Home› The Fisch Bowl (Recruiting)

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Recruiting IQ Test #2: How realistic are you?

Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
in The Fisch Bowl (Recruiting)
Is it realistic for us to be able to sign top 15 classes (top 10 by 247 rating average) every year?

Recruiting IQ Test #2: How realistic are you? 56 votes

No - WE HAVE SO MANY DISADVANTAGES, PETE AND OKGS, PLUS WE DON'T EVEN WANT TO!
14%
2001400exThe_Undertakersection_332Pitchfork51El_KRedRocketRealRhinoSarkFanSixtyNine 8 votes
Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?
80%
CFetters_Nacho_LoverRaceBannonSwayeHillsboroDuckMad_SonPassionlongduckdongDennis_DeYoungTTJExtraChrisBStinky_HankeyTequillabiak1HUSKYFANATICSarkinghamhaiekh83huskyhooliganGreenRiverGatorzDHD 45 votes
I'm Not Sure - I bought into the bullshit that recruiting wasn't important on HH during the Sark era (b/c it wasn't) and I have a hard time updating my beliefs, plus I watch the NFL a lot and they seem to be able to just replace players via free agency and I expect the same model to happen here even though I have no idea how that would work.
5%
PatHadenFSBasemanCrawfish 3 votes
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?
    Answer key:

    No - IQ of 12. You should light yourself on fire and take a rocket into the sun.
    Yes - IQ of 115+. Good, you can stay. You understand that there are no excuses for shitty classes. We need good players, period.
    I'm Not Sure - IQ of 115 or below. In order for this species to survive, we can only have the cream of the crop. Kill yourself.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CrawfishCrawfish Member Posts: 734
    I'm Not Sure - I bought into the bullshit that recruiting wasn't important on HH during the Sark era (b/c it wasn't) and I have a hard time updating my beliefs, plus I watch the NFL a lot and they seem to be able to just replace players via free agency and I expect the same model to happen here even though I have no idea how that would work.
    I am not voting in this poll because I am not sure of the right answer.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    Crawfish said:

    I am not voting in this poll because I am not sure of the right answer.

    There is literally an answer 'not sure'. I'm going to suggest an IP ban.
    Awfully warm for Friday, but do it!!!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CrawfishCrawfish Member Posts: 734
    edited October 2018
    I'm Not Sure - I bought into the bullshit that recruiting wasn't important on HH during the Sark era (b/c it wasn't) and I have a hard time updating my beliefs, plus I watch the NFL a lot and they seem to be able to just replace players via free agency and I expect the same model to happen here even though I have no idea how that would work.
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    Crawfish said:

    I am not voting in this poll because I am not sure of the right answer.

    There is literally an answer 'not sure'. I'm going to suggest an IP ban.
    Fine, you peer pressured me to vote for the "I'm not sure" option. Please let the record show that my vote was under duress.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?
    Crawfish said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    Crawfish said:

    I am not voting in this poll because I am not sure of the right answer.

    There is literally an answer 'not sure'. I'm going to suggest an IP ban.
    Fine, you peer pressured me to vote for the "I'm not sure" option. Please let the record show that my vote was under duress.
    So noted.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • IPukeOregonGrellowIPukeOregonGrellow Member Posts: 2,183
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    Crawfish said:

    I am not voting in this poll because I am not sure of the right answer.

    There is literally an answer 'not sure'. I'm going to suggest an IP ban.
    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?
    RaceBannon said:

    Can't take years off either

    Need to stack top 15 classes and league titles like cord wood to get to the top of the nation

    And it's a long way

    To the top

    If you want to rock and roll

    Race GETS IT.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BasemanBaseman Member Posts: 12,366
    edited October 2018
    I'm Not Sure - I bought into the bullshit that recruiting wasn't important on HH during the Sark era (b/c it wasn't) and I have a hard time updating my beliefs, plus I watch the NFL a lot and they seem to be able to just replace players via free agency and I expect the same model to happen here even though I have no idea how that would work.
    We still let Bob Gregory recruit LBs to play behind Malloe’s DT’s and in front of Lakes secondary.

    We launched Chris Strausser, CFB’s best tactical and development OL coach, for Huff. We traded Pete’s bosom buddy, Brent Pease, for unproven Matt Lubick and we keep a RB coach who prefers working beef over upgrading Kamari Pleasant and our new power back, Sean McGrew.

    Considering my sub 116 IQ, I’m obviously missing something...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,861
    Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?
    This.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DoogCouricsDoogCourics Member Posts: 5,739
    Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?
    I just want to note that I thoroughly enjoy when you Chin your own rants.

    I just love Dennis being Dennis.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,886
    Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?
    Your standards are too low Dennis ... Top 10 is the floor IMO going forward
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • El_KEl_K Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,225 Swaye's Wigwam
    No - WE HAVE SO MANY DISADVANTAGES, PETE AND OKGS, PLUS WE DON'T EVEN WANT TO!
    voted No because it was losing
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CrawfishCrawfish Member Posts: 734
    I'm Not Sure - I bought into the bullshit that recruiting wasn't important on HH during the Sark era (b/c it wasn't) and I have a hard time updating my beliefs, plus I watch the NFL a lot and they seem to be able to just replace players via free agency and I expect the same model to happen here even though I have no idea how that would work.
    El_K said:

    voted No because it was losing

    You have a big heart. Bless your soul.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PassionPassion Member Posts: 4,622
    Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?
    Are you allowed to "chincredible" your own post?




    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    Yes - We are likely to sign top 3 players at almost every position in the West this year, why couldn't we continue that and improve on it?
    Passion said:

    Are you allowed to "chincredible" your own post?




    Only if you're a mod.







    Some of us are more equal than others.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.