Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

9-4

2

Comments

  • Blayen
    Blayen Member Posts: 106
    I don't see it.

    How will we get to those 5 conference wins?

    I realize that the home/away schedule is better for us next year, but...

    We will be a worse team.
    UCLA will be better
    ASU will be better
    WSU will be better
    Arizona will be better
    Even Cal and Col will be better (can they be worse?)

    The only teams that may slide are OSU, OU, and Stanford..

    Who are we actually going to beat? The 5 wins per year mediocrity is bad enough, but the rest of the P12 is passing us by.

    We hoard our 5 wins under the mattress like misers while the rest of the P12 is getting interest.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tailgater
    Tailgater Member Posts: 1,389
    AZDuck said:

    You lose your starting QB, RB, and all-alcoholics-anonymous TE next year. I'm sure Sark will have Miley Cyrus ready to go.

    Besides losing all that fluff, what Sark needs is to embrace The Oregon Way and get the ducks and other BCS pretenders the fuck off his schedule. As Sark has demonstrated in 2013, a coach can have one too many hurry-up no-huddle gimmicks.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500
    If Sark goes 7-6 this year it will be 4 years of incremental regression. The Holiday Bowl team was arguably his best overall. Keith's Sophomore year he at least got a win on the road at USC. Last year he at least beat Stanford, yes that win was fucktarded but he still beat the team that won the Rose Bowl.

    This year? He hasn't done anything! His best win is a home game (shocker I know) to a bad BSU team. Beating an Oregon State team that mirrors us, WSU at home, or Toledo Tech A&M in a bowl game doesn't mean anything.

    Didn't the doogs themselves called the most talented team in the Sark era? I disagree with this by the way but it is always fun to use doog arguments against them. His first team had FOUR NFL starters on defense yet he had to bring his terrible frat buddy to come coach. His 2010 team had 8 guys who are on an NFL roster and that is my pick for his most talented team.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Blayen
    Blayen Member Posts: 106
    The hole created by 0-12 is frightening. Turns out that every year we measure it, it gets deeper.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,791 Founders Club
    CuntWaffle said:

    If Sark goes 7-6 this year it will be 4 years of incremental regression. The Holiday Bowl team was arguably his best overall. Keith's Sophomore year he at least got a win on the road at USC. Last year he at least beat Stanford, yes that win was fucktarded but he still beat the team that won the Rose Bowl.

    This year? He hasn't done anything! His best win is a home game (shocker I know) to a bad BSU team. Beating an Oregon State team that mirrors us, WSU at home, or Toledo Tech A&M in a bowl game doesn't mean anything.

    Didn't the doogs themselves called the most talented team in the Sark era? I disagree with this by the way but it is always fun to use doog arguments against them. His first team had FOUR NFL starters on defense yet he had to bring his terrible frat buddy to come coach. His 2010 team had 8 guys who are on an NFL roster and that is my pick for his most talented team.

    Jack Lockner was the starting QB for both wins against USC.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    If Sark goes 7-6 this year it will be 4 years of incremental regression. The Holiday Bowl team was arguably his best overall. Keith's Sophomore year he at least got a win on the road at USC. Last year he at least beat Stanford, yes that win was fucktarded but he still beat the team that won the Rose Bowl.

    This year? He hasn't done anything! His best win is a home game (shocker I know) to a bad BSU team. Beating an Oregon State team that mirrors us, WSU at home, or Toledo Tech A&M in a bowl game doesn't mean anything.

    Didn't the doogs themselves called the most talented team in the Sark era? I disagree with this by the way but it is always fun to use doog arguments against them. His first team had FOUR NFL starters on defense yet he had to bring his terrible frat buddy to come coach. His 2010 team had 8 guys who are on an NFL roster and that is my pick for his most talented team.

    Jack Lockner was the starting QB for both wins against USC.
    Yea that was my mistake. All this mediocre football blends together so it is hard to remember.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • IrishDawg22
    IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754
    9-4 is an EPIC failure with this schedule. I REALLY lost interest after the Stanford game because unlike most I do not believe Stanford w/Hogan is that good and I always had that as a must win game on the schedule.

    Even if we win 9, we will not have beaten a good team and our road woes continue. While a lot of the Dawg community will site progress, in reality it will be a +2 in win totals from Yr 2 with a shit bowl trophy in the case.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,358
    edited November 2013
    Tailgater said:

    AZDuck said:

    You lose your starting QB, RB, and all-alcoholics-anonymous TE next year. I'm sure Sark will have Miley Cyrus ready to go.

    Besides losing all that fluff, what Sark needs is to embrace The Oregon Way and get the ducks and other BCS pretenders the fuck off his schedule. As Sark has demonstrated in 2013, a coach can have one too many hurry-up no-huddle gimmicks.

    If oregon's offense is a gimmick, sign me up. It's no more of a gimmick than running the 46 defense.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter