Sweet fucking Geezus Hondo, I love how ask yourself questions I never asked and then give responses to questions I never asked. I didn't ask you "when have Democrats not nominated a moderate?" Gawd you're dishonest piece of shit. Well either Republicans are pussies or Democrats nominated justices they knew would go through.
So Republicans have never Borked a Rat nominee because they're "pussies" when your initial claim was that Republicans get more "riled up" when it comes to SC nominations. You can't even keep track of the bullshit that comes out your own mouth Hondo.
Btw, what happen to your lie about Democrats confirmed Gorsuch.
This is what you asked.
Can someone name a moderate put on the court by any of the recent Rat Presidents?
How did you not ask that, that's copy pasta. And I responded. Democrats got them through, those under Clinton were Republican Congress.
How is what I said about Gorsuch a lie? Did the Democrats block him? Did some vote for him? Did they have an 11th hour smear? You are playing with words to come up with a smoking gun.
Ok hear is another question for you. Why is it always Democrats fault? Why can't you put fault on Republicans for not properly vetting a couple candidates?
That being said. It's clear you are just looking for an argument. You scream that you want answers when I'm being a dick. Then when I answer honestly, it's not what you want to hear so you get even more pissed. To a point you can't even read what I say.
Sweet fucking Geezus Hondo, I love how ask yourself questions I never asked and then give responses to questions I never asked. I didn't ask you "when have Democrats not nominated a moderate?" Gawd you're dishonest piece of shit. Well either Republicans are pussies or Democrats nominated justices they knew would go through.
So Republicans have never Borked a Rat nominee because they're "pussies" when your initial claim was that Republicans get more "riled up" when it comes to SC nominations. You can't even keep track of the bullshit that comes out your own mouth Hondo.
Btw, what happen to your lie about Democrats confirmed Gorsuch.
This is what you asked.
Can someone name a moderate put on the court by any of the recent Rat Presidents?
How did you not ask that, that's copy pasta. And I responded. Democrats got them through, those under Clinton were Republican Congress.
How is what I said about Gorsuch a lie? Did the Democrats block him? Did some vote for him? Did they have an 11th hour smear? You are playing with words to come up with a smoking gun.
Ok hear is another question for you. Why is it always Democrats fault? Why can't you put fault on Republicans for not properly vetting a couple candidates?
That being said. It's clear you are just looking for an argument. You scream that you want answers when I'm being a dick. Then when I answer honestly, it's not what you want to hear so you get even more pissed. To a point you can't even read what I say.
Using your Kunt logic Clarence Thomas and Justice Scalia were "moderates" because they both received votes from the Rat party.
You're a fucking dipshit that I've already wasted too much time on today.
Why hasn't there ever been a Borking of a Rat President's nominee? Why has there never been one of these 11th hour smear jobs done on a Rat party nominee like was done with this nominee and with Clarence Thomas? When was the last time that a Rat President's SC nominee ended up not being a reliable liberal or even moderate vote on the court? Surely if the Rats didn't take SC nominees as seriously as the GOP does, there would be examples of when a Rat President put a moderate on the court. C
Can someone name a moderate put on the court by any of the recent Rat Presidents?
Can you respond without fucking strawman ass Hondo? Seriously? I've never said that liberals are evil and want to destroy America and I've never said Republicans are saints. Straight up strawman ass rape.
I didn't ignore that Republicans wouldn't vote for Garland, I just refuted your comparison of not holding a vote, to smearing a nominee and trying to destroy their character. Again, I didn't ignore that Democrats confirmed Gorsuch. Which is a lie btw, 3 Rats voted for Gorsuch and he would have been confirmed even they had voted the other way. And I've not ignored that Kavanaugh "obviously" had skeletons in his closet. I've just said that unverified accusations shouldn't be enough to derail his confirmation.
You're fucking strawman ass all while you pull claims out of your own ass all because you can't answer the questions you were asked.
Hondo all you fucking do is waste time here. And you waste it performing your pathetic Kunt act.
Can you respond without talking about a straw man's asshole?
That being said. You sure do respond to me a lot for being a waste of your time.
Like I said. You downplay shit against Republicans and think everything Democrats do is evil. And you can't see anything other than that, including your last post.
Good day mate.
Does that mean that you don't consider responding to Honda a waste of your tim?
Axing for a fren. His name is Trayvon, if you want to know.
Can you respond without fucking strawman ass Hondo? Seriously? I've never said that liberals are evil and want to destroy America and I've never said Republicans are saints. Straight up strawman ass rape.
I didn't ignore that Republicans wouldn't vote for Garland, I just refuted your comparison of not holding a vote, to smearing a nominee and trying to destroy their character. Again, I didn't ignore that Democrats confirmed Gorsuch. Which is a lie btw, 3 Rats voted for Gorsuch and he would have been confirmed even they had voted the other way. And I've not ignored that Kavanaugh "obviously" had skeletons in his closet. I've just said that unverified accusations shouldn't be enough to derail his confirmation.
You're fucking strawman ass all while you pull claims out of your own ass all because you can't answer the questions you were asked.
Hondo all you fucking do is waste time here. And you waste it performing your pathetic Kunt act.
Can you respond without talking about a straw man's asshole?
That being said. You sure do respond to me a lot for being a waste of your time.
Like I said. You downplay shit against Republicans and think everything Democrats do is evil. And you can't see anything other than that, including your last post.
Good day mate.
Does that mean that you don't consider responding to Honda a waste of your tim?
Axing for a fren. His name is Trayvon, if you want to know.
Can you respond without fucking strawman ass Hondo? Seriously? I've never said that liberals are evil and want to destroy America and I've never said Republicans are saints. Straight up strawman ass rape.
I didn't ignore that Republicans wouldn't vote for Garland, I just refuted your comparison of not holding a vote, to smearing a nominee and trying to destroy their character. Again, I didn't ignore that Democrats confirmed Gorsuch. Which is a lie btw, 3 Rats voted for Gorsuch and he would have been confirmed even they had voted the other way. And I've not ignored that Kavanaugh "obviously" had skeletons in his closet. I've just said that unverified accusations shouldn't be enough to derail his confirmation.
You're fucking strawman ass all while you pull claims out of your own ass all because you can't answer the questions you were asked.
Hondo all you fucking do is waste time here. And you waste it performing your pathetic Kunt act.
Can you respond without talking about a straw man's asshole?
That being said. You sure do respond to me a lot for being a waste of your time.
Like I said. You downplay shit against Republicans and think everything Democrats do is evil. And you can't see anything other than that, including your last post.
Good day mate.
Does that mean that you don't consider responding to Honda a waste of your tim?
Axing for a fren. His name is Trayvon, if you want to know.
Can you respond without fucking strawman ass Hondo? Seriously? I've never said that liberals are evil and want to destroy America and I've never said Republicans are saints. Straight up strawman ass rape.
I didn't ignore that Republicans wouldn't vote for Garland, I just refuted your comparison of not holding a vote, to smearing a nominee and trying to destroy their character. Again, I didn't ignore that Democrats confirmed Gorsuch. Which is a lie btw, 3 Rats voted for Gorsuch and he would have been confirmed even they had voted the other way. And I've not ignored that Kavanaugh "obviously" had skeletons in his closet. I've just said that unverified accusations shouldn't be enough to derail his confirmation.
You're fucking strawman ass all while you pull claims out of your own ass all because you can't answer the questions you were asked.
Hondo all you fucking do is waste time here. And you waste it performing your pathetic Kunt act.
Can you respond without talking about a straw man's asshole?
That being said. You sure do respond to me a lot for being a waste of your time.
Like I said. You downplay shit against Republicans and think everything Democrats do is evil. And you can't see anything other than that, including your last post.
Good day mate.
Does that mean that you don't consider responding to Honda a waste of your tim?
Axing for a fren. His name is Trayvon, if you want to know.
Comments
Can someone name a moderate put on the court by any of the recent Rat Presidents?
How did you not ask that, that's copy pasta. And I responded. Democrats got them through, those under Clinton were Republican Congress.
How is what I said about Gorsuch a lie? Did the Democrats block him? Did some vote for him? Did they have an 11th hour smear? You are playing with words to come up with a smoking gun.
Ok hear is another question for you. Why is it always Democrats fault? Why can't you put fault on Republicans for not properly vetting a couple candidates?
That being said. It's clear you are just looking for an argument. You scream that you want answers when I'm being a dick. Then when I answer honestly, it's not what you want to hear so you get even more pissed. To a point you can't even read what I say.
You're a fucking dipshit that I've already wasted too much time on today.
Is this a trick question?
Axing for a fren. His name is Trayvon, if you want to know.