race was there!!!
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    Why was the economy so shitty five years into the New Deal? Unemployment remained in double digits until 1941, eight years after the New policies had started. The New Deal actually retarded economic growth and crippled a strong and sustained economic recovery. Just like with Obama's recovery, all of the government spending and all of the new regulations hurt economic growth and lead to an anemic recovery.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,790 Founders Club
    SFGbob said:

    Why was the economy so shitty five years into the New Deal? Unemployment remained in double digits until 1941, eight years after the New policies had started. The New Deal actually retarded economic growth and crippled a strong and sustained economic recovery. Just like with Obama's recovery, all of the government spending and all of the new regulations hurt economic growth and lead to an anemic recovery.

    This is true
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,790 Founders Club

    The economy sucked until WW2

    Hth

    Caused by a crisis of capitalism and only saved by a Keynesian, labor-friendly economy.
    Sure
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    Why was the economy so shitty five years into the New Deal? Unemployment remained in double digits until 1941, eight years after the New policies had started. The New Deal actually retarded economic growth and crippled a strong and sustained economic recovery. Just like with Obama's recovery, all of the government spending and all of the new regulations hurt economic growth and lead to an anemic recovery.

    Bob do you want to talk about the role the collapse of banks in that time period had on the economy?
  • HardlyClothedHardlyClothed Member Posts: 937
    SFGbob said:

    Why was the economy so shitty five years into the New Deal? Unemployment remained in double digits until 1941, eight years after the New policies had started. The New Deal actually retarded economic growth and crippled a strong and sustained economic recovery. Just like with Obama's recovery, all of the government spending and all of the new regulations hurt economic growth and lead to an anemic recovery.

    Economic lightweight. The stimulus failed because it was not nearly big enough. Needed to be $2 trillion or more but investment bankers Larry Summers and Timmy Geithner kneecapped it by capping it at $500 billion. It also included massive tax cuts that were saved instead of spent, just like always. And the foreclosure crisis that wiped out the net worth of millions of middle and lower class families.

    It wasn’t regulations moron.
  • HardlyClothedHardlyClothed Member Posts: 937
    The stimulus also favored short term projects over longer term investments, another reason it sucked.
Sign In or Register to comment.