everybody remembers Price played a major role in the OT loss in last year's A/C? That Miles is coming off a previously-unknown type of trashing? .... of a team that beat the coogs, running up the score to 52???
This season is already over. Get Miles more time for the new coach.
There is no way Sark is getting fired after last Saturday.
As for all this Miles talk I'll just copy and paste what I said in another thread.
I think people are making the classic mistake of giving too much to the QB in a win and too much blame in a loss.
They see Miles started and UW scored 69 so therefore he should start over Price. Nevermind UW's defense shut them out first three quarters and had over 500 yards rushing.
I like Miles but he is nothing special IMO. He is a better runner than Price but he's not an electric runner either like Locker was prior to Sark showing up.
Price still has a 19 TD to 4 INT ratio and really has only played one terrible game this year which happen to be a game where the entire team including Sankey decided to no show.
It seems like Price doesn't come through when the chips are down. I agree not to give to much credit to Miles for the blowout, but jesus, he's got dead-on accuracy.
It seems like Price doesn't come through when the chips are down. I agree not to give to much credit to Miles for the blowout, but jesus, he's got dead-on accuracy.
Is it Price not coming through or is it his coach? I'd go with the crappy coach. I mean Price to date has played the best against Stanford than any other QB this year. He also led a game winning drive against them last year.
Miles deep and intermediate passes look good. Price is way quicker and accurate on the short stuff I hate it when coaches bench upper classmen to play for next year unless price would be messing with an nfl future.
If he is healthy enough to be better than miles then play price.
I'd like to re-bump this. Price in the 2nd half played pretty well. Sark should have featured the run from the very beginning to allow Price to get settled in.
I'd like to re-bump this. Price in the 2nd half played pretty well. Sark should have featured the run from the very beginning to allow Price to get settled in.
I think Miles would have won the game by a wider margin
I'd like to re-bump this. Price in the 2nd half played pretty well. Sark should have featured the run from the very beginning to allow Price to get settled in.
I think Miles would have won the game by a wider margin
It depends, I think if Sark had came out throwing then probably not.
I think had he came out running Sankey to get Price going UW wins rather easily say 34-17?
Comments
As for all this Miles talk I'll just copy and paste what I said in another thread.
I think people are making the classic mistake of giving too much to the QB in a win and too much blame in a loss.
They see Miles started and UW scored 69 so therefore he should start over Price. Nevermind UW's defense shut them out first three quarters and had over 500 yards rushing.
I like Miles but he is nothing special IMO. He is a better runner than Price but he's not an electric runner either like Locker was prior to Sark showing up.
Price still has a 19 TD to 4 INT ratio and really has only played one terrible game this year which happen to be a game where the entire team including Sankey decided to no show.
It's time to move forward though. Winning the next two games doesn't matter regardless of the QB.
I think fans are way too critical of Price.
Last night was like crack cocaine 24 hours before a drug test. High and happy. But now we are fucked.
We are fucked
If he is healthy enough to be better than miles then play price.
I'd like to vote for the one most likely to get Sark fired.
I think had he came out running Sankey to get Price going UW wins rather easily say 34-17?