Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Quook confidence going into the Washington game
Comments
-
New bored mottoMikeSeaver said:
Shit football. Shit threads.CuntWaffle said:Well this thread sucks
-
10.3 to SvenTierbsHsotBoobs said:
New bored mottoMikeSeaver said:
Shit football. Shit threads.CuntWaffle said:Well this thread sucks
-
They were a good Stanford team until Love got injured. It's almost like he didn't play in the Utah game.PurpleBaze said:
That was a GOOD Stanford team... until it wasn't.mobey said:How can we(?) possibly compete with a team who beat the likes of Bowling Green, Portland St, San Jose St and "a very good Cal team"?
Their only loss to what we now know is an unbelievable Stanford squad. -
Does he play defense?oregonblitzkrieg said:
They were a good Stanford team until Love got injured. It's almost like he didn't play in the Utah game.PurpleBaze said:
That was a GOOD Stanford team... until it wasn't.mobey said:How can we(?) possibly compete with a team who beat the likes of Bowling Green, Portland St, San Jose St and "a very good Cal team"?
Their only loss to what we now know is an unbelievable Stanford squad. -
Gotcha. I also said before the season they are at least a 3, maybe 4 loss team.MikeSeaver said:
After they beat WASHINGTON and everyone around this way was making it out as a signature loss, I said Auburn wasnt even that good and were a 4 loss team.SECDAWG said:MikeSeaver said:SECDAWG said:That makes a lot of sense...
Gone have to do better than that Seaver
You listed a bunch of good teams Auburn is going to lose to as proof they are a GOOD team.
And I’m the one who has to do better?
Oh ok.
So you saying Auburn is not a good team??
I’m trying to get this scrate...
End of story.
They are. Could be more from the looks of things.
News flash, those L’s are coming from this conference. I never said they were a bad team....or as you put it, Auburn “wasn’t even that good” of a team. They are a good team and in the end, if UDUB wins out, it will be a “signature loss.” Cook it.
Your not very good at this football stuff.
-
I like to agree with someone on every point they made and then say they aren’t very good at this.SECDAWG said:
Gotcha. I also said before the season they are at least a 3, maybe 4 loss team.MikeSeaver said:
After they beat WASHINGTON and everyone around this way was making it out as a signature loss, I said Auburn wasnt even that good and were a 4 loss team.SECDAWG said:MikeSeaver said:SECDAWG said:That makes a lot of sense...
Gone have to do better than that Seaver
You listed a bunch of good teams Auburn is going to lose to as proof they are a GOOD team.
And I’m the one who has to do better?
Oh ok.
So you saying Auburn is not a good team??
I’m trying to get this scrate...
End of story.
They are. Could be more from the looks of things.
News flash, those L’s are coming from this conference. I never said they were a bad team....or as you put it, Auburn “wasn’t even that good” of a team. They are a good team and in the end, if UDUB wins out, it will be a “signature loss.” Cook it.
Your not very good at this football stuff.
Oh except for this....
“Folks at home need to remember Washington had that great loss to an unranked, 4 loss Auburn team”
-
MikeSeaver said:
I like to agree with someone on every point they made and then say they aren’t very good at this.SECDAWG said:
Gotcha. I also said before the season they are at least a 3, maybe 4 loss team.MikeSeaver said:
After they beat WASHINGTON and everyone around this way was making it out as a signature loss, I said Auburn wasnt even that good and were a 4 loss team.SECDAWG said:MikeSeaver said:SECDAWG said:That makes a lot of sense...
Gone have to do better than that Seaver
You listed a bunch of good teams Auburn is going to lose to as proof they are a GOOD team.
And I’m the one who has to do better?
Oh ok.
So you saying Auburn is not a good team??
I’m trying to get this scrate...
End of story.
They are. Could be more from the looks of things.
News flash, those L’s are coming from this conference. I never said they were a bad team....or as you put it, Auburn “wasn’t even that good” of a team. They are a good team and in the end, if UDUB wins out, it will be a “signature loss.” Cook it.
Your not very good at this football stuff.
Oh except for this....
“Folks at home need to remember Washington had that great loss to an unranked, 4 loss Auburn team”
It was the main point I think you fail to comprehend.
3, 4 or even 5 losses may come from top 25 teams, 2 of them from possibly #1 and #2 teams in the country....possibly. We’re not talking 3,4, 5 losses to shit teams.
I have confidence they will be ranked in at least the top 25 when all said and done, more than likely significantly higher.
-
I get what you’re saying.SECDAWG said:MikeSeaver said:
I like to agree with someone on every point they made and then say they aren’t very good at this.SECDAWG said:
Gotcha. I also said before the season they are at least a 3, maybe 4 loss team.MikeSeaver said:
After they beat WASHINGTON and everyone around this way was making it out as a signature loss, I said Auburn wasnt even that good and were a 4 loss team.SECDAWG said:MikeSeaver said:SECDAWG said:That makes a lot of sense...
Gone have to do better than that Seaver
You listed a bunch of good teams Auburn is going to lose to as proof they are a GOOD team.
And I’m the one who has to do better?
Oh ok.
So you saying Auburn is not a good team??
I’m trying to get this scrate...
End of story.
They are. Could be more from the looks of things.
News flash, those L’s are coming from this conference. I never said they were a bad team....or as you put it, Auburn “wasn’t even that good” of a team. They are a good team and in the end, if UDUB wins out, it will be a “signature loss.” Cook it.
Your not very good at this football stuff.
Oh except for this....
“Folks at home need to remember Washington had that great loss to an unranked, 4 loss Auburn team”
It was the main point I think you fail to comprehend.
3, 4 or even 5 losses may come from top 25 teams, 2 of them from possibly #1 and #2 teams in the country....possibly. We’re not talking 3,4, 5 losses to shit teams.
I have confidence they will be ranked in at least the top 25 when all said and done, more than likely significantly higher.
You can’t expect them to beat Missipiippippi State when they’re coming off that high of losing to LSU.
-
I never did.MikeSeaver said:
I get what you’re saying.SECDAWG said:MikeSeaver said:
I like to agree with someone on every point they made and then say they aren’t very good at this.SECDAWG said:
Gotcha. I also said before the season they are at least a 3, maybe 4 loss team.MikeSeaver said:
After they beat WASHINGTON and everyone around this way was making it out as a signature loss, I said Auburn wasnt even that good and were a 4 loss team.SECDAWG said:MikeSeaver said:SECDAWG said:That makes a lot of sense...
Gone have to do better than that Seaver
You listed a bunch of good teams Auburn is going to lose to as proof they are a GOOD team.
And I’m the one who has to do better?
Oh ok.
So you saying Auburn is not a good team??
I’m trying to get this scrate...
End of story.
They are. Could be more from the looks of things.
News flash, those L’s are coming from this conference. I never said they were a bad team....or as you put it, Auburn “wasn’t even that good” of a team. They are a good team and in the end, if UDUB wins out, it will be a “signature loss.” Cook it.
Your not very good at this football stuff.
Oh except for this....
“Folks at home need to remember Washington had that great loss to an unranked, 4 loss Auburn team”
It was the main point I think you fail to comprehend.
3, 4 or even 5 losses may come from top 25 teams, 2 of them from possibly #1 and #2 teams in the country....possibly. We’re not talking 3,4, 5 losses to shit teams.
I have confidence they will be ranked in at least the top 25 when all said and done, more than likely significantly higher.
You can’t expect them to beat Missipiippippi State when they’re coming off that high of losing to LSU.
-
Yeah, you pretty much did.SECDAWG said:
I never did.MikeSeaver said:
I get what you’re saying.SECDAWG said:MikeSeaver said:
I like to agree with someone on every point they made and then say they aren’t very good at this.SECDAWG said:
Gotcha. I also said before the season they are at least a 3, maybe 4 loss team.MikeSeaver said:
After they beat WASHINGTON and everyone around this way was making it out as a signature loss, I said Auburn wasnt even that good and were a 4 loss team.SECDAWG said:MikeSeaver said:SECDAWG said:That makes a lot of sense...
Gone have to do better than that Seaver
You listed a bunch of good teams Auburn is going to lose to as proof they are a GOOD team.
And I’m the one who has to do better?
Oh ok.
So you saying Auburn is not a good team??
I’m trying to get this scrate...
End of story.
They are. Could be more from the looks of things.
News flash, those L’s are coming from this conference. I never said they were a bad team....or as you put it, Auburn “wasn’t even that good” of a team. They are a good team and in the end, if UDUB wins out, it will be a “signature loss.” Cook it.
Your not very good at this football stuff.
Oh except for this....
“Folks at home need to remember Washington had that great loss to an unranked, 4 loss Auburn team”
It was the main point I think you fail to comprehend.
3, 4 or even 5 losses may come from top 25 teams, 2 of them from possibly #1 and #2 teams in the country....possibly. We’re not talking 3,4, 5 losses to shit teams.
I have confidence they will be ranked in at least the top 25 when all said and done, more than likely significantly higher.
You can’t expect them to beat Missipiippippi State when they’re coming off that high of losing to LSU.
