If Republicans really do get more "riled up" when it comes to SC nominees, than Rats...

SFGbob

Why hasn't there ever been a Borking of a Rat President's nominee? Why has there never been one of these 11th hour smear jobs done on a Rat party nominee like was done with this nominee and with Clarence Thomas? When was the last time that a Rat President's SC nominee ended up not being a reliable liberal or even moderate vote on the court? Surely if the Rats didn't take SC nominees as seriously as the GOP does, there would be examples of when a Rat President put a moderate on the court. C

Can someone name a moderate put on the court by any of the recent Rat Presidents?

2001400ex

SFGbob

And there's the Kunt act.

I would think that someone who claimed that Republicans get more "riled up" about SC nominees would be able to address the questions but then I realized I was dealing with Hondo the lightweight dipshit.

2001400ex

SFGbob said:

And there's the Kunt act.

I would think that someone who claimed that Republicans get more "riled up" about SC nominees would be able to address the questions but then I realized I was dealing with Hondo the lightweight dipshit.

I would think that a self proclaimed intellect such as yourself would be able to read the 8 times I've explained why I've said what I said.

SFGbob

Fucking liar.

Do us all a favor Hondo and quote just one of those 8 response that addresses the questions I asked. Just one. Cue the Kunt act.

2001400ex

Why do you hate Garland?

SFGbob

Ahhhh a non-answer, "answer." I'll see your Garland and raise you a Miguel Estrada. Not voting on Garland hardly equals smearing Thomas and Kavanaugh and turning "Borking" into verb.

Now, why don't you try and answer the questions I asked lightweight? When was the last time that a Rat President's nominee ended up not being a reliable liberal vote on the Court? Surely if the Rats don't take SC nominations as seriously as the GOP there must have been at least one sneak through.

2001400ex

SFGbob said:

Ahhhh a non-answer, "answer." I'll see your Garland and raise you a Miguel Estrada. Not voting on Garland hardly equals smearing Thomas and Kavanaugh and turning "Borking" into verb.

Now, why don't you try and answer the questions I asked lightweight? When was the last time that a Rat President's nominee ended up not being a reliable liberal vote on the Court? Surely if the Rats don't take SC nominations as seriously as the GOP there must have been at least one sneak through.

Why do you hate Gorsuch?

SFGbob

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

Ahhhh a non-answer, "answer." I'll see your Garland and raise you a Miguel Estrada. Not voting on Garland hardly equals smearing Thomas and Kavanaugh and turning "Borking" into verb.

Now, why don't you try and answer the questions I asked lightweight? When was the last time that a Rat President's nominee ended up not being a reliable liberal vote on the Court? Surely if the Rats don't take SC nominations as seriously as the GOP there must have been at least one sneak through.

Why do you hate Gorsuch?

Yeah, you've answered it 8 times and I just don't understand your answer.


Sweet Geezus are you worthless Kunt around here Hondo.

2001400ex

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

Ahhhh a non-answer, "answer." I'll see your Garland and raise you a Miguel Estrada. Not voting on Garland hardly equals smearing Thomas and Kavanaugh and turning "Borking" into verb.

Now, why don't you try and answer the questions I asked lightweight? When was the last time that a Rat President's nominee ended up not being a reliable liberal vote on the Court? Surely if the Rats don't take SC nominations as seriously as the GOP there must have been at least one sneak through.

Why do you hate Gorsuch?

Yeah, you've answered it 8 times and I just don't understand your answer.


Sweet Geezus are you worthless Kunt around here Hondo.

Yes it's clear to everyone but you that you don't understand.

SFGbob

It's clear that you run like a scalded dog when you're asked to back up your mouth Hondo. All of your cute little pictures and game playing is just the obvious way that you try and cover that even you yourself know you're a fucking dipshit and that if you were to actually try and engage honestly around here you'd quickly be exposed as the fucking moron you are.

You were asked some very simple question and you couldn't answer them. And not only that but you fucking lied and claimed you had.

2001400ex

SFGbob said:

It's clear that you run like a scalded dog when you're asked to back up your mouth Hondo. All of your cute little pictures and game playing is just the obvious way that you try and cover that even you yourself know you're a fucking dipshit and that if you were to actually try and engage honestly around here you'd quickly be exposed as the fucking moron you are.

You were asked some very simple question and you couldn't answer them. And not only that but you fucking lied and claimed you had.

It's a waste of my time to fully engage you. Your mind is made up, liberals are evil and want to destroy America and Republicans are saints and Patriots. You ignore that Republicans wouldn't vote on Garland. You like to brag that elections have consequences. You ignore that Democrats confirmed Gorsuch. You ignore that Kavanaugh obviously had skeletons in his closet because you are afraid Democrats might win the midterm. And then would be able to better control the next justice. Cause you are a republican shill.

Comprehende?

SFGbob

Can you respond without fucking strawman ass Hondo? Seriously? I've never said that liberals are evil and want to destroy America and I've never said Republicans are saints. Straight up strawman ass rape.

I didn't ignore that Republicans wouldn't vote for Garland, I just refuted your comparison of not holding a vote, to smearing a nominee and trying to destroy their character. Again, I didn't ignore that Democrats confirmed Gorsuch. Which is a lie btw, 3 Rats voted for Gorsuch and he would have been confirmed even they had voted the other way. And I've not ignored that Kavanaugh "obviously" had skeletons in his closet. I've just said that unverified accusations shouldn't be enough to derail his confirmation.

You're fucking strawman ass all while you pull claims out of your own ass all because you can't answer the questions you were asked.

Hondo all you fucking do is waste time here. And you waste it performing your pathetic Kunt act.

SFGbob

Seriously Hondo are you really that blind to what a hypocrite you are? You dance around here claiming people are using "talking points" when you are constantly attacking things you wish the other person had said, which are really nothing more than your own personal talking points that you insert when you can't actually address what the other person was really saying, while refusing to answer any questions put to you that are based entirely on direct quotes from you.

2001400ex

SFGbob said:

Can you respond without fucking strawman ass Hondo? Seriously? I've never said that liberals are evil and want to destroy America and I've never said Republicans are saints. Straight up strawman ass rape.

I didn't ignore that Republicans wouldn't vote for Garland, I just refuted your comparison of not holding a vote, to smearing a nominee and trying to destroy their character. Again, I didn't ignore that Democrats confirmed Gorsuch. Which is a lie btw, 3 Rats voted for Gorsuch and he would have been confirmed even they had voted the other way. And I've not ignored that Kavanaugh "obviously" had skeletons in his closet. I've just said that unverified accusations shouldn't be enough to derail his confirmation.

You're fucking strawman ass all while you pull claims out of your own ass all because you can't answer the questions you were asked.

Hondo all you fucking do is waste time here. And you waste it performing your pathetic Kunt act.

Can you respond without talking about a straw man's asshole?

That being said. You sure do respond to me a lot for being a waste of your time.

Like I said. You downplay shit against Republicans and think everything Democrats do is evil. And you can't see anything other than that, including your last post.

Good day mate.

SFGbob

Quit fucking strawman ass in your responses and I'll stop referring to it. I don't think everything Democrats do is evil. That's pure bullshit and a dodge to cover for the fact that you know you're a lightweight dumbfuck who needs that kind of rhetorical crutch because if you were to actually let go of the side of the kiddie pool and engage in a real exchange you'd sink like a stone.

2001400ex

SFGbob said:

Quit fucking strawman ass in your responses and I'll stop referring to it. I don't think everything Democrats do is evil. That's pure bullshit and a dodge to cover for the fact that you know you're a lightweight dumbfuck who needs that kind of rhetorical crutch because if you were to actually let go of the side of the kiddie pool and engage in a real exchange you'd sink like a stone.

Ok. Name one positive thing a democratic has done the last two years.

SFGbob

That's a good Kunt, move those goal posts. I'll tell you what Hondo, I'll respond to your question right after you finally answer the questions I put to you first.

TierbsHsotBoobs

Mods?

2001400ex

SFGbob said:

That's a good Kunt, move those goal posts. I'll tell you what Hondo, I'll respond to your question right after you finally answer the questions I put to you first.

Back to this again? Ok let's go through the list.

Gorsuch confirmed 54-45.
Garland lapsed.
Kagan confirmed 63-37.
Sotomayor confirmed 68-31.
Alito confirmed 58-42.
Miers withdrew.
Roberts confirmed 78-22.
Breyer confirmed 87-9.
Ginsburg confirmed 96-3.

Your questions.

1) why haven't Republicans pulled a borking of a Democrat nominee? Why has there never been an 11th hour smear?

Well either Republicans are pussies or Democrats nominated justices they knew would go through.

2) when have Democrats not nominated a moderate?

Well look above, they got them through with Republican support.

I answered your questions. Answer mine.

SFGbob

Sweet fucking Geezus Hondo, I love how ask yourself questions I never asked and then give responses to questions I never asked. I didn't ask you "when have Democrats not nominated a moderate?" Gawd you're dishonest piece of shit.
Well either Republicans are pussies or Democrats nominated justices they knew would go through.

So Republicans have never Borked a Rat nominee because they're "pussies" when your initial claim was that Republicans get more "riled up" when it comes to SC nominations. You can't even keep track of the bullshit that comes out your own mouth Hondo.

Btw, what happen to your lie about Democrats confirmed Gorsuch.