Total defense rank each year at Colorado. Leavitt took over a worse defense at Oregon in year 1 and will finish way ahead of 85 this year. Looks like he's on track to me
As much as people think coaches make up for talent, they don't. Saban at Bama and Dabo at Clemson were barely even competitive their first year.
Apelu is starting at LB which means our LB group is awful, minus Dye. They are taking four HS LB's and trying to take one JUCO in this class.
Our corners are really bad. C64 is turning into a good one, but Graham has already hit his ceiling. That's why they are going to bring in five DB's in this class.
They'll end up with five or six line guys also, but that's just being responsible.
Total defense rank each year at Colorado. Leavitt took over a worse defense at Oregon in year 1 and will finish way ahead of 85 this year. Looks like he's on track to me
Calling BS on "way worse" than 114.
Didn’t say way worse? And Oregon was #126 in 2016, which yes, is worse than 114. Jfc hoke was bad
Total defense rank each year at Colorado. Leavitt took over a worse defense at Oregon in year 1 and will finish way ahead of 85 this year. Looks like he's on track to me
Calling BS on "way worse" than 114.
Didn’t say way worse? And Oregon was #126 in 2016, which yes, is worse than 114. Jfc hoke was bad
You're welcome to post the numbers on Petersen at his small gig
You might notice a difference
That little gigs don't translate to big ones?
Mario has FIU's only conference title and Bowel win.
You're trying so hard to talk yourself into Peterman being great, but we all know he isn't. He is good and for anyone under 40 that's the best they can remember.
Apparently neither one of you can see the Kent State record is far superior to FIU
Boise doesn't fit your fake narrative
Year 6 Cristobal was back to 3-9
But I'm struggling
Did James have a losing record after his first year? Dig deeper
I'm not the one trying to talk myself into anything. I'm using your argument
Year 5
You’re really having a really, really hard time.
It’s like watching Elvis on the toilet, near the end.
But BOISE!!!!1!11!!!!
Firmly forgets to mention every coach at Boise has been awesome since Koetter and Harsin currently. He was just another cog in the wheel there.
This is the thing that just isn't true. Those guys were good at Boise, but Pete took Boise to heights no one did before or since. He may or may not be a great coach but trying to explain away his success at Boise with "everyone else did it" is willfully ignorant. No, they didn't.
Comments
Guess I’m wrong.
Harsh but fair.
I salute you sir.
Apelu is starting at LB which means our LB group is awful, minus Dye. They are taking four HS LB's and trying to take one JUCO in this class.
Our corners are really bad. C64 is turning into a good one, but Graham has already hit his ceiling. That's why they are going to bring in five DB's in this class.
They'll end up with five or six line guys also, but that's just being responsible.
Seems to me that some of youz are headed the wrong way
Year 5. 6 was a doozy too
I don't see a year 5 there
You're welcome to post the numbers on Petersen at his small gig
You might notice a difference
Mario has FIU's only conference title and Bowel win.
You're trying so hard to talk yourself into Peterman being great, but we all know he isn't. He is good and for anyone under 40 that's the best they can remember.
Again, pimp Boise results all you want. It only further proves my point.
You’re Fucking STRUGULING right about now.
call Joe Namath for help.
Boise doesn't fit your fake narrative
Year 6 Cristobal was back to 3-9
But I'm struggling
Did James have a losing record after his first year? Dig deeper
I'm not the one trying to talk myself into anything. I'm using your argument
Year 5
Jesus
It’s like watching Elvis on the toilet, near the end.
Firmly forgets to mention every coach at Boise has been awesome since Koetter and Harsin currently. He was just another cog in the wheel there.