Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Voter suppression is a good idea

2»

Comments

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    edited November 2018

    SFGbob said:

    No, because if the family are still net tax consumers I don't want the non-working, or working spouse for that matter to vote.

    Skin in the game. The non-working wife who's husband still pays all the bills making them net taxpayers has skin in the game.

    Let's just compromise and give her 3/5 vote.
    Are we could just go back to pre-19th Amendment days. If we did that and restricted the vote to net taxpayers, the Rats couldn't win a single statewide election.
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,949
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    No, because if the family are still net tax consumers I don't want the non-working, or working spouse for that matter to vote.

    Skin in the game. The non-working wife who's husband still pays all the bills making them net taxpayers has skin in the game.

    Let's just compromise and give her 3/5 vote.
    Are we could just go back to pre-19th Amendment days.
    I think we can all agree that things went down hill when they got the vote
  • UWhuskytskeetUWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    No, because if the family are still net tax consumers I don't want the non-working, or working spouse for that matter to vote.

    Skin in the game. The non-working wife who's husband still pays all the bills making them net taxpayers has skin in the game.

    Let's just compromise and give her 3/5 vote.
    Are we could just go back to pre-19th Amendment days. If we did that and restricted the vote to net taxpayers, the Rats couldn't win a single statewide election.
    Might be your only hope.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,779 Founders Club
    I don't see any reason to make it easy for stupid or lazy people to vote

    If that's your base that's your problem not mine
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    No, because if the family are still net tax consumers I don't want the non-working, or working spouse for that matter to vote.

    Skin in the game. The non-working wife who's husband still pays all the bills making them net taxpayers has skin in the game.

    Let's just compromise and give her 3/5 vote.
    Are we could just go back to pre-19th Amendment days. If we did that and restricted the vote to net taxpayers, the Rats couldn't win a single statewide election.
    Might be your only hope.
    Oh I know, the Rats have made an art form out of getting the votes of people who pay little if any taxes while demanding all kinds of "free" shit. The takers far, far out number the makers and the Rats have a hammer lock on that vote.
  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,233
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    No, because if the family are still net tax consumers I don't want the non-working, or working spouse for that matter to vote.

    Skin in the game. The non-working wife who's husband still pays all the bills making them net taxpayers has skin in the game.

    Let's just compromise and give her 3/5 vote.
    Are we could just go back to pre-19th Amendment days. If we did that and restricted the vote to net taxpayers, the Rats couldn't win a single statewide election.
    Might be your only hope.
    Oh I know, the Rats have made an art form out of getting the votes of people who pay little if any taxes while demanding all kinds of "free" shit. The takers far, far out number the makers and the Rats have a hammer lock on that vote.
    Yeah. Appalachian welfare is different than Harlem welfare, isn't it?
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    dflea said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    No, because if the family are still net tax consumers I don't want the non-working, or working spouse for that matter to vote.

    Skin in the game. The non-working wife who's husband still pays all the bills making them net taxpayers has skin in the game.

    Let's just compromise and give her 3/5 vote.
    Are we could just go back to pre-19th Amendment days. If we did that and restricted the vote to net taxpayers, the Rats couldn't win a single statewide election.
    Might be your only hope.
    Oh I know, the Rats have made an art form out of getting the votes of people who pay little if any taxes while demanding all kinds of "free" shit. The takers far, far out number the makers and the Rats have a hammer lock on that vote.
    Yeah. Appalachian welfare is different than Harlem welfare, isn't it?
    I don't put a skin color on parasites, appears you do.
  • BennyBeaverBennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    Sledog said:

    Voter suppression in Floriduh going on as we speak as dem operative excludes repub ballots.

    Outraged?

    Clockwork shill
  • BennyBeaverBennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    edited November 2018
    In this thread sofuckinggayboob wants to take rights away from American citizens.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203

    In this thread sofuckinggayboob wants to take rights away from American citizens.

    They want to steal my labor from me. I don't want anything from them. If they want to vote they can either join the military or start being a net tax payer.
  • BennyBeaverBennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    SFGbob said:

    In this thread sofuckinggayboob wants to take rights away from American citizens.

    They want to steal my labor from me. I don't want anything from them. If they want to vote they can either join the military or start being a net tax payer.
    Dream on.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    Trust me, I realize that what I want isn't going to happen. Too many parasites out there would never allow it.
  • BennyBeaverBennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    Pay my way boob!
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    Pay for your own healthcare and retirement parasite.
  • BennyBeaverBennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    SFGbob said:

    Pay for your own healthcare and retirement parasite.

    Why would I do that when I’ve got you to do it for me?
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203

    SFGbob said:

    Pay for your own healthcare and retirement parasite.

    Why would I do that when I’ve got you to do it for me?
    That's the way most parasites think
  • BennyBeaverBennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Pay for your own healthcare and retirement parasite.

    Why would I do that when I’ve got you to do it for me?
    That's the way most parasites think
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,839 Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    No, because if the family are still net tax consumers I don't want the non-working, or working spouse for that matter to vote.

    Skin in the game. The non-working wife who's husband still pays all the bills making them net taxpayers has skin in the game.

    Let's just compromise and give her 3/5 vote.
    Are we could just go back to pre-19th Amendment days.
    I think we can all agree that things went down hill when they got the vote
    Things went downhill when they purchased votes with our tax dollars. Now people vote themselves gifts from the US Treasury via the dems or we should just use the word commie.
Sign In or Register to comment.