Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Hondo do you believe Liz Warren is Native American?
SFGbob
Member Posts: 33,183
in Tug Tavern
Yes or no? Simply question, shouldn't be tough to answer. Try to lay off the strawman's asshole this time.
Comments
-
She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.
Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar? -
You didn't answer the question2001400ex said:She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.
Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar? -
Another question Hondo is just too big a Kunt to answer.2001400ex said:She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.
Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar? -
So unless someone is an "enrolled tribal member" even if they are 100% Native American they can't say that on their resume? Btw, I don't know if Warren ever put it on a "resume" and I know what a stickler you are for precise language Hondo.
-
None of us have enough information to answer the question. Her test said anywhere from 1/64 to 1/1024 native American. A conservative shill says she's not. A liberal shill says she is. A practical person says I don't know. So the tie breaker is she isn't enrolled.greenblood said:
You didn't answer the question2001400ex said:She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.
Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar? -
SFGbob said:
So unless someone is an "enrolled tribal member" even if they are 100% Native American they can't say that on their resume? Btw, I don't know if Warren ever put it on a "resume" and I know what a stickler you are for precise language Hondo.
Holy fuck dude. Seriously. You got issues. -
Let's say she is 1/64 Native American. Does a "practical person" still say they don't know or do they say she is native American?2001400ex said:
None of us have enough information to answer the question. Her test said anywhere from 1/64 to 1/1024 native American. A conservative shill says she's not. A liberal shill says she is. A practical person says I don't know. So the tie breaker is she isn't enrolled.greenblood said:
You didn't answer the question2001400ex said:She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.
Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar? -
Translation: Don't dissect my gibberish and ask me to respond to it, I'm just spouting bullshit and hoping no one notices that I have no fucking clue about what I'm talking about.2001400ex said:SFGbob said:So unless someone is an "enrolled tribal member" even if they are 100% Native American they can't say that on their resume? Btw, I don't know if Warren ever put it on a "resume" and I know what a stickler you are for precise language Hondo.
Holy fuck dude. Seriously. You got issues. -
She'd be part native American. Here's some information for you. Some tribes don't require blood quantum. Some require a certain percentage. Some require you to be a descendant of a certain family.SFGbob said:
Let's say she is 1/64 Native American. Does a "practical person" still say they don't know or do they say she is native American?2001400ex said:
None of us have enough information to answer the question. Her test said anywhere from 1/64 to 1/1024 native American. A conservative shill says she's not. A liberal shill says she is. A practical person says I don't know. So the tie breaker is she isn't enrolled.greenblood said:
You didn't answer the question2001400ex said:She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.
Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar?
In other words you are trying to make something be black and white. Like a shill would. That isn't black and white. -
Really? So someone who is 1.5% Native American should be able to claim minority status for purposes employment and college admissions? I don't care about what "some tribes" require Hondo, I'm asking you about what Liz Warren did, that you're obviously not defending in anyway.2001400ex said:
She'd be part native American. Here's some information for you. Some tribes don't require blood quantum. Some require a certain percentage. Some require you to be a descendant of a certain family.SFGbob said:
Let's say she is 1/64 Native American. Does a "practical person" still say they don't know or do they say she is native American?2001400ex said:
None of us have enough information to answer the question. Her test said anywhere from 1/64 to 1/1024 native American. A conservative shill says she's not. A liberal shill says she is. A practical person says I don't know. So the tie breaker is she isn't enrolled.greenblood said:
You didn't answer the question2001400ex said:She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.
Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar?
In other words you are trying to make something be black and white. Like a shill would. That isn't black and white.
Does someone who is 1.5% black qualify for Affirmative Action and other racial set asides Hondo? How thin does the percentage have to be before they would no longer qualify? -
Warren has not one of your moving goalpost qualifications for Indian therefore, she isn’t Indian, if we’re going to use hondolojic
-
It's obviously lost on you that tribes don't use DNA tests for enrollment. Most of those applications require Tribal enrollment information.SFGbob said:
Really? So someone who is 1.5% Native American should be able to claim minority status for purposes employment and college admissions? I don't care about what "some tribes" require Hondo, I'm asking you about what Liz Warren did, that you're obviously not defending in anyway.2001400ex said:
She'd be part native American. Here's some information for you. Some tribes don't require blood quantum. Some require a certain percentage. Some require you to be a descendant of a certain family.SFGbob said:
Let's say she is 1/64 Native American. Does a "practical person" still say they don't know or do they say she is native American?2001400ex said:
None of us have enough information to answer the question. Her test said anywhere from 1/64 to 1/1024 native American. A conservative shill says she's not. A liberal shill says she is. A practical person says I don't know. So the tie breaker is she isn't enrolled.greenblood said:
You didn't answer the question2001400ex said:She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.
Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar?
In other words you are trying to make something be black and white. Like a shill would. That isn't black and white.
Does someone who is 1.5% black qualify for Affirmative Action and other racial set asides Hondo? How thin does the percentage have to be before they would no longer qualify?
That being said, where did Warren use her heritage to benefit herself? -
What did the Tribes say about Warren being a fucking liar?2001400ex said:
It's obviously lost on you that tribes don't use DNA tests for enrollment. Most of those applications require Tribal enrollment information.SFGbob said:
Really? So someone who is 1.5% Native American should be able to claim minority status for purposes employment and college admissions? I don't care about what "some tribes" require Hondo, I'm asking you about what Liz Warren did, that you're obviously not defending in anyway.2001400ex said:
She'd be part native American. Here's some information for you. Some tribes don't require blood quantum. Some require a certain percentage. Some require you to be a descendant of a certain family.SFGbob said:
Let's say she is 1/64 Native American. Does a "practical person" still say they don't know or do they say she is native American?2001400ex said:
None of us have enough information to answer the question. Her test said anywhere from 1/64 to 1/1024 native American. A conservative shill says she's not. A liberal shill says she is. A practical person says I don't know. So the tie breaker is she isn't enrolled.greenblood said:
You didn't answer the question2001400ex said:She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.
Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar?
In other words you are trying to make something be black and white. Like a shill would. That isn't black and white.
Does someone who is 1.5% black qualify for Affirmative Action and other racial set asides Hondo? How thin does the percentage have to be before they would no longer qualify?
That being said, where did Warren use her heritage to benefit herself? -
Exactly what I just stated.RaceBannon said:
What did the Tribes say about Warren being a fucking liar?2001400ex said:
It's obviously lost on you that tribes don't use DNA tests for enrollment. Most of those applications require Tribal enrollment information.SFGbob said:
Really? So someone who is 1.5% Native American should be able to claim minority status for purposes employment and college admissions? I don't care about what "some tribes" require Hondo, I'm asking you about what Liz Warren did, that you're obviously not defending in anyway.2001400ex said:
She'd be part native American. Here's some information for you. Some tribes don't require blood quantum. Some require a certain percentage. Some require you to be a descendant of a certain family.SFGbob said:
Let's say she is 1/64 Native American. Does a "practical person" still say they don't know or do they say she is native American?2001400ex said:
None of us have enough information to answer the question. Her test said anywhere from 1/64 to 1/1024 native American. A conservative shill says she's not. A liberal shill says she is. A practical person says I don't know. So the tie breaker is she isn't enrolled.greenblood said:
You didn't answer the question2001400ex said:She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.
Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar?
In other words you are trying to make something be black and white. Like a shill would. That isn't black and white.
Does someone who is 1.5% black qualify for Affirmative Action and other racial set asides Hondo? How thin does the percentage have to be before they would no longer qualify?
That being said, where did Warren use her heritage to benefit herself? -
Who knew that something I'm not talking about, that I've never referenced and isn't the point of any of the questions I've put to you and is clearly a fucking diversion by you in order to avoid the questions you've been asked, is "lost" on me.
-
Exactly. You still don't get it. I'll type slowly. You can't say "1.5% maybe American". It doesn't work like that. You can be zero percent blood quantum and be a tribal member eligible for benefits. And you can be 100% but not enrolled member and not eligible for benefits.SFGbob said:Who knew that something I'm not talking about, that I've never referenced and isn't the point of any of the questions I've put to you and is clearly a fucking diversion by you in order to avoid the questions you've been asked, is "lost" on me.
Again, stop being black and white. -
There's another lie2001400ex said:
Exactly what I just stated.RaceBannon said:
What did the Tribes say about Warren being a fucking liar?2001400ex said:
It's obviously lost on you that tribes don't use DNA tests for enrollment. Most of those applications require Tribal enrollment information.SFGbob said:
Really? So someone who is 1.5% Native American should be able to claim minority status for purposes employment and college admissions? I don't care about what "some tribes" require Hondo, I'm asking you about what Liz Warren did, that you're obviously not defending in anyway.2001400ex said:
She'd be part native American. Here's some information for you. Some tribes don't require blood quantum. Some require a certain percentage. Some require you to be a descendant of a certain family.SFGbob said:
Let's say she is 1/64 Native American. Does a "practical person" still say they don't know or do they say she is native American?2001400ex said:
None of us have enough information to answer the question. Her test said anywhere from 1/64 to 1/1024 native American. A conservative shill says she's not. A liberal shill says she is. A practical person says I don't know. So the tie breaker is she isn't enrolled.greenblood said:
You didn't answer the question2001400ex said:She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.
Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar?
In other words you are trying to make something be black and white. Like a shill would. That isn't black and white.
Does someone who is 1.5% black qualify for Affirmative Action and other racial set asides Hondo? How thin does the percentage have to be before they would no longer qualify?
That being said, where did Warren use her heritage to benefit herself?
They told her to apologize and shut the fuck up -
I didn't read that one. Care to post a link?RaceBannon said:
There's another lie2001400ex said:
Exactly what I just stated.RaceBannon said:
What did the Tribes say about Warren being a fucking liar?2001400ex said:
It's obviously lost on you that tribes don't use DNA tests for enrollment. Most of those applications require Tribal enrollment information.SFGbob said:
Really? So someone who is 1.5% Native American should be able to claim minority status for purposes employment and college admissions? I don't care about what "some tribes" require Hondo, I'm asking you about what Liz Warren did, that you're obviously not defending in anyway.2001400ex said:
She'd be part native American. Here's some information for you. Some tribes don't require blood quantum. Some require a certain percentage. Some require you to be a descendant of a certain family.SFGbob said:
Let's say she is 1/64 Native American. Does a "practical person" still say they don't know or do they say she is native American?2001400ex said:
None of us have enough information to answer the question. Her test said anywhere from 1/64 to 1/1024 native American. A conservative shill says she's not. A liberal shill says she is. A practical person says I don't know. So the tie breaker is she isn't enrolled.greenblood said:
You didn't answer the question2001400ex said:She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.
Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar?
In other words you are trying to make something be black and white. Like a shill would. That isn't black and white.
Does someone who is 1.5% black qualify for Affirmative Action and other racial set asides Hondo? How thin does the percentage have to be before they would no longer qualify?
That being said, where did Warren use her heritage to benefit herself?
They told her to apologize and shut the fuck up -
The flounder continues to flop. We aren't talking about tribes Kunt. We're talking about Liz Warren. She is the one claiming she is an Indian and I just asked you if someone who is 1.5% Native American should really be bragging about their native American roots and claiming that her parents had to elope because her grandparents where such racists against her "Indian" mother?2001400ex said:
Exactly. You still don't get it. I'll type slowly. You can't say "1.5% maybe American". It doesn't work like that. You can be zero percent blood quantum and be a tribal member eligible for benefits. And you can be 100% but not enrolled member and not eligible for benefits.SFGbob said:Who knew that something I'm not talking about, that I've never referenced and isn't the point of any of the questions I've put to you and is clearly a fucking diversion by you in order to avoid the questions you've been asked, is "lost" on me.
Again, stop being black and white. -
Can you read? I've already addressed the question.SFGbob said:
The flounder continues to flop. We aren't talking about tribes Kunt. We're talking about Liz Warren. She is the one claiming she is an Indian and I just asked you if someone who is 1.5% Native American should really be bragging about their native American roots and claiming that her parents had to elope because her grandparents where such racists against her "Indian" mother?2001400ex said:
Exactly. You still don't get it. I'll type slowly. You can't say "1.5% maybe American". It doesn't work like that. You can be zero percent blood quantum and be a tribal member eligible for benefits. And you can be 100% but not enrolled member and not eligible for benefits.SFGbob said:Who knew that something I'm not talking about, that I've never referenced and isn't the point of any of the questions I've put to you and is clearly a fucking diversion by you in order to avoid the questions you've been asked, is "lost" on me.
Again, stop being black and white. -
You know Hondo, the only real hope for you is a steel-toed boot right in your lying Kunt.2001400ex said:
Can you read? I've already addressed the question.SFGbob said:
The flounder continues to flop. We aren't talking about tribes Kunt. We're talking about Liz Warren. She is the one claiming she is an Indian and I just asked you if someone who is 1.5% Native American should really be bragging about their native American roots and claiming that her parents had to elope because her grandparents where such racists against her "Indian" mother?2001400ex said:
Exactly. You still don't get it. I'll type slowly. You can't say "1.5% maybe American". It doesn't work like that. You can be zero percent blood quantum and be a tribal member eligible for benefits. And you can be 100% but not enrolled member and not eligible for benefits.SFGbob said:Who knew that something I'm not talking about, that I've never referenced and isn't the point of any of the questions I've put to you and is clearly a fucking diversion by you in order to avoid the questions you've been asked, is "lost" on me.
Again, stop being black and white. -
Fuck off2001400ex said:
I didn't read that one. Care to post a link?RaceBannon said:
There's another lie2001400ex said:
Exactly what I just stated.RaceBannon said:
What did the Tribes say about Warren being a fucking liar?2001400ex said:
It's obviously lost on you that tribes don't use DNA tests for enrollment. Most of those applications require Tribal enrollment information.SFGbob said:
Really? So someone who is 1.5% Native American should be able to claim minority status for purposes employment and college admissions? I don't care about what "some tribes" require Hondo, I'm asking you about what Liz Warren did, that you're obviously not defending in anyway.2001400ex said:
She'd be part native American. Here's some information for you. Some tribes don't require blood quantum. Some require a certain percentage. Some require you to be a descendant of a certain family.SFGbob said:
Let's say she is 1/64 Native American. Does a "practical person" still say they don't know or do they say she is native American?2001400ex said:
None of us have enough information to answer the question. Her test said anywhere from 1/64 to 1/1024 native American. A conservative shill says she's not. A liberal shill says she is. A practical person says I don't know. So the tie breaker is she isn't enrolled.greenblood said:
You didn't answer the question2001400ex said:She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.
Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar?
In other words you are trying to make something be black and white. Like a shill would. That isn't black and white.
Does someone who is 1.5% black qualify for Affirmative Action and other racial set asides Hondo? How thin does the percentage have to be before they would no longer qualify?
That being said, where did Warren use her heritage to benefit herself?
They told her to apologize and shut the fuck up -
Komo4 buttfuckerRaceBannon said:
Fuck off2001400ex said:
I didn't read that one. Care to post a link?RaceBannon said:
There's another lie2001400ex said:
Exactly what I just stated.RaceBannon said:
What did the Tribes say about Warren being a fucking liar?2001400ex said:
It's obviously lost on you that tribes don't use DNA tests for enrollment. Most of those applications require Tribal enrollment information.SFGbob said:
Really? So someone who is 1.5% Native American should be able to claim minority status for purposes employment and college admissions? I don't care about what "some tribes" require Hondo, I'm asking you about what Liz Warren did, that you're obviously not defending in anyway.2001400ex said:
She'd be part native American. Here's some information for you. Some tribes don't require blood quantum. Some require a certain percentage. Some require you to be a descendant of a certain family.SFGbob said:
Let's say she is 1/64 Native American. Does a "practical person" still say they don't know or do they say she is native American?2001400ex said:
None of us have enough information to answer the question. Her test said anywhere from 1/64 to 1/1024 native American. A conservative shill says she's not. A liberal shill says she is. A practical person says I don't know. So the tie breaker is she isn't enrolled.greenblood said:
You didn't answer the question2001400ex said:She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.
Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar?
In other words you are trying to make something be black and white. Like a shill would. That isn't black and white.
Does someone who is 1.5% black qualify for Affirmative Action and other racial set asides Hondo? How thin does the percentage have to be before they would no longer qualify?
That being said, where did Warren use her heritage to benefit herself?
They told her to apologize and shut the fuck up -
-
9 pages (7 on the previous thread and 2 on this one) of HondoFS defending Pocahantas for scientifically proving she is 0.09766% Native American, and by Native American I mean Mexican, Columbian, or Peruvian.
You can't make this shit up...
HondoFS... -
Liar. You don't read well either.HoustonHusky said:9 pages (7 on the previous thread and 2 on this one) of HondoFS defending Pocahantas for scientifically proving she is 0.09766% Native American, and by Native American I mean Mexican, Columbian, or Peruvian.
You can't make this shit up...
HondoFS... -
I love how he is now trying to stake out a “moderate” position by claiming that partisans on the right will now say no, she isn’t an Indian, while on the left they will say yes, she is an Indian, while the nonpartisan Hondo will say, we just don’t know.HoustonHusky said:9 pages (7 on the previous thread and 2 on this one) of HondoFS defending Pocahantas for scientifically proving she is 0.09766% Native American, and by Native American I mean Mexican, Columbian, or Peruvian.
You can't make this shit up...
HondoFS...
He attempts to use his cowardice as a badge of honor while engaging in 9 pages of defense of Warren because he just doesn’t know.
And the bullshit about the tribes and DNA, classic Hondo dipshitery.
At best Warren is 1.5% Native American, but Hondo just can’t say if she really is or is not an Indian. -
Ahhh...the guy defending and lying his ass off about Pocahontas and Trump is a little sensitive. Keep defending Pocahantas for scientifically proving she is 0.09766% Native American, and by Native American I mean Mexican, Colombian, or Peruvian.2001400ex said:
Liar. You don't read well either.HoustonHusky said:9 pages (7 on the previous thread and 2 on this one) of HondoFS defending Pocahantas for scientifically proving she is 0.09766% Native American, and by Native American I mean Mexican, Columbian, or Peruvian.
You can't make this shit up...
HondoFS...
You can't make this shit up...
HondoFS...
-
I have stated I do know. Very clearly. You are too dumb to understand. Reread this thread.SFGbob said:
I love how he is now trying to stake out a “moderate” position by claiming that partisans on the right will now say no, she isn’t an Indian, while on the left they will say yes, she is an Indian, while the nonpartisan Hondo will say, we just don’t know.HoustonHusky said:9 pages (7 on the previous thread and 2 on this one) of HondoFS defending Pocahantas for scientifically proving she is 0.09766% Native American, and by Native American I mean Mexican, Columbian, or Peruvian.
You can't make this shit up...
HondoFS...
He attempts to use his cowardice as a badge of honor while engaging in 9 pages of defense of Warren because he just doesn’t know.
And the bullshit about the tribes and DNA, classic Hondo dipshitery.
At best Warren is 1.5% Native American, but Hondo just can’t say if she really is or is not an Indian. -
95% of americans would be native under your guidelnes.2001400ex said:
She'd be part native American. Here's some information for you. Some tribes don't require blood quantum. Some require a certain percentage. Some require you to be a descendant of a certain family.SFGbob said:
Let's say she is 1/64 Native American. Does a "practical person" still say they don't know or do they say she is native American?2001400ex said:
None of us have enough information to answer the question. Her test said anywhere from 1/64 to 1/1024 native American. A conservative shill says she's not. A liberal shill says she is. A practical person says I don't know. So the tie breaker is she isn't enrolled.greenblood said:
You didn't answer the question2001400ex said:She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.
Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar?
In other words you are trying to make something be black and white. Like a shill would. That isn't black and white.
