Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Hondo do you believe Liz Warren is Native American?

SFGbob
SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
Yes or no? Simply question, shouldn't be tough to answer. Try to lay off the strawman's asshole this time.
«1

Comments

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.

    Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar?
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,560
    2001400ex said:

    She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.

    Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar?

    You didn't answer the question
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.

    Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar?

    Another question Hondo is just too big a Kunt to answer.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited October 2018
    So unless someone is an "enrolled tribal member" even if they are 100% Native American they can't say that on their resume? Btw, I don't know if Warren ever put it on a "resume" and I know what a stickler you are for precise language Hondo.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.

    Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar?

    You didn't answer the question
    None of us have enough information to answer the question. Her test said anywhere from 1/64 to 1/1024 native American. A conservative shill says she's not. A liberal shill says she is. A practical person says I don't know. So the tie breaker is she isn't enrolled.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    So unless someone is an "enrolled tribal member" even if they are 100% Native American they can't say that on their resume? Btw, I don't know if Warren ever put it on a "resume" and I know what a stickler you are for precise language Hondo.


    Holy fuck dude. Seriously. You got issues.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.

    Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar?

    You didn't answer the question
    None of us have enough information to answer the question. Her test said anywhere from 1/64 to 1/1024 native American. A conservative shill says she's not. A liberal shill says she is. A practical person says I don't know. So the tie breaker is she isn't enrolled.
    Let's say she is 1/64 Native American. Does a "practical person" still say they don't know or do they say she is native American?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited October 2018
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    So unless someone is an "enrolled tribal member" even if they are 100% Native American they can't say that on their resume? Btw, I don't know if Warren ever put it on a "resume" and I know what a stickler you are for precise language Hondo.


    Holy fuck dude. Seriously. You got issues.
    Translation: Don't dissect my gibberish and ask me to respond to it, I'm just spouting bullshit and hoping no one notices that I have no fucking clue about what I'm talking about.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.

    Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar?

    You didn't answer the question
    None of us have enough information to answer the question. Her test said anywhere from 1/64 to 1/1024 native American. A conservative shill says she's not. A liberal shill says she is. A practical person says I don't know. So the tie breaker is she isn't enrolled.
    Let's say she is 1/64 Native American. Does a "practical person" still say they don't know or do they say she is native American?
    She'd be part native American. Here's some information for you. Some tribes don't require blood quantum. Some require a certain percentage. Some require you to be a descendant of a certain family.

    In other words you are trying to make something be black and white. Like a shill would. That isn't black and white.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.

    Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar?

    You didn't answer the question
    None of us have enough information to answer the question. Her test said anywhere from 1/64 to 1/1024 native American. A conservative shill says she's not. A liberal shill says she is. A practical person says I don't know. So the tie breaker is she isn't enrolled.
    Let's say she is 1/64 Native American. Does a "practical person" still say they don't know or do they say she is native American?
    She'd be part native American. Here's some information for you. Some tribes don't require blood quantum. Some require a certain percentage. Some require you to be a descendant of a certain family.

    In other words you are trying to make something be black and white. Like a shill would. That isn't black and white.
    Really? So someone who is 1.5% Native American should be able to claim minority status for purposes employment and college admissions? I don't care about what "some tribes" require Hondo, I'm asking you about what Liz Warren did, that you're obviously not defending in anyway.

    Does someone who is 1.5% black qualify for Affirmative Action and other racial set asides Hondo? How thin does the percentage have to be before they would no longer qualify?
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Warren has not one of your moving goalpost qualifications for Indian therefore, she isn’t Indian, if we’re going to use hondolojic
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.

    Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar?

    You didn't answer the question
    None of us have enough information to answer the question. Her test said anywhere from 1/64 to 1/1024 native American. A conservative shill says she's not. A liberal shill says she is. A practical person says I don't know. So the tie breaker is she isn't enrolled.
    Let's say she is 1/64 Native American. Does a "practical person" still say they don't know or do they say she is native American?
    She'd be part native American. Here's some information for you. Some tribes don't require blood quantum. Some require a certain percentage. Some require you to be a descendant of a certain family.

    In other words you are trying to make something be black and white. Like a shill would. That isn't black and white.
    Really? So someone who is 1.5% Native American should be able to claim minority status for purposes employment and college admissions? I don't care about what "some tribes" require Hondo, I'm asking you about what Liz Warren did, that you're obviously not defending in anyway.

    Does someone who is 1.5% black qualify for Affirmative Action and other racial set asides Hondo? How thin does the percentage have to be before they would no longer qualify?
    It's obviously lost on you that tribes don't use DNA tests for enrollment. Most of those applications require Tribal enrollment information.

    That being said, where did Warren use her heritage to benefit herself?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,187 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.

    Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar?

    You didn't answer the question
    None of us have enough information to answer the question. Her test said anywhere from 1/64 to 1/1024 native American. A conservative shill says she's not. A liberal shill says she is. A practical person says I don't know. So the tie breaker is she isn't enrolled.
    Let's say she is 1/64 Native American. Does a "practical person" still say they don't know or do they say she is native American?
    She'd be part native American. Here's some information for you. Some tribes don't require blood quantum. Some require a certain percentage. Some require you to be a descendant of a certain family.

    In other words you are trying to make something be black and white. Like a shill would. That isn't black and white.
    Really? So someone who is 1.5% Native American should be able to claim minority status for purposes employment and college admissions? I don't care about what "some tribes" require Hondo, I'm asking you about what Liz Warren did, that you're obviously not defending in anyway.

    Does someone who is 1.5% black qualify for Affirmative Action and other racial set asides Hondo? How thin does the percentage have to be before they would no longer qualify?
    It's obviously lost on you that tribes don't use DNA tests for enrollment. Most of those applications require Tribal enrollment information.

    That being said, where did Warren use her heritage to benefit herself?
    What did the Tribes say about Warren being a fucking liar?
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.

    Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar?

    You didn't answer the question
    None of us have enough information to answer the question. Her test said anywhere from 1/64 to 1/1024 native American. A conservative shill says she's not. A liberal shill says she is. A practical person says I don't know. So the tie breaker is she isn't enrolled.
    Let's say she is 1/64 Native American. Does a "practical person" still say they don't know or do they say she is native American?
    She'd be part native American. Here's some information for you. Some tribes don't require blood quantum. Some require a certain percentage. Some require you to be a descendant of a certain family.

    In other words you are trying to make something be black and white. Like a shill would. That isn't black and white.
    Really? So someone who is 1.5% Native American should be able to claim minority status for purposes employment and college admissions? I don't care about what "some tribes" require Hondo, I'm asking you about what Liz Warren did, that you're obviously not defending in anyway.

    Does someone who is 1.5% black qualify for Affirmative Action and other racial set asides Hondo? How thin does the percentage have to be before they would no longer qualify?
    It's obviously lost on you that tribes don't use DNA tests for enrollment. Most of those applications require Tribal enrollment information.

    That being said, where did Warren use her heritage to benefit herself?
    What did the Tribes say about Warren being a fucking liar?
    Exactly what I just stated.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    Who knew that something I'm not talking about, that I've never referenced and isn't the point of any of the questions I've put to you and is clearly a fucking diversion by you in order to avoid the questions you've been asked, is "lost" on me.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    Who knew that something I'm not talking about, that I've never referenced and isn't the point of any of the questions I've put to you and is clearly a fucking diversion by you in order to avoid the questions you've been asked, is "lost" on me.

    Exactly. You still don't get it. I'll type slowly. You can't say "1.5% maybe American". It doesn't work like that. You can be zero percent blood quantum and be a tribal member eligible for benefits. And you can be 100% but not enrolled member and not eligible for benefits.

    Again, stop being black and white.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,187 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.

    Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar?

    You didn't answer the question
    None of us have enough information to answer the question. Her test said anywhere from 1/64 to 1/1024 native American. A conservative shill says she's not. A liberal shill says she is. A practical person says I don't know. So the tie breaker is she isn't enrolled.
    Let's say she is 1/64 Native American. Does a "practical person" still say they don't know or do they say she is native American?
    She'd be part native American. Here's some information for you. Some tribes don't require blood quantum. Some require a certain percentage. Some require you to be a descendant of a certain family.

    In other words you are trying to make something be black and white. Like a shill would. That isn't black and white.
    Really? So someone who is 1.5% Native American should be able to claim minority status for purposes employment and college admissions? I don't care about what "some tribes" require Hondo, I'm asking you about what Liz Warren did, that you're obviously not defending in anyway.

    Does someone who is 1.5% black qualify for Affirmative Action and other racial set asides Hondo? How thin does the percentage have to be before they would no longer qualify?
    It's obviously lost on you that tribes don't use DNA tests for enrollment. Most of those applications require Tribal enrollment information.

    That being said, where did Warren use her heritage to benefit herself?
    What did the Tribes say about Warren being a fucking liar?
    Exactly what I just stated.
    There's another lie

    They told her to apologize and shut the fuck up
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.

    Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar?

    You didn't answer the question
    None of us have enough information to answer the question. Her test said anywhere from 1/64 to 1/1024 native American. A conservative shill says she's not. A liberal shill says she is. A practical person says I don't know. So the tie breaker is she isn't enrolled.
    Let's say she is 1/64 Native American. Does a "practical person" still say they don't know or do they say she is native American?
    She'd be part native American. Here's some information for you. Some tribes don't require blood quantum. Some require a certain percentage. Some require you to be a descendant of a certain family.

    In other words you are trying to make something be black and white. Like a shill would. That isn't black and white.
    Really? So someone who is 1.5% Native American should be able to claim minority status for purposes employment and college admissions? I don't care about what "some tribes" require Hondo, I'm asking you about what Liz Warren did, that you're obviously not defending in anyway.

    Does someone who is 1.5% black qualify for Affirmative Action and other racial set asides Hondo? How thin does the percentage have to be before they would no longer qualify?
    It's obviously lost on you that tribes don't use DNA tests for enrollment. Most of those applications require Tribal enrollment information.

    That being said, where did Warren use her heritage to benefit herself?
    What did the Tribes say about Warren being a fucking liar?
    Exactly what I just stated.
    There's another lie

    They told her to apologize and shut the fuck up
    I didn't read that one. Care to post a link?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Who knew that something I'm not talking about, that I've never referenced and isn't the point of any of the questions I've put to you and is clearly a fucking diversion by you in order to avoid the questions you've been asked, is "lost" on me.

    Exactly. You still don't get it. I'll type slowly. You can't say "1.5% maybe American". It doesn't work like that. You can be zero percent blood quantum and be a tribal member eligible for benefits. And you can be 100% but not enrolled member and not eligible for benefits.

    Again, stop being black and white.
    The flounder continues to flop. We aren't talking about tribes Kunt. We're talking about Liz Warren. She is the one claiming she is an Indian and I just asked you if someone who is 1.5% Native American should really be bragging about their native American roots and claiming that her parents had to elope because her grandparents where such racists against her "Indian" mother?
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Who knew that something I'm not talking about, that I've never referenced and isn't the point of any of the questions I've put to you and is clearly a fucking diversion by you in order to avoid the questions you've been asked, is "lost" on me.

    Exactly. You still don't get it. I'll type slowly. You can't say "1.5% maybe American". It doesn't work like that. You can be zero percent blood quantum and be a tribal member eligible for benefits. And you can be 100% but not enrolled member and not eligible for benefits.

    Again, stop being black and white.
    The flounder continues to flop. We aren't talking about tribes Kunt. We're talking about Liz Warren. She is the one claiming she is an Indian and I just asked you if someone who is 1.5% Native American should really be bragging about their native American roots and claiming that her parents had to elope because her grandparents where such racists against her "Indian" mother?
    Can you read? I've already addressed the question.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Who knew that something I'm not talking about, that I've never referenced and isn't the point of any of the questions I've put to you and is clearly a fucking diversion by you in order to avoid the questions you've been asked, is "lost" on me.

    Exactly. You still don't get it. I'll type slowly. You can't say "1.5% maybe American". It doesn't work like that. You can be zero percent blood quantum and be a tribal member eligible for benefits. And you can be 100% but not enrolled member and not eligible for benefits.

    Again, stop being black and white.
    The flounder continues to flop. We aren't talking about tribes Kunt. We're talking about Liz Warren. She is the one claiming she is an Indian and I just asked you if someone who is 1.5% Native American should really be bragging about their native American roots and claiming that her parents had to elope because her grandparents where such racists against her "Indian" mother?
    Can you read? I've already addressed the question.
    You know Hondo, the only real hope for you is a steel-toed boot right in your lying Kunt.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,187 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.

    Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar?

    You didn't answer the question
    None of us have enough information to answer the question. Her test said anywhere from 1/64 to 1/1024 native American. A conservative shill says she's not. A liberal shill says she is. A practical person says I don't know. So the tie breaker is she isn't enrolled.
    Let's say she is 1/64 Native American. Does a "practical person" still say they don't know or do they say she is native American?
    She'd be part native American. Here's some information for you. Some tribes don't require blood quantum. Some require a certain percentage. Some require you to be a descendant of a certain family.

    In other words you are trying to make something be black and white. Like a shill would. That isn't black and white.
    Really? So someone who is 1.5% Native American should be able to claim minority status for purposes employment and college admissions? I don't care about what "some tribes" require Hondo, I'm asking you about what Liz Warren did, that you're obviously not defending in anyway.

    Does someone who is 1.5% black qualify for Affirmative Action and other racial set asides Hondo? How thin does the percentage have to be before they would no longer qualify?
    It's obviously lost on you that tribes don't use DNA tests for enrollment. Most of those applications require Tribal enrollment information.

    That being said, where did Warren use her heritage to benefit herself?
    What did the Tribes say about Warren being a fucking liar?
    Exactly what I just stated.
    There's another lie

    They told her to apologize and shut the fuck up
    I didn't read that one. Care to post a link?
    Fuck off
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.

    Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar?

    You didn't answer the question
    None of us have enough information to answer the question. Her test said anywhere from 1/64 to 1/1024 native American. A conservative shill says she's not. A liberal shill says she is. A practical person says I don't know. So the tie breaker is she isn't enrolled.
    Let's say she is 1/64 Native American. Does a "practical person" still say they don't know or do they say she is native American?
    She'd be part native American. Here's some information for you. Some tribes don't require blood quantum. Some require a certain percentage. Some require you to be a descendant of a certain family.

    In other words you are trying to make something be black and white. Like a shill would. That isn't black and white.
    Really? So someone who is 1.5% Native American should be able to claim minority status for purposes employment and college admissions? I don't care about what "some tribes" require Hondo, I'm asking you about what Liz Warren did, that you're obviously not defending in anyway.

    Does someone who is 1.5% black qualify for Affirmative Action and other racial set asides Hondo? How thin does the percentage have to be before they would no longer qualify?
    It's obviously lost on you that tribes don't use DNA tests for enrollment. Most of those applications require Tribal enrollment information.

    That being said, where did Warren use her heritage to benefit herself?
    What did the Tribes say about Warren being a fucking liar?
    Exactly what I just stated.
    There's another lie

    They told her to apologize and shut the fuck up
    I didn't read that one. Care to post a link?
    Fuck off
    Komo4 buttfucker
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,000
    9 pages (7 on the previous thread and 2 on this one) of HondoFS defending Pocahantas for scientifically proving she is 0.09766% Native American, and by Native American I mean Mexican, Columbian, or Peruvian.

    You can't make this shit up...

    HondoFS...
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    9 pages (7 on the previous thread and 2 on this one) of HondoFS defending Pocahantas for scientifically proving she is 0.09766% Native American, and by Native American I mean Mexican, Columbian, or Peruvian.

    You can't make this shit up...

    HondoFS...

    Liar. You don't read well either.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    9 pages (7 on the previous thread and 2 on this one) of HondoFS defending Pocahantas for scientifically proving she is 0.09766% Native American, and by Native American I mean Mexican, Columbian, or Peruvian.

    You can't make this shit up...

    HondoFS...

    I love how he is now trying to stake out a “moderate” position by claiming that partisans on the right will now say no, she isn’t an Indian, while on the left they will say yes, she is an Indian, while the nonpartisan Hondo will say, we just don’t know.

    He attempts to use his cowardice as a badge of honor while engaging in 9 pages of defense of Warren because he just doesn’t know.

    And the bullshit about the tribes and DNA, classic Hondo dipshitery.

    At best Warren is 1.5% Native American, but Hondo just can’t say if she really is or is not an Indian.
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,000
    2001400ex said:

    9 pages (7 on the previous thread and 2 on this one) of HondoFS defending Pocahantas for scientifically proving she is 0.09766% Native American, and by Native American I mean Mexican, Columbian, or Peruvian.

    You can't make this shit up...

    HondoFS...

    Liar. You don't read well either.
    Ahhh...the guy defending and lying his ass off about Pocahontas and Trump is a little sensitive. Keep defending Pocahantas for scientifically proving she is 0.09766% Native American, and by Native American I mean Mexican, Colombian, or Peruvian.

    You can't make this shit up...

    HondoFS...
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    9 pages (7 on the previous thread and 2 on this one) of HondoFS defending Pocahantas for scientifically proving she is 0.09766% Native American, and by Native American I mean Mexican, Columbian, or Peruvian.

    You can't make this shit up...

    HondoFS...

    I love how he is now trying to stake out a “moderate” position by claiming that partisans on the right will now say no, she isn’t an Indian, while on the left they will say yes, she is an Indian, while the nonpartisan Hondo will say, we just don’t know.

    He attempts to use his cowardice as a badge of honor while engaging in 9 pages of defense of Warren because he just doesn’t know.

    And the bullshit about the tribes and DNA, classic Hondo dipshitery.

    At best Warren is 1.5% Native American, but Hondo just can’t say if she really is or is not an Indian.
    I have stated I do know. Very clearly. You are too dumb to understand. Reread this thread.
  • Ice_Holmvik
    Ice_Holmvik Member Posts: 2,912
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    She is not an enrolled tribal member and therefore shouldn't use native American on her resume.

    Your turn. Do you think Trump is a compulsive liar?

    You didn't answer the question
    None of us have enough information to answer the question. Her test said anywhere from 1/64 to 1/1024 native American. A conservative shill says she's not. A liberal shill says she is. A practical person says I don't know. So the tie breaker is she isn't enrolled.
    Let's say she is 1/64 Native American. Does a "practical person" still say they don't know or do they say she is native American?
    She'd be part native American. Here's some information for you. Some tribes don't require blood quantum. Some require a certain percentage. Some require you to be a descendant of a certain family.

    In other words you are trying to make something be black and white. Like a shill would. That isn't black and white.
    95% of americans would be native under your guidelnes.