Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The perfect encapsulation of the leftist mind.

12357

Comments

  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,233
    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
    You can interpret that your way or you can interpret it to mean, teach people to have sex without having kids. That’s how I interpreted it.

    You of all people should have grace, when it comes to ambiguity.
    Withholding valid sex ed in favor of abstinence only sex ed and not providing easy access to birth control is a curious way to accomplish this.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
    You can interpret that your way or you can interpret it to mean, teach people to have sex without having kids. That’s how I interpreted it.

    You of all people should have grace, when it comes to ambiguity.
    The word AND is important.

    But dipshit Hondo can’t fucking figure it out.
    Oh wait. Now you care about reading comprehension after fighting for days about what a hate crime means. Ok!

    BTW I know exactly what you meant but it's funny to watch you get pissed at what you do in a daily basis.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    dflea said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
    You can interpret that your way or you can interpret it to mean, teach people to have sex without having kids. That’s how I interpreted it.

    You of all people should have grace, when it comes to ambiguity.
    Withholding valid sex ed in favor of abstinence only sex ed and not providing easy access to birth control is a curious way to accomplish this.
    Yeah. That’s a bad way.

    Thanks for the input though.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited January 2019
    2001400ex said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
    You can interpret that your way or you can interpret it to mean, teach people to have sex without having kids. That’s how I interpreted it.

    You of all people should have grace, when it comes to ambiguity.
    The word AND is important.

    But dipshit Hondo can’t fucking figure it out.
    Oh wait. Now you care about reading comprehension after fighting for days about what a hate crime means. Ok!

    BTW I know exactly what you meant but it's funny to watch you get pissed at what you do in a daily basis.
    You’re bizarre





































































    Ok!
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    dflea said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
    You can interpret that your way or you can interpret it to mean, teach people to have sex without having kids. That’s how I interpreted it.

    You of all people should have grace, when it comes to ambiguity.
    Withholding valid sex ed in favor of abstinence only sex ed and not providing easy access to birth control is a curious way to accomplish this.
    So you really believe that people having kids out of wedlock are doing so because they don't know where babies come from and they don't have easy access to birth control?

    Explain to me how you could of had out of wedlock birth rates that were just a tiny fraction of what they are today back in the 1950s when few schools even taught sex ed of any kind and access to birth control was much more restricted than it is today? Where is it in America today that people don't have easy access to birth control?
  • USMChawkUSMChawk Member Posts: 1,800
    dflea said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
    You can interpret that your way or you can interpret it to mean, teach people to have sex without having kids. That’s how I interpreted it.

    You of all people should have grace, when it comes to ambiguity.
    Withholding valid sex ed in favor of abstinence only sex ed and not providing easy access to birth control is a curious way to accomplish this.
    Where did I advocate for that? My girls both took health (sex Ed) in HS and we (their parents) also discussed it with them. Shockingly, we are heavily involved in their upbringing and they are good kids who will be productive citizens. It’s a foreign concept, I know.
  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,233
    USMChawk said:

    dflea said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
    You can interpret that your way or you can interpret it to mean, teach people to have sex without having kids. That’s how I interpreted it.

    You of all people should have grace, when it comes to ambiguity.
    Withholding valid sex ed in favor of abstinence only sex ed and not providing easy access to birth control is a curious way to accomplish this.
    Where did I advocate for that? My girls both took health (sex Ed) in HS and we (their parents) also discussed it with them. Shockingly, we are heavily involved in their upbringing and they are good kids who will be productive citizens. It’s a foreign concept, I know.
    Where did I say you did?

    The GOP are champions of abstinence only sex ed. It's fucking stupid, but it seems to be ok to accept idiocy from the GOP around here while the Dems idiocy is grounds for declaring a national emergency.

    I tip my hat to you for being engaged with your kids' upbringing. They're already ahead of the game because of that.

    PS - Fuck off, Gaybob. I wasn't fucking talking to you.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,964 Standard Supporter

    El oh fucking El.

    The poster child for liberal nonsense. It is a liberals right to never be taught common sense, decency, facts of success and personal responsibility but it everyone else's responsibility to pay for the libs who want to fail using their own made up "values to guide their life".

    An interesting opinion coming from a liberal who's party espouses teaching liberally revised history, having cross dressing men read to grade school children, forcing feeding children the idea that transsexuals are normal and blocking Conservatives from having a voice on campuses all across the country.

    I love your brain. Stay.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,964 Standard Supporter

    If it’s all about giving kids the best chance for success why aren’t we paying for them to go to college?

    Because MOST kids don't belong on college campuses, as we can plainly see everyday. MOST kids need job skills and job training, not to be endlessly pondering what future trauma Jack will endure after he switches his anatomy to Jill.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,964 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:

    You know what would have been meaningful to him? His mother not having to work two jobs because neither would pay her a living wage.

    Living wage? My question for you Marxists is how much of your current income did you donate to give others a living wage? I'll bet it's zero. Given your beliefs a small apartment in a shitty neighborhood is all you need. If you are living above that downsize and give it away. It's what you want. You just expect everyone else to pay for it.
    You'll notice that CD who claims he is against free loaders and people who can't hack it in today's economy never has anything to say against these people who believe that government should set some kind of "living wage" that businesses must pay.
    Because CD is a classic projector extraordinaire.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    dflea said:

    USMChawk said:

    dflea said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
    You can interpret that your way or you can interpret it to mean, teach people to have sex without having kids. That’s how I interpreted it.

    You of all people should have grace, when it comes to ambiguity.
    Withholding valid sex ed in favor of abstinence only sex ed and not providing easy access to birth control is a curious way to accomplish this.
    Where did I advocate for that? My girls both took health (sex Ed) in HS and we (their parents) also discussed it with them. Shockingly, we are heavily involved in their upbringing and they are good kids who will be productive citizens. It’s a foreign concept, I know.
    Where did I say you did?

    The GOP are champions of abstinence only sex ed. It's fucking stupid, but it seems to be ok to accept idiocy from the GOP around here while the Dems idiocy is grounds for declaring a national emergency.

    I tip my hat to you for being engaged with your kids' upbringing. They're already ahead of the game because of that.

    PS - Fuck off, Gaybob. I wasn't fucking talking to you.
    Did anyone mention the GOP?
  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,233

    dflea said:

    USMChawk said:

    dflea said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
    You can interpret that your way or you can interpret it to mean, teach people to have sex without having kids. That’s how I interpreted it.

    You of all people should have grace, when it comes to ambiguity.
    Withholding valid sex ed in favor of abstinence only sex ed and not providing easy access to birth control is a curious way to accomplish this.
    Where did I advocate for that? My girls both took health (sex Ed) in HS and we (their parents) also discussed it with them. Shockingly, we are heavily involved in their upbringing and they are good kids who will be productive citizens. It’s a foreign concept, I know.
    Where did I say you did?

    The GOP are champions of abstinence only sex ed. It's fucking stupid, but it seems to be ok to accept idiocy from the GOP around here while the Dems idiocy is grounds for declaring a national emergency.

    I tip my hat to you for being engaged with your kids' upbringing. They're already ahead of the game because of that.

    PS - Fuck off, Gaybob. I wasn't fucking talking to you.
    Did anyone mention the GOP?
    Yes.

    I did.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    dflea said:

    dflea said:

    USMChawk said:

    dflea said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
    You can interpret that your way or you can interpret it to mean, teach people to have sex without having kids. That’s how I interpreted it.

    You of all people should have grace, when it comes to ambiguity.
    Withholding valid sex ed in favor of abstinence only sex ed and not providing easy access to birth control is a curious way to accomplish this.
    Where did I advocate for that? My girls both took health (sex Ed) in HS and we (their parents) also discussed it with them. Shockingly, we are heavily involved in their upbringing and they are good kids who will be productive citizens. It’s a foreign concept, I know.
    Where did I say you did?

    The GOP are champions of abstinence only sex ed. It's fucking stupid, but it seems to be ok to accept idiocy from the GOP around here while the Dems idiocy is grounds for declaring a national emergency.

    I tip my hat to you for being engaged with your kids' upbringing. They're already ahead of the game because of that.

    PS - Fuck off, Gaybob. I wasn't fucking talking to you.
    Did anyone mention the GOP?
    Yes.

    I did.
    That’s what I thought.
  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,233

    dflea said:

    dflea said:

    USMChawk said:

    dflea said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
    You can interpret that your way or you can interpret it to mean, teach people to have sex without having kids. That’s how I interpreted it.

    You of all people should have grace, when it comes to ambiguity.
    Withholding valid sex ed in favor of abstinence only sex ed and not providing easy access to birth control is a curious way to accomplish this.
    Where did I advocate for that? My girls both took health (sex Ed) in HS and we (their parents) also discussed it with them. Shockingly, we are heavily involved in their upbringing and they are good kids who will be productive citizens. It’s a foreign concept, I know.
    Where did I say you did?

    The GOP are champions of abstinence only sex ed. It's fucking stupid, but it seems to be ok to accept idiocy from the GOP around here while the Dems idiocy is grounds for declaring a national emergency.

    I tip my hat to you for being engaged with your kids' upbringing. They're already ahead of the game because of that.

    PS - Fuck off, Gaybob. I wasn't fucking talking to you.
    Did anyone mention the GOP?
    Yes.

    I did.
    That’s what I thought.
    You've still got it.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,790 Founders Club
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    dflea said:

    USMChawk said:

    dflea said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
    You can interpret that your way or you can interpret it to mean, teach people to have sex without having kids. That’s how I interpreted it.

    You of all people should have grace, when it comes to ambiguity.
    Withholding valid sex ed in favor of abstinence only sex ed and not providing easy access to birth control is a curious way to accomplish this.
    Where did I advocate for that? My girls both took health (sex Ed) in HS and we (their parents) also discussed it with them. Shockingly, we are heavily involved in their upbringing and they are good kids who will be productive citizens. It’s a foreign concept, I know.
    Where did I say you did?

    The GOP are champions of abstinence only sex ed. It's fucking stupid, but it seems to be ok to accept idiocy from the GOP around here while the Dems idiocy is grounds for declaring a national emergency.

    I tip my hat to you for being engaged with your kids' upbringing. They're already ahead of the game because of that.

    PS - Fuck off, Gaybob. I wasn't fucking talking to you.
    Yeah, it sucks to have your for shit argument completely destroyed.
  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,233
    SFGbob said:

    dflea said:

    USMChawk said:

    dflea said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
    You can interpret that your way or you can interpret it to mean, teach people to have sex without having kids. That’s how I interpreted it.

    You of all people should have grace, when it comes to ambiguity.
    Withholding valid sex ed in favor of abstinence only sex ed and not providing easy access to birth control is a curious way to accomplish this.
    Where did I advocate for that? My girls both took health (sex Ed) in HS and we (their parents) also discussed it with them. Shockingly, we are heavily involved in their upbringing and they are good kids who will be productive citizens. It’s a foreign concept, I know.
    Where did I say you did?

    The GOP are champions of abstinence only sex ed. It's fucking stupid, but it seems to be ok to accept idiocy from the GOP around here while the Dems idiocy is grounds for declaring a national emergency.

    I tip my hat to you for being engaged with your kids' upbringing. They're already ahead of the game because of that.

    PS - Fuck off, Gaybob. I wasn't fucking talking to you.
    Yeah, it sucks to have your for shit argument completely destroyed.
    Did fuck off confuse you, you drippy fucking cunt?

    Go hump someone else's leg, faggot.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    dflea said:

    SFGbob said:

    dflea said:

    USMChawk said:

    dflea said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
    You can interpret that your way or you can interpret it to mean, teach people to have sex without having kids. That’s how I interpreted it.

    You of all people should have grace, when it comes to ambiguity.
    Withholding valid sex ed in favor of abstinence only sex ed and not providing easy access to birth control is a curious way to accomplish this.
    Where did I advocate for that? My girls both took health (sex Ed) in HS and we (their parents) also discussed it with them. Shockingly, we are heavily involved in their upbringing and they are good kids who will be productive citizens. It’s a foreign concept, I know.
    Where did I say you did?

    The GOP are champions of abstinence only sex ed. It's fucking stupid, but it seems to be ok to accept idiocy from the GOP around here while the Dems idiocy is grounds for declaring a national emergency.

    I tip my hat to you for being engaged with your kids' upbringing. They're already ahead of the game because of that.

    PS - Fuck off, Gaybob. I wasn't fucking talking to you.
    Yeah, it sucks to have your for shit argument completely destroyed.
    Did fuck off confuse you, you drippy fucking cunt?

    Go hump someone else's leg, faggot.
    Yeah, that's probably that tact that I'd take if I was lightweight Kunt who just had their ass handed to them.
  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,233
    SFGbob said:

    dflea said:

    SFGbob said:

    dflea said:

    USMChawk said:

    dflea said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
    You can interpret that your way or you can interpret it to mean, teach people to have sex without having kids. That’s how I interpreted it.

    You of all people should have grace, when it comes to ambiguity.
    Withholding valid sex ed in favor of abstinence only sex ed and not providing easy access to birth control is a curious way to accomplish this.
    Where did I advocate for that? My girls both took health (sex Ed) in HS and we (their parents) also discussed it with them. Shockingly, we are heavily involved in their upbringing and they are good kids who will be productive citizens. It’s a foreign concept, I know.
    Where did I say you did?

    The GOP are champions of abstinence only sex ed. It's fucking stupid, but it seems to be ok to accept idiocy from the GOP around here while the Dems idiocy is grounds for declaring a national emergency.

    I tip my hat to you for being engaged with your kids' upbringing. They're already ahead of the game because of that.

    PS - Fuck off, Gaybob. I wasn't fucking talking to you.
    Yeah, it sucks to have your for shit argument completely destroyed.
    Did fuck off confuse you, you drippy fucking cunt?

    Go hump someone else's leg, faggot.
    Yeah, that's probably that tact that I'd take if I was lightweight Kunt who just had their ass handed to them.
    Sure, faggot. The tact you'd take is spending the next 4 days going back and forth with Hondo because you are a faggot with no hobbies or job.

    Then you'd do it again.

    It's because you're a retarded shitbird with nothing going on in your pathetic life.

    Fuck off, loser.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,209
    SFGbob said:

    dflea said:

    SFGbob said:

    dflea said:

    USMChawk said:

    dflea said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
    You can interpret that your way or you can interpret it to mean, teach people to have sex without having kids. That’s how I interpreted it.

    You of all people should have grace, when it comes to ambiguity.
    Withholding valid sex ed in favor of abstinence only sex ed and not providing easy access to birth control is a curious way to accomplish this.
    Where did I advocate for that? My girls both took health (sex Ed) in HS and we (their parents) also discussed it with them. Shockingly, we are heavily involved in their upbringing and they are good kids who will be productive citizens. It’s a foreign concept, I know.
    Where did I say you did?

    The GOP are champions of abstinence only sex ed. It's fucking stupid, but it seems to be ok to accept idiocy from the GOP around here while the Dems idiocy is grounds for declaring a national emergency.

    I tip my hat to you for being engaged with your kids' upbringing. They're already ahead of the game because of that.

    PS - Fuck off, Gaybob. I wasn't fucking talking to you.
    Yeah, it sucks to have your for shit argument completely destroyed.
    Did fuck off confuse you, you drippy fucking cunt?

    Go hump someone else's leg, faggot.
    Yeah, that's probably that tact that I'd take if I was lightweight Kunt who just had their ass handed to them.
    Strawman ass! Strawman ass!
Sign In or Register to comment.